AP Language: Close-Reading & Rhetorical Analysis
CLOSE-READING MODEL: Reading for rhetorical purpose
The following annotations are observations and close-reading insights on the first few paragraphs
of The Great Gatsby. These are, of course, not the interpretations of the text, meaning that your
own interpretations are valuable. Consider these annotations that are also available in color on
my teacher page.
Some rhetorical strategies annotated for in the following passage:
RHETORICAL STRATEGY: CONTRADICTORY PHRASE
RHETORICAL STRATEGY: REPETITION
RHETORICAL STRATEGY: JUDGMENTAL DICTION (Type of connotative diction)
RHETORICAL STRATEGY: ORGANIZATION OF MAIN IDEA (i.e. father’s aphorism) AND
DISPROOF OF THE MAIN IDEA
In my younger and more vulnerable years my father gave me some advice that I’ve been turning
over in my mind ever since (internal characterization = contemplative, receptive,
acknowledges the precarious nature of naiveté. So why is he still contemplating this
advice?)
“Whenever you feel like criticizing any one,” he told me, “just remember that all the people in
this world haven’t had the advantages that you’ve had.” (rhetorical device: maxim/aphorism)
He didn’t say any more, but we’ve always been unusually communicative in a reserved way
(rhetorical device: oxymoronic phrase), and I understood that he meant a great deal more than
that. In consequence, I’m inclined to reserve all judgments, a habit that has opened up many
curious natures to me and also made me the victim of not a few veteran bores (rhetorical
device: contradictory phrase in which he immediately contradicts himself suggesting
questionable narration). The abnormal mind is quick to detect and attach itself to this quality
when it (what is the antecedent to “it”? His habit) appears in a normal person, and so it came
about that in college I was unjustly accused of being a politician, because I was privy to the
secret griefs of wild, unknown men. Most of the confidences were unsought—frequently I have
feigned sleep, preoccupation, or a hostile levity (oxymoron) when I realized by some
unmistakable sign that an intimate revelation was quivering on the horizon; for the intimate
revelations of young men, or at least the terms in which they express them, are usually
plagiaristic and marred by obvious suppressions (unoriginal revelations, platitudes).
Reserving judgments is a matter of infinite hope (impossibility that Nick acknowledges). I
am still a little afraid of missing something if I forget that, as my father snobbishly suggested,
Delacruz
AP Language: Close-Reading & Rhetorical Analysis
and I snobbishly repeat, a sense of the fundamental decencies (connotative = decorum) is
parcelled out unequally at birth (thematic idea = the force of inequality (oppression) is
entwined in one’s reality according to Nick’s perception and his father’s. Sarcasm here,
since they do not really care that these inequalities exist as they simply “snobbishly” repeat
this and maintain these inequalities by creating divisions between them – the poor - and us
– the rich.)
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS CLAIM (chronological and topical): Fitzgerald characterizes
Nick as a rather cynical man, one reflection of the bourgeois attitude of the 1920’s.
Fitzgerald delivers his claim through the use of contradictory phrases, and repetition
coupled with judgmental diction.
SAMPLE BODY PARAGRAPH 1 FOR CLAIM STATEMENT ABOVE:
Fitzgerald begins the book with Nick’s contemplation of his father’s aphorism that
essentially is a warning to think about how less fortunate some people have been before
‘criticizing them’. However, Nick almost immediately narrates a series of contradictory phrases
that are not only rhetorically contradictory, but contradict the very advice his father gave. First,
Nick attests to “reserving all judgments” (line 7), but by doing so frequently falls victim to some
expert bigmouths, or as he describes, “veteran bores” (line 7). Within this one statement, the
juxtaposition between Nick’s admittance that he reserves judgments from those “veteran bores”
is a clear contradiction. Nick clearly has no issues judging others as ‘veteran’ fools. He delivers a
similar contradiction when he describes his attitude towards the college peers who share their
secrets with him. Nick narrates that he often faked sleep, preoccupation, or “hostile levity” (line
13), all suggesting that he immediately judges those around him without even listening to them.
The last two words – “hostile levity” are also oxymoronic, since he cannot possible be
aggressively lighthearted as these two words suggest. This oxymoron is consistent with Nick’s
contradictory phrases that oppose the very aphorism that Nick introduced the readers to in the
beginning of the passage. A close examination of the first three paragraph’s structure reveals that
while Nick begins with a life lesson his father taught him, he uses subsequent sentences to
disprove his obedience to his father’s advice, reflecting his cynicism not only of his father’s
advice, but towards those around him who may not have been born with the same advantages as
his own. Ultimately, Fitzgerald effectually uses contradictory phrases to render Nick a
disingenuous and rather cynical man.
***************************************************************
And, after boasting this way of my tolerance, I come to the admission that it has a limit. Conduct
may be founded on the hard rock or the wet marshes (rhetorical device: antithesis), but after
a certain point I don’t care what it’s founded on. When I came back from the East last autumn I
felt that I wanted the world to be in uniform and at a sort of moral attention forever; I wanted no
more riotous excursions with privileged glimpses into the human heart. Only Gatsby, the man
Delacruz
AP Language: Close-Reading & Rhetorical Analysis
who gives his name to this book, was exempt from my reaction—Gatsby, who represented
everything for which I have an unaffected scorn. If personality is an unbroken series of
successful gestures, then there was something gorgeous about him, some heightened sensitivity
to the promises of life, as if he were related to one of those intricate machines that register
earthquakes ten thousand miles away (rhetorical device: intense simile). This responsiveness
had nothing to do with that flabby impressionability which is dignified under the name of the
“creative temperament.”—it was an extraordinary gift for hope, a romantic readiness such as
I have never found in any other person and which it is not likely I shall ever find again. No—
Gatsby turned out all right at the end; it is what preyed on Gatsby, what foul dust floated in the
wake of his dreams that temporarily closed out my interest in the abortive sorrows and shortwinded elations of men.
What do you notice about these words?
gorgeous
heightened sensitivity
extraordinary gift for hope
a romantic readiness
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS CLAIM (chronological and topical including text paragraph
above): Fitzgerald characterizes Nick as a cynical narrator, not only in his style of
narration but his contradictory rhetorical treatment of those around him, with the
exception of Gatsby. Fitzgerald develops Nick’s characterization through the use of
contradictory phrases, and repetition coupled with judgmental diction that discernibly
shifts to consistent romanticized diction towards only Gatsby.
Delacruz
AP Language: Close-Reading & Rhetorical Analysis
*************************************************************************************
CHAPTER 1: (Daisy)
Daisy took her face in her hands as if feeling its lovely shape, and her eyes moved gradually out
into the velvet dusk. I saw that turbulent emotions possessed her, so I asked what I thought
would be some sedative questions about her little girl.
“We don’t know each other very well, Nick,” she said suddenly. “Even if we are cousins. You
didn’t come to my wedding.”
“I wasn’t back from the war.”
“That’s true.” She hesitated. “Well, I’ve had a very bad time, Nick, and I’m pretty cynical
about everything.”
Evidently she had reason to be. I waited but she didn’t say any more, and after a moment I
returned rather feebly to the subject of her daughter.
“I suppose she talks, and—eats, and everything.”
“Oh, yes.” She looked at me absently. “Listen, Nick; let me tell you what I said when she was
born. Would you like to hear?”
“Very much.”
“It’ll show you how I’ve gotten to feel about—things. Well, she was less than an hour old and
Tom was God knows where. I woke up out of the ether with an utterly abandoned feeling, and
asked the nurse right away if it was a boy or a girl. She told me it was a girl, and so I turned my
Delacruz
AP Language: Close-Reading & Rhetorical Analysis
head away and wept. ‘all right,’ I said, ‘I’m glad it’s a girl. And I hope she’ll be a fool—that’s
the best thing a girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool.”
“You see I think everything’s terrible anyhow,” she went on in a convinced way. “Everybody
thinks so—the most advanced people. And I KNOW. I’ve been everywhere and seen everything
and done everything.” Her eyes flashed around her in a defiant way, rather like Tom’s, and she
laughed with thrilling scorn. “Sophisticated—God, I’m sophisticated!”
The instant her voice broke off, ceasing to compel my attention, my belief, I felt the basic
insincerity of what she had said. It made me uneasy, as though the whole evening had been a
trick of some sort to exact a contributory emotion from me. I waited, and sure enough, in a
moment she looked at me with an absolute smirk on her lovely face, as if she had asserted her
membership in a rather distinguished secret society to which she and Tom belonged.
Inside, the crimson room bloomed with light.
Delacruz