GRIFFITH GRANTS FOR LEARNING AND TEACHING
FINAL REPORT (GROUP PROJECTS AND STRATEGIC PRIORITY SCHEMES)
Project team - please complete the relevant sections in the areas provided.
Questions which are not required to be answered by School/program or Course based
grant holders are indicated with an #.
Section 1 – Project Details
Project Team to complete
Project Title
Level
Group Projects Scheme
Strategic Group/Discipline based projects (1year, up to $50,000)
School/Program based projects (1 year, up to $20,000)
Course based projects (1 year, up to $5,000)
Strategic Priority Scheme
University/Group/Discipline based project (1 year up to $25,000)
School/Program based project (1 year up to $15,000)
Course based project (1 year up to $5,000)
Project Leader
Project Team
Year grant was
awarded
Institutional/OLT
priority the grant
aligns with
Section 2 – Endorsement
Project Team to complete
Has your Head of School/Department or element seen and
endorsed this report?
Has your Dean/Deputy Dean
(Learning and Teaching) seen and endorsed this report?
Only required for Strategic/Discipline based projects
Yes
No
N/A
Yes
No
N/A
Grants Review Committee Chair to complete
Report endorsed
Endorsed with recommendations
Please specify:
Not endorsed
Reasons for not endorsing:
Records updated (Learning Futures to update reports schedule and database)
Section 3 – Executive Summary
Project Team to complete
Section 4 – Project Report
Project Team to complete
FEEDBACK FROM PREVIOUS PROGRESS REPORTS:

Yes
Has the Committee’s feedback from the last report been addressed?
No N/A
If Yes, indicate how the feedback has been addressed
If no, provide a rationale for why the feedback has not been addressed
PROJECT AIMS:
PROJECT OUTCOMES AND DELIVERABLES:
PROJECT EVALUATION (Attach evaluation report):

Formative and summative evaluation processes used

Evaluation findings

Lessons learnt: analysis of difficulties and critical success factors

Recommendations for future development of the project
PROJECT IMPACT: provide evidence of the impact of your project

On student outcomes

On staff learning and teaching practices

On the School/Faculty/Group/University (# not required for Course based
projects)

Other impact or outcomes (e.g., graduate outcomes in terms of feedback from
the profession, sector etc.) (# not required for School/Program based or
Course based projects)
PROJECT EMBEDDING AND GENERALISABILITY: (# section not required for Course
based projects)

Analysis of and actions taken for embedding the project as ongoing
sustainable practice within the University

Analysis of the potential application of the project to other areas of the
University

Potential of the project to be developed further within the sector (# not required
for level School/Program based projects)
PROJECT DISSEMINATION:

Ways the project outcomes have or will be shared within the School &/or
Faculty/Group &/or across the University

Ways the project outcomes have or will be shared across the sector (# not
required School/Program based or Course based projects)
OTHER COMMENTS:
Section 5 – Budget Report
Project Team to complete. Please provide a detailed budget showing how this grant was
expended
EXPENDITURE ITEM:
AMOUNT EXPENDED
Personnel
Equipment
Travel
Running expenses
Other
TOTAL
Have all claims been expended against this account so that it can be closed?
Yes
No
If no, when do you anticipate that this account can be closed?
Section 6 – Assessment of Report
Grants Review Committee to complete
FEEDBACK FROM PREVIOUS PROGRESS REPORTS:

Yes
Has the project team addressed the Committee’s feedback on previous
progress reports?
No
N/A
If no, has the rationale provided by the team been convincing?
Yes
No
N/A
Comments:
PROJECT AIMS:

Has this project aligned with institutional priorities? (not relevant for Course
based projects)
No
Yes

High value priority
Was the grant implemented as described?
No
Comments:
Yes
Exceeded expectations

None
What substantive changes (if any) have there been to the original grant
application plan, staffing or time line?
Minimal
Substantial
Indicate key changes:

To what extent has evidence been provided of action taken to problem solve
and overcome potential or actual problems?
Minimal
Emerging
Strongly
Indicate evidence:
PROJECT OUTCOMES AND DELIVERABLES:

No
Has the project achieved its stated outcomes?
Yes
Exceeded expectations
Identify:
 Has the project achieved its stated deliverables?
No
Yes
Exceeded expectations
Identify:
PROJECT EVALUATION (Attach evaluation report if one was conducted):

Minimal
To what extent has evidence been provided for the evaluation of processes
and outcomes?
Emerging
Strongly
Describe evidence:
PROJECT IMPACT:

Minimal
To what extent has evidence been provided of the impact on student
outcomes?
Moderate
Significant
N/A
Identify:
 To what extent has evidence been provided of the impact on staff
outcomes?
Minimal
Moderate
Significant
N/A
Identify:
 To what extent has evidence been provided of the impact on
School/Faculty/Group/ Institutional outcomes? (limited capacity with Course
based projects)
Minimal
Moderate
Significant
N/A
Identify:
PROJECT EMBEDDING AND GENERALISABILITY: (limited capacity with Course
based projects)

To what extent are there mechanisms in place for the project processes or
outcomes to become mainstreamed/ embedded as standard practice?
Minimal
Emerging
Strongly
Comments:
 What is the potential for this project to be related to other Griffith projects?
None
Minimal
Substantial
Comments:
 What is the potential for upgrading to a national competitive OLT grant?
Minimal
Requires considerable work
Very competitive
Is already successful
N/A
Comments:
PROJECT DISSEMINATION:

School
What is the potential for wider dissemination of the project’s outcomes?
Faculty/Group
Whole of University
National
N/A
Comments:
PROJECT SCHOLARSHIP: (generally not relevant for Course based projects)
 What scholarly outcomes have resulted from this grant?
None
Local
National
International
Describe specific outcomes:
Conference
presentations______________________________________________________
Conference papers
___________________________________________________________
Refereed
publications_________________________________________________________
Other
______________________________________________________________________
OTHER COMMENTS:
 Summary of Committee’s feedback

Grant holders response to Committee’s feedback