Percentage
Range
Points
Explanation
What does this mean???
95-100
4.0
Complex
content
HIGH PERFORMANCE: Outstanding! Your work consistently reflects the following criterion:
A.
Comprehension: signs of advanced comprehension, proportional to the scope requirements of the assignment, such as insight, reflection, and
links to other ideas from this program, regular classes, experiences;
B.
Engagement: work reflects a productive & appropriate level of engagement with content [whether it’s text, materials, personal experiences, etc.].
In other words, you’ve stopped, visited, spent some quality time with the assignment! Further description: adequate use of examples, details,
and elaboration shows comprehension/mastery of content; responses are complete, rich & thorough, but proportional to the requirements and
scope of the assignment; responses are also concise enough to avoid excessive, repetitive, or unnecessary language;
C.
Effort/specifications: The quality indicates an outstanding effort to fulfill assignment. The work is legible and neatly prepared; follows assigned
and/or appropriate specifications; is as complete as required or as possible; was completed and submitted on time;
90-94
3.5
HIGH PERFORMANCE: Outstanding! Your work consistently reflects the following criterion:
Target and
A.
Comprehension: signs of advanced comprehension, proportional to the scope requirements of the assignment, such as insight, reflection, and
some complex
B.
C.
links to other ideas from this program, regular classes, experiences;
Engagement: work reflects a productive & appropriate level of engagement with content [whether it’s text, materials, personal experiences, etc.].
In other words, you’ve stopped, visited, spent some quality time with the assignment! Further description: adequate use of examples, details,
and elaboration shows comprehension/mastery of content; responses are complete, rich & thorough, but proportional to the requirements and
scope of the assignment; responses are also concise enough to avoid excessive, repetitive, or unnecessary language;
Effort/specifications: The quality indicates an outstanding effort to fulfill assignment. The work is legible and neatly prepared; follows assigned
and/or appropriate specifications; is as complete as required or as possible; was completed and submitted on time;
85-89
3.0
Target goal
PROFICIENT: Good job and solid effort! Assignment generally and adequately reflects the “High Performance” criterion, but one or two categories could be
slightly stronger. The work may partly, but no fully, reflect the HP descriptors for comprehension; Engagement with content generally reflects the HP criterion,
but may be a little too light, inaccurate, detailed or otherwise flawed; the work falls slightly short of the effort/specifications criterion;
80-84
2.5
Simple and
some target
PROFICIENT: Good job and solid effort! Assignment generally and adequately reflects the “High Performance” criterion, but one or two categories could be
slightly stronger. The work may partly, but no fully, reflect the HP descriptors for comprehension; Engagement with content generally reflects the HP criterion,
but may be a little too light, inaccurate, detailed or otherwise flawed; the work falls slightly short of the effort/specifications criterion;
75-79
2.0
Simple/Found DEVELOPING: Adequate job: The work reflects enough of the HP criterion to show some comprehension and learning, but it falls short of the HP criterion in
substantial ways; the work may not adequately reflect descriptions for comprehension; engagement with content may be far too light, heavy, incomplete, or
ational
otherwise flawed; the work may fall far short of the effort specifications criterion;
70-74
1.5
DEVELOPING: Adequate job: The work reflects enough of the HP criterion to show some comprehension and learning, but it falls short of the HP criterion in
Partial
substantial ways; the work may not adequately reflect descriptions for comprehension; engagement with content may be far too light, heavy, incomplete, or
success at
simple content otherwise flawed; the work may fall far short of the effort specifications criterion;
65-69
1.0
NOT YET: Unacceptable: the work does not reflect the HP criterion enough to show adequate comprehension and/or learning
With help,
partial success
at 2.0 & 3.0
content
60-64
0.5
NOT YET: Unacceptable: the work does not reflect the HP criterion enough to show adequate comprehension and/or learning
With help,
partial success
at 2.0 content
59-55
0.0
Even with
help, no
success
NOT YET: Unacceptable: the work does not reflect the HP criterion enough to show adequate comprehension and/or learning