CONSUMER CREDIT DIVISION (CCD) ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Document Owner: Sheryl Lawrence (CRO) Version Number: V2.0 Document to be Approved By: CCD Board Effective Date: 22-Jun-2015 Next Review Date: 30-Sep-2016 CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 Version Control Version Date Status Comment V0.1 25/06/14 Draft Initial draft V1.0 29/08/14 Approved Updated for David Merrett and Internal Audit comments V1.1 April 15 Draft Revised V1.0 for review V1.2 01/05/15 Draft Draft reviewed for submission to EROC & CCD Board for approval V2.0 22/06/20 15 Approved Approved by CCD Board Related Documents Provident Financial Plc Risk Management Framework Provident Financial Plc Corporate Policies CCD Internal Governance Framework CCD Policy Framework CCD Risk Management Policy CCD Risk Event Reporting Policy CCD Level 1 Risk Frameworks Business/Strategic Risk Framework Credit Risk Framework Customer & Conduct Risk Framework People Risk Framework Operations Risk Framework Technology Risk Framework Sourcing and Supplier Management Risk Framework Financial Accounting & Reporting Risk Framework Legal Risk Framework Regulatory Risk Framework Financial Crime Risk Framework Funding and Liquidity Risk Framework CCD Compliance Manual CCD - ERMF Page 2 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework CCD - ERMF v1.2 Page 3 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 Contents 1 2 Purpose of the Framework............................................................................................ 5 Framework Overview ..................................................................................................... 5 3 Risk Principles ............................................................................................................... 7 4 Risk Culture & Capability .............................................................................................. 8 4.1 Culture................................................................................................................. 8 4.2 Communications.................................................................................................. 9 4.3 Capability ............................................................................................................ 9 Risk Organisation ........................................................................................................ 10 5.1 Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Function ................................................... 10 5.2 Risk Oversight Functions ................................................................................... 10 5.3 Compliance Function ......................................................................................... 11 5.4 First Line Risk Partners ..................................................................................... 11 5.5 Three Lines of Defence ..................................................................................... 11 5.5.1 First Line of Defence ............................................................................ 12 5.5.2 Second Line of Defence....................................................................... 12 5.5.3 Third Line of Defence........................................................................... 13 5.6 Risk Management Forum .................................................................................. 13 Risk Committees ......................................................................................................... 13 Risk Categories/Universe............................................................................................ 14 Risk Appetite................................................................................................................ 16 Risk Management Strategy ......................................................................................... 17 5 6 7 8 9 10 Risk Policies & Frameworks ....................................................................................... 17 10.1 Level 1 Risk Framework .................................................................................... 17 10.2 Level 2 Policy/Framework.................................................................................. 18 10.3 Level 3 Processes and Procedures ................................................................... 18 11 Risk Management Lifecycle ........................................................................................ 18 11.1 Risk Identification .............................................................................................. 19 11.2 Risk Measurement............................................................................................. 19 11.2.1 PF Risk Assessment Model – Risk Impact ........................................... 20 11.2.2 PF Risk Assessment Model – Risk Likelihood...................................... 20 11.2.3 Gross and Net risk ............................................................................... 21 11.2.4 Model risk ............................................................................................ 21 11.3 Risk Response .................................................................................................. 21 11.4 Risk Monitoring.................................................................................................. 21 11.5 Risk Reporting & Escalation .............................................................................. 22 11.5.1 Integrated Risk Reporting .................................................................... 22 11.5.2 Other Risk Reporting ........................................................................... 23 11.5.3 Risk and Event Escalation ................................................................... 24 11.5.4 Risk data.............................................................................................. 24 12 Stress Testing & Capital Planning .............................................................................. 24 12.1 Stress Testing & Scenario Analysis ................................................................... 24 12.2 Capital planning ................................................................................................. 24 13 ERMF Maintenance ...................................................................................................... 25 14 Glossary ....................................................................................................................... 26 CCD - ERMF Page 4 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 1 Purpose of the Framework The Enterprise Risk Management Framework (ERMF) is a component of the CCD Internal Governance Framework and fulfils the requirements of PF’s Risk Management and Risk Appetite Frameworks. It provides a structured, joined-up and consistent approach to the management of risks to and arising from CCD’s business strategy and environment. PF Risk Appetite Framework PF Risk Management Framework CCD Internal Governance Framework CCD Business Strategy & Environment CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework Embedding the ERMF involves integrating the management of risk into business management and decision making at both the strategic and operational levels. 2 Framework Overview The ERMF comprises the following components: Enterprise Risk Management Framework Risk Principles Risk Categories/Universe Risk Culture & Capability Risk Appetite Risk Organisation Risk Management Strategy Risk Committees Risk Policies & Frameworks Risk Management Lifecycle Stress Testing & Capital Planning Risk Principles – form the foundations on which the ERMF is built. They represent the fundamental guidelines through which CCD achieves effective risk management practice. Risk Culture & Capability – CCD aims to deliver a culture of risk awareness, transparency and rewarding of correct behaviours that is championed by skilled and experienced risk people. Risk Organisation – identifies the roles and responsibilities of those involved in providing and operating the framework. CCD adopts the 3 lines of defence model. Risk Committees – support risk decision-making (first line) and oversight of risk exposures (second line). CCD - ERMF Page 5 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 Risk Categories/Universe – provides a common language for the possible risks to which CCD may be exposed given its strategic objectives, business model, size and complexity. It also provides an organising structure for risk management activities and for risk data. Risk Appetite – aligns with PF’s risk appetite and expresses CCD Board’s boundaries of acceptable risk exposure to support achievement of CCD’s strategic objectives and business plan, in terms of risk appetite statements, measures and related limits/thresholds. Risk Management Strategy – details how a specific risk category or individual risk will be managed, in terms of policies and key controls, taking into account the current internal and external drivers of risk and within the overall context of CCD’s risk appetite. Risk Policies & Frameworks – provides additional detail and clarity for risk categories or individual risks: Policies set out direction, responsibilities and requirements specific to a risk category (Level 1) or individual risks (Level 2) Frameworks apply the ERMF to a specific risk category or provide detailed guidance as well as policy statements related to a specific risk. Risk Management Lifecycle – defines a structured set of processes for identifying, measuring, responding to, monitoring and reporting individual risks: Identification – All CCD colleagues are responsible for the timely identification of risks and events, throughout the business. A programme of education and training driven by the ERM Function and line managers underpins this. Measurement – consistent with PF, systems appropriate to the nature of the risks and controls are employed to evaluate and assess the likelihood and impact of the risk, and the effectiveness of control design and operation, setting priorities for further action. Where models are deployed, they are subject to appropriate levels of validation and monitoring to ensure they remain predictive and robust throughout their lifecycle; Response – involves a planning phase to determine what action should be taken in response to a risk or event within the context of its measurement and CCD’s appetite for that risk, followed by an execution phase where agreed actions are implemented. Monitoring – periodic or on-going review of risk exposures to determine whether risk and control measurements remain valid and within risk appetite. Reporting & Escalation – timely, accurate, comprehensive, integrated and insightful collation of risk information to enable communication, escalation, monitoring and oversight. Stress Testing & Capital Planning – CCD contributes to PF’s capital and liquidity planning. CCD - ERMF Page 6 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework 3 v1.2 Risk Principles The following principles govern CCD’s approach to risk management: Independent: CCD adopts the three lines of defence structure where the ERM Function and delegated Risk Oversight Functions are separate from business management who originate and own risks, and report to an Executive level Chief Risk Officer (CRO) ensuring the voice of risk is considered and valued. Robust: The ERM Function is ultimately responsible for the oversight and challenge to business management, and ensures appropriate delegated risk oversight and risk control are in place through policies, frameworks, tools, analysis and the Risk Oversight Committee. Integrated: The ERM Function supported by the delegated Risk Oversight Functions, offers a business wide view of risk exposures, through the collation and integration of risks information into a single reporting structure. Technical excellence: CCD is committed to having people with the right capabilities in the ERM Function and delegated Risk Oversight Functions, to ensure CCD’s risk management activities are in line with industry ‘good practice’ and regulatory expectations. Proportionate: Risk management practice is commensurate with the nature, size, diversity and complexity of CCD’s strategic objectives and business model and sufficient to meet key stakeholder expectations. Integrated into decision making: CCD is committed to risk-informed decision making, based on a combination of analytically evidenced assessments and balanced subject matter expert judgements. Fair and Transparent: The ERM Function and the Compliance Function are committed to ensuring that risks decisions are taken in the customer’s best interests, ensuring customer outcomes (short and long term) are integral to the decision making process. Flexible and Dynamic: Risk management is a rapidly evolving field, driven by changes in technical analysis, regulatory expectations and the wider economic environment. It is therefore essential that CCD’s risk capability remains agile to respond to known and unexpected changes in the wider operating environment. Outward looking: CCD maintains a close watch on external events and industry ‘good practice’ to ensure its risk management capability continues to evolve, using strategic partners to augment internal skills where appropriate. Forward looking: The ERM Function, supported by the delegated Risk Oversight Functions, is focused on delivering a holistic view of CCD’s risk exposures, covering CCD - ERMF Page 7 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 current profiles, historic trends and forecasts of future positions against a range of scenarios. Effective risk control: A key outcome of the ERMF and its principles is that the risks of the business are effectively controlled within Board approved appetites and limits. 4 Risk Culture & Capability 4.1 Culture A strong CCD-wide risk culture is a key element of effective risk management. CCD aims to deliver a culture of risk awareness, transparency and rewarding of correct behaviours. A number of activities are undertaken to ensure consistency of message and appropriate cultural reinforcement: Non-Executive Risk Education: A rolling programme of Board level briefings on key risk issues and projects ensures that all Board members are appropriately educated and risk aware. CRO & ERM Function briefings: Senior management briefings are delivered by the CRO & ERM Function to support a shared vision, philosophy and culture. Risk awareness briefings: A series of senior management briefings delivered to all key business functions, ensuring they understand their risk management roles and responsibilities. Modular risk training: Specialist risk training will be provided to those who are actively involved in providing and operating the ERMF based on identified training and development needs. Job descriptions: All job descriptions will specify risk management responsibilities and, where appropriate, include ‘risk management’ as an essential or desired competency. Staff appraisal: CCD’s performance development and review (PDR) process include setting and appraising specific ‘Risk Management’ objectives for Executives, HOFs, Senior Managers and Managers. Staff surveys: Future surveys of CCD staff will consider the risk management culture to assess the effectiveness with which this is being embedded. Whistle-blowing: CCD offers protection against dismissal or any other detriment when an employee discloses information which is in the public interest or ‘blows the whistle’ on a specific event or practice. Incentive schemes: The CRO reviews and oversees remuneration and reward schemes and systems to ensure they are appropriate and supportive of CCD’s risk principles. The CRO is also involved in the review of executive performance. CCD - ERMF Page 8 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework 4.2 v1.2 Communications Enterprise Risk & Compliance SMT: ‘People’ is retained as a standing agenda item for these meetings to ensure recruitment, development and retention matters are given due consideration. Risk functional briefings: Key communications are cascaded consistently via members of the Risk Management Forum. Team meetings: Ensure the flow of key messages on a regular basis. 4.3 Capability Risk People Plan: Creates an integrated view of the ‘people agenda’ for colleagues in the ERM and Risk Oversight functions, including those that are delegated. Resource planning: The appropriateness of resources and the aggregate mix is reviewed periodically to ensure the ERM and Risk Oversight functions remains able to deliver their objectives. Integrated recruitment: Campaigns are run jointly across the specialist teams. Talent management: The ERM and Risk Oversight functions ensure colleagues with potential are identified and developed. Succession Planning: CCD recognises the importance of succession planning and ensures that across key risk roles appropriate talent management is used to plan for the future. Training & Development: On-going training and development is acknowledged as critical to retain top risk talent, ensure a continued awareness of emerging ‘good practice’ and integrate this learning into CCD. Strategic partnering: There is recognition that strategic partnering can bring benefits to CCD through transfer of knowledge, rapid progress or an external window to continued support and ‘good practice’. Rewards & Incentives: As with risk culture, the CRO and ERM function seek to embed appropriate criteria within the ratings process to encourage and to foster the development of risk capability across CCD. CCD - ERMF Page 9 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework 5 v1.2 Risk Organisation The functions that report to the CRO are shown below. CRO Enterprise Risk Management 5.1 Credit & Financial Crime Oversight Business Risk Oversight Compliance First Line Risk Partners Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Function The ERM Function aims to: Establish and embed the ERMF such that CCD has an effective structured approach to ensure risk exposures do not exceed Board approved risk appetite and policies; Operate within the ERMF to provide an integrated view of risk appetite and transparent and insightful consolidated risk analysis and reporting to CCD Board and Risk Oversight Committee; and Maintain a CCD-wide perspective across all risks. 5.2 Risk Oversight Functions The Risk Oversight Functions provide independent, expert advice, guidance and challenge to CCD’s Board, Executive and Management in a manner that ensures: Risk coverage is viewed holistically to ensure risks do not fall between other functions; Risk strategy is integrated and resources are directed to those single or combined areas of risk most prevalent within CCD; Risk policies are consistent in level and style and reviewed to ensure no gaps exist; Risk reporting and communications form a total risk perspective and ensure aggregation and correlation issues are addressed; and Risk management is embedded as a core part of business processes. CCD - ERMF Page 10 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework 5.3 v1.2 Compliance Function The Compliance Function has 2 primary aims: To support, challenge the business to ensure fair outcomes for customers are considered and embedded through having the appropriate frameworks in place. To interpret, implement regulatory change and provide pragmatic regulatory advice to all business functions within CCD. Further details are set out in the Compliance Manual. 5.4 First Line Risk Partners First Line Risk Partners provide first line risk management support to management and risk committees. This involves: Ensuring risk appetite is understood across the business, used to inform risk decisions and regularly monitored. Providing support to the business to determine the appropriate response where it appears to be operating outside risk appetite. Working with business areas to ensure risks are identified, assessed, managed, reported and monitored, and that related controls are effectively designed, evidenced, documented and monitored. Facilitating risk assessments and documentation of key risks, controls, monitoring, and application of regulation and the design of effective controls. Providing guidance and support in relation to risk events or issues raised in audits, compliance reviews or regulatory investigations. Details of the three lines of defence are provided in Section 5.5 below. 5.5 Three Lines of Defence CCD adopts the ‘three lines of defence’ model which has become accepted practice within the financial services industry with the following features and benefits: Risk is originated and owned by line management; The management of risk is integrated into business processes; Appropriate supporting arrangements exist to ensure independent risk expertise and assurance is available; Segregation of duties exists to ensure the avoidance of conflicts of interest within individual roles; and CCD - ERMF Page 11 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 Risk management is a partnership between the Risk Function and the business. First Line Risk Origination, Ownership & Management Identify, manage and report on risks and events, including the risk registers and event logs Effective design, implementation and operation of controls Monitor risks, policy compliance and execution of controls. Second Line Risk Oversight Functions Provide oversight and challenge to 1st line. Supports the appropriate risk taking via policies, frameworks, tools, aggregation and analysis. Third Line Internal Audit Provides independent assurance over the first 2 lines of defence. The key responsibilities for each line of defence are set out below. 5.5.1 First Line of Defence Establish and maintain an effective risk and control environment; Ensure key decision making recognises the associated risks, and balances both short and long term considerations; Identify and measure risks inherent in business objectives and activities. Respond to and control risks in line with approved appetite, frameworks and policies. Undertake first line monitoring of risk exposures, controls and policy compliance. Report risks to first line risk committees including the provision of Key Risk Indicators and relevant commentary. Promptly raise any risks and events at the appropriate level. Record risks on risk registers and related systems provided by the ERM function. Effectiveness will be evidenced through the successful delivery of the corporate plan with all risks managed within CCD’s Risk Appetite. 5.5.2 Second Line of Defence Provide independent integrated oversight and challenge to the ‘1st line of defence’; CCD - ERMF Page 12 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 Ensure Level 1 Risk Frameworks, including risk appetite, measures and thresholds, is developed and in line with industry 'good practice', providing guidance and support where required. Review and challenge the identification and management of risks and events, in line with approved appetite, frameworks and policies. Undertake second line monitoring of risk exposures, controls and policy compliance Challenge first line risk reporting, including related systems and controls and data quality Report to CCD Board and Risk Oversight Committee; Support stress testing and scenario analysis to assess CCD’s risk exposures, risk mitigants and contingency arrangements under a range of environments. Effectiveness will be evidenced through achievement of the Risk Management Strategy and effective risk control. 5.5.3 Third Line of Defence Provide independent assurance to Executive and Board across the ‘1st and 2nd lines of defence’ and the appropriateness and effectiveness of internal controls. This is provided by PF Internal Audit. Effectiveness is evidenced through timely delivery of an Audit Committee approved riskbased audit plan. 5.6 Risk Management Forum HOFs and Senior Managers from the CRO Risk Functions and the First Line Risk Partners, under the direction of the CRO, form the Risk Management Forum with the following responsibilities: Consistently communicating a common risk vision and strategy; Ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities for risk management across CCD; Ensuring a holistic approach to integrated risk management; Creating a balanced risk focus with sufficiently robust independent challenge; Driving ‘best practice’ in each risk category; and Provide a positive working environment in which the Risk Function is trusted and respected, facilitating the recruitment, development and retention of skilled risk people. 6 Risk Committees The committee structure supporting the management and oversight of risk is shown below. CCD - ERMF Page 13 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 PF Board PF Risk Advisory Committee PF Audit Committee Strategy & Performance PF Risk Advisory Group Customer & Conduct Risk CCD Board Chair: PF CEO Internal Audit Internal financial control All other risk categories First Line Second Line Third Line CCD ExCo Chair: CCD MD CCD Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee Chair: CCD CRO Legal Regulatory Financial Crime Business/Strategic CEL Management Committee Chair: CEL MD CCD Customer & Conduct Risk Management Committee SMT Home Credit Business SMT Satsuma Business SMT glo Business SMT Commercial Function SMT Technology & Change Function SMT Finance Function Chair: MD Chair: HCD Chair: NMD Chair: NMD Chair: CD Chair: TCD Chair: FD Conduct Credit Issuing Credit Collections Credit Issuing Credit Collections Credit Issuing Credit Collections Technology Operations Credit Modelling Fin Acc & Rep Funding & Liq Sourc & Supp SMT Enterprise Risk & Compliance Function Chair: CRO 7 First line committees support risk decision-making in relation to risks and events and continually improve the effectiveness of risk management and control Second line committee reviews and challenges risk exposures against risk appetite, monitors external trends and developments and ensures the ERMF is fit for purpose. CCD Board is responsible for the approval of the Risk Appetite Statements, measures and limits/thresholds. Risk Categories/Universe The principal categories of risk to which CCD is exposed, given its business strategy, business model and operating environments are set out below: Risk Risk Sub Categories Categories Description First Line Committee Customer & Conduct Risk - The risk that our behaviours, attitudes, motivations and actions lead to unfair customer outcomes or poor standards of customer conduct in any of our trading activities. CCD Customer & Conduct Risk Management Committee (C&CRMC) Business/ Strategic - The risk arising out of the delivery of the CCD ExCo Corporate Plan. This may arise through CCD - ERMF Page 14 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 Risk Risk Sub Categories Categories Risk Description Credit Risk The risk that unexpected losses may arise as a result of customers or market CCD Home Credit counterparties failing to meet their SMT obligations to repay the debt. CCD Satsuma SMT - First Line Committee the selection of the wrong strategy, its improper implementation, a lack of responsiveness to external business developments or through changes in the business environment forcing deviation from the plan. CCD glo SMT CCD Finance SMT Operational People Risk Operations Technology Sourcing & Supplier Management Financial Accounting & Reporting Legal & Regulatory Risk Funding & Liquidity Risk Financial Crime Regulatory Legal - The risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. CCD Technology & Change SMT (Operations & Technology risk) CCD Finance SMT (Financial Accounting & Reporting risk, Sourcing & Supplier Management risk, People risk) The risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, CCD Risk material financial loss or loss to Leadership Team reputation CCD may suffer as a result of (RLT) its failure to comply with laws, regulations, rules, principles, selfregulatory organisation standards, and codes of conduct applicable to its activities. The risk that CCD is unable to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. CCD Finance SMT Generic risks, within these categories and relevant to CCD, form the risk universe and contributes significantly to a common risk language. The risk universe is defined in Level 1 policies for each risk category. CCD - ERMF Page 15 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework 8 v1.2 Risk Appetite The CCD Board establishes Risk Appetite Statements at divisional level and for each risk category that describe those risks, and the aggregate amount, it is willing to take and those it will not take in pursuit of its strategic objectives and business plans. These statements support and align with the risk appetite approved by the PF Board. The CCD Risk Appetite Statements for each risks category are supported by quantitative and qualitative measures of risk for which limits/thresholds are defined as: Green – acceptable, within appetite Amber – outside of appetite with formal plans to reduce risk sufficiently and in acceptable timeframes, relatively high confidence of delivery Red – outside of appetite with large scale, complex, insufficient, inadequate or no plans to remediate, reasonable degree of risk associated with their delivery Volatile amber and green risks should be shown with a red outline where the risk is volatile due to external events which could result in impact or likelihood increasingly rapidly, and where existing mitigating controls or future actions are appropriate but need to be reviewed frequently. The Risk Appetite Statements, measures and limits/thresholds establish a framework for taking risk decisions and may affect wider business decision-making. To be effective, these statements, measures and limits/thresholds should be: based on forward looking perspectives of risk rather than on backward looking perspectives of loss; communicated to Executives, HOFs, Senior Managers and Managers who are responsible for taking risk decisions; and utilised by Risk Management and Oversight Committees to support and challenge risk decisions. Risk category owners are responsible for proposing Risk Appetite Statements, measures and limits/thresholds to the CCD Board for approval. The proposal should describe the approach taken to developing and defining the risk appetite as well as the factors and influences considered. The ERM Function is responsible for reviewing the proposed risk appetites for each risk category for consistency with each other and for alignment with PFG’s overall risk appetite and for presenting a unified view to the CCD Board. Performance against the risk appetite measures will form part of the monthly risk reporting and assessed as follows: CCD - ERMF Page 16 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework Sufficient & effective controls in place to manage the risk No / minor historical risk events recorded Monitoring on ongoing basis Amber Risk outside of appetite with formal plans to reduce risk sufficiently and in acceptable timeframes, relatively high confidence of delivery Reporting Assessment Green Acceptable, within appetite - v1.2 Red Outline Amber and Green risks where the risk is volatile due to external events which could result in impact or likelihood increasingly rapidly, and where existing mitigating controls or future actions are appropriate but need to be reviewed frequently Insufficient, inadequate or lack of controls to mitigate risk Action plans do not reduce the risk within appetite quickly enough Monitoring required frequently Risk outside appetite Controls in place not adequate to manage risk Historical risk breaches recorded Monitoring required regularly and frequently until acceptable Risk /action plans discussed at divisional Board level Red Risk outside of appetite with large scale, complex, insufficient, inadequate or no plans to remediate, reasonable degree of risk associated with their delivery Risk /action plans discussed at divisional Board level Risk/action plans discussed at Group Board Where more detailed measures are used for risk and control monitoring, the related limits/thresholds should align with the risk appetite statements and limits/thresholds. Risk appetite statements, measures and limits/thresholds are subject to annual review and approval unless an earlier update is appropriate. 9 Risk Management Strategy Risk category owners are responsible for defining the risk management strategy for each risk category for approval by the CCD Board on an annual basis or more frequently if appropriate. The risk management strategy defines, in the context of CCD’s strategic objectives and business plan, the overall approach to managing that risk category in terms of Level 2 policies and key controls. This necessarily takes into account the internal and external drivers of risk within the risk category and must address what is required to ensure that the risks remain within risk appetite. The effective delivery of the Risk Management Strategy should result in CCD having an effective risk and control environment for all of its risk categories, in which risk exposures are managed within CCD Board approved appetites and limits/thresholds to ensure ‘no surprises’. 10 Risk Policies & Frameworks The Polices and Frameworks in place to support the management of risk categories and risks is set out in the map in Appendix 1. 10.1 Level 1 Risk Framework Risk category owners are responsible for documenting key aspects of the ERMF relevant to their risk category in a Level 1 Risk Framework, including: CCD - ERMF Page 17 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 Risk Categories/Universe – specify and define the generic risks that fall within the category Risk Appetite – provide the Risk Appetite Statements, measures and limits/ thresholds approved by the CCD Board Risk Management Strategy – specify the internal and external drivers of risk and the Level 2 policies and key controls that will be deployed to manage the risks in the category Risk Organisation – define first and second lines of defence relevant to the risk category Risk Committees – define the risk management (first line) and risk oversight (second line) committees, as well as lower level supporting working groups as appropriate. Risk Management Lifecycle – specify the triggers that should initiate the risk identification process, specific risk reporting and monitoring to be undertaken by the first and second lines. 10.2 Level 2 Policy/Framework These documents set out, for a specific risk, formal statements that give effect to CCD’s risk principles and risk management strategies. They provide direction and guidance, as well as establish responsibilities, requirements or limits. Risk category owners are responsible for ensuring that the Level 2 policies specified in their Level 1 risk frameworks are assigned owners who will develop, implement and monitor the policy. 10.3 Level 3 Processes and Procedures Level 3 Processes & Procedures outline the processes and standard operational procedures by which policies are implemented. 11 Risk Management Lifecycle Identify Report & Escalate Measure Respond Monitor CCD - ERMF Page 18 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework 11.1 v1.2 Risk Identification Executive and line management within the first line of defence are responsible for identifying sources of risk, their causes and potential consequences. This is the identification phase of the Risk Management Lifecycle. The aim is to generate a comprehensive list of risks and events that might enhance, accelerate, delay or obstruct the achievement of objectives. Comprehensive identification is critical because a risk that is not identified at this stage will not be included in further analysis. Risk identification should: Include consideration of knock-on effects Involve people with appropriate knowledge Consider relevant and up to date information Be initiated whenever there is likely to be a change in the nature of the risk Risks should be identified, assigned an owner and recorded on Risk Registers by Senior Managers and Managers within CCD and aggregated through HOFs and Executives for consideration at the relevant risk management and oversight committees. It is the responsibility of each HOF to determine, with an appropriate rationale, where Risk Registers are maintained. In addition, there should be a top-down risk assessments at least annually linked to strategy setting. The risk assessments required here should be set out in further detail within the Business/Strategic Risk Framework. 11.2 Risk Measurement Credit risk models and the adjusted PF’s risk assessment model, provided below, are the primary tools used within CCD for measuring risks. The adjustments are intended to set financial impact levels that are more appropriate to be applied at the functional level. Whatever approach is used, the aim is to develop a detailed understanding of the risk and its potential consequences. It is also important to consider the interdependence of different risks and their sources. Any assumptions, gaps in information or other limitations should be noted and communicated to those involved in the response phase of the Risk Management Lifecycle. CCD - ERMF Page 19 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 11.2.1 PF Risk Assessment Model – Risk Impact 11.2.2 PF Risk Assessment Model – Risk Likelihood Remote May happen in a 50 year cycle 1 : 50 or 2%) e.g. loss of 1 Godwin Street CCD - ERMF Unlikely Could happen at some stage within a 1-10 year period 1 : 10 or 10% e.g. credit/economic cycle Possible within a 1-4 year period 1 : 4 or 25% e.g. industry mis-selling Page 20 of 26 Probable within a 1 year period or already happened 1 : 2 or 50% e.g. routine transactional Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 11.2.3 Gross and Net risk All risk categories will use the PF’s risk assessment model to measure risk on a gross and net basis. This will require management judgement on the effectiveness of the design and operation of controls using the following criteria. Design effectiveness • Does the control activity clearly address the relevant control objective and risk • Is the control is documented well enough to allow an alternate to perform the control in an emergency • Has a control owner been assigned • Consider if there have been any material incidents and/ or regulatory breaches as a result of the control activity not being appropriate. • Have there been any Internal Audit reports or Compliance Monitoring results during the quarter that provide cause for concern with regards to the design of the control Operating effectiveness • Is the control is monitored • Have there been repeated instances of non-performance of the control during the quarter • Has the control failed to operate during the quarter • Is there evidence of control performance • Have there been Risk Events due to the non performance or break in control • Have Internal Audit and/ Compliance Monitoring reported that the key control has not been performed. 11.2.4 Model risk As CCD evolves its disciplines with regards to quantitative model development, implementation, usage and monitoring, the Risk Oversight Functions will ensure there are appropriate controls surrounding model risk throughout the model lifecycle. 11.3 Risk Response Decisions on how to respond to a specific risk will depend on its criticality to business objectives, how the net risk compares with risk appetite. Selecting the most appropriate response involves balancing the associated costs and benefits and being alert to knock-on risks or unintended consequences. Response options include: Avoiding the risk by terminating or not starting the activity that gives rise to the risk Taking action to change the likelihood or the potential consequences Accepting the risk Accepted risks must be documented, including rationale, approved at an appropriate level depending on the scale of the risk, and monitored periodically. Controls implemented to bring gross risks within appetite must be assigned an owner, documented, monitored and evidenced. 11.4 Risk Monitoring Monitoring involves regular checking and review by all lines of defence with the aim to: Ensure controls are effective and efficient in design and operation Learn lessons from events, including near misses CCD - ERMF Page 21 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 Detect changes in the nature and scale of the risks and in the internal and external environment Identify emerging risks Regular checking and review will take the form of: on-going monitoring, including 121s/challenge meetings, risk committees/working groups, monitoring key indicators separate evaluations, including sample-based checks, ‘deep dive’ reviews and control testing It is the responsibility of each line of defence to plan their monitoring activities commensurate with the gross and net risk assessments, level of change in the internal and external environment, as well as the degree of complexity, formalisation and centralisation. A summary of the monitoring plans for the first and second lines will be captured in the Level 1 policy for each risk category. Results of monitoring will be recorded and provided to the appropriate risk management and oversight committees. 11.5 Risk Reporting & Escalation The ERM Function is the focus for integrated risk reporting and escalation across CCD ensuring that at all levels risk reporting provides clarity on the current risks and events and supports decision making at all levels. Risk reporting is subject to continued evolution with the following key principles embedded; is focused and provides insightful commentary, analysing themes and trends to help inform and prioritise business decisions and actions; informs the formulation, challenge and oversight of Risk Appetite; provides a multidimensional view across businesses and risk types through a standard set of key risk criteria and metrics; includes forward-looking analysis under a range of potential scenarios; and enables the governance and oversight of risk management activities. 11.5.1 Integrated Risk Reporting The CRO is responsible for preparing the CCD ERM Report which integrates risk information across all risk categories. The report provides an integrated view of the current and emerging risk profile of CCD, performance against risk appetite, impacts on corporate plan and external risk influences. The main sources of information are shown below. CCD - ERMF Page 22 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 The Risk Dashboard and Heat Maps are the primary form of regular first line risk reporting. These are prepared and reviewed monthly by the relevant first line committees. The CCD ERM Report is prepared and reviewed monthly at the Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee. The following principles govern risk reporting: Environmental monitoring: External events or circumstances may change risk measurements rapidly and frequent monitoring is undertaken to ensure that existing controls and future actions remain appropriate. These risks are identified on the risk heat map using a red outline. Risk benchmarking: CCD undertakes to periodically review its risk profile and risk management practices against external sources. Risk forecasting: A forward-looking approach is integral to the management judgement applied within risk reporting. Risks should be noted as volatile where external events that are wholly or largely outside of PF’s control could quickly change the status of a risk without warning. Reporting standards: The ERM Function validates its own models and reporting to ensure reporting is based on data and information sources with the highest standards of integrity, accuracy, timeliness and relevance. 11.5.2 Other Risk Reporting ‘Deep dive’ reviews: In addition to regular risk reporting, additional reports will be prepared for the Risk Management and Oversight Committees that provide further detail on key issues, major exposures and developments. These may be based on a rolling programme of reviews or triggered by specific risksand events or control deficiencies identified through risk management activities. Each committee should have a ‘calendar of events’ that sets out the forward schedule of risk information to be provided. Material control failures: any control failure with an operational loss exceeding £500k must be reported to the Risk Oversight Committee, including the nature of the event , the underlying cause, the impacts and any actions taken/planned to address the event. Risk oversight reports: These are prepared by risk category for discussion at the Risk Oversight Committee with the aim to present oversight outcomes and concerns and review progress on oversight activities. These reports are scheduled so that each category is covered at least twice a year. CCD Board: An overview of the most significant risks to CCD’s strategic objectives and business plan, across all risk categories, are reported to the CCD Board bimonthly. This includes key current risks and events and position against risk appetite. CCD - ERMF Page 23 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 PFG Advisory Group/Committee: CCD risks that are material to the Group, material control failures in excess of £1m, and performance against risk appetite are reported quarterly or sooner in line with the escalation requirements below. External risk reporting: CCD risk information may be included in external reporting including the annual report and accounts, and risk capital reporting (Pillar 3 disclosure). The CRO and Risk Oversight Committee will ensure that these reports contain relevant, reliable, understandable and comparable information that useful to external stakeholders. ERMF embedding: The CRO will provide an update to the CCD Board on the deployment and effectiveness of the ERMF on a half-yearly basis, including an opinion on adherence to the risk principles, a summary of progress and status of risk culture and capability development and the effectiveness of the delegated risk oversight model. 11.5.3 Risk and Event Escalation Risks and Events need to be reported in a timely manner as set out in the CCD Risk Management Policy and the CCD Risk Event Reporting Policy. 11.5.4 Risk data Each process in the Risk Management Lifecycle generates risk data that is the basis for risk decisions and risk reporting, and form key input to risk models. Strong data management and control is therefore required to ensure integrity and availability: The specific data fields to be captured and retained should be specified along with quality expectations Data capture processes should be reviewed periodically with a view to continuous improvement Data quality should be sufficient to allow causal analysis, statistical analysis and analysis of loss behaviour that may result from trends in the internal and external environment 12 Stress Testing & Capital Planning 12.1 Stress Testing & Scenario Analysis Stress Testing and Scenario Analysis may be deployed from time to time as required to support CCD’s strategic planning or as directed to support PFG’s capital and liquidity planning. The approach used should follow the Risk Management Lifecycle and include processes for identification, measurement, response, reporting and monitoring. 12.2 Capital planning Capital planning is coordinated by PF and from time to time CCD is required to input risk information to the process. CCD - ERMF Page 24 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 13 ERMF Maintenance The ERMF is owned by the CRO and is submitted to Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee for review and challenge ahead of approval by the CCD Board. It is also to be submitted to the Head of Corporate Strategy & Risk to ensure consistency and alignment with PF requirements and the PF Risk Advisory Group for information. The ERMF may be reviewed on a more frequent basis in the event of a material change in business strategy or CCD’s operating environment. It is the responsibility of the CRO (supported by the ERM Function) to review and maintain the ERMF and ensure its effective implementation, advising any material changes to Enterprise Risk Oversight Committee for review and CCD Board for approval. CCD - ERMF Page 25 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only CCD Enterprise Risk Management Framework v1.2 14 Glossary Control A process, action or activity effected by the CCD Board, management and/or other colleagues, designed to minimise either or both of the impact or probability of a risk crystallising, avoiding the loss or damage or failure to meet a strategic objective or business plan. ERC Enterprise Risk & Compliance CRO Chief Risk Officer ERMF Enterprise Risk Management Framework Event A risk that has crystallised. Gross risk The probability and impact of the risk, before any mitigation or controlling activities. Net risk The probability and impact of the risk, after any mitigation or controlling activities. Risk An event that, if crystallised, would detract from the achievement of CCD’s strategic objectives or business plan. Risk category A group of risks that are classified together because of common characteristics. Risk category owner The Risk Oversight Function with primary responsibility for the effective oversight of the risk category Risk owner The individual or role holder with primary responsibility for the effective identification, management, monitoring and reporting of the risk Standard operating procedures A high level description of the essential steps, responsibilities and, where appropriate, work organisation to complete the tasks associated with processes and policies. CCD - ERMF Page 26 of 26 Strictly Private & Confidential – for internal use only