FACTSHEET Lagos CO2 Emissions Assessment Handbook Developer Integrated Transport Planning Ltd for World Bank/Lagos Metropolitan Area Transport Authority Location This handbook provides guidance to calculate the impact on carbon emissions from the implementation of a new transport scheme, including the collection of the necessary data required for this task. The objective of the manual is to set out the monitoring and evaluation framework for the estimation of carbon emissions savings through the implementation of new BRT lines in Lagos. This methodology gives practical instructions on the collection of the data required for the calculation of emissions estimates, including specifications for each of the different surveys required, advice on choice of survey location and a schedule for survey timings. Methodology The aim of this methodology is to quantify the true emissions reductions realized by delivery of the Bus Rapid Transit system in a robust way, allowing confident assertions to be made about the real success of the scheme in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The following emissions sources are included within the estimates: Vehicle emissions produced by the BRT system Changes in vehicle emissions for other vehicles within the study area caused by: o Changes in vehicle distance (activity) o Changes in vehicle speed/driving conditions Rebound effect – encouragement to travel through improved travel conditions There are many factors which impact on emissions which are not directly related to the introduction of the BRT system. There may also be indirect changes in emissions as a result of the BRT system occurring outside the study area which cannot easily be captured. The following factors are not included within the estimates: Changes in vehicle activity beyond the study area Electricity usage within BRT system (eg stop lighting etc) With regard to geographic boundary, it is important to consider that the spatial area of the project is the entire zone in which the project operates. This is the entire area bounded by the trip origins and trip destinations. The process of calculating emissions savings derived from the BRT project can be summarized in the following steps: Baseline Scenario Baseline emissions (termed “Counterfactual in the Handbook) are the emissions which would have been caused by the project passengers in absence of the project activity. This is the hypothetical situation in which BRT is not implemented. The emissions calculations are calculated as the difference between observed emissions with the BRT scheme in place and the baseline. In order to quantify vehicle emissions in the base year and baseline scenario, vehicle kilometers traveled, number of passenger trips and vehicle occupancy can be used. Then, baseline emissions can be estimated based on following method: In the short-term post-implementation, the base year scenario as recorded in “before‟ surveys is likely to provide a good proxy for the baseline. These surveys will have been carried out for the study area and are therefore directly comparable to the “after‟ surveys carried out on the same corridor. Up to 3 years post implementation, the baseline scenario will be taken as being equivalent to base year conditions before BRT implementation. Over time, the base year scenario will become increasingly less robust as a proxy for baseline (without the BRT) conditions due to exogenous changes in city geography and demographics, transport network, policy and travel demand. From year 4 onwards, the baseline is estimated based on surveyed trends recorded on a control corridor. In order to determine the base year scenario, the following surveys are carried out: Classified Traffic Counts and Occupancy Counts: The objective of this survey is to record the number of vehicles travelling along the BRT corridor(s), and to record the occupancy of vehicles to allow passenger flows to be determines. Origin Destination/Roadside Interview Surveys: The objective of these surveys is to collect information about travel patterns which will underpin the estimation of average journey distances to populate the vehicle activity calculation. The survey must collect information on journey distances for travelers on each of the public transport bin types, for taxi passengers and for travelers using private cars. Heavy goods vehicles (trucks) are assumed to have fixed journey distances, and are not included in the origin-destination surveys. Drive Cycle Surveys: The aim of the drive cycle surveys is to collect information on typical driving patterns in the city for use in the vehicle energy intensity calculations. The survey is designed to capture average driving conditions across the different vehicle bin types within the study area, and to monitor how travel conditions evolve over time following the introduction of the BRT scheme. Fuel Consumption Surveys: This survey establishes the fuel consumption of the types of vehicles using the highway network, under the driving conditions that are typically experienced within the city. By understanding the amount of fuel consumed by each vehicle “bin‟ under different driving conditions, the relationship between fuel consumption and CO2 emissions can be used to calculate the CO2 emissions for the individual vehicle and by extension, in conjunction with the other survey data, for all vehicles activity. Project Emissions In order to estimate project emissions, the monitoring of the BRT corridor will continue through the life of the project, with comparative surveys undertaken at regular intervals. These surveys will provide a direct comparison back to travel conditions in the base year (before the scheme). In order to quantify vehicle emissions in the project scenario, vehicle kilometers traveled, number of passenger trips and vehicle occupancy can be used. Inputs Input and monitored data collected by surveys regarding to vehicle types as follows: Vehicle Types Car Taxi Classified Traffic Counts Occupancy Counts Subclassification Origin Destination /Roadside Interview Surveys Drive Cycle Surveys Method Fuel Consumption Surveys Subclassification Petrol/diesel Journey distances for travelers Car survey vehicles to travel along pre-selected routes within hourly intervals Engine size, Petrol/diesel Petrol/diesel Journey distances for travelers Volunteer taxi vehicles to be given GPS devises, Engine size, and to then operate as Petrol/diesel normal, taking fare paying passengers Truck Light goods, medium goods, heavy goods Motorcycle /Okada 2-stroke/4stroke Heavy goods vehicles (trucks) are assumed to have fixed journey distances, and are not included in the origindestination surveys. No of Axels Volunteer Okada to carry GPS equipment and operate as usual 2-stroke/4stroke "Mystery traveler" surveyors to carry GPS equipment in bags and to Engine size travel on selected bus routes. Danfo 14 seat Danfo 18 seat Danfo 22 seat Molue Coaster Other Large Bus (eg Lagbus) Volunteer light and medium goods vehicles from local businesses to be selected to carry the GPS equipment and operate as usual. Heavy goods vehicles to be "tailed" by survey cars (as these vehicles are more likely to operate long haul routes beyond the study area. Engine size Journey distances for travelers “Mystery traveler” Engine size surveyors to carry GPS equipment in bags and to Engine size travel on selected bus Engine size routes. Vehicle type BRT Trunk Line Bus “Mystery traveler" surveyors to carry GPS Vehicle type equipment in bags and to travel on BRT route. BRT Feeder Bus "Mystery traveler" surveyors to carry GPS equipment in bags and to Vehicle type travel on BRT feeder route. Pollutants/Gases Analyzed CO2 Evaluation No independent evaluation has been undertaken of this methodology. However, the following strengths and weaknesses apply. Strengths This methodology describes estimating accurately the emission reduction of new BRT lines implementation. Weaknesses The data collection requirements could be costly. Clearly laid out methodology and data collection instructions. Guidelines for data collection and a clear procedure make this methodology more accurate than some method available whilst being less onerous than following a CDM methodology. Data collection techniques could be used for other tools and methodologies. References Integrated Transport Planning Ltd, 2010, Lagos CO2 Emissions Assessment Handbook, Final Edition