2009 EEC 4940 Internship Experience Evaluation - Rubric
by Florida Gulf Coast University
Assessment
Task Description
The candidate interns in a K-12 classroom for 12 weeks, assuming full responsibility for teaching for 6 weeks. During
that time period, s/he demonstrates competency in each of the Florida Educator Accomplished Practices through both
performance and product-based measures, the results of which are summarized in this evaluation, which is comprised
of multiple indicators for each Practice. (Base Standards 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12)
2009 EEC 4940 Internship Experience Evaluation - Rubric
2009 EEC 4940 Internship Experience Evaluation - Rubric
Target (3 pts)
Acceptable (2 pts)
Unacceptable (1 pt)
Task Criterion 1 FEAP.1
The candidate (1) uses a variety of informal performancebased assessments to determine students’ performance of
specified outcomes; (2) modifies instruction based on
assessed student performance; (3) uses student readiness
and performance data to plan for instruction; (4) assesses
individual and group performance to design
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
likely.
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
to harm a child.
Task Criterion 2 FEAP.2
The candidate (1) establishes positive interactions between
teacher candidate and students; (2) communicates
procedures/behaviors effectively using verbal and nonverbal
styles with all students; (3) maintains standards of mutually
respectful interaction during all activities; (4) provides all
students with opportunities to learn from each other; (5)
motivates, encourages and supports individual and group
inquiry; (6) communicates with colleagues, school specialists,
administrators and families consistently and appropriately;
and (7) uses written communication effectively including
correct sentence structure, spelling, punctuation, and
grammar.
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
likely.
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
to harm a child.
Task Criterion 3 FEAP.3
The candidate (1) uses data from own learning environments
as basis for reflecting upon and experimenting with personal
teaching practices; (2) shows evidence of continuous
reflection and improvement in own performance in
teacher/learning activities and in an increased capacity to
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
Missing
facilitate learning for all students; (3) works as member
likely.
to harm a child.
Task Criterion 4 FEAP.4
The candidate (1) chooses varied teaching strategies,
materials, and technologies to expand students’ thinking
abilities; (2) includes problems, dilemmas and questions in
lessons that involve value knowledge and that require
evaluative thinking; and (3) teaches cause and effect
relationships, and helps students make judgments based on
evidence.
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
likely.
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
to harm a child.
Task Criterion 5 FEAP.5
The candidate (1) models acceptance, high expectations and
support for all students; (2) uses appropriate teaching
techniques and strategies to instruct all students effectively;
(3) maintains a learning environment in which all students are
treated equitably; and (4) uses a range of activities to
effectively meet students’ learning styles and cultural and
linguistic backgrounds.
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
likely.
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
to harm a child.
Task Criterion 6 FEAP.6
The candidate (1) adheres to the Florida Code of Ethics, as
well as school and county codes; (2) is responsible and
dependable when dealing with students, families and
colleagues; (3) demonstrates a professional concern for the
well-being of students; (4) demonstrates emotional maturity
and balance; (5) meets expectations regarding responsibility,
attendance, punctuality, and professionalism; and (6)
demonstrates enthusiasm and a positive attitude toward
teaching.
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
likely.
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
to harm a child.
Task Criterion 7 FEAP.7
The candidate (1) recognizes the developmental level of each
student as demonstrated by behavior, writings, and
responses; (2) guides students to recognize links between old
knowledge and experience and new knowledge; (3)
implements activities that engage and motivate students at
appropriate developmental levels; and (4) presents
information at varying levels of complexity to provide
meaningful input for students at various levels of
development.
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
likely.
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
to harm a child.
Task Criterion 8 FEAP.8
The candidate (1) presents accurate subject matter
information; (2) demonstrates breadth of knowledge by links
made across subject areas and/or related topics; and (3)
incorporates references, materials and technologies as
appropriate to levels of learners.
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
likely.
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
to harm a child.
Task Criterion 9 FEAP.9
The candidate (1) manages student behavior through routines
and consistent application of rules and standards; (2) designs
appropriate instructional activities to meet students’ cognitive,
linguistic and affective needs in individual, small and large
group settings; (3) monitors student activities and behavior;
(4) uses specific praise often and appropriately; (5) uses
student learning time efficiently; and (6) provide clear
directions for instructional activities.
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
likely.
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
to harm a child.
Task Criterion 10 FEAP.10
The candidate (1) plans instructional activities based on
appropriate standards and benchmarks; (2) plans a variety of
activities that support student learning; (3) provides
comprehensible instruction; (4) assists students in use of
appropriate, available resources; (5) presents concepts in a
variety of methods; (6) modifies instruction based on
reflection of own practice; and (7) incorporates
interdisciplinary approaches in planning and instruction.
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
likely.
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
to harm a child.
Task Criterion11 FEAP.11
The candidate (1) advocates for students; (2) communicates
and cooperates with families to ensure student success; (3)
communicates and cooperates with colleagues to ensure
student success; (4) works effectively with school volunteers;
(5) demonstrates interest in and support of school activities;
and (6) works effectively with cooperating teacher to develop
knowledge base and expand use of instructional strategies.
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
likely.
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
to harm a child.
Task Criterion 12 FEAP.12
The candidate (1) uses available technology to enhance
instruction and management of instruction; (2) teaches
students to use available technology for instructional and
motivational purposes; (3) incorporates use of technology into
instruction and student motivation as appropriate; and (4)
exhibits a willingness to learn new technological applications
and openness to use technology for instruction and record
management.
There are minor errors
in the work, but the
candidate is likely to
self-correct over time.
No harm to children is
likely.
There is at least one major
error in the work which
shows a lack of
understanding of the
concept and/or the potential
to harm a child.
Standards
FEAP.1
ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE #1: Assessment
FEAP.2
ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE #2: Communication
FEAP.3
ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE #3: Continuous Improvement
FEAP.4
ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE #4: Critical-thinking
FEAP.5
ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE #5: Diversity
FEAP.6
ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE #6: Ethics
FEAP.7
ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE #7: Human Development and Learning
FEAP.8
ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE #8: Knowledge of Subject Matter
FEAP.9
ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE #9: Learning Environments
FEAP.10 ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE # 10: Planning
FEAP.11 ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE #11: Role of the Teacher
FEAP.12 ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICE #12: Technology (revised 9-4-03)