UNEP DTIE OzonAction Programme
ANNUAL MEETING OF THE REGIONAL OZONE NETWORK
FOR EUROPE & CENTRAL ASIA, BELGRADE, SERBIA,
AND
ROUNDTABLE ON CLIMATE & OZONE-FRIENDLY TECHNOLOGIES IN
REFRIGERATION & AIR-CONDITIONING
BELGRADE, SERBIA, 10-13 MAY 2011
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE SUMMARY
25 Evaluation Questionnaires returned by the participants
1 = excellent … 3 = fair … 5 = poor
1. What is your overall evaluation of the meeting?
1  - 10
2  - 11
3-2
4 - 1
5-1
Comments:
 Very useful
 Excellent
2. Has the agenda been balanced leaving sufficient time for discussion?
1 - 1
2 - 8
3 - 13
4 - 3
Comments:
 Yes,excellent
 Overloaded
 Overloaded by presentations
 Time for discussions is not sufficient
Document1
Page 1 of 3
UNEP DTIE OzonAction Programme
3. Was the composition of participants appropriate?
1 - 9
2 - 12
3 - 3
5 - 1
Comments:
4. Was the quality of resource persons appropriate?
1 - 12
2 - 10
3 - 1
4 - 1
5 - 1
Comments:
5. Are you satisfied with the local organisation and travel arrangements?
1 - 11
2 - 8
3 - 1
4 - 3
5 - 1
Comments:
 Very bad translation
6. Has the workshop met its objectives?
1 - 9
2 - 12
3 - 1
4 - 2
5 - 1
Comments:
7. Please indicate those presentations which should be translated either from English to
Russian or from Russian to English:
 All (KYR)
 All technical presentations (TKM)
 More translations on new technologies and alternatives (TKM)
 Hungary’s presentation (RUS)
 Presentations 39 & 40 (RUS)
 Presentation 08 (TAJ)
 Was extremely unsatisfied by the translation. The translators didn’t know the
terminology. Often without completing the previous sentence they started to
translate the new one. For me personally it was extremely difficult to follow the
presenter. (TAJ)
Document1
Page 2 of 3
UNEP DTIE OzonAction Programme
8. Please suggest how future meetings could be improved:
 It is desirable to invite good translators (AZB)
 I propose that meeting should have less presentations and consist of more days
(SER)
 Less presentations, more time for discussions. Future meetings – 3 days
(MAC)
 I think that the meetings should have less presentations and more discussions
(SER)
 I think that the meetings should have less presentations. (SER)
 We would appreciate if you could reconsider organizational matter of
accommodation – you should enable the participant to have freedom to choose
accommodation as it is a common practice with UNEP COPs MOPs and other
UNEP regional meetings under other MEAs. (BiH)
 It is desirable to have more discussions between the participants (SER)
 Creation of working groups on experience exchange on specific problems
(RUS)
 Reduce the number of presentations. To focus on 2-3 topics maximum. More
time for discussion (UNIDO)
 It is desirable not to have large scientific presentations and allow more time
for discussing new technologies (TKM)
 Maybe first representatives of associations, technicians or engineers should
discuss the technical issues under a supervision of a professor who is also
responsible to prepare an information note from the results of the discussions
for the NOU officers; and then a roundtable meeting should be organized.
(TUR)
 Short presentations and more discussions with scientists and experts (TKM)
 First of all the meeting should be following the time limit and all the issues
should be highlighted to the point. Although the meeting met its objectives
still there were shortcomings. On the whole the materials discussed were very
useful. The information I got will be helpful in my further work in taking
decisions. (TKM)
Document1
Page 3 of 3