DONOR SUPPLEMENT
1
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROGRAMME-BASED APPROACH – DONOR GUIDANCE ........................................................................... 5
CLUSTER PROGRAMME ONE-PAGERS ......................................................................................................... 7
AGRICULTURE................................................................................................................................................... 8
COORDINATION & SUPPORT SERVICES ..................................................................................................... 10
EDUCATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 11
FOOD ................................................................................................................................................................ 11
HEALTH ............................................................................................................................................................ 13
LICI .................................................................................................................................................................... 16
MULTI-SECTOR................................................................................................................................................ 19
NUTRITION ....................................................................................................................................................... 24
PROTECTION ................................................................................................................................................... 28
WASH ................................................................................................................................................................ 34
EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND ................................................................................................................... 38
ANNEX I
CAP 2011 CLUSTER COORDINATOR CONTACT LIST ............................................................ 39
ANNEX II
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................... 40
3
4
PROGRAMME-BASED APPROACH – DONOR GUIDANCE
The aim of this ‘Donor Supplement’ document is to summarize the programme-based Consolidated Appeal
Process (CAP) approach, including the logic behind introducing it in the Zimbabwe context. The document
lies out the individual CAP programmes by cluster and outlines the procedures that have been agreed to
support these programmes. This Supplement is a ‘Living Document’, which will be reviewed quarterly by the
clusters in order to provide donors with a timely overview of accomplishments, gaps and challenges in the
implementation of the 2011 Zimbabwe CAP.
Rationale and development
Different funding strategies and strategic frameworks have been developed in Zimbabwe in an attempt to
address the complexity of the humanitarian situation and underlying structural deficits. Some of the elements
in the various strategies and frameworks have overlapped with the strategic priorities set out in the CAP.
During 2010, key humanitarian stakeholders became increasingly concerned that the agency-specific project
approach applied in Zimbabwe’s CAP no longer provided the strategic analysis required to support the
required programming and interventions in the still highly volatile, yet improving situation. The Humanitarian
Country Team (HCT) therefore agreed that the programme-based approach provides a more strategic, flexible
and time sensitive framework to address the evolving situation in Zimbabwe.
To address these concerns, HCT participants at the CAP 2011 workshop held on 1 September 2010
endorsed a programme-based approach. The approach is to be supported by robust information management
and will rely on the clusters to develop holistic, cluster-specific programmes that are owned by all partners
active in the cluster working group. Aiming to link real-time priority needs with costing at the cluster level, the
approach expands the engagement of cluster coordinators with cluster members, the Government and donors
and also partners accountable for cluster achievements.
Through the programme-based approach, the role of the clusters is strengthened. In particular, cluster
coordinators are responsible for developing a more coordinated and strategic humanitarian response,
including closer alignment with Government priorities. Further, the approach provides a unique opportunity for
increased strategic dialogue with donors on crucial areas requiring funding as well as discussions on the most
effective means to channel anticipated funds.
Implementation
Under the programme-based approach, cluster partners have worked together to develop cluster-specific
programmes that provide a detailed overview of the needs, activities and outcomes in each of the cluster
priority areas. The clusters have then, costed the programmes using average costs and taking into
consideration available capacities and access issues. Using the activities outlined in the cluster programmes,
individual cluster will then, develop individual project proposals. Their activities, once funded, will be
monitored on a regular basis by the cluster.
The clusters will advocate that funding for cluster programmes be channelled either through bi-lateral
agreements or through other arrangements, such as pooled funds (e.g. the Education Transition Fund).
Transparent and accountable donor engagement will contribute to the systematic tracking of donor funding
through the OCHA Financial Tracking Service (FTS). This will enable clusters to consolidated funding
information for humanitarian and transition activities and to provide donors with up-to-date priority
requirements.
Each cluster has formed a task force to monitor the progress made on priority programme areas, which will
enable the cluster coordinators to advise donors on the most pressing priorities at any given time. As agencyspecific projects will only be developed immediately prior to funding decisions, regular consultation between
donors and cluster coordinators as well as OCHA on future funding arrangements will be very important. In
this way, donors will be able to take full advantage of the increased strategic focus of the 2011 CAP to ensure
their funding targets priority needs of the most vulnerable populations in Zimbabwe.
Guidance for Donors
5
Over the past few months, clusters have worked together to ‘unpacked’ the CAP programmes, including
calculating financial requirements by agency, geographic and/or thematic area of the programme. Detailed
discussions have also been held on preferred funding arrangements. The Donor Supplement summaries the
numerous planning worksheets, which are based on agreements made on standardizing activities and on
distributing responsibilities amongst the cluster members. Cluster coordinators are ready to brief specific
donors on the detail of the discussions and decisions taken. The cluster coordinator contact list is attached as
Annex I.
In order to maximize the benefits of the programme-based approach, donors are encouraged to support the
direct implementation of international and / or national organizations, which plan and coordinate their activities
through the cluster coordination mechanisms. As a means to accommodate donors with limited in-country
fund management capacity, some of the clusters are also exploring the possibility of setting up NGO
consortiums. Other clusters have identified economies of scale opportunities by proposing funding of a single
agency to undertake the purchase of large quantities of relief items of behalf of the wider cluster membership.
The distribution of the relief items would then be undertaken by organizations in line with their comparative
geographical and operational advantages.
Although the majority of clusters feel that bi-lateral agreements remain the most appropriate funding
arrangement for implementing cluster programmes, some are also exploring alternative mechanisms. The
education cluster, for example, has proposed a pool fund in support of its programmes in line with the
successful first phase of the Education Transition Fund in 2009/10.
The following standard operational procedures (SOPs) are intended to guide donors in identifying how to
effectively channel funding to the 2011 Zimbabwe CAP:
Step 1a:
Step 1b:
Donor X expresses interest in funding the Zimbabwe CAP 2011 OR
Donor X is approached by an organisation with a request to fund humanitarian and / or early
recovery activities for Zimbabwe in 2011
Step 2a:
Step 2b:
Donor X contacts OCHA Zimbabwe (see Annex I) for a briefing on priority areas and humanitarian
developments as well as coordination / funding frameworks issues OR
Donor X contacts cluster Y coordinator directly (see Annex I) for up-to-date information on cluster
priorities, programme implementation and preferred cluster funding mechanism, and indicates any
potential constraints that could impact the channelling of funding
Step 3:
Donor X makes an informed decision to support cluster Y
Step 4:
Donor X reviews Zimbabwe CAP 2011 cluster Y programmes in the on-line project compendium
and related guidance in the Zimbabwe CAP 2011 Donor Supplement
Step 5:
Donor X consults the Financial Tracking Service website (http://fts.unocha.org/) to get an up-todate overview of the outstanding funding requirements of cluster Y and if required, browses the
Zimbabwe humanitarian website (ochaonline.un.org/zimbabwe/) for additional background
information on cluster Y (through the navigation menu labelled ‘clusters / sectors’)
Step 7:
Cluster Y coordinator provides Donor X with recommendations from the cluster strategic advisory
group (if applicable) and facilitates contacts between the donor and potential funding recipient
agencies
Step 8:
Cluster Y coordinator (where applicable) provides guidance to recipient agencies and Donor X to
facilitate adherence to Zimbabwe CAP 2011 cluster Y programme.
6
CLUSTER PROGRAMME
SUMMARIES
7
Agriculture: BASIC AGRICULTURAL INPUTS (ZIM-11/A/39629)
Programme Introduction
The programme aims to improve the food security status, including produce sufficient food for their own
consumption for 100,000 communal farmers. Hands-on extension activities will support farmers to improve
their farming practices, which will be combined with targeted inputs, which will aim to increase yields. The
target figure represents the minimum number - based on a best case scenario - who are projected to be in
need of assistance through either free or subsidised inputs for the 2011/12 season. This number and the
corresponding budget will be revised when the projected food insecurity data becomes available in June –
July 2011. Therefore, a likely increase in the number to be assisted and budget should not be taken as a sign
of the worsening of the situation.
Programme Objective
Increased food security of smallholder farmers through improved accessibility and availability of agricultural
inputs and support within farming communities through robust marketing structures to reinvigorate the
agriculture input value chain.
Agency
AAID; ACF; Africa 2000,
AFRICARE, Christian Care,
CADS, CAFOD, Caritas,
CARE, Christian Aid, Concern,
Cordaid, COSV, CRS,CTC,
DACHICCARE, DP Foundation
Environment Africa, FACHIG,
FAO, FCTZ, GAA, GOAL,
GTZ, HAZ, HELP, IRC, IRD,
ISL, LEAD Trust, LGDA, Mercy
Corps, NRC, OXFAM, PI,
PENYA Trust, Foundations for
Farming, SAT, SC, TDH,
Trocaire, WV, ZCDT, ZFU,
ZRC
TOTAL
Activity
Direct
Beneficiaries
Partners
Provision of basic agriculture
inputs to vulnerable small
holder farmers. Various
agricultural input delivery
models will be implemented
depending on the farmers’
locations and the 2010/11
cropping season assessment.
Implementation models may
include open electronic
vouchers, open paper
vouchers and direct input
distribution.
100,000 HH
AGRITEX
farmers
unions
Cost ($)
19,060,897
19,060,897
Funding Frameworks
 NGOs : Bilateral agreements between donors and partners
 UN: Bilateral agreements between Donors and partners
AGRICULTURE: INCREASED LIVESTOCK PRODUCTIVITY (ZIM-11/A/39631)
Programme Objective
The aim of this intervention is to support smallholder farmers within vulnerable rural communities through:
support for cash economy; replenishment of lost disposable assets; the promotion of small livestock
production (poultry, goats and rabbits) and development of sustainable production models. This will be
achieved through asset re-building, sustainable small-livestock re-stocking, and income generating programs
coupled with improved livestock production, productivity models and appropriate veterinary care.
Geographical Coverage
District
Agency
Cost ($)
Beitbridge
Gokwe North
Gwanda
Gweru
Hurungwe
Matobo,
WV
Christian Care
Christian Care, WV
Christian Care
GOAL
Christian Care, WV
300,000
100,000
500,000
100,000
600,000
528,000
Mbire,
Mudzi
CLUSA
SPWSN
150,000
180,000
8
Muzarabani
TBC
TOTAL
CLUSA
PENYA Trust
150,000
200,000
2,808,000
Funding Frameworks
 NGOs : Bilateral agreements between donors and partners
 UN: Bilateral agreements between Donors and partners
AGRICULTURE: COORDINATION (ZIM-11/CSS/39635)
Programme Title
Strengthen coordination mechanisms and early warning systems to mitigate the impact of unexpected crises
on an affected population.
Programme Objectives
To provide the agriculture sector with appropriate coordination services to ensure consistency among
interventions and to produce and disseminate accurate, timely and independent information on agriculture and
food security to be used as a basis for programming and to inform policy.
Agency
Activity
District
Province
Direct
Beneficiaries
Partners
FAO
Coordination
mechanisms
and early
warning systems
All
districts
All
Provinces
150 institutions
MoA, AGRITEX,
NGOs, UN
agencies
TOTAL
Cost ($)
1,125,397
1,125,397
Funding frameworks
 FAO: bilateral agreements with donors
AGRICULTURE: INTENSIFIED CROP PRODUCTION (ZIM-11/A/39637)
Programme Title
Improved crop productivity and commercialisation in the small holder farming sector
Programme Objectives
The objective of this intervention is to support farmers in achieving food and nutrition security as well as
improve their income base through the promotion of improved and diversified crop production.
Geographical Coverage
Province
Agency
Cost ($)
Manicaland
Masonaland Central
Mashonaland East
GOAL, Aquaculture Zimbabwe
ISL, CLUSA, Aquaculture Zimbabwe, FAO
WV, FAO
350,000
425,009
244,060
Mashonaland West
Masvingo
Matebeleland North
Matebelaland South
Midlands
TOTAL
ISL, GOAL, Aquaculture Zimbabwe; FAO
DACHICARE, Aquaculture Zimbabwe
Aquaculture Zimbabwe
Aquaculture Zimbabwe
Christian Care, CLUSA, Aquaculture Zimbabwe
Funding Frameworks
 NGOs : Bilateral agreements between donors and partners
 UN: Bilateral agreements between Donors and partners
9
230,922
250,000
444,000
150,000
208,406
2,302,397
COORDINATION & SUPPORT SERVICES: SECURITY (ZIM-11/CSS/39565)
Programme Title
Enhancing Security and Safety Coverage of Humanitarian Organizations in Field
Programme Objectives
To facilitate the delivery of humanitarian assistance and in a timely, safe and secure manner through the
deployment of security and safety resources in strategic locations in Zimbabwe.
Coverage
Agency
Activity
Geographical
coverage
Direct
Beneficiaries
Partners
Cost ($)
UNDSS
Deploy security and safety
resources in strategic
locations within the
humanitarian areas of
operations in Zimbabwe
Nationwide
NGOs, UN
agencies
NGOs, UN
agencies
230,683
TOTAL
230,683
Funding Frameworks
 UN: Bi-lateral agreements between donors and UNDSS
COORDINATION & SUPPORT SERVICES: COORDINATION (ZIM-11/CSS/39601)
Programme Title
Humanitarian Coordination and Advocacy in Zimbabwe
Programme Objectives
Strengthen humanitarian coordination and advocacy through:
 Improve effectiveness and timeliness of humanitarian and early recovery interventions by strengthening
cluster coordination
 Ensure adequate linkage between humanitarian and recovery coordination structures
 Support partners in humanitarian response preparedness
 Strengthen relationships with a wider group of operational partners and other relevant actors to advance
humanitarian and early recovery action
Coverage
Agency
OCHA
Cluster lead agencies:
FAO, UNDP, UNHCR,
UNICEF, WHO, WFP
Co-lead agencies:
OXFAM, SC, two other
NGOs (tbc)
Activity
Humanitarian
coordination,
information
management
and advocacy
Cluster
coordination
undertaken by
eight cluster
coordinators
and four NGO
cluster co-leads
Geographical
coverage
Nationwide
Nationwide
Direct
Beneficiaries
Donor
community,
Government,
NGOs, UN
agencies
Donor
community,
Government,
NGOs, UN
agencies
TOTAL
Partners
Cost ($)
Donor
community,
Government,
NGOs, UN
agencies
2,767,891
Donor
community,
Government,
NGOs, UN
agencies
1,287,204
4,055,095
*The original programme breakdown contained an error. This will be adjusted on the on-line programme shortly.
Funding Frameworks
 NGOs : Bi-lateral agreements between donors and partners
 UN: Bi-lateral agreements between donors and partners
10
EDUCATION: COORDINATION MECHANISMS & FINANCING STRUCTURES
(ZIM-11/E/39341 & 39350 & 39540 & 39542)
The Education Cluster has a dual role of strengthening national structures to improve disaster preparedness
and building programme systems to work towards sectoral early recovery objectives. The 2011 CAP, through
the four key objectives provides a basis from which this dual role can be achieved.
The Education Cluster consists of more than 200 individuals and 116 organisations. Monthly meetings are
held which include an average representation of more than 50 participants. The Cluster, which was
established as a response to the crisis in 2008, is now working towards building sector based coordination
mechanisms and is guided by the recently developed MoESAC Strategic Investment Plan (2011). This plan
highlights five sectoral priorities including: Professional Support for Teachers; Improving School and System
Infrastructure; Improving Teaching and Learning; Supporting School and System Governance; and Support
for Marginalised and Disadvantage Students. Sub-cluster working groups are being established for each of
the strategic objectives which will be lead by a Ministry counterpart, supported by an NGO with significant
capacity in the sub-sector and include technical and donor representatives who will provide a forum for
discussion, review and decision making for the development of a sub-sector strategic plan of activities,
priorities and funding needs. The Cluster lead, supported by UNICEF, will assist in the coordination of the
sub-sector working groups. Plans for these sub-sectors will form the basis of the Ministry of Education’s Five
Year Strategic Plan document, which will be an expansion of the Interim Investment Plan (2011).
Further to providing an effective platform for sector planning, the Cluster is also establishing an Emergency
Education Joint Response and Preparedness Network (EEJRPN) which consists of three main ‘umbrella’
NGOs (Save the Children, Plan International and World Vision), together with a network of smaller NGOs who
will provide a more systematic mechanism for school monitoring during crisis and disasters. National in
scope, the Network employs a large numbers of school monitoring teams, who will work hand in hand with the
Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Local Government through the Civil Protection Unit. The Network will
have a dual role of providing a rapid response mechanism for schools affected by disaster or crisis as well as
providing ongoing school level monitoring visits for at least 80% of the 6,333 schools across the country. One
of the sector’s main constraints is the lack of reliable, timely and relevant data. The work of the Network will
be critical during the 2011 school year and additional funding for these activities is actively being sought to
ensure that activities can continue until the end of the academic school year.
Funding for the education sector has been primarily sourced through the UNICEF managed Education
Transition Fund (ETF), which is a pooled/common fund through which donors have provided support to the
education sector. Contributions have been received from 12 partners including Denmark, Netherlands,
USAID, Norway, AusAID, DFID, Finland, New Zealand, SIDA, Japan, EC, and Germany (in process). The
fund, which was launched at the end of 2009, had a broad objective to support and catalyse transition in the
education sector through revitalising it and moving from crisis to early recovery. It therefore provided the
platform from which a transitional mechanism could be established for development partners to jointly support
the Ministry of Education to lead the reinvigoration of the education sector in Zimbabwe. The first phase of
the ETF which was considered to be an emergency stop-gap initiative is coming to a close and is described
as a major success in the achievement of the procurement and delivery of school text books and learning
materials for all primary school children. The second phase of the ETF is now being developed and the
Education Cluster is providing the forum for which a more detailed strategy of intervention can be developed
through the establishment of the above mentioned sub-sector working groups.
Emergency related sector activities will remain a priority for the cluster including: in-service teacher education;
support for at least 1,000 schools for water and sanitation facilities; procurement and distribution of
complimentary learning materials for students, especially early learning; the provision of schools grants and
scholarship programmes aimed at supporting remote/poor schools with a focus on ensuring girls completing a
fully cycle of basic education; special programmes for marginalised and disadvantaged students including an
out-of-school youth programme; and the support for the national Education in Emergencies NGO network.
Funding mechanisms for development partners are flexible and can be assessed based on donor and partner
priorities, capacities and local needs. Pooled or aligned funding through the ETF continues to be the
preferred option for Government and most development partners. This allows for a clearer understanding of
external contributions and ensures funds are more strategically aligned with sectoral priorities. However,
direct funding to NGOs or local partners, within the CAP sectoral objectives, is possible, with decisions of
priorities resting with partners and sub-working groups members.
FOOD: ASSISTANCE FOR FOOD-INSECURE (ZIM-11/F/39573)
11
Programme Introduction
Food sector partners seek to provide assistance to transitory food-insecure people living in order to protect
lives and livelihoods of the most affected groups (including, HIV/AIDS affected, orphans and vulnerable
children and displaced populations), as well as preserve their nutritional status. Efforts are also made to
consolidate the activities implemented in previous years and initiate early recovery activities with a view to
achieving sustainable solutions to food insecurity and inadequate nutrition. The response combines relief and
early recovery involving unconditional food support, food for asset creation, local purchase strategies, cash
transfers and vouchers.
Geographical Coverage
Direct
Beneficiaries
Partners
42
300,000 HH
Africare, IOM, HelpAge
Zimbabwe, Mashambanzou
Care Trust, CRS, Christian
Care, HELP from Germany,
ORAP, OXFAM, SC, WV, PI,
CARE, GOAL, Concern,
RMT
Seasonal
feeding, food
for asset
8
30,000 HH
CRS, CARE, ACDI
Seasonal
Feeding (3
months)
2
10,000 HH
N/A
52
340,000 HH
Agency
Activity
WFP
Seasonal
targeted
assistance,
social safety
nets through
food, cash
and vouchers,
food/cash for
asset, local
purchase
PRIZE
Christian
Care
# Districts
TOTAL
Cost ($)
134,630,641
22,000,000
2,000,000
158,630,641
Funding Frameworks
Activity
Funding frameworks
Partners
Cost (USD)
Seasonal assistance / feeding,
social safety net, food for asset
Bi-lateral agreements between
donors and partners
WFP, Christian
Care
136,630,641
Seasonal feeding, food for asset
NGO consortium (lead agency: CRS)
CARE, ACDI
TOTAL
22,000,000
158,630,641
12
HEALTH: ESSENTIAL MEDICINE (ZIM-11/H/37498)
Program Introduction
Health cluster assessments indicate that both access and quality of basic health care have been severely
hindered by lack of essential drugs at facility level. Field M&E visits indicate districts and rural health facilities
are not adequately equipped to run a functioning drug management information system. Moreover, district
health staff does not have required knowledge and skills on rational drug use and issuing prescriptions. The
donor community currently supports the purchase and distribution through NatPharm of essential medicines to
district and facility level. In support of this programme, it will be crucial for health cluster partners to support
the rational use of drugs, stocks management and supply chain/logistics with a focus on the district level in 31
priority districts. Programme objectives and activities are summarized in the table below.
Objectives
Increase the
availability of vital
drugs and
emergency
medicines for
vulnerable
children, women
and men, at clinic
level in selected
districts, by
strengthening the
district drug
management
information
system
Results
Outputs indicators
Staff trained in stock management & reporting
Timeliness and completeness of stock reporting
Support supervision visits to health facilities
Health facilities with updated stock book
Health facilities report no stock out on essential
drugs
# health professionals trained in drug use /
prescription
# health facilities with at least 1 health staff trained
on drugs’ use and prescription
% rational prescription at health facility by health
professionals
Health professionals possess
the necessary skills in stock
management and reporting of
drug information as per the
MoHCW guidelines
In the clinics and hospitals of
the targeted districts, the drug’s
prescription is rational and its
use is appropriate as per the
MoHCW guidelines
Targeted districts provided with
ICT equipments for adequate
functioning of Drug
Management Information
System; clinic / districts'
pharmacies are refurbished
Number of districts equipped with appropriate ICT
Proportion of districts reporting relevant information
on drug availability
# clinic drug store rooms refurbished
# district pharmacies rehabilitated and equipped
Geographic Coverage*
Agencies
Activity
# Districts
Partners
SC
Help Germany
MDM
MERLIN
IMC
GOAL
IRC
PLAN
TOTAL
Cost ($)
Funds secured ($)
Full program
Full program
Full program
Full program
Full program
4
2
1
6
8
MoHCW
MoHCW
MoHCW
MoHCW
MoHCW
/ RDC
/ RDC
/ RDC
/ RDC
/ RDC
288,977
144,488
72,244
433,465
577,954
Fully covered
Full program
Full program
Full program
3
3
4
31
MoHCW / RDC
MoHCW / RDC
MoHCW / RDC
216,733
216,733
288,977
2,239,571
46,000
14,180
* WHO will provide support at national, provincial and district levels as necessary and act as provider of last resort.
Concurrently to this project, UNICEF runs the essential and vital drugs supply programme supported by a pooled funding
mechanism covering overall national needs through the distribution of essential and vital medicines at the provincial and
district levels, though this programme does not cover the above set of support activities identified by the cluster.
Funding Frameworks
 NGO’s: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium (under discussion by NGOs)
 UN: bilateral agreements
 Pooled fund mechanism (under consideration)
13
HEALTH: REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (ZIM-11/H/37652)
Programme Introduction
Improve emergency reproductive health services in Zimbabwe by strengthening the service delivery and
referral system for essential maternal and newborn health care. The programme has four focus areas: 1)
ANC, delivery and PNC; 2) EmONC; 3) ASRH, and 4) Minimum initial service package. Each focus area is
comprised of a set of activities. Each organization is expected to implement the complete set of activities of
the focus area the partner indicated to be working on in 2011. Priority will be given to strengthen reproductive
health services at rural health centres and district level hospitals. Interventions at these levels will reach most
people and most vulnerable groups. However, strengthening of referral mechanisms from district level
onwards is also crucial to ensure quality comprehensive EmONC for both rural and urban populations.
Geographic Coverage
 Result 4 (MISP) will be covered by UNFPA in collaboration with implementing partners in affected areas.
 All provincial and central level hospitals will be covered by UNFPA for EmONC (result 2)
Province
Agency
Mashonaland
West
Mashonaland
Central
Mashonaland
East
Manicaland
Masvingo
Matabeleland
North
Matabeleland
South
Midlands
Bulawayo
Harare
TOTAL
UNFPA
PENYA Trust
Merlin
SC
GOAL
IMC
UNFPA
PENYA Trust
PI
PENYA Trust
PI
IOM
GOAL
MDM
IRC
PENYA Trust
UNFPA
SC
IOM
PI
UNFPA
UNFPA
SC
PI
IOM
Help Germany
UNFPA
Merlin
UNFPA
PI
-
Result
area
#
Districts
2/3
3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
3
3
1,2,3
3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2
3
3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
2/3
2/3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3
2/3
1,2,3
7/6
2
2
1
1
8
1
1
1
2
3
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
1
1
1/1
7/6
1
1
3
1
7/2
4
2/3
8/1
1,2,3
-
1
-
Coverage*
Costs ($)
4 out of 7 districs (full package)
all districts (EmONC and ASRH)
1,304,850
All 8 districts (full package)
1,079,925
1 out of 9 districts (full package)
1 district (ASRH)
1,223,109
5 out of 7 districts (full package)
remaining 2 districts (ASRH)
1,702,103
3 out of 7 districts (full package)
all districts (EmONC), 1 district (ASRH)
1,432,518
2 out of 7 districts (full package)
all districts (EmONC), 6 districts
(ASRH)
764,784
3 out of 7 districts (full package)
2 districts (ASRH), all districts
(EmONC)
708,488
3 out of 8 districts (full package)
1 district (ASRH), all districts (EmONC)
-
1,588,259
734,085
2,057,079
12,595,200
* For districts that are not covered in the current mapping exercise, WHO will act as provider of last resort to advocate for
funding and seek for implementation partners among health cluster partners.
Funding Frameworks
 NGO’s: bilateral agreements or as NGO consortium (discussions ongoing)
 UN: bilateral agreements
HEALTH: EARLY WARNING & RAPID RESPONSE (ZIM-11/H/38040)
14
Result Areas
1. Strengthened Epidemic Prone Disease Surveillance system and capacity for rapidly responding to public
health emergencies at provincial and district levels
2. Increased capacity from the community to provincial levels for emergency preparedness
Geographic Coverage Mapping
Each organization will cover all activities under each of the two results in a comprehensive package to ensure
full district coverage.
Geographic Area
Manicaland
Mashonaland West
Mashonaland Central
Mashonaland East
Midlands
Masvingo
Matebeleland North
Matebeleland South
Large Urban
(Harare, Chitungwiza
Bulawayo)
Agencies
GOAL
PI
FACT
IOM
MDM
IRC
ARDeZ
Merlin
SC
GOAL
IMC
PI
ARDeZ
SC
Merlin
ARDeZ
SC
PI
IOM
ARDeZ
PI
SC
ARDeZ
PI
IOM
Help Germany
WHO
Christian Care
WV
# Districts
1
3
7
4
1
3
2
2
1
3
8
1
1
1
4
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
Coverage*
Cost ($)
All 7 districts covered
1,835,433
6 out of 7 districts covered
1,464,184
All 8 districts covered
969,996
2 out of 9 districts covered
1,224,967
6 out of 8 districts covered
1,752,885
6 out of 7 districts covered
1,581,009
3 out of 7 districts covered
844,060
5 out of 7 districts covered
781,925
All 3 cities/urban areas covered
TOTAL
3,052,922
13,507,381
* Note that WHO as cluster lead agency will act as provider of last resort where no partners are identified to cover the
program needs.
Funding Frameworks
 NGO’s: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium
 UN: bilateral agreements
15
LICI: CAPACITY BUILDING (ZIM-11/ER/39583)
Programme Introduction
The aim of the programme is to support small-scale community-level infrastructure schemes, access to
markets and commercial linkages, which will augment and complement other local recovery initiatives when
implemented and strengthen the communities’ response capacities to new crisis.
Geographic Coverage
Agency
Activity
Geographical area
SCC
Capacity building for local
organizations responsible for
rural households
Mashonaland West and East,
Masvingo, Matebelelands,
Manicaland, Midlands
UNHABITAT
Sustainable Community
Planning and Implementation
Covering all districts
UNDP
IRC
IOM
AFRICARE
Early recovery coordination
Matebelelands, Midlands,
capacity strengthened on all
Manicaland, Mashonaland
levels
West
provide support to institutions
responsible for supporting the
social development and
Manicaland
economic recovery of
households
Technical skills training for women,
youth and community
Masvingo, Matebelelands
Associations in high migrant
South, Bulawayo, Manicaland
sending areas
Capacity building of micro
Manicaland
enterprises
TOTAL
Beneficiaries
Cost ($)
600,000
460,165
1,183,420
5000
3,000,000
18,000
1,800,000
1 000
1,250,000
1 000
450 000
8,146,585
*The original 2011 CAP programme funding request is for $ 1,230,769. After in-depth mapping and intra-cluster
discussions on the division of activities the total request has been adjusted to $8,146,585, while the overall total
requirements of the three LICI programmes still come to $31,086,067
Funding Frameworks
 NGO’s: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium (preparatory discussions amongst some
NGO partners are underway)
 UN: bilateral agreements
16
LICI: INFRASTRUCTURE (ZIM-11/ER/39592)
Programme Introduction
The aim of the programme is to provide support to institutions responsible for supporting the social
development and economic recovery of households in Zimbabwe, in order to strengthen local authorities’
(LAs) critical role in developing, implementing and coordinating time-sensitive recovery schemes as well as to
increase their capacity to reduce future disasters.
Geographic Coverage Mapping
Agency
Mushawasha
Development
Trust
AEA, Africa
2000
Activity
Small scale irrigation scheme,
feeder roads rehabilitated, 1
bridge construction, 5 community
centres established, public works
programme re-established
Support construction of
infrastructure for irrigation and
gardening and rehabilitate dams
Geographical area
Beneficiaries
Cost ($)
Masvingo
2,000
145,000
Manicaland, Masvingo,
Matebelelands
50,000
Jonpris
Foundation
Establishing marketing, vending
places and community centres /
skills training centre
Manicaland
800
UNDP
Restoring infrastructure for
economic recovery in rural areas
with focus on market access
All provinces
100,000
TOTAL
3,000,000
716,500
5,808,487
9,861,500
*The original 2011 CAP programme funding request is for $11,390,769. After in-depth mapping and intra-cluster
discussions on the division of activities the total request has been adjusted to $9,861,500, while the overall total
requirements of the three LICI programmes still come to $31,086,067
Funding Frameworks
 NGO’s: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium (preparatory discussions amongst some
NGO partners are underway)
 UN: bilateral agreements
17
LICI: ECONOMIC LIVELIHOODS (ZIM-11/ER/39593)
Programme Introduction
The aim of the programme is to support and improve livelihoods through job creation, skills, micro-enterprise
recovery and development and quick impact initiatives that serve to reduce the vulnerability of those most
affected by the crisis, reduce dependence on negative coping strategies and particularly reduce dependence
on humanitarian aid
Geographic Coverage
Agency
Activity
Geographical area
Beneficiaries
Cost ($)
Provision of microfinance services
CARE, SCC,
Tony Waites
Organization,
PENYA Trust
Micro finance activities for rural
communities/ women and youth
IOM
Community initiatives through the
Diaspora engagement and micro
finance for migrants returning
Masvingo, Harare,
Mashonaland East /
West, Midlands,
Matebelelands,
Manicaland
Masvingo,
Bulawayo,
Manicaland,
Matebelelands
650,000
4,190,000
6,000
3,690,695
Job creation, skills development, market access and employment linkages with the private sector for trained
participants
Mercy Corps,
Simuka Africa,
NRC
Business training and market
linkages, youth job creation and
entrepreneurship, market linkages
and vocational training
Masvingo,
Manicaland
64,000
1,952,000
Production, business development and market linkages
Saodi, FOST
Aquaculture
Zimbabwe
Value Addition
Project Trust
Productive spaces and skills
development
Development and improvement of
post-harvest management, foodfish processing methods to value
add the kapenta and bream
harvests
Business access for women and
youth
TOTAL
Midlands,
Mashonalands
6,000
760,000
Mashonaland West,
Matebeleland North
7,500
2,550,000
Mashonaland East
3,000
125,000
13,267,695
*The original 2011 CAP programme funding request is for $18,461,538. After in-depth mapping and intra-cluster
discussions on the division of activities the total request has been adjusted to $13,267,695, while the overall total
requirements of the three LICI programmes still come to $31,086,067
Funding Frameworks
 NGO’s: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium (preparatory discussions amongst some
NGO partners are underway)
 UN: bilateral agreements
18
MULTI-SECTOR: REFUGEES (ZIM-11/MS/37525)
Programme Title
Protection and Assistance for Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Refugee Returnees
Programme Objectives
 Strengthen Refugee Status Determination mechanisms to ensure the integrity of the institution of asylum
in Zimbabwe, and the right of refugees to access physical/legal protection
 Provide timely and adequate assistance to camp based refugees, ensuring their basic needs are met and
strengthening self reliance projects in an attempt to improve their overall protection and viability of their
stay in the host country, as well as seeking ways to support urban refugees
 Seek durable solutions for refugees including resettlement, voluntary repatriation and local integration,
while also providing legal and, if required, material support to refugee returnees
Geographical Coverage
Agency
Activities
UNHCR
Policy/Advocacy,
Emergency and or
Interim Support ,
Durable Solutions,
Capacity Building
and awareness
raising
Coverage
Beneficiaries
Partners
Nationwide
5,000 +/- refugees,
asylum seekers and
refugee returnees
Christian Care,
DSS (Office of the
Commissioner for
Refugees) of
MoLSS
TOTAL
Cost ($)
5,060,273
5,060,273
Funding Frameworks
 UNHCR: bilateral agreements with donors
19
MULTI-SECTOR: SAFE LABOUR MIGRATION (ZIM-11/MS/38373)
Programme Introduction
The project aims to contribute to the safe migration of Zimbabweans and the reduction of irregular migration.
Through extensive surveys conducted at the IOM Beitbridge Reception and Support Centre, the majority of
Zimbabweans deported before April 2009 travelled to South Africa to look for work due to the difficult
economic situation in Zimbabwe. A survey conducted at the IOM Plumtree Reception and Support Centre in
August 2009 further highlighted that the majority of Zimbabweans travelled to Botswana for the same reasons.
As a result of their irregular status, migrants have often been subjected to exploitation by employers. The
Labour Migration Centre, inaugurated by the Ministers of Labour of both South Africa and Zimbabwe in
August 2009 has created a mechanism which links the needs of employers in South Africa with the available
skills and expertise in Zimbabwe, while also ensuring that the workers will have access to their full rights as
guaranteed by the South African Constitution. This in turn will support Zimbabweans at home and act as a
spur to improvements in family livelihood standards. The project will also, through collaboration with the
Registrar General’s Office, make travel documents available for selected candidates. A similar set up will be
initiated in Plumtree to include farm workers and mines in Botswana requiring labour. Proposed activities of
the programme are as follows:






Establishment of job seeker/vacancies registration and database in Government Labour Offices
Assessments and monitoring of employment conditions on South African and Botswana farms and mines
Assessments and monitoring of conditions in Botswana mines (Orapa and Jwaneng)
Matching of job seekers to available vacancies in South Africa and Botswana
Information campaign about the project in target districts in Zimbabwe and Limpopo, South Africa and the
Central District in Botswana
Issuing of travel documents, work permits and contracts to successful job seekers
Geographic Coverage
Agency
IOM
Activity
District
Province
Direct
Beneficiaries
Partners
Full programme
Chiredzi,
Masvingo,
Beitbridge,
Plumtree
Masvingo,
Matebeleland
South
5,000
ILO,
MoLSS
TOTAL
Cost ($)
1,459,231
1,459,231
Funding Frameworks
 IOM: bilateral agreements with donors
20
MULTI-SECTOR: SAFE JOURNEY INFORMATION (ZIM-11/MS/38376)
Programme Introduction
The project aims to contribute to an enabling environment for the safer migration of Zimbabweans. In
response to the growing problem of irregular migration of Zimbabweans leaving the country, and as a result of
the problems which many face in foreign countries, a series of initiatives aimed at improving the environment
for the safer migration of Zimbabweans will be launched. Ultimately, the goal is to enable Zimbabweans to
make informed decisions about migration and prevent migrants from arriving in host countries without the
correct information. The interventions will seek to inform beneficiaries of the wide services available from
various partner organisations on a host of topical issues affecting them as migrants, potential migrants as well
as returnees. Proposed activities of the programme are as follows:











Community awareness campaigns on Safe Migration
Production and distribution of relevant IEC materials
Multi media awareness raising on safe migration and HIV and AIDS including commuter and cross border
bus advertising
Support community youth centres, Safe Zones and youth centres under the National Youth Service
Programme in high migrant sending areas
Provide livelihood skills training and self help initiatives to beneficiaries of the youth centres
Organize the National Youth Dialogue on Migration youth and migration issues
Conduct awareness campaign on safe migration among children in major migrant sending districts and
border towns
Strengthen the capacity of child protection mechanisms
Establish migrant resource centres within border towns and border posts
Develop a policy framework and guidelines to promote best practices and a consistent approach to
addressing the needs of returnees both long term and short term
Develop surveys to increase knowledge base on migration patterns and monitor the impact of information
campaigns
Geographic Coverage
Agency
IOM
Activity
Full programme
Coverage
Nationwide
Direct
Beneficiaries
Partners
1,000,000
GoZ, local authorities,
Zimbabwean artists,
national and regional
media, OASIS, ILO,
UNICEF, UNAIDS, UNDP
TOTAL
Cost ($)
1,200,000
1,200,000
Funding Frameworks
 IOM: bilateral agreements with donors
21
MULTI-SECTOR: SUSTAINABLE MIGRANT REINTEGRATION (ZIM-11/MS/39387)
Programme Introduction
To provide livelihoods and vocational training opportunities for sustainable reintegration returned migrants
including children and at risk population in Zimbabwe. Despite the improvements in the humanitarian situation
in Zimbabwe during 2010, the economic difficulties continue to fuel migration of Zimbabweans to neighbouring
countries in search of livelihoods. Most of them are undocumented and extremely vulnerable. This group is in
need of assistance to voluntary return and reintegration in their communities in Zimbabwe. However, many
migrant sending districts are faced with the challenge of integrating returnees into the social and economic
fabric of the communities, and needs support to successfully host the returnees. Proposed activates of the
programme are as follows:

















Community mobilization and mediation workshops among stakeholders on sustainable reintegration
Establishment and training of Integration and Recovery Committees in migration affected areas
Conduct market research and capacity assessment in the top10 migrant-sending districts
Support vulnerable communities with market linkages and vocational training to improve their livelihoods
and enhance their recovery
Facilitate capacity development for livelihoods provisioning with special focus on access to microfinance
services, business skills training, vocational training and agricultural inputs
Revitalize productive support structures at district level
Provision of small scale block grants and technical support for community infrastructure rehabilitation
Integration and Recovery Committees (if there is evidence of local investment in the projects)
Rehabilitation or expansion of 10 schools and/or teachers accommodation in the border areas to help
prolong girls’ education, and reduce vulnerability to irregular migration and abuse
Refurbishment and/or establishment of 5 community irrigation schemes to provide incomes
Provide individually tailored reintegration support (health, education, household income and protection)
for unaccompanied minors
Improve local governmental and non governmental capacity to address the priority needs of returnees in
particular unaccompanied minors and migrant children in general
Improve the capacity of remittance-recipient families to manage household budgets and remittances
Establish savings and lending schemes to promote livelihood opportunities
Provide stimulus support to local economies affected by high incidence of migration
Mainstreaming of protection, gender/GBV and HIV/AIDS, specifically targeting children and youth
Provide social protection such as cash transfer and education assistance to vulnerable households
Geographic Coverage
Agency
Activity
Province
Direct
Beneficiaries
Partners
NRC
Support vulnerable
communities with
market linkages and
vocational training
Manicaland (2),
Masvingo
5,000
AGRITEX, District
Education
Department, DSS
1,300,000
Full programme
Masvingo (2),
Manicaland (2),
Bulawayo,
Matebeleland
South
6,000
GoZ, District
Education
Department, DSS,
local NGOs
8,200,000
IOM
TOTAL
Cost ($)
9,500,000
Funding Frameworks
 NRC: bilateral agreements with donors
 IOM: bilateral agreements
22
MULTI-SECTOR: ASSISTANCE FOR RETURNED MIGRANTS (ZIM-11/MS/39392)
Programme Introduction
The project aims to address the humanitarian needs of returned Zimbabwean migrants from neighbouring
countries in particular South Africa and Botswana (including Unaccompanied Minors (UAM). This will be done
through humanitarian assistance as well as through capacity building of GoZ to respond to the cross border
migration and humanitarian challenges. Additionally an effort will be made to strengthen the knowledge base
on cross border mobility including migration patterns, socio-economic, demographic and demographic and
geographic profiles in order to better design and target future interventions. Proposed activities of the
programme are as follows:















Emergency humanitarian assistance to returned migrants from Botswana and South Africa through its
Reception and Support Centres (RSCs) in Plumtree and Beitbridge and other border areas if need arise
Information about irregular migration, how to practice safe migration to returned migrants, referral
services for special needs
Fitness for travel checks for all requesting transport home, treatment of minor medical conditions an TB
screening
Disseminate information on HIV and AIDS and SGBV, including voluntary counselling and testing for HIV
Provide protection and counselling services
Support specialized care, temporary accommodation, counselling and family reunification for returned
unaccompanied minors
Conduct safe migration and health campaigns in border and migrant sending communities
Conduct awareness raising campaigns for children in border areas
Support local hospitals and clinics accessed by migrants and migration affected communities
Support local authorities to secure availability of safe water and sanitation for migrants
Assisted voluntary return
Organize cross-border stake holders meetings and capacity building workshops
Support the government to develop a national standard operation strategy for children on the move
Sensitization of returning migrants on job opportunities
Surveys on migration causes, effects and patters conducted within the RSCs as well as in border and
high migrant sending communities
Geographic Coverage Mapping
Agency
Activity
Coverage
Direct
Beneficiaries
Partners
IOM
Full programme
Nationwide
250,000
MoLSS, MoHCW, SC
TOTAL
Cost (USD)
9,200,000
9,200,000
Funding Framework
 IOM: bilateral agreements with donors
23
NUTRITION: MICRONUTRIENT AND DE-WORMING MEDICINES (ZIM-11/H/39613)
Programme Introduction
In the absence of a quality diet, supplementation and or food fortification have proven effective means of
delivering key micronutrients. While coverage of Vitamin A supplementation in children in Zimbabwe is
reasonable at 85 percent, coverage of maternal Vitamin A and iron supplementation are extremely low at 28
and 25 per cent respectively. There are limited efforts to ensure delivery of zinc in the management of
diarrhoea, and there are currently no large-scale food fortification or de-worming programmes.




By the end of 2011, coverage of post partum vitamin A supplementation and maternal micronutrient
supplementation (iron and folate) will have increased by 10 percent
By the end of 2011, coverage of Vitamin A supplementation for children 6 to 59 months of age will be
sustained at 85 percent
By the end of 2011, 50 percent of children between 1 and 12 years of age will have received at least one
round of de-worming
By the end of 2011, the feasibility of using large scale hammer mill and point of use fortification to deliver
key micronutrients will have been established
Geographic Coverage
Agencies
Province
District
Direct Beneficiaries
Cost ($)
Micronutrient Supplementation (Vitamin A, iron/folate, zinc for diarrhoea)
UNICEF (supplies)
HKI, OPHID, WHO, IOM,
UNICEF, FAO (mobilization)
Nationwide
All
1,246,000 children (6-59 Months)
65.000 women (pregnant)
Hammer mill and Point of Use Fortification (Pilot Activities)
234,000 children (6-59 months)
HKI, CARE, WFP, UNICEF,
12 districts
All
26,000 women (pregnant or
WHO, FAO
(TBD)
lactating)
De-worming
UNICEF (supplies)
35,000
400,000
687,500
85,000
UNICEF, WFP, HKI , OPHID
(programme delivery)
Nationwide
All
2,000,000 Children
TOTAL
250,000
1,457,500
Funding Frameworks
Activity
Funding frameworks
Partners
Cost ($)
Micronutrient
Supplementation
Bi-lateral agreement with UNICEF
(and/or HKI)
Bilateral agreement with NGO
(HKI/CARE) or UN (WFP/UNICEF)
lead
Bilateral agreement with UNICEF or
WFP
UNICEF, HKI, OPHID, WHO, IOM,
FAO, MoHCW
435,000
HKI, CARE, WFP, UNICEF, WHO,
FAO, MoHCW, FNC
687,500
UNICEF, WFP, HKI, OPHID,
MoHCW, MoESAC
335,000
Fortification
De-worming
TOTAL
1,457,500
24
NUTRITION: INFANT AND YOUNG CHILD FEEDING INTERVENTIONS (ZIM-11/H/39616)
Programme Introduction
Sub optimal infant and young child feeding practices are the single greatest determinants of malnutrition in
children – global estimates suggest that wide scale adoption of appropriate complementary feeding could
reduce rates stunting by 15 percent, and adoption of exclusive breastfeeding could reduce child mortality by
more than 13 percent. Despite having one of the lowest exclusive breastfeeding rates on the continent, there
has been very little investment in infant and young child feeding in Zimbabwe over the past decade. There is
limited information on potential barriers to adoption of optimal feeding practices, and there are few rigorously
tested messages or materials for the promotion of feeding related practices and services. According to the
2008-2010 Nutrition Atlas, just 10% of target beneficiaries for nutrition programs received direct IYCF
interventions.



By the end of 2011, the proportion of newborns put to breast within one hour of birth in priority districts will
have increased by 7 percent
By the end of 2011, the proportion of children under six months of age who are exclusively breastfed in
priority districts will have increased by 7 percent
By the end of 2011, the proportion of children in priority districts receiving a minimum acceptable diet will
have increased by 7 percent
Geographic Coverage
Agencies
Province
District
Direct Beneficiaries
Cost ($)
Strategy and Materials Development, Production, and Dissemination
UNICEF, Zvitambo, HKI, WHO
Nationwide
All
440,000 children
(0-24 months)
162,000 women
(pregnant/lactating)
All
24 prioritized districts
(see CAP map)
80,000 children
(0-24 months)
50,000 women
(pregnant/lactating)
1,000,000
2,520,000
Programme Delivery
UNICEF, WHO, WFP, IOM,
HKI, MoHCW, ACF, WV,SC,
GOAL, PI, Zvitambo,
KAPNEC, OPHID, ADRA,
Shalom Children's Home, IMC
TOTAL
3,520,000
Funding Frameworks
Activity
Funding frameworks
Partners
Materials Development,
Production, Dissemination
Bi-lateral agreement with
UNICEF
Zvitambo, HKI, MoHCW
1,000,000
Program Delivery
Bi-lateral agreement with
UNICEF or NGO
consortium with NGO lead
UNICEF, WHO, WFP, IOM, HKI,
MoHCW, ACF, WV, SC, GOAL, PI,
Zvitambo, KAPNEC, OPHID, IMC
ADRA, Shalom Children's Home
2,520,000
Total
Cost ($)
3,520,000
25
NUTRITION: LIFE-SAVING CARE FOR ACUTE MALNUTRITION (ZIM-11/H/39620)
Programme Introduction
The government of Zimbabwe has adopted CMAM as its primary strategy for treating acute malnutrition.
CMAM aims to treat uncomplicated SAM on an outpatient basis using ready to use therapeutic foods, to treat
complicated SAM in inpatient facilities applying standard WHO therapeutic care guidelines, and to treat MAM
through provision of fortified supplementary foods. Despite concerted efforts over the past three years to scale
up CMAM, today just 40 percent of eligible health facilities in Zimbabwe provide CMAM services, default rates
in existing CMAM sites exceed SPHERE targets, and there are no large scale supplementary feeding
programs for the treatment of MAM. The nutrition cluster objectives for 2011 CAP are:

By the end of 2011, 60 percent of CMAM eligible health facilities nationwide, and 80 percent of eligible
facilities in priority districts will be CMAM competent
By the end of 2011, 50 percent of CMAM implementing facilities in priority districts will include a
supplementary feeding program (SFP) for the moderately malnourished
By the end of 2011, 60 percent of CMAM implementing facilities within priority districts will meet the
SPHERE standards for quality of care


Geographic Coverage
Agencies
GOAL
ADRA
WV
IOM*
PI
SC
ACF*
Province
District
Manicaland
Mashonaland West
Midlands
Mat North
Mash Central
Mat South
Mat South
Manicaland
Manicaland
Mash East
Midlands
Masvingo
Mat North
Mash West
Masvingo
Midlands
Mat South
All
All
All
Makoni, Nyanga
Hurungwe
Gokwe North
Lupane
Rushinga
Gwanda, Insiza
Bulilima, Mangwe
Mutare, Chiredzi
Chipinge
Mutoko
KweKwe
Bikita
Binga
Kariba
Chivi, Gutu
Berengua
Umzingwane
All remaining districts
All
All
Cost ($)
636,513
379,973
413,000
341,919
500,000
570,707
287,131
UNICEF Program
UNICEF Supplies
WFP Supplies**
TOTAL
**Note - costs are accommodated within the Food Assistance Cluster Programme
1,722,758
1,055,462
(2,613,952)
5,907,463
Please Note: There is a slight difference between current programme requirements and the programme
requirements listed in CAP 2011 primarily due to further in-depth planning by cluster partners.
Funding Frameworks
Activity
Funding frameworks
Partners
Cost ($)
Programming by NGO
Programming by UNICEF
CMAM equipment/supplies
Total
Consortium with lead NGO or bi-lateral agreements
Bi-lateral agreement with UNICEF
Bi-lateral agreement with UNICEF
MoHCW
MoHCW
MoHCW
3,129,243
1,722,758
1,055,462
5,907,463
26
NUTRITION: CROSS SECTOR FOOD/NUTRITION SECURITY ANALYSIS (ZIM-11/H/39626)
Programme Introduction
Nutrition emergencies are generally slow onset events – they evolve over time. Early detection of deterioration
in the underlying causes of malnutrition (food security, care practices, or health), and timely delivery of
interventions to address those causes can often avert wide spread malnutrition and mortality. In 2010, the
cluster lead agencies for Nutrition, Agriculture, and Food, in close collaboration with the national Food and
Nutrition Council commissioned a study to explore mechanisms for improving cross sector food and nutrition
analysis and response. Consistent with the report’s recommendations, the nutrition cluster, in collaboration
with the Food and Agriculture clusters, will pursue 3 key objectives in 2011:



By the end of 2011, there will be a functioning Food and Nutrition Security Analysis Unit in Zimbabwe
By the end of 2011, there will be a National Food and Nutrition Policy to guide multi-sector coordination
and response in Zimbabwe
By the end of 2011, there will be a functioning national nutrition surveillance system in Zimbabwe
Geographic Coverage
Agencies
Province
District
Direct Beneficiaries
Cost ($)
Food and Nutrition Analysis Unit and Policy
UNICEF, WFP, FAO
Nationwide
All
1,703,000 children (0-59 months)
3,248, 000 women (reproductive age)
other vulnerable groups
1,500,000
All
1,703,000 children (0-59 months)
3,248, 000 women (reproductive age)
other vulnerable groups
500,000
Nutrition Surveillance System
UNICEF
Nationwide
TOTAL
2,000,000
Funding Frameworks
Activity
Funding frameworks
Partners
Food and Nutrition
Analysis Unit and Policy
Bi-lateral agreement with WFP as lead
agency, or bilateral agreements with
each agency (1/3 each)
FAO, UNICEF, FNC,
other key ministries
Surveillance System
Bi-lateral agreement with UNICEF
MoHCW and FNC
TOTAL
Cost ($)
1,500,000
500,000
2,000,000
27
PROTECTION: HUMAN RIGHTS/RULE OF LAW (ZIM-11/P-HR-RL/39538)
Programme Title
Human Rights and Rule of Law Programme
Programme Objectives
 Advocate for and work with authorities, communities and individuals to promote human rights and rule of
law, as well as an understanding and advancement of applicable international and national human rights
standards, especially for the most exposed/vulnerable women, men, girls and boys
 Strengthen and support a rights based environment through practical interventions, especially for and/or
on behalf of the most vulnerable (women, children, victims/survivors of GBV and/or trafficking, and IDPs),
in areas such as access to documentation and avenues of redress
 Engage key stakeholders (Government as well as other agencies) in sensitization and build their capacity
to better assess and respond to human rights and rule of law issues
Geographic Coverage
Agency
Activities
Coverage
Beneficiaries
Partners
Cost ($)
UNHCR
Coordination/Policy/advo
cacy, Capacity Building,
Durable Solutions
Nationwide
TBC
MoLSS, MoHA
790,155
TBC
Coordination/Policy/advo
cacy, Capacity Building,
Durable Solutions
Nationwide
TBC
MoLSS, MoHA
1,209,845
TOTAL
2,000,000
Funding Frameworks
 UNHCR: bilateral agreements with donors
 TBC: to be confirmed
28
PROTECTION: CHILD PROTECTION (ZIM-11/P-HR-RL/39539)
Programme Introduction
Child protection (CP) partners seek to enhance the child protection system in Zimbabwe through both
recovery and emergency interventions aimed at building back resilient family and community support
structures.
Result areas
1. Protective environment and sustainable protection solutions with particular attention to the most
vulnerable children such as survivors of violence, children on the move, children engaged in the worst
forms of child labour, children in contact with the law are strengthened
2. Key stakeholders (Government, civil society, as well as other agencies) build their capacity to better
assess and respond to children on the move, the worst forms of child labour as well as the protection
needs of girls and boys in emergency
3. Unaccompanied and separated children are reintegrated in their community
4. Mainstreaming child protection issues in broader social sector programming
Geographic Coverage Mapping
Agency
Result
areas
Target Provinces
(# of districts)
Direct Beneficiaries
12,000 child survivors,
6,000 vulnerable HH,
CP actors in justice,
welfare and social
protection sectors
UNICEF
all
National
BTTZ
1
Mashonaland West (1)
CESVI
1,2
Nationwide
1
Harare, Midland (2)
Matebeleland North (1)
Manicaland (3)
Mashonaland East (1)
Masvingo (1),
Bulawayo
CPS
1, 2
prisons nationwide,
Mashonaland West,
Harare, Manicaland (1)
CLSZ
1
Bulawayo, Masvingo
Matebelelands,
Midlands
CRDT
1
Manicaland (2)
DACHI
CARE
1
Masvingo (4)
FAWEZI
1,2
Manicaland (1)
Mashonaland East (1),
Matebeleland North(2),
Matebeleland South
(1), Masvingo (1)
3,700 children, 50
clubs
HIPO
1, 2
Masvingo (5)
20,000 children, 150
CPC
HCC
1,2
Bulawayo,
Matabeleland North,
Matabeleland South (2)
3,860 people, 240 HH
Island
Hospice
1
Bulawayo, Harare,
Manicaland (1)
Mashonaland East (2)
2,500 youths/children
Childline
240 caregivers, 500
children
705 street children /
youth in Harare, 2,000
community members
Partners
VFSC, MoWAGCD,
PI, FST, MoJLA,
MoHCW, ZRCS,
MWAGCD, IOM,
MoLSS, ZimStat,
CPS, UNHCR,
CCORE, SC,
ChildLine, CP
partners
community leaders
Cost ($)
10,015,000
67,760
Streets Ahead
307,480
8,000 child callers, 25
prison officers, 10,000
adult callers, 60
children in conflict with
the law
ZACRO & Zimbabwe
Prison Service
270,000
4,000 children
Childline, Simukai,
ZACRO, NODED,
ZNCWC and SOS
for reunification of
children
180,000
FI, ZOEH, SURCZ,
ZWLA, HT
236,580
children including
OVC, youth,
community leaders,
IDPs, PLWHIV
4,473 children
120 stakeholders, 4
district CPCs, 240 care
supporters, 600
children, 1,200 HH
29
IOM
FACT
54,993
274,857
2,630
FACT
GF, MT, Social
Services Office, LA,
MoESAC, CPC,
others
SRH, Childline,
PADARE, hospices,
Mavambo Trust,
173,360
450,000
132,252
others
PI
1,2,3
Matebeleland North
(1), Mashonaland East
(1), Midlands (1),
Masvingo (1),
Manicaland (3)
children in conflict with
law, CPC
MoJLA, MoLSS,
CPC
1,250,000
MoJLA, MoESAC,
IOM, UNICEF,
UNHCR, CRS, PI,
FOST, JCT, others
1,660,200
SC
all
Nationwide
At least 14,200
children, 3,280 primary
schools, 9 NGOs
SA
SAD
1, 2, 3
1
Nationwide
Nationwide
1,275 street children
100,000 people
WEG
1, 2
Manicaland,
Mashonaland East,
2,500 children
WVI
1, 2, 3
TBC
TBC
Manicaland (3),
Mashonaland East (1),
Mashonaland Central
(1)
TBC
FOST, CC, AWANA
MoWGCD, DSS,
VFU, UNFPA,
UNDP, HLPC,
Childline, others
At least 50,000
individuals
Childline, SPW
TBC
TBC
TOTAL
54,610
42,000
280,000
409,618
4,683,660
20,545,000
Funding Frameworks
 NGOs: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium (discussions ongoing)
 UN: bilateral agreements with donors
 TBC: to be confirmed
30
PROTECTION: IDPS (ZIM-11/P-HR-RL/39544)
Programme Title
IDP Protection, Assistance and Durable Solutions
Programme Objectives
 Advocate for and work with authorities, communities and individuals to promote a protective environment
and sustainable protection solutions with particular attention to IDPs through enhanced coordination and
policy making
 Strengthen and support the protection environment (material/livelihoods, physical and legal) environment
especially for existing IDPs and new displacements, especially focusing on civil status documentation,
interim livelihoods activities and emergency response with an emphasis on community based approaches
 Sensitize key stakeholders (Government as well as other agencies and build their capacity to better
assess and respond to internal displacement as well as the overall protection needs of women, men, girls
and boys through trainings on displacement, reconciliation activities and infrastructure support for
national, provincial and local authorities
Geographical Coverage
Agency/Org
Activities
District/Province
WV
Durable Solutions/
Early Recovery
Bulawayo urban
NRC
Durable
Solutions/Capacity
Building
IOM
Emergency and/or
Interim support,
Durable
Solutions/Early
Recovery, Policy/
Advocacy, Capacity
Building
ISL
Durable Solutions
Caritas
Durable Solutions
ZCDT
Emergency or
Interim Support
Christian
Care
Emergency
Support, and
Durable Solutions /
Early Recovery
Caritas
Beneficiaries
Partners
Cost ($)
416,090
Chipinge,Chiredzi
District-Manicaland and
Masvingo Provinces
Chiredzi, Kadoma,
Makonde, Hurungwe,
Mbire, Muzarabani,
Bulawayo, Mutare,
Makoni and Mutasa,
Chipinge, Harare,
Centenary and Mt
Darwin , Mbire
Mt Darwin, MhondoroNgezi, Muzarabani,
Chegutu, Zvimba
Hurungwe, Makonde,
Mberengwa, Lower
Gweru, Gokwe North
and Gokwe South
25,000 : Male
10,000 Females
15,000
7000
183,400
Makonde, Chinhoyi,
Rusape, Buhera,
Bulawayo
2000 : Male
900
Females 1100
145,000
Manicaland,
Mashonaland East,
Masvingo, Mashonaland
Central, Matabelelands
Svosve, Marondera
District
70% IDPs and
30% vulnerable
members of the
host community
400: Males 228
Females 172
4,000
Christian
Care
Durable Solutions /
Early Recovery
Chirumanzu District
IRC
Durable Solutions
Mutare, Nyanga,
Mutasa districtsManicaland
UNHCR
Emergency/Interim
support, Durable
Solutions,Policy/Ad
vocacy, Capacity
Building and
general awareness
raising
Manicaland, Harare
Matebeleland,
Mashonaland East /
West
31
600,000
ZCDT,
CRDT,
ISL,
LEAD
Trust,
Christian
Care
8,000,000
IOM,OXF
AM,UNIF
EM
1,500,000
502,375
150,000
IOM
320,000
1,000,000
Christian
Care,
Caritas
4,432,293
TOTAL
11,816,865
Please Note: There is a slight difference between current programme requirements and the programme
requirements listed in CAP 2011 primarily due to further in-depth planning by cluster partners.
Funding Frameworks
 NGOs: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium (discussions with NGO partners underway)
 UN: bilateral agreements with donors
32
PROTECTION: GBV (ZIM-11/P-HR-RL/39547)
Programme Introduction
The Gender Based Violence partners seek to enhance prevention and response to all forms of gender based
violence, as well as better coordination and advocacy at district and national levels. Efforts will be made to
establish a database and to collect data at all levels which will help inform and guide evidence-based
programming. Activities will include establishment as well as the strengthening of service provision at “one
stop centres” or coordinated multi sectoral approaches to GBV. Traditional leaders, religious leaders,
communities, men and women will be sensitized on GBV.
Result Area
Enhancing GBV
prevention and
response
coordination,
advocacy and
policy
Provision of
comprehensive
quality services for
protection, care
and support of
GBV survivors:
Agencies
UNFPA
UNFPA
UNFPA
Capacity building
and raising
awareness of
government
counterparts,
NGOs, agencies
and beneficiaries
Coverage
Partners
10 provinces
MoWAGCD,
MoHCW, MoJLA,
MoHA, UNICEF,
IOM
26 districts
FST, Musasa,
PADARE, WAG,
ZWLA, IOM,
UNICEF, NFBCZ
and all line
ministries
30 districts
IOM
15 districts
IRC
NFBCZ
3 districts
4 districts
Adult Rape Clinic,
PADARE,
Musasa, WAG,
FST, ZWLA and
other partners
Musasa, WAG,
faith-based
organizations,
ZWLA, line
ministries,
MoWAGCD,
AGRITEX,
MoHCW, MoHA,
MoJLA, MoLSS
UNICEF, FST
TOTAL
Beneficiaries
Cost
500,000
Total: 2,000,000
incl. survivors and
care providers,
children: 800,000,
women: 1 million,
other group:
200,000 men
5,858,380
Total: 2,000,000
including survivors
and care
providers, children:
800,000, women:
1,000,000, other
group: 200,000
men
1,641,620
2,000,000
8,000,000
FundingF
 For districts that are not covered in the current mapping exercise, UNHCR will act as a last resort to
advocate for funding and seek for implementation partners among health cluster partners.
 NGOs: bilateral agreements with donors or as a consortium
 UN: bilateral agreements with donors
33
WASH: EMERGENCY RESPONSE (ZIM-11/WS/39324)
Programme Introduction
Within the water, sanitation and hygiene promotion (WASH) emergency response unit (WERU), partners
Action Contre la Faim, Oxfam, German Agro Action, Mercy Corps, World Vision share the country coverage in
order to take the lead in emergency WASH rapid assessments based on a set of agreed upon tools. Another
partner, French Red Cross responds to emerging and critical water shortages by undertaking repair and
rehabilitation to high capital water and sanitation equipment and infrastructure. Funds for their intervention will
be raised within the scope of emergency urban rehabilitation. Partners within WERU prepare to be engaged in
the first alert assessment within 24 hours and a response within 72 hours. Responses to Cholera, currently
the most frequently occurring emergency within 3 days (before the peak of the epidemiological curve) have
higher impact and are more cost effective. Partners within WERU prepare to be engaged in the first alert
assessment and a 7 – 14 days response thereafter. The WASH cluster will work with the Department of Civil
Protection, local and International NGOs to develop capacities and response systems in advance of disasters.
At all appropriate levels of local government, disaster risk reduction will be implemented in collaboration with
the other clusters. Improvements will be made to co ordination and communication of information on disease
outbreaks as well as support with hardware for communication of emergencies.
Geographic Coverage Mapping
Agency
Activity
GAA
FULL
PROGRAMME
ACF
FULL
PROGRAMME
WV
FULL
PROGRAMME
OXFAM
FULL
PROGRAMME
Mercy
Corps
FULL
PROGRAMME
UNICEF
NFI purchase
required for
programme
Province
Direct
Beneficiaries
Mash Central,
Mash West,
Chitungwiza
Midlands
(Gokwe North /
South)
Masvingo,
Manicaland
(Chipinge
district)
Bulawayo,
Matebeleland
North
Mash East,
Midlands
(except Gokwe
North / South),
Harare
Manicaland
(except
Chipinge district)
Countrywide
Partners
Cost ($)
Funding ($)
29,800
MoHCW, DDF,
UNICEF, DCP,
WERU, HERU,
780,000
530,000
29,800
MoHCW, DDF,
UNICEF, DCP,
WERU, HERU,
780,000
530,000
29,800
MoHCW, DDF,
UNICEF, DCP,
WERU, HERU,
780,000
530,000
29,800
MoHCW, DDF,
UNICEF, DCP,
WERU, HERU,
780,000
530,000
29,800
MoHCW, DDF,
UNICEF, DCP,
WERU, HERU,
780,000
530,000
149,000
MoHCW, DDF,
UNICEF, DCP,
WERU, HERU,
4,500,000
500,000
8,400,000
3,150,000
TOTAL
Please Note: There is a slight difference between current programme requirements and the programme
requirements listed in CAP 2011 primarily due to further in-depth planning by cluster partners.
Funding Frameworks
 NGO consortium (one partner agency leading)
 Bilateral agreements with donors
34
WASH: URBAN WASH (ZIM-11/WS/39444)
Programme Introduction
The objective of the urban emergency WASH programme is to arrest decline of and restore water, sanitation
and hygiene promotion services for the vulnerable living in urban and peri-urban areas and growth points. The
key activities planned under this programme are:
1. Emergency rapid Assessment of WASH infrastructure of at least 15 major towns/cities and growth points
2. Emergency rehabilitation of water and sanitation infrastructure, and provision of alternative water sources,
in at least 20 towns, cities, growth points and institutions from supply to distribution
3. Provision of essential water treatment chemicals to 20 towns and growth points
4. Development of sustainable systems for the provision of supplies such as chemicals and household water
treatment options
5. Capacity strengthening of municipal technical and non technical staff
6. Support urban councils in effective cost recovery including tariff study
Geographic Coverage
Agency
Province (# cities /
growth points / town)*
Rapid
assessments
UNICEF, Mercy
Corps,
ZimAHEAD
Masvingo (3)
Manicaland (7)
Mashonaland West (5)
Matebeleland North (3)
Harare (1)
Midlands (1)
Mashonaland East (1)
Emergency
rehabilitation of
growth points,
towns and cities
ACF,
ZimAHEAD,
Thamaso,
CADI, UNICEF,
Mercy Corps,
IRC, FRC,
GAA, PSI, WV,
Mvuramanzi
Trust
Procurement of
water treatment
chemicals
Human resource
capacity
development
Activity
Direct
Beneficiaries
Partners
Cost ($)
N/A
LA,
MoWRD,
MoLGRUD,
MoHCW
300,000
Mashonaland West (3)
Manicaland (5)
Harare (2)
Mashonaland East (7)
Mashonaland Central (3)
Matebeleland North (3)
Matebeleland South (3)
Midlands (3)
Masvingo (1)
5 million
PS, CBOs,
LA,
MoWRD,
ZINWA,
MoLGRUD,
MoHCW,
TC, RDC,
OXFAM
20,216,050
UNICEF , PSI
20 towns + 5 ZINWA
catchments
4 million
Mercy Corps,
WV, GAA, ACF,
FRC,UNICEF,
PSI
Mashonaland West (1)
Matebeleland South (2)
Manicaland (10)
Masvingo (4)
Matebeleland North (1)
N/A
TOTAL
8,000,000
RDC, LA,
MoWRD,
ZINWA,
MoHCW,
MoLGRUD,
TC
881,570
29,397,620
Please Note: There is a slight difference between current programme requirements and the programme
requirements listed in CAP 2011 primarily due to further in-depth planning by cluster partners.
Funding Frameworks
 Bilateral negotiations with Donors
 Discussions on possible pooled funding and NGO consortium in progress
35
WASH: RURAL WASH (ZIM-11/WS/39557)
Programme Introduction
Arrest decline of and restore water, sanitation and hygiene promotion services for vulnerable men, women
and children in rural areas.
Geographic Coverage
WASH Focus
Clinics
Province
Agencies
Manicaland
Mashonaland Central
Mashonaland East
Mashonaland West
Masvingo
Matabeleland North
Matabeleland South
Manicaland
GAA, IRC, Mercy Corps
GAA, IRC, IMC, OXFAM
CPT, OXFAM
CRS, GOAL, GAA
THAMASO
CAFOD
CAFOD
GAA, CRS
IRC, IOM, WV, MDRA, PENYA Trust,
IMC
CPT, MDRA, CRS, PENYA Trust
MDRA, CRS, GOAL, PENYA Trust
THAMASO, OST, CARE, CRS
GAA, CAFOD, CRS
CAFOD, WVI, MDRA
Mvuramanzi, IRC, Mercy Corps,
CAFOD, WV, GOAL, ZimAHEAD,
MDRA, CRS, PSI
IOM, WV, MDRA, ISL, PSI, PENYA
Trust, IMC, OXFAM
CPT, MDRA, CRS, PSI, PENYA Trust,
OXFAM
Mvuramanzi Trust, CRS, GOAL, IOM,
PSI, PENYA Trust, OXFAM
ZimAHEAD, FACT, Mvuramanzi Trust,
CAFOD, CARE, THAMASO, CRS, PSI
Mvuramanzi Trust, CAFOD, GAA,
CRS
CAFOD, WV, MDRA, PSI
PSI, OXFAM
Mashonaland Central
Schools
Mashonaland East
Mashonaland West
Masvingo
Matabeleland North
Matabeleland South
Manicaland
Mashonaland Central
Mashonaland East
Community
Mashonaland West
Masvingo
Matabeleland North
Matabeleland South
Midlands
TOTAL
Cost ($)
Funded ($)
839,700
548,600
167,500
655,025
0
0
7,500
1,505,600
119,000
62,500
62,500
615,025
0
0
2,500
1,600
421,800
0
395,600
1,396,000
203,500
469,000
470,000
5,600
66,000
123,500
462,000
0
2,607,812
420,700
3,691,180
1,538,440
1,261,430
401,740
2,054,130
678,190
1,052,824
332,212
3,001,600
930,400
676,500
727,500
22,152,801
344,500
37,500
6,203,907
Please Note: There is a slight difference between current programme requirements and the programme
requirements listed in CAP 2011 primarily due to further in-depth planning by cluster partners.
Funding Frameworks for Unfunded Activities
WASH Focus
Clinics
Schools
Community
Funding frameworks
NGO Consortium
Bilateral negotiations with donors
NGO Consortium,
Bilateral negotiations with donors
NGO Consortium
Bilateral negotiations with donors
TOTAL
Cost ($)
1,356,800
4,202,800
10,389,294
15,948,894
WASH : SECTOR COORDINATION (ZIM-11/WS/39560)
Program Introduction
The objective of this program is Improve sector information and knowledge management and coordination for
36
an effective humanitarian / recovery response Under this program, building on the outcome of the WASH
stakeholder’s forum, donors and the WASH cluster will embark on a series of stakeholder meetings leading to
a joint sector review. The joint sector reviews, which would review an annual sector report, will become an
annual event. The review would establish sector development goals and indicators, which would be regularly
reviewed by NAC and the other coordinating bodies. Key activities planned are:





joint needs assessment for sector recovery
support to the WASH stakeholder’s forum 2011
support and capacity development of NGOs, National Action Committee (NAC) structures from communal
to national level for effective WASH humanitarian coordination
support trials of new technologies, approaches and strategies for humanitarian response
development of WASH sector information/ knowledge management system for humanitarian and
transitional needs including WASH atlas, WASH inventory, 3W matrices; training
Geographic Coverage
Agency
Activity
District
Province
Direct
Beneficiaries
Partners
Cost ($)
UNICEF
Joint sector
review
Nationwide
ALL
Nation wide
NAC, OXFAM, WV,
Mercy Corps, ACF,
IRC, ZimAHEAD
200,000
UNICEF
Sector Needs
Assessment
Nationwide
ALL
Nation wide
NAC, OXFAM, WV,
Mercy Corps, ACF,
IRC, ZimAHEAD
200,000
UNICEF
WASH
Stakeholder’s
Forum
Nationwide
& provinces
for 31
districts
Provinces
for the 31
Districts
Nation wide
NAC, OXFAM, WV,
Mercy Corps, ACF,
IRC, ZimAHEAD
100,000
Nationwide
ALL
Nation wide
NAC, OXFAM, WV,
Mercy Corps, ACF,
IRC, ZimAHEAD
500,000
Nationwide
ALL
Nation wide
NAC, OXFAM, WV,
Mercy Corps, ACF,
IRC, ZimAHEAD
600,000
UNICEF
UNICEF
WASH
information
and knowledge
Management
Government
Capacity for
humanitarian
coordination
TOTAL
1,600,000
Funding Frameworks
Activity
Funding frameworks
Partners
Full Sector Co-ordination
Programme
Consortium with UNICEF as
lead
OXFAM, Mercy Corps,
ACF, IRC, ZimAHEAD, WV
37
Cost ($)
1,600,000
EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND
ZIMBABWE FUNDING APPEAL 2011
ERF Structure
The Emergency Response Fund (ERF) for Zimbabwe supports short-term but high impact humanitarian
response projects. It is a pooled fund of un-earmarked contributions from various donors to target unexpected
emergencies. The ERF operates with greater flexibility and speedier approval processes than traditional
funding mechanisms. The guiding principles of the fund is to allow timely emergency and /or gap filling
responses and is a valuable asset in case of sudden-onset emergencies or deterioration of the situation within
an on-going emergency.
In 2011, decisions for funding will continue to be taken through consultative and collaborative approval
processes by the representatives of key stakeholders from local and international NGOs as well as UN
agencies participating at the cluster level as well as at the ERF Advisory Board. The Advisory Board is chaired
by the UN Humanitarian Coordinator and consists of the heads of three UN Agencies, one national NGO and
one international NGO. OCHA Zimbabwe will continue to provide secretariat support to the management of
the fund.
Due to the short-term nature of projects eligible for funding through the ERF, the implementation period for
projects will continue to be limited to 6 months, with a funding ceiling of $250,000 per project. The applicant
organizations are encouraged to consult relevant partners in the clusters / working groups, geographical areas
and local communities during development of the intervention. Once the approval process is completed, an
agreement is entered into between the implementing partner and the Humanitarian Coordinator after which
OCHA requests for the funds to be released from its Geneva-based account directly to the implementing
agency.
Strategic Focus in 2011
In 2011, the ERF will prioritize projects that respond to emergency needs. Un-earmarked funds will be used in
the eventuality that there is a sudden outbreak or unexpected upscale of the ongoing humanitarian crisis. In
consideration of the recent strategic shift to a programme-based approach in the elaboration of the Zimbabwe
CAP 2011, the ERF will pool funds to support (in part) those cluster programmes that are purely humanitarian
in nature while keeping its major focus on funding emergency activities in response to unforeseen
deteriorations of the humanitarian situation.
Coverage
National and international non-governmental organizations, the Red Cross Movement, UN agencies and
international organizations are eligible to apply for funding. Funds received are used to support emergency
programming within all areas identified by humanitarian partners under the Zimbabwe CAP 2011 requiring
intervention.
ERF Funding Requirement
Building on good practices from the past two years the ERF will aim to raise a total of $6.5 million that will
allow the fund to address its key objectives and in line with the strategic focus for 2011.
38
ANNEX I
CAP 2011 CLUSTER COORDINATOR CONTACT LIST
Cluster
Organisation
Name
Functional Title
Email
Telephone
Physical Address
Agriculture
FAO
Constance Oka
Agriculture Cluster
Coordinator
constance.oka@fao.org
+263(773)587 614
Coordination &
Support Services
Livelihoods
Institutional Capacity
& Infrastructure (LICI)
OCHA
Marcel Vaessen
UNDP
Kirstine Primdal
Humanitarian Affairs
vaessen@un.org
Officer
LICI Cluster Coordinator kirstine.primdal@undp.org
+263(4)338836-44
+263(772)125298
+263(773)093 313
+263(4)338836-44
Block 1 Tendeseka Park,
Samora Machel Avenue,
Eastlea, Harare
Arundel Office Park, Block
9, 3 Norfolk road, Harare
Arundel Office Park, Block
10, 3 Norfolk road, Harare
Livelihoods
Institutional Capacity
& Infrastructure (LICI)
Education
IOM
Natalia Perez
LICI Cluster Coordinator nperez@iom.int
(Co-Lead)
142 King George Road,
Avondale, Harare
UNICEF
Jeaniene Spink
jspink@unicef.org
Education
SC
TBC
Food Aid
WFP
Liljana Jovceva
Health
WHO
Bonkoungou
Boukare
Education Cluster
Coordinator
Education Cluster
Coordinator
(Co-Lead)
Food Aid Working
Group Coordinator
Health Cluster
Coordinator
+263(772)102 095
+263 (4)303514
+263 (4)335044
+263(772)414842
+263(4)703 941-2
TBC
+263(772) 278957
+263(4)799 215-20
+263(772)124022
+ 263(4)253 724-30
Multi-Sector Working
Groups
IOM
Natalia Perez
working group focal
point
nperez@iom.int
15 Natal Road, Belgravia,
Harare
WHO Country Office,
Parirenyatwa Hospital,
Harare
142 King George Road,
Avondale, Harare
Nutrition
UNICEF
Tobias Stillman
tstillman@unicef.org
Protection
UNHCR
Peter Trotter
Nutrition Cluster
Coordinator
Protection Cluster
Coordinator
WASH
UNICEF
OXFAMGB
WASH Cluster
Coordinator
WASH Cluster
Coordinator
(Co-Lead)
bwoldeamanuel@unicef.org
WASH
Belete
Woldeamanuel
Boiketho Murima
TBC
liljana.jovceva@wfp.org
bonkoungoub@zw.afro.who.int
trotterp@unhcr.org
bmurima@oxfam.org.uk
39
+263(772)102 095
+263 (4)303514
+263 (4)335044
+263 (772)124 271
+263 (4) 703 941-2
+263 (772)433 833
+263(4)793274-4
+263(4)792 681-6
+263 772 475 034
+263 (4) 703 941-2
+263(772) 124 314
+263(4)722 352
+263(4)700 824
6 Fairbridge Avenue,
Belgravia, Harare
221 Five Avenue, Harare
6 Fairbridge Avenue,
Belgravia, Harare
2nd Floor Takura House
Building, 67-69 Kwame
Nkrumah Avenue, Harare
6 Fairbridge Avenue,
Belgravia, Harare
28 Josiah Tongogara
Avenue, Milton Park,
Harare
ANNEX II
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ACDI
ACF
ADRA
AEA
AGRITEX
ANC
ASRH
AusAID
Agricultural Cooperative Development International
Action Against Hunger/Action contre la Faim
Adventist Development and Relief Agency
Association of Evangelicals in Africa
Agricultural Technical Extension
ante-natal care
adolescent sexual and reproductive health
Australian Agency for International Development
BTTZ
Bright Tomorrows Trust Zimbabwe
CADI
CADS
CAFOD
CAP
CC
CESVI
CLSZ
CLUSA
CMAM
COSV
CP
CPC
CPS
CPT
CRDT
CRS
CTC
Cluster Agriculture Development Agency
Catholic Agency for Overseas Development
Consolidated Appeal Process
Christian Counselling
Cooperazione E Sviluppo
Christian Legal Society Zimbabwe
Cooperative League of the USA
community management of acute malnutrition
Comitato di coordinamento delle Organizzaziani per il Servizio Volontario
Child Protection
Child Protection Committee
Child Protection Society
Citizen’s Participation Trust
Christian Relief and Development Trust
Catholic Relief Service
cholera treatment centre
DACHICARE
DCP
DDF
DFID
DSS
Dananai Child Care
Department of Civil Protection
District Development Fund
Department for International Development
Department of Social Services
EC
EEJRPN
EmONC
ETF
European Commission
Emergency Education Joint Response & Preparedness Network
emergency obstetric and neonatal care
Education Transition Fund
FACHIG
FACT
FAO
FAWEZI
FCZT
FI
FNC
FOST
FRC
FST
Farmers Association of Community Self Help Group
Family AIDS Caring Trust
Food and Agriculture Organization
Forum for African Women Educationalists Zimbabwe Chapter
Farmers Community Trust of Zimbabwe
Family Impact
Food and Nutrition Council
Farm Orphan Trust
French Red Cross
Family Support Trust
GAA
GBV
GF
GoZ
German Agro Action/Welt Hunger Hilfe
Gender-Based Violence
Goodwill Foundation
Government of Zimbabwe
40
GTZ
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (German Technical Cooperation)
HAZ
HCC
HCT
HERU
HH
HIPO
HIV/AIDS
HKI
HT
HelpAge Zimbabwe
Hope for a Child in Christ
Humanitarian Country Team
Health Emergency Response Unit
households
Help Initiatives for People Organization
human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome
Helen Keller International
HALO Trust
ICT
IDPs
IEC
ILO
IMC
IOM
IRC
IRD
ISL
IYCF
information and communication technology
internally displaced people
information, education and communication
International Labour Organisation
International Medical Corps
International Organisation for Migration
International Rescue Committee
International Relief and Development
Integrated Sustainable Livelihoods
infant and young child feeding
JCT
Justice for Children Trust
LA
LGDA
LICI
local authorities
Lower Guruve Development Association
Livelihoods Institutional Capacity & Infrastructure
M&E
MAM
MDM
MDRA
MISP
MoA
MoESAC
MoHA
MoHCW
MoJLA
MoLGRUD
MoLSS
MoWAGCD
MoWRD
MT
monitoring and evaluation
moderate acute malnutrition
Medecins du Monde
Methodist Development and Relief Agency
Minimum Initial Service Package
Ministry of Agriculture, Mechanisation and Irrigation Development
Ministry of Education, Sport, Art and Culture
Ministry of Home Affairs
Ministry of Health and Child Welfare
Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs
Ministry of Local Government, Rural and Urban Development
Ministry of Labour and Social Services
Ministry of Women’s Affairs, Gender and Community Development
Ministry of Water Resources Development Management
Mpumelelo Trust
NAC
NGOs
NODED
NRC
National Action Committee
Non Governmental Organization
National Organisation for the Development of the Disadvantaged
Norwegian Refugee Council
OCHA
OPHID
ORAP
OST
OVC
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
Organization of Public Health Interventions and Development
Organisation of Rural Associations for Progress
Open Society Trust
orphans and vulnerable children
PI
PLWHIV
PNC
PS
Plan International
people living with HIV
post-natal care
private sector
41
PSI
Populations Services International
RDC
RMT
RSC
Rural District Committee
Redan Mobile Transaction
Reception and Support Centres
SA
SAD
SAM
SAT
SGBV
SC
SFP
SIDA
SPWSN
SRH
SSC
SSO
Streets Ahead
Southern Africa Dialogue
severe acute malnutrition
Sustainable Agriculture Trust
sexual or gender based-violence
Save the Children
supplementary feeding program
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
Single Parents and Widow/ers Support Network
Seke Rural Home
Swedish Cooperative Centre
Social Service Office
TB
TC
TDH
tuberculosis
town councils
Terre des hommes
UAM
UN
UNAIDS
UNDP
UNDSS
UNFPA
UNHABITAT
UNHCR
UNICEF
UNIFEM
USAID
unaccompanied minors
United Nations
United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS
United Nations Development Programme
United Nations Department of Safety and Security
United Nations Population Fund
United Nations Human Settlements Programme
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
United Nations Children’s Fund
United Nations Development Fund for Women
United States Agency for International Development
VFSC
VFU
Victim Friendly System Committee
Victim Friendly Unit
WAG
WASH
WEG
WERU
WFP
WHO
WV
Women’s Action Group
Water, sanitation and hygiene
Women’s Empowerment Group
WASH Emergency Response Unit
World Food Programme
World Health Organisation
World Vision
ZACRO
ZANRM
ZCDT
ZFU
ZimAHEAD
ZINWA
ZOEH
ZRCS
ZWLA
Zimbabwe Association for Crime Prevention and Rehabilitation of the Offender
Zimbabwean Artists, National and Regional Media
Zimbabwe Community Development Trust
Zimbabwe Farmers Union
Zimbabwe Applied Health Education & Development
Zimbabwe National Water Authority
Zimbabwe Orphans through Extended hands
Zimbabwe Red Cross Society
Zimbabwe Women Lawyers Association
42
O FFI CE FO R THE C O O RDI N ATI O N O F HUM ANI T ARI AN AF F AI RS
(OCHA)