MATHEMATICS UNIT PLANNER Topic: Probability Year Level: 4 Term: 3 Week: 1 Date: 21/9/2012 Learning focus: Students will develop skills in describing and interpreting different data sets in order to challenge their subjective probability views and develop probabilistic reasoning through experimental contexts. Key mathematical understandings Key AusVELS documentation (taken directly from AusVELS documents): (2-4 understandings only): Fairness Content strand(s): Data collection Sub-strand(s): Probabilistic reasoning Level descriptions: Probabilistic language Describe possible everyday events and order their chances of occurring. Number and Algebra Measurement and Geometry Statistics and Probability Identify everyday events where one cannot happen if the other happens. Identify events where the chance of one will not be affected by the occurrence of the other. Proficiency strand(s): Understanding Fluency Problem Solving Reasoning Understanding includes making connections between representations of numbers Fluency includes collecting and recording data Problem Solving includes formulating, modelling and recording authentic situations Reasoning includes using generalising from results of calculations, and communicating information using graphical displays Key skills to develop and practise (including strategies, ways of working Key equipment / resources: Key vocabulary: mathematically, language goals, etc.): Refer to appendices Sample space Probabilistic reasoning Fairness Probabilistic language Prediction Experimental probability Problem solving Experiment Results Data representations Analysis Justifications Probability/likelihood Overview of assessment Key probing questions (focus questions that will be used to Links to other contexts (if applicable, e.g., inquiry unit focus, develop understanding to be used during the sequence of lessons): current events, literature, etc.) “how can you justify this? Literacy “why do you believe so?” Fractions/percentages “what have you learned?” Number Teacher assessment – strong use of teacher assessment throughout, mainly through work samples and observations. Peer assessment – through many discussions and justifications students evaluated each-others’ work and provided constructive criticism for future learning. “how do you know?” “what do you notice about..?” “can you apply this to another situation?” Self-assessment – at the end of this learning sequence students have the opportunity to selfassess, whereby they evaluate what they have skills Learning strategies/ learnt. Analysing Estimating Listening Performing Reading Seeing patterns Testing Checking Explaining Locating information Persuading Recognising bias Selecting information Viewing Classifying Generalising Making choices Planning Reflecting Self-assessing Visually representing Co-operating Hypothesising Note taking Predicting Reporting Sharing ideas Working independently Working to a timetable Considering options Inferring Observing Presenting Responding Summarising Designing Interpreting Ordering events Providing feedback Restating Synthesising Elaborating Justifying Organising Questioning Revising MATHEMATICAL FOCUS ‘TUNING IN’ ‘INVESTIGATIONS ‘REFLECTION & MAKING (WHOLE CLASS FOCUS) SESSION’ CONNECTIONS (a short, sharp task relating to the (what you want the children focus of the lesson; sets the scene/ to come to understand as a context for what students do in the work in pairs, small groups or result of this lesson – short, independent aspect. e.g., It may be a individually. Time for teacher to probe problem posed, spider diagram, an children’s thinking or work with a small succinct statement) open-ended question, game, or reading a story) SESSION’ (INDEPENDENT LEARNING) (extended opportunity for students to group for part of the time and to also conduct roving conferences) ADAPTATIONS ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES - Enabling prompt (to allow those experiencing difficulty to (WHOLE CLASS FOCUS) engage in active experiences related to (focused teacher questions and the initial goal task) summary to draw out the mathematics - Extending prompt and assist children to make links. NB. (questions that extend students’ This may occur at particular points thinking on the initial task) during a lesson. Use of spotlight, (should relate to objective. Includes what the teacher will listen for, observe, note or analyse; what evidence of learning will be collected and what criteria will be used to analyse the evidence) strategy, gallery walk, etc.) Session 1 ‘Language Line’ (refer to Students individually write The class discussion and Enabling prompt: The class response to Students will appendix 1) 4 sentences which each writing activity involves In order for students who ‘language line’ develop an include one word or phrase critical thinking and may be struggling with specifically their understanding of from the number line and justifications in order for understanding the language justification of the language used are contextualised through students to develop a clear of probability, the teacher word/phrase placement to describe the being linked with an understanding of the provides real life examples can be used as probability of everyday event. difference between words of an event and asks “is documentation of everyday events, (See appendix 2) and phrases within this event likely to occur”? learning. and will be able to probability of everyday The students respond and order them based events. order each events based on Students’ probability how likely they are to sentences are evaluated occur. They can then link based on accuracy of these ordered events to a likelihood as well as specific word along the justifications to show Language Line. students’ thinking and on likelihood of occurrence. Questions: see appendix 2 understanding of Extending prompt: probability language The students create their meanings. own language line which has 10 words along it, and link each word with an event. Session 2 Class reads “It’s probably ‘Spinners activity’ (refer to Throughout the lesson, Enabling prompt: Teacher observation and Students will Penny” and is involved in appendix 4) teacher helps students to instead of differentiating anecdotal notes drawn identify various discussion of the book and make connections between between all the words on from discussion, events within prior learning (see students’ predictions and the number line, the including students’ prior everyday life appendix 3) interpretations of teacher allocates them knowledge of probability, which have probability with words from the line to look their understanding and different appropriate language at, and the students then use of language, probabilities and be through questioning (refer have to find the spinner predictions, outcome able to order their to italics, see appendix 4). within the group which interpretations matches with the given justifications, words. explanations and likelihood of occurrence along a Students will be continuum of encouraged to link probabilistic probability with everyday Extending prompt: language. events through teacher’s Create a mix-n-match sheet providence of clear for partner, whereby you examples (refer to italics, will draw a certain number see appendix 4). of spinners on one side, questions throughout the lesson. and the same amount on the other in a mixed order for your partner to match. Session 3 Coloured dice (see Students work in groups of Class discussion Enabling prompt: Students will be appendix 5) 3 and complete “Fair Students justify their views Focus group works Students’ samples of dice able to challenge 1. The teacher presents dice?” activity (see of the game, and justify together to order the help teacher to identify their subjective coloured dice 1 to the appendix 6) their reasons for their ‘fair’ likelihood of events, and whether they understand beliefs by using students, and has them dice may not use numerical fairness and is supported experimental choose a colour which they ways of representation but by their responses to the evidence to predict the dice will land Summary refer to language line to leading questions determine and on. Students become aware of describe the probability throughout the dice compare likelihood 2. Justifications lead whole fairness within probability, through language activity. of events as well as class discussion, and and see that on a di, to fairness. another coloured dice is make it fair for 6 people Extending Prompt: presented. there has to be 6 possible What else is fair? 3.Step 1 and 2 are repeated outcomes. This is - Can you apply what you 4. After discussion of all 3 connected to the outcomes have learnt about dice dice, the students order the on real dice, where no being fair to other models. dice along the ‘Language number is more likely to How do you know they are Line’. occur than another. fair? Are coins fair? Are other multi-sided dice fair? Leading questions: what did you find out about the game? Justify why you believe it is fair/unfair. Did you believe it was fair when you were winning? How might this influence our view of fairness? Session 4 Are normal dice fair? Class discusses the Class discussion: Enabling prompt: Teacher identifies Students further Class reflects on what they similarities and differences Discussion questions as per Have small group of students understanding understand found in the previous of a six sided number di to appendix 7 students be the ‘recorder’ through analysing their differences within lesson while rolling the coloured di of the Class data collection and write down each record sheets; whether probability coloured dice. previous session moves towards a larger persons’ results, then work they provide an informed including fairness What makes a dice fair? sample space which can in pairs with students who prediction, they have through recording Why is equal chance extend students’ view of have grasped the concept, linguistically described and interpreting important? results as they see the but will not extend too far the probability as well as Students engage in rotation data, and activities of probability whole class results – due to and leaving them behind represented the chance larger sample space whilst interpreting results numerically through comparing the Teacher poses question: games with data collection, probability of “When we are playing a where they first predict the various outcomes dice game where we had to results, and record the Extending prompt: both linguistically throw a 6 to start the game, results in many ways Can you simplify the and numerically. Johnny said, ‘let’s make it (see appendix 7) probabilities? Can you fractions that we have to throw a 3 represent the probabilities instead of 6 because it is as a percentage? What easier’. Do you agree with other ways of recording him? Why?’ fair results are there? Is a coin fair? Secret spinner Students create their own Spinner discussion Enabling prompt: Students’ tally of results (refer to appendix 8). secret spinner, and then What was in the data that When predicting the and correlating secret Students will play with a partner (same encouraged them to alter colours on their partner’s spinner predictions are demonstrate their steps as appendix 8). their thinking? Could they spinner, allow students to analysed to identify knowledge of expect to stay with their know all the possible whether they made likelihood of answer if the activity went colours that will definitely accurate predictions events, by making on for 50 spins? What do appear. They then can based on the previous informed you know about probability focus on the proportion and predictions based that helped you to differing probabilities of on experimental determine what the spinner each colour. Student self-assessment evidence, and looks like? Extending prompt: of their process and Have students create their learning throughout the Session 5 representing their results. results visually Students then reflect on own spinner which has activity as well as linking with accurate their learning by using segmented sections. Their to other activities. interpretations and these questions as prompts partner then has to add the evaluations. for self-assessment. fractional parts together to find the overall proportion to determine the probability. Word Count: 1,391 (with removal of template word count).