1 EXPERIMENT 9: REAL WORLD PROJECT Risk Assessment Form Definitions: H - Hazard P - Precautions needed R - Response to Hazard Ammonium Hydroxide Buffer H1.1 Inhalation - will damage upper respiratory tract P1.1 Work in fume hood when using the buffer R1.1 If inhaled, move person to fresh air H1.2 Acute Toxicity - harmful if swallowed P1.2 Wash hands before leaving the lab and eating food R1.2 Rinse mouth with water, consult a physician H1.3 Corrosive - will burn skin P1.3 Wear gloves R1.3 Remove contaminated clothing, wash affected area with water for 15 minutes Hydrochloric Acid H2.1 Inhalation P2.1 Work in the fume hood R2.1 If inhaled, move person to fresh air H2.2 Corrosive - will burn skin P2.2 Wear gloves R2.2 Remove contaminated clothing, wash affected area with water for 15 minutes 2 EXPERIMENT 9: REAL WORLD PROJECT Intro: The purpose of this lab is to look deeper into EDTA titrations by testing the hardness of various tap water samples. This lab is a recap of Experiment 6, in which EDTA was first standardized, then tested against an antacid tablet containing Calcium and tap water. The lab helps enhance the understanding of how EDTA titrations work, and how they react with metals. Procedure: A pH meter was calibrated and used to test ammonium buffer. HCl and NaOH would be added to the ammonium until a pH of 10 was reached. An EDTA solution (~0.01 M) was prepared using 1 g of EDTA, 5 mL of ammonium buffer, and diluting it to 250 mL. A CaCO3 solution (~0.05 M) was prepared using 0.5 g CaCO3 (s) and dissolved in 100 mL of 0.15 M HCl. The EDTA was then standardized with the CaCO3 with calagamite indicator. This process was repeated 3 times until good titrations were recorded. For each source of tap water, 3 x 100 mL samples with 5 mL buffer and calagamite were titrated with EDTA until good titrations were recorded. Data: Refer to Excel Spreadsheet Calculations: Mass EDTA Required Moles CaCO3 π πΈπ·ππ΄ ∗ 0.1 πππ πΈπ·ππ΄ 372.24 π πΈπ·ππ΄ ∗ 1πΏ 1 πππ πΈπ·ππ΄ πππ π πΆππΆπ3 ∗ 1 πππ πΆππΆπ3 100.09 π πΆππΆπ3 Molarity EDTA π πΆππΆπ3 ∗ πππ πΆππΆπ3 1 ∗ 1 πΏ πΆππΆπ3 π πΈπ·ππ΄ Concentration Ca2+ π πΈπ·ππ΄ ∗ πππ πΈπ·ππ΄ 1 ∗ 1 πΏ πΈπ·ππ΄ π πππ‘ππ Hardness of Water (ppm) πππ πΆπ 40.078 π πΆπ 1000 ππ ∗ ∗ 1 πΏ πΆπ 1 πππ πΆπ 1π Spike Recovery % [πΆπ2+] ππ₯ππππππππ‘ ∗ 100% [πΆπ2+] πβπππππ‘ππππ 0.25 πΏ ∗ 0.1 πππ πΈπ·ππ΄ 372.24 π πΈπ·ππ΄ ∗ = 1.02π πΈπ·ππ΄ 1πΏ 1 πππ πΈπ·ππ΄ 0.5024 πΆππΆπ3 ∗ 1 πππ πΆππΆπ3 = 0.0502 πππ πΆππΆπ3 100.09 π πΆππΆπ3 0.005 πΏ πΆππΆπ3 ∗ 0.0502 πππ πΆππΆπ3 1 πΏ πΆππΆπ3 ∗ 1 =0.0099 M 0.04950 πΈπ·ππ΄ EDTA 0.00873 πΏ πΈπ·ππ΄ ∗ 0.000994πππ πΆπ 1 πΏ πΆπ 0.0099 πππ πΈπ·ππ΄ 1 πΏ πΈπ·ππ΄ ∗ 40.078 π πΆπ 1 πππ πΆπ ∗ ∗ 1 0.1 πΏ πππ‘ππ 1000 ππ 1π =0.000994 M Ca =39.85 ppm 63.16 ∗ 100% = 59.50% πππππ£πππ¦ 106.15 3 EXPERIMENT 9: REAL WORLD PROJECT Conclusion: Overall, the experiment was successful up to the point of the spike recovery. A whole new EDTA solution had to be made just for the spike solution, because I had run out prior to this portion of the lab. Because the new EDTA solution was not the same as the one prior to the spike, there was some error to be had. Along with this, I also decided to use a 0.06 M HCl to dissolve the CaCO3, rather than the 0.15 M in the previous lab, so this also added to the error.