Samantha Nock GCSE Science Investigation 2011 Prediction: For this experiment I must investigate the changes in the rates of reaction between Hydrochloric Acid and Sodium Thiosulphate, when one variable in the experiment is changed. The variables that are possible in my experiment are heat, concentration and surface area and will all affect the rate of reactions. Since the chemicals that I’m working with are liquids it would be very difficult to control so I will exclude that method and test concentration and heat in my preliminary methods. I predict that when either the heat is increased or the concentration is higher then the rate of the reaction will be a lot faster. For example as the concentration of Sodium Thiosulphate decreases the rate of the reaction will do the same because there are less thiosulphate particles to react with the hydrochloric acid. When temperature increases the then the rate of reaction will speed up because the particles in the solution are moving quicker because the heat is giving the particles energy and therefore are colliding more often. Scientific Theory: The rate of a reaction is how fast a chemical reaction happens. Some reactions are almost instantaneous whilst others can take years to finish. For example, dynamite exploding is very quick but rusting can take years to happen. We can only calculate a rate of a reaction by seeing how much of a reactant has been used in a certain amount of time. The collision theory: In order for any reaction to take place, particles in a substance must collide. The faster the chemicals collide the quicker the reaction. There are several factors that can increase the rate of collisions: 1. Surface Area If the particle size decreases, this means that the reaction will be faster because the surface are of the chemical has increased so there is more chemical to be reacted. Large Pebbles Small Pebbles Here are some pebbles being dissolved in water. The smaller pebbles will dissolve quicker as there is more surface area of the pebbles for the water particles to react with. Samantha Nock GCSE Science Investigation 2011 2. Concentration When substances are dissolved in water like acid we can control the concentration of the liquid. If there is more acid then then there are more particles which causes collisions to be more likely with a substance that can be put into the solution. Therefore the rate of reaction increases. Here are two beakers with different concentrations of acid. There are magnesium strips being reacted in the acid solutions. 1 2 The magnesium is more likely to collide with the acid in number 2 as the acid is more concentrated. 3. Temperature Increasing the temperature can affect the rate of a reaction in two ways: As the temperature increases then this causes particles to move more quickly which makes collisions more likely in a certain amount of time. As the temperature increases the particles gain more energy so collisions are more likely to occur and result in a reaction. 4. Catalyst Catalysts are substances that can increase the rate of a reaction. At the end of any reaction however they remain unchanged. An enzyme is a natural occurring biological enzyme. This scientific explanation will be used throughout investigation to explain certain aspects if the experiments. Apparatus list: Conical Flask Beaker Small and Large measuring cylinder Stirrer Pipette Samantha Nock GCSE Science Investigation 2011 Thermometer Stopwatch 1molar of Hydrochloric Acid 0.1molar of Sodium Thiosulphate Distilled water Bunsen Burner Gauze Tripod Black Marker Pen Preliminary Experiments: I have carried out preliminary experiments because it helps me to see how to carry out my experiment according to the variables. For example the amount of each chemical I should use and how other things affect my results. I have ruled out the methods of using catalysts as I do not have any to use, and surface area because since the chemicals are liquids then I cannot control the surface area in any easy way therefore I tested these two methods of investigating the rate of reaction: 1. Heat: In this experiment I kept the amount of hydrochloric acid and sodium thiosulphate the same each time at 20ml each. But I changed the temperature of the solution each time. Starting at room temperature of about 20C then increasing by 10C each time up to 60C. Firstly I drew a cross on the bottom of the conical flask, this will help me tell when the reaction has finished. Next I used a beaker of water which I boiled to 60C first on a tripod and gauze over a Bunsen flame. I then measured 20ml of each chemical (making sure to wash the measuring cylinder in between so the chemicals wouldn’t mix too early) and put them both into the conical flask and then quickly put the flask into the beaker of water and pressed START on the stopwatch. I waited until I could not see the cross I drew on the bottom of the conical flask before I stopped the stopwatch and recorded the time. I repeated this at other temperature going down from 60C by 10 each time and recorded the results shown below: Samantha Nock Hydrochloric acid (ml) 20 20 20 20 20 GCSE Science Investigation 2011 Sodium Thiosulphate (ml) 20 20 20 20 20 Temperature (C) 20- Room temp. 30 40 50 60 Time (Minutes: Seconds) 1:40 0:51 0:45 0:43 0:34 The conclusion I can make from these results is that the higher the temperature the quicker the rate of reaction. This is because the heat is making the particles in the solution move quicker and therefore more likely to collide and the reaction happens faster. Also I can see that I have used an appropriate amount of each chemical as they are both the same amount and the reaction took a reasonable amount of time to happen. However the experiment isn’t very accurate. It is hard to control the temperature of the water as it is always changing and either needs to be heated up or cooled down at inconvenient times. This therefore makes my experiment inaccurate as the temperatures would not have been exact and would have affected my results. Because of this, heat is not the best method to use for investigating the rate of reactions as it is difficult to control and affects my results. 2. Concentration: I started with 20ml of each chemical with no distilled water added. To do this I drew a cross with black marker on the bottom of the conical flask, measured 20ml of each chemical with the measuring cylender. Then added them both to the conical flask and started the stopwatch. I recorded the time it took for the cross to not be seen, which told me the reaction had finished, to stop the stopwatch and record the time. The next one I did I added 2ml of water with the two chemicals. I repeated what I did for the previous test and recorded the time. I repeated it again twice more with 4ml and 6ml of water added and got these results: Samantha Nock Hydrochloric acid (ml) 20 20 20 20 GCSE Science Investigation 2011 Sodium Thiosulphate (ml) 20 20 20 20 Distilled water (ml) 0 2 4 6 Time (minutes: seconds) 2:22 2:37 2:08 2:37 For the first two tests I stirred the solutions and the second two I did not. Here it seems to show that this makes the reaction go faster. Maybe I have doing the experiment incorrectly and not knowingly changing a variable but it is definitely something to consider. The successful aspect about this experiment is that I can see the effects in the times as the distilled water is added, this shows that the experiment is viable. But however I have changed more than one variable in this test. In this experiment I have to keep the total amount of liquid in the reaction the same by reducing the amount of thiosulphate each time as I add distilled water to change the concentration of the solution. This is the way to keep the experiment fair. Therefore the hydrochloric acid will stay at the same volume of 20ml but the sodium thiosulphate will change whilst the distilled water increases so together they will make 20ml in order for the total volume of liquid to remain at 40ml. This is the best method which I will use for this investigation as it is efficient to control and usually accurate. Method: Firstly I drew a cross on the underside of the conical flask which would be used to see whether the reactions have completed. Next I measured 20ml of sodium thiosulphate using the measuring cylinder then added it to the clean conical flask. Then I washed the measuring cylinder and measured 20ml of hydrochloric acid. This was then added quickly to the conical flask with the sodium and the stopwatch was started as soon as possible. I stirred the solution with a stirrer also. I watched the solution until I could no longer see the cross through the liquid which went a cloudy pale yellow. At which point I stopped the stopwatch because I knew the reaction had completed. I recorded the time on a table. Samantha Nock GCSE Science Investigation 2011 I then washed all the equipment before starting the next test. Here I reduced the amount of sodium thiosulphate to 17.5ml and added 2.5ml of water to it. Which reduces the concentration of sodium and the amount of liquid I use still equates to 40ml altogether. I then added 20ml of hydrochloric acid, remembering to wash the apparatus in between chemicals, and started timing. I recorded the total time for that test. I carried on this same process but decreasing the amount of sodium thiosulphate and increasing the amount of distilled water each time in this order. 20:20, 17.5:2.5, 15:5, 12.5:7.5, 10:10, 7.5:12.5, 5:15, 2.5:17.5. During this the amount of hydrochloric acid stays the same in order to make the experiment a fair test by only changing the one variable. I also repeated the whole experiment two more times in order to make sure I get the most accurate results possible. Results: Hydrochloric acid (ml) Distilled water (ml) Time (seconds) Average time (seconds) 20 Sodium Thiosulphate (ml) 20 0 91 20 17.5 2.5 20 15 5 20 12.5 7.5 20 10 10 20 7.5 12.5 20 5 15 20 2.5 17.5 101 84 89 108 120 110 119 119 117 118 164 204 266 187 243 426 416 295 511 435 446 537 548 507 The highlighted times are outliers 113 118 185 255 421 441 531 Samantha Nock GCSE Science Investigation 2011 Graph: The graph of my results shows a steady negative correlation. This shows the relation between the concentration and the time taken for the reaction to take place; which is that as the concentration decreases, the time taken for the reaction to happen increases. This is because as the concentration decreases there are less thiosulphate particles to react with the hydrochloric acid which slows the rate of reaction down significantly with each reduction in concentration of thiosulphate. My graph also shows several outliers (circled results) which may have occurred due to faulty equipment or a mistake in the recording of results. The error bars show the range of what each record could fall in. This gives me an idea of how results can vary with each test and that the rates of reactions cannot be accurately predicted. Conclusion: My results show a correlation between concentration and rates of reaction but not a definite cause of concentration can either speed up or slow down a reaction. I can see that my experiment had many outliers. This shows that my experiment was probably not very accurate. These outliers were probably caused by faulty equipment or incorrect measuring of chemicals or recording the results incorrectly. Because of this my experiment may not show an accurate link between time and concentration. I could improve this investigation by taking more time to measure out my chemicals and to make sure that I have waited long enough to see that the reactions have finished so as the results are true and accurate. I also need to take special care in recording my results to make sure I don’t make a mistake. I should check that all of my equipment works and are in the correct units if I’m measuring something. This will reduce the amount of outliers I get and will probably create a more acceptable graph of results. Overall my conclusion is that as the concentration decreases in volume, the rate of the reaction also decreases. This is caused by the lack of sodium thiosulphate particles to collide with the hydrochloric acid particles to create a quick reaction. So concentration affects the rate of reaction significantly and is shown as a negative correlation on a graph.