University of Leicester PLUME Ref: PLM-PSU-PowerProd-309-1 Date: 11/03/2009 Power Production M. Cro Date Updated Reference Number change 11/03/2009 PLM-PSU-PowerProd-309-1 first version issued Abstract We have calculated the maximum and minimum power we can get out of the solar cells over an orbit, considering the efficiency of the power supply unit too. The actual power production is expected to lie between these two extreme values. These values are Pmin=1.19W and Pmax=4.39W. The team has also estimated the average power expected, considering the average exposed area of the solar cells. This was found to be Pav=2.30W. Introduction In order to estimate the power available for the subsystems of the satellite the following need to be considered: The solar irradiance The solar cell efficiency The efficiency of the power supply unit The effective area of the solar cells Solar Irradiance Φ The solar energy flux is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the Sun. The equation that describes the relationship between the solar luminosity L and the flux at a distance R from the sun is L 4R 2 [1] We require the extraterrestrial solar irradiance distribution at a distance of 1 AU from the Sun, which is known as the air mass zero AM0. The value recommended by the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) is 1366.1 Wm-2. Page 1 of 5 University of Leicester PLUME Ref: PLM-PSU-PowerProd-309-1 Date: 11/03/2009 Solar Cell Efficiency ε Clyde Space will supply the solar panels for the PLUME CubeSat. Clyde Space uses two types of solar cells, EMCORE’s Advance Triple Junction cells (ATJ) with efficiency 27.5% and Spectrolab’s Triangular Advanced Solar Cells (TASC) with efficiency 27.0%. Efficiency of the Power Supply Unit k The power supply unit consists of components such as the battery charge regulators and the two power bus regulators that dissipate energy. This reduces the power available for the subsystems. According to Clyde Space who is our power supply unit’s provider, the total efficiency of the power supply unit is 90%. Effective Area of the Solar Panels A The effective area of the solar panels is the total area of the solar panels exposed to the Sun. Obviously; the effective area will depend on the way the satellite is spinning. The team has decided that the best way to deal with this is to consider the two extreme cases. The area is minimum when axis of rotation of the satellite is pointing always to the Sun, thus, only one side of the satellite is exposed. The area is maximum when the corner between 3 faces points towards the Sun. In this case the effective area is equal to the area of a hexagon. Figure 1. Configuration for minimum (left) and maximum (right) effective area. Page 2 of 5 University of Leicester PLUME Ref: PLM-PSU-PowerProd-309-1 Date: 11/03/2009 The minimum effective area Amin is the area of one face, equal to 0.01 fraction of the face covered with solar cells m2 [2] maximum effective area Amax is the area of a regular polygon, The 3 3 0.01 fraction of the faces covered with solar cells 2 m2 [3] In both cases we need to multiply by the fraction of the faces that is covered with solar cells since 3 out of six faces will not be completely covered with solar cells. In fact, 3 faces will have 100% of their area covered in with solar cells, 2 faces will have 84% of their area covered in solar cells (faces with the detector) and 1 face will have 96% of its area covered with solar cells (face with the camera). The PSU team has also estimated the average area exposed to the Sun by considering the area of each face projected on a plane perpendicular to the solar rays when the satellite is at some random orientation. These areas were then integrated between φ=0 and the satellite to rotate by and 0 and to allow for 2 2 about both the y and z axis (solar flux in the was taken to be parallel to 2 the x axis). The exact expression used was Aav 2 0 2 0 A cos cos A sin cos A sin dd dd 1 2 2 0 3 2 0 A1, A2 and A3 are the areas of three random faces of the satellite. In our calculations we have substituted these areas by the average area of each face given by A 1 6 0.102 2 0.04 2 0.022 9.4 103 m 2 6 Page 3 of 5 University of Leicester PLUME The final result obtained for Aav is Calculations 8 2 2 Ref: PLM-PSU-PowerProd-309-1 Date: 11/03/2009 9.4 103 0.0136m 2 . The power available for the satellite is calculated using the following equation combined with the data listed above P k A [4] where the symbols used have been defined above. The following Excel Spreadsheet can be used to calculate the power production, both when in sunlight and averaged over the orbital period for the two extreme cases discussed above, when we have a maximum exposed area and a minimum exposed area, and for the average exposed area. The three tables below list the minimum, maximum and average expected power. For the minimum power, it has been assumed that only one face will be exposed to the Sun and that face will have only 84% of its area covered in solar cells. For the maximum power, the second geometrical configuration was used, assuming this time that all three faces exposed to the solar radiation are completely covered in solar cells. Both these cases are not very likely and we are expecting a more randomised rotation of the satellite. Maximum Exposed Area Solar Irradiance (Wm-2) 1366.1 Solar Cell efficiency 0.275 Power Supply Unit Efficiency 0.90 Fraction of Area covered with solar cells 1.00 Effective Area (m2) 0.026 Power production when in sunlight (W) 8.78 Power production averaged over the period (W) 4.39 Minimum Exposed Area Page 4 of 5 University of Leicester PLUME Ref: PLM-PSU-PowerProd-309-1 Date: 11/03/2009 Solar Irradiance (Wm-2) 1366.1 Solar Cell efficiency 0.275 Power Supply Unit Efficiency 0.90 Fraction of Area covered with solar cells 0.84 Effective Area (m2) 0.008 Power production when in sunlight (W) 2.39 Power production averaged over the period (W) 1.19 Average Exposed Area Solar Irradiance (Wm-2) 1366.1 Solar Cell efficiency 0.275 Power Supply Unit Efficiency 0.90 Effective Area (m2) 0.0136 Power production when in sunlight (W) 4.60 Power production averaged over the period (W) 2.30 Page 5 of 5