This report has been compiled by Work Package 5 partners:
Cláudia Conceição –School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Portugal;
Marvic Sammut – Ministry of Health, the Elderly and Community Care, Malta (MHEC);
Amanda Saliba – Ministry of Health, the Elderly and Community Care, Malta (MHEC);
Zuzana Katreniakova – Slovak Public Health Association (SAVEZ);
Olivier Grimaud – French School of Public Health (EHESP);
Laura Narkauskaitė – Lithuanian Institute of Hygiene (LIH);
And
Floris Barnhoorn – European Public Health Association (EUPHA)
Mark McCarthy – Faculty of Public Health (UKFPH)
This publication arises from the project ‘PHIRE - Public Health Innovation and Research in Europe’,
Agreement Number 2009 12 14, which has received funding from the European Union, in the framework of the Health Programme.
PHIRE is implemented from 1 September 2010 until 28 February 2013.
The project is coordinated by the European Public Health Association (EUPHA). Associated partners are School of Public Health (EHESP), France; Faculty of Public Health (FPH), United
Kingdom; Institute of Hygiene (LIH), Lithuania; Karolinska Institute, Sweden; Ministry of Health, the Elderly and Community Care (MHEC), Malta; Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research
(NIVEL), the Netherlands; Slovak Public Health Association (SAVEZ), Slovakia.
2
Contents
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 5
PHIRE, Public Health Innovation and Research in Europe ........................................................ 5
Work package 5, Demonstrating national innovation and research ........................................ 5
MATERIAL AND METHODS ............................................................................................................ 7
RESULTS ....................................................................................................................................... 13
Thematic areas of public health research (research fields) which were financed through national programmes and calls in 2010 .................................................................................. 15
Establishing contacts and collaboration with National Public Health Associations ................ 19
DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 20
CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................... 22
Appendix 1 - Distribution of the countries by partners .............................................................. 53
Appendix 2 - 1 st phase WP5 letter sent by email to National Public Health Associations’contacts or other national contacts ........................................................................................................... 54
Appendix 3 - Form ....................................................................................................................... 56
Appendix 4 - Email and letter from EUPHA office and president about PHIRE 1 st phase WP5 .. 61
Appendix 5 - Letter from EUPHA president to National Public Health Associations .................. 62
Appendix 6 - PHIRE summary sent to National Public Health Associations ................................ 64
Appendix 7 – Second email from EUPHA office and president to National Public Health
Associations ................................................................................................................................. 65
Appendix 8 – Second letter from EUPHA president to National Public Health Associations ..... 66
Appendix 9 - Form with answers ................................................................................................. 67
Appendix 11 - PHIRE Supplemental Information – Ireland ......................................................... 71
3
List of Boxes
Box 1 - Summary of activities carried by PHIRE management committee and WP5 coordination to design and conduct the 1st phase WP5.
Box 2 – Definition of Public Health Research sent as reference.
List of tables
Table 1 - WP5 first phase, summary of contacts between regional coordinators and National
Public Health Associations and Country informants and type of organization from final respondent.
Table 2 - Countries with or without calls or programmes on public health research opened in
2010.
Table 3 - Number of calls included by country.
Table 4 - Number of calls or programmes by areas of research.
Table 5 - Number of calls or programmes by main areas of research financed in 2010, total and without France and the United Kingdom.
Table 6 - Open calls or programmes in public health research opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives
Table 7 - Calls or programmes in methods in public health research opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Table 8 - Calls or programmes on cancer (Public health research / Disease control / Noncommunicable chronic diseases) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Table 9 - Calls or programmes on mental health (Public health research / Disease control /
Non-communicable chronic diseases) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Table 10 - Calls or programmes on non-specified and other non-communicable chronic diseases (Public health research / Disease control / Non-communicable chronic diseases) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives
Table 11 - Calls or programmes on other or non-specified diseases (Public health research /
Disease control) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Table 12 - Calls or programmes on communicable Disease (Public health research / Disease control) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Table 13 - Calls or programmes on environmental and occupational health (Public health research / Health promotion) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives (to be continued).
Table 14 - Calls or programmes on Health promotion, in general (Public health research /
Health promotion) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives (to be continued).
Table 15 - Calls or programmes on health services, statistics, information, screening, organization (Public health research / Health services) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives (to be continued).
Table 16 - Calls or programmes on other health services (Public health research / Health services) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Table 17 - Call or program on youth (Public health research / Target groups) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Table 18 - Call or program on ageing (Public health research / Target groups) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Table 19 – Additional information provided by countries, summary.
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries.
4
PHIRE (Public Health Innovation and Research in Europe) is a collaborative action between
EUPHA members and its general objective is to contribute to the improvement of public health knowledge and practice across the European Union by assessing the impact and uptake of the first Public Health Programme (PHP) and structuring information on public health research.
PHIRE seeks to explore uptake of knowledge from public health actions funded under the first
PHP at national level across Europe; develop a resource base bringing together national public health research at European level; assess the impact of the public health programme and propose recommendations for improved effectiveness of current and future health programmes.
During 2011, PHIRE activities were mainly developed by two work packages 4 and 5. The specific objectives for WP4 were to identify and characterize eight ‘tracer projects’ developed within the first Public Health Programme (PHP). The projects were selected in relation to their applicability across European countries and for their innovative character. The aim was to assess dissemination and uptake of the results across the 30 European Economic Area (EEA) countries to determine national and regional impact on public health actions. The work was undertaken in close cooperation with the EUPHA Section leads 1 . An independent report will be produced.
The Work package 5 was designed, through collaboration of EUPHA's member national associations, to present national and comparative data on public health research and innovation across Europe.
1 Seven EUPHA Sections decided to take part in PHIRE: Public health epidemiology, Food and nutrition,
Urban public health, Public mental health, Environment related diseases, Injury prevention & safety promotion, and Chronic diseases.
5
It was led by a Work Package Coordinator together with four PHIRE partners. Each of these four PHIRE partners worked with 7-8 national associations in geographical sectors of Europe
(Appendix 1).
Two sets of data were gained from National Public Health Associations: i) In the first year, information describing national public health research calls and programmes was collected; ii) In the second year, national summary reports were compiled based on public health innovation and research drawn from the investigations by the 7 EUPHA section informants (obtained during 2011, with WP4).
This report concerns the first year of the project (2011). The specific objectives of this 1st phase of WP5 were:
To describe thematic areas of public health research (research fields) which are currently being financed through national programmes and calls;
Establish contacts and collaboration with National Public Health Associations.
6
To fulfil the objectives, a set of activities and tools were developed. Box 1 lists the main meetings during which the study was designed and implementation was followed up.
Box 1 - Summary of activities carried by PHIRE management committee and WP5 coordination to design and conduct the 1 st phase WP5
Management committee meeting, Utrecht 30 September and 1 st October 2010
Work Package 5 Coordination Meeting on the 11th Nov 2010 in Amsterdam, during
EUPHA annual conference
Telephone conference 31st January 2011, from Paris with summary of main resolutions)
Work Package 5 Coordination Meeting on the 3rd May 2011 in Brussels
Participation on the meeting of WP 4 section leads (Cláudia Conceição, Denmark, 4th June
2011)
Management Committee Meeting, Utrecht 22 September and 23 September 2011
The main instrument developed to collect information on public health research programmes and calls was a form. The form drew on lessons learned with the preparation of country profiles in STEPS’ (Strengthening Engagement in public health research, www.steps-ph.eu
).
According to limitations of time and the knowledge of the variability on the amount of calls on public health research, it was decided that the survey would be limited to programmes and calls on public health research opened during 2010.
A first version of the form was piloted during December in each of the countries of the regional coordinators (France, Lithuania, Malta and Slovakia). The final version was ready after the telephone conference in January 2011.
The form was to be completed for each call or programme on public health research identified in the country. The definition of public health research, to be used as reference by the National
Public Health Association is shown in Box 2 and Appendix 2.
7
Box 2 – Definition of public health research sent as reference
Definition of public health research used on SPHERE*
Public-health research operates at a complex level between scientists, individuals and society.
And the issues that public-health research addresses – how to improve the health of the population, and how to ensure the effective and efficient organisation of health care – are of direct concern to governments themselves. For SPHERE, the following definition of public health research, which gave a broad meaning, was used:
"Public-health research refers to the organized quest for new knowledge to protect, promote and improve people's health. It:
• is undertaken at population or health services level, in contrast to laboratory
(cellular) or clinical (individual) health research;
• differs from public-health practice (which also uses scientific methods), as it is designed to obtain generalizable knowledge rather than to address specific programmes for service delivery;
• is usually goal-oriented, addressing questions of policy relevance, and may be published in either academic journals or reports; and
• uses a range of observational methods, including surveys, registers, data sets, case studies and statistical modelling, and draws on disciplines including epidemiology, sociology, psychology and economics, and interdisciplinary fields of environmental health, health promotion, disease prevention, health-care management, healthservices research and health-systems research."
(BMC Public Health 2009, 9:203 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-203)
* SPHERE, Strengthening Public Health Research in Europe, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/publichealth/sphere
The form (Appendix 3) covered four main areas:
A - Identification of the funding thematic program or call for research projects;
B - Description of the program/call;
C - Funding and duration of the program/call;
D - Eligibility criteria and other conditions to obtain funding.
8
The strategy to launch the first phase WP5 was as follow:
A first email was sent to EUPHA Governing Council members from EUPHA office on the first February 2011 (Appendix 4). This email asked each National Public Health
Association to designate a responsible person to collaborate with PHIRE. It included: o a letter from EUPHA President regarding PHIRE (PHIRE had already been presented at the annual Governing Council meeting in November 2010). The
EUPHA President also introduced the Regional coordinators who would send the forms and asked for collaboration from the National Public Health
Associations (Appendix 5); o a summary on PHIRE (Appendix 6)
Emails and phone calls from regional coordinators followed until November 2011
(Table 1 )
Second email to EUPHA members from EUPHA office on the 14 April 2011 (Appendix 7) with the following attachments: o Second letter from EUPHA President acknowledging contributions received and again reminding National Public Health Associations about PHIRE
(Appendix 8); o Summary on PHIRE (Appendix 6)
The strategies to obtain collaboration from National Public Health Associations were further discussed in May (Box 1). The general strategy followed by regional coordinators included the following steps:
Address initial email to National Public Health Associations’contact given by EUPHA office;
Offer to contact by telephone (ask for a time, date and number to establish the contact);
Ask the National Public Health Associations first contact to suggest another person to be contacted if the first contact was unable to provide information (to use even if the contact does not belong to the National Public Health Associations);
Offer assistance in organizing the information and fulfilling the forms
If no answer, use other contacts of the same National Public Health Associations (to be asked for from EUPHA office);
If still no answer, use contacts outside National Public Health Associations.
9
Contacts made and final respondents are presented on Table 1. A total of more than 242 emails were sent and 60 phone calls were made. The results were received until the end of
November 2011.
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Table 1 - WP5 first phase, summary of contacts between regional coordinators and National
Public Health Associations and Country informants and type of organization from final
Country
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Czech
Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
NPHA
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(2)
N
Date first contact
9 Feb 11 of
9 Feb 11 2
10 Feb 11 1
9 Feb 11 -
11 Feb 11 5
9 Feb 11
9 Feb 11
4
4
9 Feb 11 4
10 Feb 11 - respondent
E - mails
Number of phone calls
4
Sent
11
10
10
5
11
6
13
6
1
Received
5
1
2
1
1
10
6
5
3
Date of reception of answers
Organization of final respondent
/key
- informants
-
28 Apr 11 NPHA
22 Jun 11 NPHA
29 Apr 11 University
- -
8 Sep 11
-
WP5
-
7 Jun 11 NPHA
18 May 11 NPHA + WP5
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y (3)
N
Y(2)
Y
Y
Y
10 Feb 11 1
11 Feb 11 3
9 Feb 11
2 Apr 11
6
1
23 Feb 11 -
11 Feb 11 -
9 Feb 11
9 Feb 11
3
-
20 May 11 -
11 Feb 11 -
2 Apr 11
9 Feb 11
1
1
9 Feb 11 4
11 Feb 11 7
9 Feb 11 -
9 Feb 11
9 Feb 11
-
3
7
2
3
2
1
4
6
1
4
3
-
5
1
-
3
1
2
10
1
9
8
14
11
6
2
6
7
4
14
6
6
6
1
10
9 Sep 11 NPHA + WP5
22 Apr 11 MoH
-
1 Nov 11
-
NPHA + WP5
14 Mar 11 MoH + HRA
26 May 11 NPHA
19 Jul 11 NPHA
15 Apr 11 WP5
-
19 Jan 11
-
NPHA
Nov 11 HRA
17 Aug. 11 NPHA + WP5
6 Oct 11
15 Jul 11
26 Jul 11
NPHA + WP5
NPHA
NPHA
5 Apr 11 NPHA
30 Oct 11 NPHA
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United
Kingdom
TOTAL
Y
Y
Y
Y(2)
11 Feb 11 5
9 Feb 11 -
10 Feb 11 1
2 Apr 11 -
23
8
12
5
10
6
4
4
27 Jul 11 HRA
10 May 11 NPHA
19 Sep 11 NPHA + WP5
19 Aug 11 NPHA
60 242 103
Notes: NPHA – National Public Health Association; Y – yes; N – no; (number of NPHA when more than one); MoH - Ministry of Health; WP5 – work package 5; HRA - Health research agency
10
Definition of calls and programmes to include
The WP partners sent a definition of Public Health Research (Box 2 and Appendix 2) to National
Public Health Associations or country key informants (Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, and
Luxembourg). The submitted material was sometimes discussed with respondents and also moderated by the work package or project coordinators. A further revision for internal consistency was performed during the preparation of this report, and at this stage the decisions were taken by consensus or majority of authors.
Classification of themes
To organise thematic areas financed through competitive financing (programmes and calls) some classifications were explored 2 but none matched the needs of this project.
A new typology was therefore developed by the WP partners. An initial proposal was applied to the existing reported calls and programmes. It was revised twice, and a final classification was agreed.
Some general rules guided the process of thematic organization of the calls /programmes:
the main objective was not to create a taxonomy on public health research but to classify the calls collected;
all the items included on the classification created had, at least, one call. This means that even if a category would be logical, if no call existed, it wouldn’t be included;
2 UK Clinical Research Collaboration. Health Research Classification System. January 2009 http://www.hrcsonline.net/sites/default/files/HRCS_Document.pdf
, last accessed April 2012;
RICHE (Research into Child Health in Europe) Taxonomies of Child Health Research. Draft Discussion
Document – Version 1 - 6 April 2010. Available at: http://www.childhealthresearch.eu/aboutus/inventory-of-research/taxonomy-discussion-paper/view, last assessed in September 2011;
Bauer G, Davies JK, Pelikan J on behalf of the Euhpid Theory Working Group and The Euhpid Consortium.
The EUHPID Health Development Model for the classification of public health indicators. Health Promot.
Int. (2006) 21 (2): 153-159. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dak002;
Jorm L., Gruszin S., Churches T. A multidimensional classification of public health activity in Australia. http://www.anzhealthpolicy.com/content/pdf/1743-8462-6-9.pdf
;
Public Health Classifications Project. http://www.nphp.gov.au/workprog/phi/index.htm
;
Public Health Classifications Project - Phase One: Final Report . Report to the National Public Health
Partnership. December 2005. http://www.publichealth.gov.au/pdf/reports_papers/technical%20papers/ph_classifications_report_ph ase01.pdf
;
Public Health Classifications Project – Determinants of Health. Phase Two: Final Report. NSW
Department of Health. December 2010. http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/pubs/2010/pdf/public_health_classifications_project.pdf
;
McCarthy M, Harvey G, Conceição C, La Torre G, Gulis G. Comparing public health research priorities in
Europe.Health Research Policy and Systems 2009, 7:17.
11
as a call might include many aspects, a main “entry point” of that research should be chosen and then classified accordingly. This means that a call/program is included in only one category.
The classification process took place by email, where reasons for disagreement on others
‘classifications was offered and positions changed. During the Management committee that took place in June 2012 and during revision of earlier versions of this report, further revisions of the classification were made.
12
Of the 30 countries included, we obtained answers from 25, and of these 16 had at least one calls or program on public health research announced in 2010 whilst nine did not find information on calls or programmes opened in the same period (Table 2).
Table 2 - Countries with or without calls or programmes on public health research opened in
2010.
No calls on public health research announced in 2010
Calls on public health research announced in 2010
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Greece
Latvia
Malta
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Belgium
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Lithuania
Netherlands
Norway
Romania
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Note: No answers received from: Austria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary and Luxembourg.
The number of calls or programmes on public health research opened in 2010 and financed by the main national commissioners is shown in Table 3. While the median value is two calls or programmes per country, France and United Kingdom described 41 calls, more than 50% of the total.
13
Table 3 - Number of calls included by country
Country
Belgium
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Lithuania
Netherlands
Norway
Romania
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Total
3
1
1
2
1
1
2
6
Number of forms/calls
3
5
2
27
5
1
1
14
75
We have previously worked with country respondents, using phone calls and emails to build knowledge on public health research systems 3 , and recognise that the final information obtained may not be complete. Only France had an organized database to record calls or programmes on public health research across a full range of commissioning organisations. The data are collected by IReSP (French Institute for Public Health Research) within the national medical research institute (INSERM) and distributed with the collaboration of the French
Society of Public Health.
Aspects of bias that may be present in these results are:
1. Reporting. The extent of informants’ knowledge of, and engagement in, systems of public health research differ in European countries to an unknown degree.
2. Country systems. Larger countries tend to organise research calls separately, while smaller countries may make a single overall call for research. For a smaller country, the opportunity (in principle) for public health research may exist within a broader call.
3 STEPS report: Public Health Research –Europe’s Future, available at http://www.steps-ph.eu/wpcontent/uploads/STEPS_Report.pdf
; Country ‘profiles: http://www.steps-ph.eu/country-researchprofiles/ ; Conceição C, McCarthy M. Public health research systems in the European Union. Health
Research Policy and Systems 2011, 9:38.
14
3. In some countries, research is supported through the traditional method of institutional grants (negotiated directly between institution and government department), rather than through the competitive calls and programmes recorded by this WP.
4. Only one year was chosen, and in some countries calls for research are not made every year.
Moreover, 2010 was a particularly difficult budget year.
Tables 4 and 5 summarise the number of calls/ programmes in each thematic area in total and without France and United Kingdom. Tables 6-18 (page xx) information obtained on commissioning agency and objectives of calls and programmes.
Table 4 - Number of calls or programmes by areas of research.
Number of
Open calls / All public health
Thematic areas of public health research
Disease control
calls/programmes
11
Number of
calls/programmes
7
3
Health promotion
Health services
Methods
Target groups
Noncommunicable chronic diseases
Cancer
Mental health
Non-specified and other non-communicable chronic diseases
Other or non-specified diseases
Communicable Disease
Environmental, occupational
Health promotion (general)
Health services, statistics, information, screening, organization
Other
Epidemiology, social sciences, other
Youth
Ageing
8
2
4
1
1
3
4
11
8
12
15
Table 5 - Number of calls or programmes by main areas of research financed in 2010, total and without France and the United Kingdom.
Total
Number of calls/programmes
11
% of calls/ programmes
15
Without France and United
Kingdom
Number of calls/programmes
6
% of calls/ programmes
18 Open calls / All public health
Thematic areas of public health research
Disease control
Health promotion
Health services
Methods
(Epidemiology, social sciences, other)
Target groups (Youth,
Ageing)
Total
25
19
14
4
2
64
75
33
25
19
5
3
85
100
10
9
7
2
0
28
34
29
26
21
6
0
82
100
Many countries have open calls on “health” research (Table 19). However we were looking for specific programmes for Public Health Research areas. Some countries do also have open calls on public health research (details on these calls on Tables 6-18). The countries where we could find these generic calls on public health research in 2010 were: France, Ireland, Lithuania,
Norway, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom.
The area with the most calls or programmes was “Disease control” (total of 25 calls with 18 on non-communicable chronic diseases) concerned with specific diseases, their prevention and health services control of the problem. The second most frequent area was “Health promotion” with research on generic determinants of health, especially environment and social. The third area with more calls was “health services”, including information systems, organization of services and effectiveness of interventions. A small group of calls was on development of methodologies of research (Belgium, France, Netherlands and United
Kingdom). Finally two calls were classified on an approach by target age group: research on ageing and on youth.
Appendix 9 provides complementary information provided in forms. In general, calls did not have target groups in terms of age group or sex. Also calls or programmes were not specifically directed to disciplines as epidemiology, economics or biostatistics.
The total amount available for each program or call was from a minimum of € 135.000 (one of the calls from Belgium) to a maximum of € 101 million (Italy). The maximum funding available
16
for each project was from € 3.000 (Iceland) to € 21 million (one of the calls from Sweden).
However this could be assigned to projects from 10 months (one of one project from France 5) until 10 years duration (one programme from France). However, in many call or programmes, this funding was available for broad research areas and the proportion of funding for public health research was not known (see content of call or programmes, Tables 6-18).
When reported for (32 calls/programmes), the nationality of the research team had to be national in 19 and could involve foreigners in 13. When further explanation was provided, the involvement of foreigners meant that: i) foreigners could be from EU countries with no further explanation (three calls, Denmark); ii) foreigners could be involved if initiative, coordination or collaboration was from a national team (three calls, France); iii) foreigners are allowed if no national expertise is available (two calls, United Kingdom); iv) international teams are allowed but only the national part will be financed by the call/ program (one call, Ireland); v) foreigners are allowed if working in the country (one call, United Kingdom).
In general the potential beneficiaries of the competitive grant were public institutions. In all cases where private institutions could apply (36) also public ones also could (50).
Tables 6-18 provides information obtained on calls or programmes on public health research opened in 2010, organized by theme of research, country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Although some countries did not open specific calls or programmes on public health research some valuable information and comments were provided. Some further information was provided on:
calls or programmes on public health research but without the time range established for this research (2010) or without information available on dates where calls were opened;
other mechanism for support of public health research in the country;
calls or programmes that were not earmarked for public health research, nor included in the objectives aspects of public health research, but where PH projects could be eligible. In this group it is frequent to find broader calls on “health” or “medical sciences”.
This information is summarized on Table 20 and more detailed information is provided on
Appendix 10 and 11. In this table and appendix it is also included information on programmes
17
and calls provided by respondents but not considered (either by researchers or researchers and respondents) as calls or programmes in public health research.
Table 19 – Additional information provided by countries, summary.
Type of additional information
Country / code of call or programme
(details in Table20)
Calls or programmes on public health research
Information on public health research support but through other mechanisms than calls or programmes
Opened before or after 2010;
With no available information on date to apply for
Funding research centres
Funding Scholarship programmes (e.g. PhD Scholars in health services research);
Awards
Cyprus
Germany b)
Poland
Greece a)
Ireland
Ireland
Malta
Portugal
Calls or programmes not considered on public health research themes
Support to infrastructure development
Calls on broader area as
“health”
Other
Ireland
Romania b)
Germany a)
Italy a)
Italy b)
Latvia
Portugal.
Romania a)
Slovakia b)
Slovenia
Italy c)
Greece b)
Greece c)
Norway
Romania c)
Romania d)
Slovakia a)
Slovakia c)
18
Getting involvement of the National Public Health Associations (NPHA) was a major objective for the project, along with obtaining the required information. In general, no National Public
Health Association designated a responsible person for the project. Information was gained, however, from individuals within and outside National Public Health Associations (where there was not a NPHA) that collaborated with valuable contributions, thoughts and opinions.
The strategies used to overcome the objections and difficulties have already been presented on the Methods section.
National Public Health Associations members of EUPHA regretted the lack of clear information on financial support for the research, because most of the countries do not have the information on public health research commissioners and programmes/calls well organized.
19
From the 30 countries inquired we obtained information from 25 countries. Of these 16 reported at least one call or programme on public health research announced in 2010, while nine found no call or programmes opened. The number of calls or programmes analysed was
75. There was a median of 2 calls per country while France and United Kingdom held more than 50% of total.
This first phase of PHIRE, WP5 aimed to describe thematic areas of public health research
(research fields) which are currently being financed through national programmes and calls.
Some public health research continues to be funded directly, through negotiation between commissioners (generally ministries) and providers (institutes and universities). However, research is increasingly funded in response to competitive calls. In general the potential beneficiaries of these competitive grants are public institutions. In all cases where private institutions could apply also public ones also could. In general, only national researchers working in the country are eligible to apply to these calls or programmes. However, there are examples of eligibility of foreign researchers especially if initiative is from a national team and if no national expertise is available.
Methodology issues
In the first year of PHIRE, information had been drawn together on national health and public health research systems, based upon financial flows from research commissioners to research performers. No country, except for France, had well-organized information on competitive public health research calls and programmes. Almost all the countries claimed that to obtain the information on calls opened in 2010 was not possible without a specific and significant allocation of time to that task.
Comparisons by country
The two countries with large numbers of call or programmes identified were France and UK. In
France, a national system for collecting research calls and programmes – and projects – has been operating within the national research council INSERM for 7 years (through the groundbreaking initiative of Professor Alfred Spira). This database draws on 28 funding organisations, including national, regional and local, and across public, charity and commercial funders. The
UK information derives from the national research councils, ministry of health and diseasebased charities, and shows segmentation to give specific support to public health themes. The
Netherlands and Denmark also had differentiated research programmes.
20
One of the reasons for the strength of health research in these countries is that they draw some funds from their health system. This is not the case in most other European countries.
Germany’s programmes for disease / topic groupings are funded directly by the Ministry of
Science and Education (more generic national programmes for ‘Prevention’ and ‘Patient
Research’ were closed in 2010). Spain reported only for a single national programme, funded from the Ministry of Science through the National School of Health Carlos III (although regional funding was not reported). No call or programme was reported for Poland, where the national scientific institutes are still directly funded, rather than by open calls and programmes. There were open calls for general research in 2010 for Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia, but these were not directed towards public health topics. In Cyprus and Ireland calls had been made in the previous year, while in Latvia, Malta and Portugal expected calls were not announced in
2010.
Comparisons by theme
Programmes and calls may be i) thematic, focused on a defined subject area; ii) open to any subject in the area of public health; or iii) general, such as to reinforce research capacity
(scholarships, seminars, training, grants for visiting researchers) 4 . The classification of research calls and programmes into themes had, as its main difficulty, the decision on how to allocate a call within a single theme – public health research often (and appropriately) stretches across scientific and medical fields. The choices were influenced by authors, by the information provided in the forms (original information was limited when transcribed) and by the structure of the classification scheme itself.
The groupings of public health calls and programmes made for this analysis were quite broad, reflecting the need to accommodate to different traditions in different countries, and also the broad categories typically seen grouping research papers in relevant journals (eg European
Journal of Public Health) and at conferences (eg European Public Health Conference annually).
Clinical research classically divides by diseases, while public health research is concerned with prevention and organisation of services more generally. Nevertheless, much public health research can be – and still needs to be – undertaken within ‘disease-specific’ fields. Cancer featured more prominently than heart disease, perhaps surprisingly as these both have strong public health aspects, as well as other ‘chronic diseases’. It was welcome to include ‘rare
4 Conceição C, McCarthy M. Public health research systems in the European Union. Health Research
Policy and Systems 2011, 9:38.
21
diseases’, stimulated in 2010 by the European coordinating project ERA-RARE, for which there are very significant public health research aspects. Environmental and occupation health were perhaps under-represented (WHO has coordinated a separate inventory of this field at ERA-
EnvHealth). The grouping of health services, statistics, screening and organisation was pragmatic, reflecting the interface of this field with ‘clinical’ research across health system lines. Finally, the categories for age-related research, although cutting across typical research methods and fields, are potentially relevant for wider public interest in the research agenda.
This is the first description that has been made of public health research calls or programmes across Europe. Restricted, for practical reasons, to one year (2010), and using information from 25 of 30 European countries, it has classified 75 calls and projects. While the broad topics in countries were similar, there was less coherence shown in comparison between the national programmes, and it was impossible to assess the funding for public health research compared with other medical research.
Public health actions achieve as much in improving health and lengthening life as bio-medical advances, yet public health research receives far less support than biomedical research. To maintain and develop the evidence base for public health, more investment is needed for public health research. Yet also, to maximise the benefit of this investment, European countries – their ministries of science, ministries of health, health services, industry and civil society – must work much more closely together.
Shared information is at the heart of cooperation. We present this report towards the success of combined research calls, programmes and projects in public health research for Europe.
22
Table 6 - Open calls or programmes in public health research opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives
Country / code
France
Commissioning agency
Institut de recherche en santé publique (IReSP) / French
Institute for Public Health
Research
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
2010 call for research projects
Public health research (mental health, prevention, new paradigms in health, general issues of IReSP: health services research, public policies and their impact on health, health determinants)
Ireland
Lithuania
Norway
Spain
Health Research Board
Research Council of Lithuania
Norwegian Research Council
Ministry of Science and
Innovation/ Institute of
Health Carlos III
Health Research Awards
(population health sciences research and health services research)
Social Challenges to
National Security
Programme for Public
Health (FOLKEHELSE)
National Plan on Research,
Development and
Innovation 2008-2011:
Strategic Agenda on Health
2010 Public Health,
Enviromental, Ocupational,
Health Service Research
Subprogramme
To fund individual researchers and research teams, who will conduct internationally competitive and innovative research, through population health sciences research and health services research that will create new knowledge and evidence of benefit to health.
To reveal the nature, content, extent and trends of the social phenomena of the threats to national security, and to develop strategic solutions and recommendations to overcome these threats.
Goals and measures for their implementation: birth studies (determinants and consequences, fertility behaviour and factors, family and household transformation factors), mortality and public health research (impacts and potential consequences).
To generate new knowledge about the factors that affect public health, the causes of social inequalities in health, and the measures that can reduce these inequalities and improve public health.
Generating knowledge for the health and welfare of citizens and for the development of the preventive, diagnostic, curative, rehabilitative techniques.
Reinforcing and increasing the competitiveness and ability in R&D&I of
Spanish National Health System and companies in this sector.
The Subprogramme aims at producing evidence for policy making decisions as well as knowledge to clinical practice.
23
Table 6 - Open calls or programmes in public health research opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives
(continuation).
Country / code Commissioning agency Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Sweden
Sweden
(FAS) Swedish council for working life and social research.
Swedish Research Council
Public Health
Epidemiology, Public Health and Caring sciences
The Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research funds research on living conditions, environment and social conditions, lifestyles, and the healthcare system for public health, as well on the efficiency of the healthcare system. Causes, prevalence and prevention of illness in the population are also studied, as is the distribution of illness by class, gender, ethnicity, age and education.
Supports research on how disease occurs and how our genetics interacts with the environment, childhood circumstances and other living conditions
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Medical Research Council
NIHR - National Institute for health Research
NIHR - National Institute for health Research
NIHR - National Institute for health Research
Population and Systems
Medicine Board
Programme
Research programme grants applied research
Public Health Research for capability
This is the main decision board within the MRC covering population health sciences.
Calls are open for any research proposal, but the current thematic priorities include Nutrition … obesity; Ageing and lifelong health; Maternal health and the early origins of health and disease; Medical sociology; lifestyle, socioeconomic and behavioural impacts on general health and health inequalities.
Alongside the full range of ‘clinical’ (disease-based) research, Population
Health Sciences - include population-based studies into aetiology of disease, traditional epidemiology and social and behavioural medicine.
Applied health research including health services research; public health research; behavioural research; economic evaluations; and modelling.
It is a national “response mode” programme that aims to provide evidence to improve health outcomes in England through promotion of health, prevention of ill health, and optimal disease management (including safety and quality), with particular emphasis on conditions causing significant disease burden.
Evaluate public health interventions: new knowledge on the benefits, costs, acceptability and wider impacts of non-NHS interventions intended to improve the health of the public and reduce inequalities in health.
Use of national electronic records system. Most of the research studies within the pilot are non-interventional (interventional studies are known as clinical trials). 10 pilot studies were commissioned in 2010.
24
Table 7 - Calls or programmes in methods in public health research opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Country / code Commissioning agency
Belgium
France
Netherlands
United Kingdom
French Community – Health
Directorate
Agence Nationale de la
Recherche (ANR) / National
Research Agency
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and
Development
Medical Research Council and
NIHR - National Institute for health Research
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Socio-Medical Information –
Customer logistics support and
To make a technical and scientific support to the achievement of the obligations of the French Community as regards statistics relating to death causes
To develop the medical data and to support their use in the preparation and the implementation of the five-year program of promotion of health, the operational community programme of promotion of health and the declaration of Community policy
Investments for the Future:
Cohorts - Public loan
To develop, over time, a small number of cohorts for health research :
• ongoing cohorts, to ensure their durability and widen their investigation scope
• new cohorts aimed at covering public health fields that have not been deeply studied yet
Research program on the development of (research) methods or – instruments on (cost)effectiveness, implementation and issues in public administration in public health. Projects should develop instruments to be
Program Prevention &
Methodology
Methodologies
Programme
Research used in research in public health.
Priorities, instruments that can be used: 1. To prove (cost-) effectiveness in public health, especially in health promotion; 2. To prove societal benefits of prevention; 3. Implementation research; 4. Research on instruments to support analyses on the evidence of public health.
Methods development and methodological outputs that are applicable beyond a specific case-study.
The programme includes research on: methods for the design and analysis of primary descriptive and evaluative studies; and secondary reviews and evidence synthesis of descriptive and evaluative studies; methodologies in the applied disciplines underpinning research in the health science, for example; the assessment and validation of patient-reported measures of health, health outcomes and satisfaction; methods development research to support the use and evaluation of complex interventions in health research.
25
Table 8 - Calls or programmes on cancer (Public health research / Disease control / Non-communicable chronic diseases) opened in 2010, by
country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Country / code
France
France
France
Commissioning agency
Research on interventions to reduce cancer related health inequalities
Ligue nationale contre le cancer / League against cancer
Ligue nationale contre le cancer / League against cancer
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Institut National du Cancer
(INCA) / National Cancer
Institute
To take into account health inequalities to ensure more equity and efficiency in all measures related to the response to cancer
Call for
Research in human and social sciences proposals
Adolescents and Cancer
Research projects for improving knowledge of cancer among adolescents and young adults aged 12 to 25 (currently being treated or having been treated) and strengthening the quality of therapeutic, psychological and social care.
Determination of anthropological, socio economic, socio cultural and geographic factors that condition the conditions of living of people affected by cancer.
Stresses multidisciplinary approaches and international comparisons.
France
Ligue nationale contre le cancer / League against cancer
Cancer
Research
Epidemiology
Research projects on cancer epidemiology
France
National Cancer Institute
(INCA)
Call for projects in public health – Cancer prevention and screening policies supporting early diagnosis and prevention of cancers
To support research and actions in public health focused on:
• promotion or evaluation of actions aiming at making cancer risks prevention better for general population or specific publics
• Design, experimental implementation and evaluation of cancer early detection actions for general populations or specific audiences
To promote implementation of balanced, reproducible, pooled, innovative actions and/or studies for the prevention, screening and early detection of cancers
26
Table 8 - Calls or programmes on cancer (Public health research / Disease control / Non-communicable chronic diseases) opened in 2010, by
country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives (continuation)
Country / code
France
United Kingdom
Commissioning agency
Cancer National Institute
(INCA)
Cancer Research UK
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Call for free research projects in human and social sciences, epidemiology and public
• To allow the emergence of original and scientifically excellent projects in different fields of social and human sciences, epidemiology and public health applied to cancers
• To increase and strengthen multidisciplinary scientific research grouping health about cancer (within the Cancer National Plan
2009-2013) together teams, fields and technological means around an issue or a specific objective
NAEDI (National Awareness and Early Diagnosis
Initiative) Research Call
Research on early detection of cancer with focus on: Targeting higher risk populations; Research focusing on public awareness and reasons for late presentation; Research focusing on health services; Methodology for, and evaluation of, early detection and awareness research
Table 9 - Calls or programmes on mental health (Public health research / Disease control / Non-communicable chronic diseases) opened in 2010,
by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Country
France
Germany
Netherlands
Commissioning agency
Foundation Plan Alzheimer
Federal Ministry of education and research (BMBF)
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and
Development
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Call for proposals 2010:
Social supports
To develop research projects dealing with new services or structures created within the Alzheimer Plan
Research on behavioural disorders associated with violence, neglect, mistreatment and abuse in childhood and adolescence
To support research collaborations on behavioural disturbances associated with violence, neglect, mistreatment and abuse in childhood and youth
Program Prevention 4
Prevention of psychological disorders (anxiety, depression) and to promote mental health
Research program on the promotion of mental health
The second call of this program only prioritizes research on: The promotion of mental resilience; Promotion of accessibility of effective interventions; Priority has universal and selective prevention.
27
Table 10 - Calls or programmes on non-specified and other non-communicable chronic diseases (Public health research / Disease control / Non-
communicable chronic diseases) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives
Country
Denmark
France
Commissioning agency
Danish Council for Strategic
Research
Agence de la biomedecine /
Biomedicine Agency
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Strategic research in individuals, disease and society/ Health and
Prevention
To contribute to the prevention of chronic diseases and their symptoms and – through treatment and rehabilitation – to preserve quality of life and functional ability for people with chronic disease and thereby also to reduce public healthcare expenditure.
Network of epidemiology and information in nephrology (REIN)
Research projects in epidemiology, economics and care management regarding renal failure
France
France
Association vaincre la mucovicidose / Association
Fight cystic fibrosis
Fondation coeur et artères /
Heart and Arteries
Foundation
Call for research projects
2011
Call for proposals 2010
To finance projects of basic and clinical research about cystic fibrosis
(includes epidemiological studies)
Germany
Germany
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
Competence
Diabetes mellitus
Competence
Obesity
Network
Network
To strengthen the development of research on cardio vascular diseases and metabolic disorders that encourage their development: diabetes, obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension
Applications are available on the following topics:
- Aetiology and pathogenesis research
- Prevention, diagnosis and treatment including clinical research studies
- Health services research, epidemiological research, health economics research. obesity
- Aetiology and pathogenesis research
- Prevention, diagnosis and treatment including clinical research studies
- Health services research, epidemiological research, health economics research.
28
Country
Lithuania
Commissioning agency
Research Council of Lithuania
(Lithuanian Budged subsidies)
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
To clarify the impact of non-infectious diseases in population’s risks and
Chronic diseases non-infectious develop a theoretical framework for a new health strategy for the country.
The program aims to acquire new knowledge necessary to reduce incidence, prevalence, mortality and disability of the Lithuanian population from prevalent NCD (cardiovascular disease, malignant neoplasm, diabetes mellitus, neurodegenerative, allergies and autoimmune diseases, mental and behavioural disorders); to develop strategic principles for prevention of these diseases; to create improved diagnostics and prevention methods.
United Kingdom
National Prevention Research
Initiative
(UK-wide, funded by government departments, research councils and medical charities)
To support research into chronic non-communicable disease prevention.
Research, both inside and outside of the NHS setting, by addressing health behaviours at the level of the individual, community or population, and with consideration of environmental factors. Relevant behaviours include physical activity, diet, alcohol misuse and tobacco use.
Table 10 - Calls or programmes on non-specified and other non-communicable chronic diseases (Public health research / Disease control / Noncommunicable chronic diseases) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives (continuation).
29
Table 11 - Calls or programmes on other or non-specified diseases (Public health research / Disease control) opened in 2010, by country, code of
call, commissioning agency and objectives.
Country Commissioning agency
France
France
Germany
Agence Nationale de la
Recherche (ANR) / National
Research Agency
Agence de la biomedecine /
Biomedicine Agency
Federal Ministry of Education and research (BMBF)
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Rare diseases (not more than five in 10.000 persons) in the European
E-Rare-2 Call for Proposals
2011 for "European
Research Projects on Rare
Diseases”
Call for proposals Research and Transplant 2011
Community, excluding infectious diseases, cancers and adverse drug events in treatments of common diseases.
Interventional clinical trials are also excluded. Part of the programme includes collaborative research using patient databases, epidemiological studies, natural history of diseases, development of innovative screening systems.
To get better knowledge of organs, tissues and cells transplant. Includes:
1) Human and social sciences, Economics : study in public health or/and ethics; ... 5) Terminal organ insufficiency: studies in epidemiology, public health, healthcare demand and offer; ... 7) Prevention of sanitary risks for sampling and transplant.
Transnational projects on rare diseases
ERA-NET "E-Rare" has been established to coordinate the research activities of the participating European countries in the field of rare diseases.
To gain better knowledge about the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of rare diseases.
30
Table 12 - Calls or programmes on communicable Disease (Public health research / Disease control) opened in 2010, by country, code of call,
commissioning agency and objectives.
Country Commissioning agency
Belgium
France
Netherlands
Romania
French Community – Health
Directorate
Association Sidaction
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and
Development
Center for Policies and Health services
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Prevention and prophylaxis of the infectious diseases in
French Community
To improve the monitoring of infectious diseases being of interest in public health, including the diseases targeted by vaccination and to detect the emergent phenomena.
To optimize the obligatory system of declarations of the infectious diseases and to reinforce its use.
Call for medical programmes scientific and research
Medical and public health research on AIDS. Basic, applied and clinical research on HIV/AIDS (virology, immunology, preventive vaccines, treatments). Human and social sciences, epidemiology and public health research on HIV/AIDS.
Co-infections and HIV/AIDS associated pathologies, if relevant for HIV/AIDS research and care.
Q Fever
Operational research in TB field – Round 2
To contribute to the reduction of the number of people suffering from C.
burnetii. Research areas
1: Development and evaluation of interventions directed toward prevention or reduction of sources of contamination. Or interventions directed towards prevention of spread of the disease between animals and humans;
2. Improvement of diagnosis of the disease in animals and humans;
3. Improving the treatment of infected humans.
The program is focused to develop models of good practice in TB management and control.
31
Table 13 - Calls or programmes on environmental and occupational health (Public health research / Health promotion) opened in 2010, by country,
code of call, commissioning agency and objectives (to be continued).
Country Commissioning agency
Belgium
Denmark
France
France
French Community – Health
Directorate
Danish Council for Strategic
Research
Ministry of ecology, energy and sustainable development
Ministry of work
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Environmental health – To ensure the scientific role of pole expert testimony in environmental health scientific pole of expert testimony in accordance with the June 13 2008 decree
Strategic research in health, food and welfare/ Foods including manufacturing biological
The research is seeking to document the health promoting effects or nutritional qualities of bioactive substances. Requirements for the strictest standards of food safety and traceability are key competitive parameters for the food industry, since they will enable Denmark to market safe and healthy foods. The research focus on preventing and combating infections and the spread of resistant microorganisms and for the purposes of extending expertise in biological preparedness.
National research program on environmental and health risks linked to genetically modified organisms
Occupational risk (SUMER survey)
Environment, health and genetically modified organisms
Methodological surveillance of GMO
Issues related to food safety including economical, ethical and social dimensions
Identification of occupational risks and of actions that can be implemented to tackle these problems
32
Table 13 - Calls or programmes on environmental and occupational health (Public health research / Health promotion) opened in 2010, by country,
code of call, commissioning agency and objectives (to be continued).
Country
France
France
France
Commissioning agency
Ministry of ecology and sustainable development
Agence Nationale de la
Recherche (ANR) / National
Research Agency
Agence Nationale de la
Recherche (ANR) / National
Research Agency
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Call for research proposals
«national research program on endocrine disruptors»
To understand better the endocrine disruptors mechanisms a) Assessment of endocrine disruptors exposure; b) Development of tools and strategies to improve the endocrine disruptors risks assessment; e) Health risk assessment and costs analysis of endocrine disruptors exposure; f) Management of the endocrine disruptors issue in public policies; g) Endocrine disruptors and scientific practice.
To bring better fundamental knowledge on contaminants in order to identify adapted preventive measures to reduce their potentially harmful effects on
Pollutants
Program Global
Environmental Changes and
Society (CEP&S) and
Environments : metrology, health, adaptability, behaviours and uses (CESA) ecosystems and human, animal and vegetal health. (…) To understand better environmental exposures (nature, sources), their effects on health, diseases associated with contaminations and methods for detecting and preventing them; To develop use and combination/coupling of environment and health data bases, from existing or future information systems; To promote surveillance methods; To evaluate risk perceptions on populations and societies, including contamination modes and behaviours and uses towards pollutants;
Strengthening comprehension of processes (evolution of production, economic, social, ecological systems) related to Global Environmental
Changes for a better governance of these changes
33
Table 13 - Calls or programmes on environmental and occupational health (Public health research / Health promotion) opened in 2010, by country,
code of call, commissioning agency and objectives (continuation).
Country Commissioning agency
France
France
Netherlands
Norway
AFSSET
Collaboration of ADEME and
INCA
Conseil Régional Nord Pas de
Calais / Nord Pas de Calais
Region
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and
Development
Norwegian Research Council
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
National program of
Research Environmental and Occupational Health,
Call for proposals 2010
Evaluation and analysis of environmental risks for human health, general population and occupational health
Research in Environmental
Health
To strengthen knowledge about the relationships between environment and health. To identify preventive actions, recommendations and structure networks of actors from the prevention and public decision making fields.
Program Prevention 4
Participation and health
(occupational health)
Research program on the development of interventions (development, evaluation of (cost)effectiveness and implementation) of interventions to improve health in work environment
Two main priorities in two calls that go together :
1. Interventions that promote life time employability;
2. Projects that promote the knowledge on implementation and strategies for
Environmental and Health
Exposures
Outcomes
(MILGENHEL programme) implementation of interventions in work areas (organizations) and effects of implementation of these interventions on the health and quality of life of employees.
To generate new research-based knowledge on the interplay between the environment and health.
Research projects must incorporate both environmental and health perspectives. The programme encompasses research into all aspects of exposure to environmental factors, and addresses basic as well as applied research questions. As a general rule, research on the working environment is not included under this programme
34
Table 14 - Calls or programmes on Health promotion, in general (Public health research / Health promotion) opened in 2010, by country, code of
call, commissioning agency and objectives (to be continued).
Country
Denmark
Finland
France
France
Commissioning agency
Danish Council for Strategic
Research
Ministry of Social Affairs and
Health
Institut de recherches scientifiques sur les boissons,
IREB / Institute on Drinking
Research
Institut veille sanitaire, InVS /
National Surveillance Institute
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Strategic research in health, food and welfare/
Connection between food, health and lifestyle
The connection between diet and lifestyle, including factors determined by changes in professional and private life; the interaction between diet and genes; and for the development of dietary recommendations which will contribute to an improvement in health. Funding is available for research within projects concerning environmental, health and ethical related issues applying new technology in the crossing of health, food and life style.
Health promotion - grant
Research on Alcohol 2011
To support current and feasible development and research projects related to health promotion, where results are useful in practice.
Research on alcohol in the field of social studies:
-Alcohol consumption: epidemiology, social use, interactions between genetic and environmental factors, psychopathological aspects, social consequences, vulnerability, interpersonal relationships
-Predictive factors of overuse and dependency
-Alcohol and society: history, culture, creativity, art and literature, policy, ethics, economics
Call for proposals for the analysis of National Study on Nutrition and Health
(ENNS) data
To use data bases of the ENNS study to carry out different analyses than those which have already been conducted, in order to have a wider scope of use of these data.
35
Table 14 - Calls or programmes on health promotion, in general (Public health research / Health promotion) opened in 2010, by country, code of
call, commissioning agency and objectives (continuation).
Country Commissioning agency
Iceland
Netherlands
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Ministry of Health and
Directorate of Health
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and
Development
Swiss Federal Office of Public
Health (Ministry of health)
Economic and Social Research
Council
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Prevention fund
Evaluation of implemented public health programmes in primary health care, target group children in elementary schools; research/surveys focusing on population health such as: alcohol/drug consumptions, tobacco, mental health, nutrition and physical activity, targets group is children in elementary and secondary schools.
Research on proven intervention strategies to prevent the transmission of
Sexual Health of Youth
Tobacco prevention fund
Health and wellbeing
STD’s and AIDS, and to prevent unwanted pregnancy, to develop.
Interventions where gaps in knowledge exist, and to disseminate at least one intervention method for each age category.
To finance preventive measures to prevent the onset of tobacco use, promote its decision and to protect people from passive smoking. One of the goals of the programme is to promote research.
ESRC provides social science funding for cross-council projects a) Addictions b) Dietary Decisions in the 21st Century
36
Country
Denmark
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Italy
Commissioning agency
Danish Council for Strategic
Research
Danish Council for Strategic
Research
The Social Insurance
Institution of Finland
Conseil Général des Alpes
Maritimes / Alpes Maritime
Department
Federal Ministry of education and research (BMBF)
Ministry of Health
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Strategic research society/ Clinical Research in individuals, disease and
Funding may be granted to clinical research projects concerning patientcentred research, intervention research and health-service research.
Strategic research society/ Rehabilitation in individuals, disease and
Funding for research and development focused on rehabilitation, health promotion, and health insurance projects
The aim is to promote research that documents the effects of methods in treatment, retraining and nursing from a holistic perspective on the citizen, with the involvement of professional expertise in the projects. These would include interventions and professional teams in disciplines such as clinical medicine, nursing, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, social work and psychology.
Objective is to support current and feasible research related to social security/health insurance, where results are useful in practice.
Support to Department medical and scientific teams for technical innovations in health
Research Networks
Health Economics
Program for health research
2009 – targeted research on
To support innovative projects, developed by department teams, aiming at improving health, prevention, screening, diagnosis or management of pathologies: Technical or technological innovations; Cancer: at the department level but in accordance with the National Response to Cancer;
Alzheimer disease.
To finance “Studies in health services research" using different methodological approaches
Financing of clinical and healthcare-related research project and of translational biomedical research. “Targeted research” is for competitive proposals.
Table 15 - Calls or programmes on health services, statistics, information, screening, organization (Public health research / Health services) opened
in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives (to be continued).
37
Table 15 - Calls or programmes on health services, statistics, information, screening, organization (Public health research / Health services) opened
in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives (to be continued).
Country
Netherlands
Norway
United Kingdom
Commissioning agency
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and
Development
Norwegian Research Council
Medical Research Council
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Program Prevention 4
New methods of screening: research on the (long term) (cost)effectiveness of already existing screening programmes; research on ethical aspects of
Screening and (medical) preventive interventions in
(primary) health care
Research Programme on
Health and Care Services
(HELSEOMSORG) screening; research on methods to inform and counsel.
Preventive interventions in health care: research on the development, evaluation and implementation of preventive interventions in health care. All research has to take into account social economic health differences.
To identify the most effective methods of organising, managing, financing and delivering high-quality health and care services, lowering the incidence of undesirable incidents, minimising differences in people’s access to health services, and providing better security for the individual patient and user.
Patient Reported Outcome
Measures (PROMs)
PROMs are an assessment of health status and health-related quality of life that comes directly from the patient. The focus of the call is improving the generation, validation, interpretation and evaluation of PROMs.
38
Table 15 - Calls or programmes on health services, statistics, information, screening and organization (Public health research / Health services)
opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and objectives (continuation).
Country
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Commissioning agency
NIHR - National Institute for health Research
NIHR - National Institute for health Research
NIHR - National Institute for health Research
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Health
Assessment
Technology
Health Technology … covers any method used by those working in health services to promote health, prevent and treat disease and improve rehabilitation and long-term care. Includes effectiveness, costs and broader impact of healthcare treatments and tests. NHS-funded interventions mentioned include: screening programmes; interventions delivered by midwives, health visitors or community pharmacists; research involving prison health services; smoking cessation services.
Research for patient benefit
Service Delivery
Organisation and
“Response-mode” programme to generate high quality research for the benefit of users of the NHS in England. It funds regionally-derived applied research projects in health services and social care. While clinical trials form the largest single category, there is also qualitative work in mixed methods studies, in pilots, and in other health interventions.
To identify, prioritise and refine the research needs of the NHS management community; to commission research that will be of great value to that community in shaping, influencing and contributing to decision-making; and in promoting the more effective use of research evidence alongside other forms of knowledge in their work.
39
Table 16 - Calls or programmes on other health services (Public health research / Health services) opened in 2010, by country, code of call,
commissioning agency and objectives.
Country
France
Commissioning agency
Caisse Nationale de Solidarité pour l’Autonomie (CNSA) and
Mission « Research » of the
Direction of Research,
Studies, Evaluation and
Statistics
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Permanent call for research about handicap autonomy loss and
Strengthening research field dealing with handicap and autonomy loss by individual and collective supports
Focus on populations and their needs, on infrastructures, services, and public policies and programmes.
United Kingdom Department of health Policy Research Programme
Heads of the main policy groups in the Department of Health submit requests for research directly to the PRP. Research is not commissioned in response to unsolicited proposals.
“The primary objective of the PRP is to assist colleagues in DH who are formulating developing or evaluating policy by: providing evidence to inform policy development and implementation in timely and accessible ways, including assessment of its potential impact and cost-effectiveness; evaluating existing policies or experimental pilots before policies are fully implemented; commissioning research evidence for policy making over the longer-term.”
40
Table 17 - Call or program on youth (Public health research / Target groups) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and
objectives.
Country Commissioning agency
France
Wyeth (Pfizer) Foundation for child and adolescent’s health
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
6th call for research proposals on adolescents and health
Youth health risks
Table 18 - Call or program on ageing (Public health research / Target groups) opened in 2010, by country, code of call, commissioning agency and
objectives.
Country Commissioning agency
United Kingdom Medical Research Council
Name of the program/call Overall objective of the program/call
Supporting multidisciplinary research, to build and sustain existing and emerging areas of ageing-related research and strengthen the UK ageing research community.
Lifelong health and wellbeing
Specific focus included: self-management of chronic pain, independence during rehabilitation, promoting health postretirement; major determinants of health and wellbeing in later life; Identify and develop effective interventions; Inform policy and practice including the development of services and technologies for independent living.
41
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries.
Country
Cyprus
Germany a)
Complementary information provided Exclusion criteria
Call/Program
Commissioning agency: Cyprus Research Promotion Foundation;
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Pillar 1: Strategic Multithematic Research, Programme Health and Biological Sciences, Action Public Health
Overall objective of the program/call: Production of New Knowledge at international level in scientific matters related to Public Health; Enforcement of initiatives for new strategies and policies in the Public Health Sphere, the provision of statistics and data on the development of various diseases and the protection and promotion of good mental health; Promotion of development of new health systems which will contribute to the promotion of quality in public health services.
Specific focus of the program/call: Epidemiological studies on various chronic or infectious diseases;
Epidemiological studies on rare diseases; Epidemiological studies on population groups such as the children, the elderly, pregnant women, communities, etc.; Epidemiology as a tool for public health policy promotion; Physical activity, sports and health promotion; Health and safety at work; Child health and risk factors; Sunlight and related consequences on health; Health risk factors; Health systems, hospital management, more effective health care and health care improvement; Development of Home Care
Information on the “Framework Programme of the Federal Government on Health Research” from the Federal
Ministry for Education and Science, adopted in December 2010.
Objective of the program: to improve the application of clinical research; research on population diseases and individualized therapy. Includes research on population diseases, on prevention and nutrition, on health care; on economic perspectives of the health care sector.
The strategic document "Health Research Framework Programme of the Federal Government", was available in
July 2011 at http://www.bmbf.de/pub/health_research_framework_programme.pdf
. No information on amounts available or application mechanisms was provided.
Cal was not announced in
2010
(call has been open /been communicated to the researchers between June and September 2009)
No specific information on public health research calls opened during 2010
42
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries (continuation).
Country
Germany b)
Greece a)
Complementary information provided
Call/Program
Commissioning agency: Federal Ministry of education and research, association of private health insurance funds, German pension insurance and Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, since 2006.
Name of the funding program: Patient-Oriented Research - Patient Orientation and Chronic Diseases
Objective of the program: Area of Health Care Research from the Health research programme from the Ministry of education and research. It establishes research oriented comprehensive care. The "Patient-oriented Research" funding priority thus contributes to a more effective and clearer presentation of the complex care system for patients with chronic diseases. Patients are more actively involved in their own health care”; “Among other things, scientists are looking into ways to evaluate training concepts for rehabilitation, innovative patient information schemes in hospitals, and how to integrate the wishes of patients into the work of general practitioners. Numerous projects are also dealing with patient-oriented healthcare which overcomes the barriers between and links the different care sectors”; http://www.bmbf.de/en/6647.php
Research center
Information on a research center under the General Secretariat for Research and Technology (Ministry of
Education, Lifelong Learning and Religious affairs)
“The National Hellenic Research Foundation (NHRF; www.eie.gr) is a national research Centre funded by the
General Secretariat for Research and Technology. It comprises a number of research institutes, including the
Institute of Biological Research and Biotechnology, within which operate a number of long-term research
Programmes of relevance to public health.
The Programme of Chemical Carcinogenesis and Genetic Toxicology is one of these programmes with closest relevance to public health, focussing on the conduct of research in the area of the environmental aetiology of cancer, identification of biomarkers of cancer risk and individual susceptibility, and mechanism-based cancer risk assessment. The Programme conducts its research in the form of specific projects, funded through the Centre’s regular budget as well as by extramural sources (mostly EU-funded projects).”
Exclusion criteria
Not possible to know if the program opened calls during 2010
Information programme on a developed inside an organization: The
National Hellenic Research
Foundation, funded by the
Ministry.
It is not a competitive funding that was open to other applicants.
It is a direct financing from the ministry to a research centre.
43
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries (continuation).
Country
Greece b)
Greece c)
Ireland
Italy a)
Complementary information provided
Call/Program
Information on a call on public health research opened in 2009
Commissioning agency: Ministry of Health
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Development of a diagnostic assay for hepcidin, the ironregulatory hormone implicated in the anaemia of chronic disease and in hemochromatosis.
Objective of the program: The aim of the proposal is the development of diagnostic tools for the detection of hepcidin.
Call/Program
Information on a call on PHR opened in 2009
Commissioning agency: Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Differentiation and Gene Flow among strains belonging to the
Leishmania donovani complex in Eastern Mediterranean
Objective of the program: The general objective is to contribute to the establishment of a surveillance system in this region and to promote trans-border control strategies.
PHIRE Supplemental Information – Ireland (Appendix 10)
Ireland provided supplemental information on governmental support to public health research development.
Exclusion criteria
Call was not announced in
2010
Thematic not on public health research
Call was not announced in
2010
Call/Program
Commissioning agency: Ministry of Education, University and Research.
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Program “Future in Research” 2010 (Bando “Futuro in ricerca”
2010) within the Fund for Investment in Basic Research (FIRB, Fondo per gli Investimenti in Ricerca di Base)
Objective of the program/call: To promote generational turnover and to support emerging scientific excellences, by allocating adequate resources to the financing of fundamental research projects proposed by young researchers. public health research financed in other ways then programmes and calls opened in 2010
Thematic not considered on public health research
44
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries (continuation).
Country
Italy b)
Italy c)
Complementary information provided
Call/Program
Commissioning agency: Ministry of Education, University and Research.
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Research Projects of National Interest 2009 (PRIN, Progetti di
Ricerca di Interesse Nazionale).
Objective of the program/call: Financing of projects that, by complexity or nature, require the cooperation of more scientists or financial resources that exceed the normal capabilities or single institutions.
The research projects can belong to one of 14 disciplines that have been specified by a previous law (Ministerial
Decree n. 175/2000); those relevant to the field of public health are “Medical sciences”, “Agrarian and veterinarian sciences”, “Biological sciences”, “Chemical sciences”, “Economic and statistical sciences”, “Political and social sciences”.
Call/Program
Commissioning agency: Italian Drug Agency (AIFA, Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco), the Government Agency supervising research, approval and surveillance of drugs in Italy.
Name of the funding program/call for projects: 2009 call for independent research on drugs (Bando 2009 per la ricerca indipendente sui farmaci).
Objective of the program/call: The AIFA calls on independent research on drugs is targeted at promoting the production of knowledge with features of “excellence” which can contribute to improving public health in research areas that would otherwise remain marginal because of their low commercial interest. AIFA, the Italian
Drug Agency, was the first European national drug agency that included among its duties the promotion of independent drug research, so as to give more opportunities to research areas that would have otherwise been overlooked by private research because of their low commercial value.
Exclusion criteria
Thematic not considered on public health research
Thematic not considered on public health research
45
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries (continuation).
Country
Latvia
Malta
Complementary information provided
Call/Program
Commissioning agency: Ministry of Education and Science
Following the recommendations from EU and initiatives of the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Science and
Educations agreed that the research strategy in clinical and public health research will be developed by the
Ministry of Health. The deadline for the Ministry of Health to develop the next research strategy was set to be
June, 2011
Name of the funding program/call for projects: State research program 2010 – 2013 "New prevention, treatment, diagnostic tools and methods, biomedical technologies to improve public health" priority direction of science "Public health (prevention, treatment, diagnostic tools and methods, biomedical technology)"
(hereinafter - the priority research areas "Public Health").
Objective of the program/call: The main objective of the program is with methods of clinical medicine, molecular genetics and cell biology, as well as medical chemical and pharmaceutical methods in framework of multidisciplinary research consortium to create new personalized medicine technologies and treatments in order to improve public health.
Program includes 3 main areas: 1) Cardiovascular and metabolic diseases; 2) Cancer; 3) Children and infectious diseases. More about the program http://stradini.lv/page.php?id=1578.
Comment from respondent: “Despite the name the program, it has very little relation with public health.
Biomedical researches are granted under the label of “public health research”. There is no separate allocated budget for public health research in Latvia. The call for state programmes is every fourth year”.
National public health funding
"The national public health funding in 2010 was limited to scholarships, training and postdoctoral awards. The
National Research and Innovation Programme, due to funding constraints, funded only 3 projects starting in
2010. None of them were Public Health projects, however."
Exclusion criteria
Call was not announced in
2010
Call not specific for public health research
Calls were not announced in 2010
46
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries (continuation).
Country
Norway
Complementary information provided
Call/Program
Poland
Commissioning agency: Norwegian Research Council
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Research Programme on Clinical Research
Objective of the program/call: The primary objective of the KLINISKFORSKNING programme is to enhance the knowledge base for preventive measures, diagnostic methods, and treatment and rehabilitation measures through clinical trials.
List of Programmes from Ministry of Health
National Public Health Association was not able to find information on areas of research that were financed through calls in 2010.
A list of programmes from the ministry of health was provided (below). Within those programmes many research are being made, but it is not clear whether it was conducted in 2010 and whether the calls were in 2010.
National Health Programmes of Ministry of Health in Poland in 2010
1. New-borns Screening Programme in Poland in 2009-2014; 2. Providing Self-sufficiency of Poland in blood and blood products in 2009-2014; 3. National Programme of Haemophilia Treatment in 2005-2011; 4. National
Programme of Cancer Fighting in 2010; 5. National Programme of Transplantation Medicine POLGRAFT in 2010-
2014; 6. National Programme of Antibiotics Protection in Poland in 2006-2010, including Module I – Monitoring of Nosocomial Infections and Invasive Bacterial Infections; for Epidemiological and Preventive Purposes and for
Treatment in 2009-2013; 7. Psychiatric Health Care in 2009-2013; 8. Antiretroviral Treatment of people infected with HIV in Poland in 2010-2011; 9. Programme of elimination of iodine deficiency in Poland in 2009-2011
10. Programme of Complex Diagnosis and Intrauterine Therapy in Developmental Defects and Fetus Illness
Prevention – as a part of Fetus’ and Newborns’ Health Status Improvement in 2009-2013; 11. National
Programme of Overweight, Obesity and Chronic Non-Infectious Diseases Prevention through Nutrition and
Physical Activity Improvement in 2007-2011 POL-HEALTH; 12. National Programme of Reduction the Inequity in
Cardiovascular Diseases Prevention and Treatment in 2010-2012 POLKARD; 13. National Programme of Lifestyle
Diseases Prevention: Module I – Programme of Overweight, Obesity and Chronic Non-Infectious Diseases
Prevention through Nutrition and Physical Activity Improvement in 2007-2011 Module II – Programme of
Diabetes Prevention and Treatment in Poland in 2010-2011 Module III – Programme of Elimination of Iodine
Deficiency in Poland in 2009-2011
Exclusion criteria
Thematic not considered on public health research
Information on whether calls were opened in 2010 was not possible to find
47
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries (continuation).
Country
Portugal
Complementary information provided
Information on activities of the Science and Technology Foundation, Ministry of Science
The FCT’ mission is mainly accomplished through the funding, subsequent to the evaluation of the merit, of proposals presented by institutions, research teams or individuals in public open calls, and also through cooperation agreements and other forms of support in partnership with universities and other public or private institutions. The FCT, Science and Technology Foundation has held Calls for Projects in all scientific domains every 2 years since 2000 and every year since 2008.
Some research on Public Health was financed but through scholarships, seminars, scientific conferences, or postdoctoral awards. However no specific call on any thematic area of Public health was open.
(Source: http://alfa.fct.mctes.pt/fct.phtml.en)
Information on research financing activities from Ministry of Health
The Ministry of health opens, on a non-regular basis, calls for support of research. At present, for example, in
2011, INSA, National Institute of Health Doctor Ricardo Jorge held a call for research on health services research/primary health care services reform. The deadline for responding to the call was end of March and the research projects approved will be completed on the next three years.
Comment from respondent: “However no calls or programmes on public health research were opened on 2010”.
Exclusion criteria
Calls were not announced in 2010
48
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries (continuation).
Country
Romania a)
Romania b)
Complementary information provided
Call
Name of the commissioning agency : National Authority for Scientific Research , Ministry of Economy, Trade And Business
Environment – Authority for Management of Operational Sectorial Program “Increasing Economic Competitiveness”
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Operational Sectorial Program “Increasing Economic Competitiveness”;
Priority Axis 2 –Research, Technological Development and Innovation for Competitiveness; Key areas of intervention 2.1 –
R&D partnerships between universities/research institutes, and enterprises for generating results directly applicable in economy
Objective of the program/call: The enhancement of the R&D cooperation between research institutes/universities, and enterprises for increasing the R&D activities in the benefit of enterprises; promoting technological transfer especially in key fields that are European or national priorities; generating results of economic interest and transferring the research results and knowledge through the economic environment; R&D partnerships with R&D organizations that will generate results directly applicable in economy with the aim of creating new or improved products, technologies and services of high addedvalue; Increasing the level of the technological development of the enterprises; the program is focused to research activities based on new technologies
Comment from respondent: “This program is not specific for public health, but it has “HEALTH” as one major fields of intervention. Public health calls are eligible as they could be classified as Health related projects.”
Call
Commissioning agency: National Authority for Scientific Research and Ministry of Economy, Trade And Business
Environment – Authority for Management of Operational Sectorial Program “Increasing Economic Competitiveness”
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Operational Sectorial Program “Increasing Economic Competitiveness”;
Priority Axis 2 –Research, Technological Development and Innovation for Competitiveness; Key areas of intervention 2.3 –
Supporting ICT use and creating new working places
Objective of the program/call: The program is focused to develop the research capacity of the enterprises in order to increase their innovation and competitiveness; increasing the number of working places in R&D activities is also an objective
(Modernising the existing infrastructure through purchasing new equipment; Building new establishments for creating new research centres or laboratories). The health field is eligible
Comment from respondent: “The call is not specific for public health, but public health research activities could be eligible as part of modernizing projects in the health fields. Private universities, hospitals and private clinics are not accepted, but
SME in public health field are eligible.”
Exclusion criteria
Call not specific for public health research
Call was not announced in
2010
Call not specific for public health research
49
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries (continuation).
Country Complementary information provided
Romania c) Call
Commissioning agency: Ministry of Internal Affairs
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Operational Program “Administrative Capacity Development”;
Priority Axis 1 – Structural and process improvements of the public policy management Cycle; Key area of intervention: Improvement the political – administrative decision-making process.
Objective of the program/call: Conceptual, horizontal issues in the areas of decision making system, aiming at increasing the quality of decisions within public administration by developing mechanisms for substantiating policy initiatives, increasing the effectiveness of organisational structures through better planning, and strengthening the accountability framework. The specific objective is to develop capacity in policy formulation,
Romania d) better regulation, strategic planning and inter-institutional partnership working. Activities under Priority Axis 1 concern the system for all central and local administration, including the health sector that was considered a priority.
Comment from respondent: “This program is not specific for public health, but the health system was defined as a priority sector. Public health research calls are eligible if they are focused to the improvement of the policy process at the administrative level.”
Call
Commissioning agency: Ministry of Internal Affairs
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Operational Program “Administrative Capacity Development”;
Priority Axis 1 – Structural and process improvements of the public policy management cycle; Key area of intervention: Improving the CSOs effectiveness in supporting the reform in public administration.
Objective of the program/call: Improving the effectiveness of CSOs in collaborating with the public institutions at least in the following fields: involving CSOs in the decision-making process at central and local level (including the definition of the public policies); involving the CSOs in the provision of social, educational and health services; developing the fund-raising capacity for CSOs; developing the CSOs capacity to be involved in national programmes or projects implemented by the public administration; involving CSOs in advisory boards of the public administration institutions.
Comment from respondent: “This program is not specific for public health, but the health system was defined as a priority sector. Public health research activities can be eligible if they are related to the main goal of improving the effectiveness of CSOs in relation to the public administration”.
Exclusion criteria
Call not specific for public health research
Call not specific for public health research
50
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries (continuation).
Country
Slovakia a)
Slovakia b)
Complementary information provided
Call
Commissioning agency: Slovak Research and Development Agency (APVV)
Name of the funding program/call for projects: General Calls – Verejná výzva; General call for projects on research and development in particular subdivisions of science and technology fields.
Objective of the call: This call has not limitation referring focus of projects. The project’s focus, objectives and scope of research and development is determined by applicant. The agency wants to increase research quality through competition of all applicants in competitive environment. In project proposal, applicant itself indicates scientific field as well as project theme.
Comment from respondent: “these kind of calls are also (potentially) related to public health research field but in fact they are not open on some specific public health theme or topic.”
Call
Commissioning agency: Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the SR (VEGA)
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Call on VEGA grant projects with start in 2011
Objective of the call: Overall objective is to support quality improvement of basic research in particular subdivisions of research and development fields and to strengthen competitiveness of Slovakia through R&D.
Public health subdivision belongs to medical sciences field. From all 136 applications, 18 were excluded before evaluation. Based on project title, no new project is public health research project.
Comment from respondent: “these kind of calls are also (potentially) related to public health research field but in fact they are not open on some specific public health theme or topic.”
Exclusion criteria
Call not specific for public health research
Call not specific for public health research
51
Table 20 - Additional information provided by countries (continuation).
Country
Slovakia c)
Slovenia
Complementary information provided
Call
Commissioning agency: Cultural and Educational Grant Agency (KEGA)
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Call on KEGA grant projects with start in 2011
Objective of the call: Overall objective is to donate projects on applied research focused on support of new pedagogical educational models, new technologies, forms and methods within school education system and beyond it. Agency is also aimed at empowering research and development projects in the education field, which are initiated by researchers and Ministry of Education in particular groups of research and development fields and financial support of projects related to creative art.
Comment from respondent: “these kind of calls are also (potentially) related to public health research field but in fact they are not open on some specific public health theme or topic.”
Call
Commissioning agency: The Slovenian Research Agency
Name of the funding program/call for projects: Public call for financing the research projects for 2011 – call in
2010 - Medicine
Objective of the call: Medicine in general: each applicant defines their own theme for the project.
Exclusion criteria
Call not specific for public health research
Call not specific for public health research
52
53
st
Dear Dr /Mr /Mrs / Professor ….
PHIRE (Public Health Innovation and Research in Europe) is a new collaborative action between
EUPHA members and is co-funded under the second Public Health Programme. Its general objective is to contribute to the improvement of public health knowledge and practice across the European Union by assessing the impact and uptake of the first Public Health Programme and structuring information on public health research.
First phase of PHIRE is aimed at the collection of data in order to provide a description of what public health research is supported through national programmes or/and calls.
We are seeking especially for information on thematic areas of public health research
(research fields) which are currently being financed through national programmes and calls
(named in different ways by commissioners as “programmes”, “calls”, “calls for research proposals”, “calls for grants”, “programme grants”, “project grants”). We are not seeking information on public health programmes or calls on scholarships, seminars, scientific conferences, training, and grants for visiting researchers, bursaries or postdoctoral awards.
We are sending you a form and kindly ask your collaboration in fulfilling one form for each national public health thematic program or call open in 2010.
We are aiming to have on-line database ready by mid September and to be presented in
EUPHA annual meeting in Copenhagen (November 2011).
We would most appreciate that you could send us the filled forms by 15 April 2011.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
We thank you for your collaboration and look forward to hearing from you,
(Partner signature) and contacts (phone)
54
PS We also send in attachment your country profile that was obtained with STEPS
(Strengthening Engagement in Public Health Research, http://www.steps-ph.eu/countryhealth-research-profiles/ ). This might be of assistance in the identification of relevant funding agencies in your country
Definition of Public Health Research used on SPHERE
Public-health research operates at a complex level between scientists, individuals and society.
And the issues that public-health research addresses – how to improve the health of the population, and how to ensure the effective and efficient organisation of health care – are of direct concern to governments themselves. For SPHERE, the following definition of public health research, which gave a broad meaning, was used:
"Public-health research refers to the organized quest for new knowledge to protect, promote and improve people's health. It:
• is undertaken at population or health services level, in contrast to laboratory (cellular) or clinical (individual) health research;
• differs from public-health practice (which also uses scientific methods), as it is designed to obtain generalisable knowledge rather than to address specific programmes for service delivery;
• is usually goal-oriented, addressing questions of policy relevance, and may be published in either academic journals or reports; and
• uses a range of observational methods, including surveys, registers, data sets, case studies and statistical modelling, and draws on disciplines including epidemiology, sociology, psychology and economics, and interdisciplinary fields of environmental health, health promotion, disease prevention, health-care management, health-services research and healthsystems research."
(BMC Public Health 2009, 9:203 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-203)
55
PHIRE
Public Health Innovation and
Research in Europe
Agreement Number 2009 12 14
Please fulfil one form for each program or call
Please, save each filled form as ‘yourcountry-PHIRE-form-number’ – e.g. ‘Slovakia-
PHIRE-form1’
Country:
Name:
Name and Contacts of Title: respondent Email:
Telephone number:
Please provide us this information, in case we need to contact you for clarifications
A - Identification of the funding thematic program or call for research projects
A1) Name of the commissioning agency which is launching the funding program/call
For identifying the relevant funding agencies from your country you can use the organogram and list of “Research Commissioners” which are described in the STEPS country profile available at http://www.steps-ph.eu/country-health-research-profiles/
A2) Name of the funding program/call for projects (please translate into English):
A3) Date of the program/call
We are looking for information on program/call which has been open (been communicated to the researchers) between the 1/01/2010 and the 31/12/2010.
Date the program/call was publically available (dd/mm/yy):
Deadline for responding to the program/call (dd/mm/yy):
56
B - Description of the program/call
Please provide in this section information on the following items when relevant
B1) Overall objective of the program/call
Please describe in one or two sentences the main goal or domain that the program/call is addressing
B2) Population targeted
Please tick as many as necessary population group(s) explicitly addressed as target group(s) of the program/call
Age group: Children Adult Elderly None specified
Gender: Men Women None specified
Other groups (e.g. drug users, ethnic minorities, …):
B3) Specific focus of the program/call
If applicable, describe in more details the specific topic(s) or focus of the research program/call
B4) Scientific disciplines invited to answer the program/call
The program/call may be aimed at one or several disciplines e.g. economics, epidemiology, biostatistics,…
57
C - Funding and duration of the program/call
C1) Total amount of funding available from the program/call
This is the total amount of money that the commissioning agency has provisioned for funding all successful bidders provide to research project(s) within the program/call
Total amount available for the € program/call:
Please convert into € if necessary
C2) Amount of funding available for individual projects within the program/call
Minimum funding for one project: €
Maximum funding for one project:
Please convert into € if necessary
€
Not specified
Not applicable (please explain):
C3) Percentage of co-funding requested from applicants own sources
Minimum of co-funding for one project: %
Not specified
C4) Expected duration of the projects to be funded
The program/call may indicate that e.g. project of no less than 12 months and no more than 36 months will be funded
Minimum duration of projects:
Maximum duration of projects:
Not specified
Not applicable (please explain):
58
D - Eligibility criteria & other conditions to obtain funding
D1) Who can apply?
Choose all the suitable answers, please
D1.1) Nationality of research team
National researchers
National plus other country researchers (Please specify which “other country”)
Other (please explain):
Not specified
D1.2) Status of research team
Public institutions (please specify which):
Private institutions (please specify which):
Other (please explain):
Not specified
D2) Other conditions to be eligible:
59
E – Link to website where further information on this program/call can be accessed
F – Additional comments
Should you have further information or comments on this program/call, please add it here
Thank you very much for your collaboration
60
st
From: Floris Barnhoorn [mailto:F.Barnhoorn@nivel.nl]
Sent: 1 de February 2011 15:06
To:
Subject: PHIRE and Member Associations
Dear Governing Council Members,
In the EUPHA Governing Council Meeting of 11 November 2010, we informed you about
PHIRE, a EUPHA coordinated project on Public Health Innovation and Research in Europe which will be implemented through collaboration of EUPHA Sections and Member Associations
(see attached Summary document). The project has started now with the research activities and it we are now looking for contributions from our members.
We would like to ask you to forward, if applicable, the attached documents to your association’s Board or Secretariat.
In the letter, EUPHA's President Walter Ricciardi invites the member associations to collaborate in PHIRE and, in particular, requests the member associations to assist with the identification of a knowledgeable researcher who could complete the forms or questionnaires which are to follow in a few days time. The forms will be sent directly to the member associations by the Work Package Co-ordinators.
Thank you very much indeed for your co-operation.
Best regards,
Floris Barnhoorn
Senior Project Officer
EUPHA - European Public Health Association
61
62
63
64
Email from EUPHA office and president to National Public Health Associations
From: Floris Barnhoorn [mailto:F.Barnhoorn@nivel.nl]
Sent: 14 th April 2011 16:21
To:
Subject: EUPHA project PHIRE
Dear EUPHA Members,
In the attached letter, EUPHA's President Walter Ricciardi extends his thanks to EUPHA member associations for their participation in PHIRE, our collaborative action to study public health research and innovation in Europe.
Those that have not responded yet are invited again to join the project in this first phase of data collection. In the coming days you will be contacted by one of the regional work package coordinators.
Thank you very much indeed for your co-operation.
Best regards,
Floris Barnhoorn
Senior Project Officer
EUPHA - European Public Health Association
66
PHIRE
Public Health Innovation and
Research in Europe
Agreement Number 2009 12 14
Please fulfil one form for each program or call
Please, save each filled form as ‘yourcountry-PHIRE-form-number’ – e.g. ‘Slovakia-PHIRE-form-1’
Country: 30 countries inquired (25 answers) ; 75 calls
16 countries with, at least, one call/program on PHR announced in 2010;
9 countries had no information on call/programmes opened in
2010
Name:
Name and Contacts of Title: respondent Email:
Telephone number:
Please provide us this information, in case we need to contact you for clarifications
A - Identification of the funding thematic program or call for research projects
A1) Name of the commissioning agency which is launching the funding program/call
For identifying the relevant funding agencies from your country you can use the organogram and list of
“Research Commissioners” which are described in the STEPS country profile available at http://www.steps-ph.eu/country-health-research-profiles/
Tables 6-18
A2) Name of the funding program/call for projects (please translate into English):
Tables 6-18
A3) Date of the program/call
We are looking for information on program/call which has been open (been communicated to the researchers) between the 1/01/2010 and the 31/12/2010.
Date the program/call was publically available (dd/mm/yy):
Deadline for responding to the program/call (dd/mm/yy):
2010
2010
67
B - Description of the program/call
Please provide in this section information on the following items when relevant
B1) Overall objective of the program/call
Please describe in one or two sentences the main goal or domain that the program/call is addressing
Tables 6-18
B2) Population targeted No answer 2
Please tick as many as necessary population group(s) explicitly addressed as target group(s) of the program/call
Age group: Children 3; Adult 0; Elderly 1; Children+adult 4; None specified 57; No answer 13
Gender: Men 0; Women 0; None specified 66; No answer 9
Other groups (e.g. drug users, ethnic minorities, …):
Specific groups of patients – 9;
Vulnerable groups – 5
Adolescents - 3
B3) Specific focus of the program/call
If applicable, describe in more details the specific topic(s) or focus of the research program/call
Tables 6-18
B4) Scientific disciplines invited to answer the program/call
The program/call may be aimed at one or several disciplines e.g. economics, epidemiology, biostatistics,…
68
C - Funding and duration of the program/call
C1) Total amount of funding available from the program/call
This is the total amount of money that the commissioning agency has provisioned for funding all successful bidders provide to research project(s) within the program/call
Total amount available for the [135 .000€; 101.482.381€] program/call:
Please convert into € if necessary
No answer: 34
C2) Amount of funding available for individual projects within the program/call No answer: 14
Minimum funding for one project:
Maximum funding for one project:
No answer: 66
[3.200€; 5.674.595€]
No answer: 53
[3.000€; 21.500.0005€]
Please convert into € if necessary
Not specified 30
Not applicable 4
No limits;
Funding scheduled by objectives of programme.
C3) Percentage of co-funding requested from applicants own sources No answer: 18
Minimum of co-funding for one project: 0% - 9; 20% - 1; 25% - 2; 30% - 2; 50% -1
Not specified 42
C4) Expected duration of the projects to be funded
The program/call may indicate that e.g. project of no less than 12 months and no more than 36 months will be funded
No response 11
Minimum projects: duration of no answer 54;
1 year-10; 2 years-6; 3 years – 4; 6 years-1.
Maximum duration of projects:
No answer 33
1 year-6;
2 years-8; 2.5 – 1;
3 years-13; 3,5 year-4;
Not specified: 17
Not applicable (please explain): 3
“no limits”
4 years-4;
5years-5;
10 years 1.
69
D - Eligibility criteria & other conditions to obtain funding
D1) Who can apply?
Choose all the suitable answers, please
D1.1) Nationality of research team
No answers: 6
National researchers 20
National plus other country researchers (Please specify which “other country”) 13
Other (please explain): 7
Not specified 31
D1.2) Status of research team
No answers: 7
Public institutions (please specify which): 50
Research institutions;
Universities;
Other public institutions with a research mission;
Health care institutions
Private institutions (please specify which): 36
Note: all the calls where private institutions could apply also public ones could.
Research institutions;
Partnerships with industry
Enterprises
Non-for-profit organizations
Universities
Other (please explain): 3
Organisations with private-public ownership
Not specified 18
D2) Other conditions to be eligible: 30
70
There are significant policy-supportive research areas of child health and well-being, health of the traveller community, and practice and standards in health care provision. T he DOH provides core funding to the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) to maintain the HIPE database of in-patient admissions to Irish hospitals, and to the Children’s Research Centre at TCD.
The Department of Children and Youth Affairs, (formerly with the DOH), has lead responsibility for the implementation of a national children’s research programme, which aims to facilitate the achievement of a better understanding of how children grow up in Ireland, including both their individual and shared needs. The overall programme comprises capacity building, the development of a data and research infrastructure around children’s lives and a commissioned research programme. Within each of these areas, public health is a core focus. The elements of the Research Programme are
A funded Research Programme, which includes Growing Up in Ireland – the National Longitudinal Study of
Children;
A Research Capacity Building Programme, which includes Research Placement and Research
Scholarship Programmes; and a contribution to the funding of a Structured PhD Programme in Child and
Youth Research in Trinity College Dublin
A Research Infrastructure and Dissemination Programme, which includes the development of a National Set of Child Well-Being Indicators, the production of a biennial State of the Nation’s Children Report based on the indicator set, the development of a National Data and Research Strategy on Children’s Lives and other initiatives
The HRB extramural research programme is supported primarily through a core grant from the DOH; others smaller sources of support include the Health Services Executive, Department of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries, Irish Aid and so on.
71
The overall purpose of this scheme is to improve the quality of PhD training in health research by facilitating a broader education for young researchers, and enhancing co-operation between post-graduate students in different research groups. It also encourages institutions to establish a critical mass of students in a themed area by funding four-year PhD training programmes. Institutions in Northern Ireland are eligible to apply as co-applicants or partners.
A total of six training sites have been established under this scheme covering a broad spectrum of health research from applied biomedical to health services research. Each programme supports four cohorts of four to eight postgraduate scholars working in related research areas for four years. Host institutions must provide a structured training programme in the first year for each scholar cohort; including access for the scholars to specialist and generic skills training; as well as choice of laboratory rotations in different groups. The PhD Scholars programme in
Health Services Research has been singled out for continued funding beyond the original 7 year programme.
The HRB’s Clinician Scientist awards are targeted at individuals with a strong, internationally competitive track record in research. An applicant must be either a medical consultant in the Irish health service or a senior clinician in a health-related discipline that is qualified to hold a post in the Irish health service. The objective of the scheme is to create research leaders in the health services, capable of driving forward a health research agenda in the HSE and in providing mentorship to postgraduate and post-doctoral medical and other health professionals. The scheme has, to date, released outstanding researchers from some or all of their service commitments for a period of five years, to conduct world-class research. There are currently seven clinicians funded under this scheme with an average investment of €1.6M per award. The scheme is currently being reviewed and a modified scheme will be launched in 2011.
This new postdoctoral fellowship scheme, launched by the HRB in 2011, is aimed at building and attracting capacity into population health and health services research and, through a team-based approach, will enable the development of partnerships between researchers, practitioners and decision makers in policy and health service delivery. The ICE Awards initiative is a strategic initiative to address gaps in capacity, build on existing investment, strength and capabilities and encourage partnership and collaboration between the population health research and health services research communities and clinical researchers. Applicant teams must be interdisciplinary in nature to ensure that fellows receive appropriate training and mentoring in contextual, methodological and other issues related to their work and they develop skills and competencies required for successful interdisciplinary and transsectoral research in population health and health services research.
The HRB has, in recent years rationalized a number of its fellowships into the Health Professional Fellowships. This encompasses the different health professions (medicine, nursing and the allied health professionals.)
Approximately 10 to 15 new awards are made annually through the Health Professional Fellowship scheme and many of these are for research relevant to public health.
This Fellowship programme aims to encourage successful applicants to pursue careers in cancer prevention on the island of Ireland. The Fellowship equips participants to embark on such careers by giving them the opportunity to obtain a Masters in Public Health (MPH) degree in year one, followed by two years of mentored research in the
National Cancer Institute’s distinguished Cancer Prevention Fellowship Programme in Washington DC.
72
This Fellowship programme aims to encourage successful applicants to pursue careers in health economics on the island of Ireland. The duration of the fellowship is four years leading to a PhD degree in health economics. The
Fellowship includes ten months of coursework in health economics, cancer prevention and health policy, based mainly in Ireland, followed by two years of mentored research at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Washington
DC and a final year of mentored research at an affiliated host institution in Ireland. Two awards have been made in each year in 2008, 2009 and 2010, and 2011.
The aim of the Cochrane Fellowship scheme is to build capacity in conducting systematic reviews in the health and social care field in Ireland by freeing up protected time for applicants to conduct a Cochrane systematic review in any topic of their choice. The Fellowship provides the Fellow with protected time of up to two days per week for up to two years to conduct their review. The award covers systematic review training costs, salary-related costs and research expenses. This scheme has supported over 70 health practitioners to undergo Cochrane training and a further 20 health professionals or scientists to undertake Cochrane Systematic Reviews. The Fellowship scheme is currently being reviewed prior to an expected new call in 2011.
Post-doctoral research fellowship awards are open to anyone with a PhD in an area relevant to health. The purpose is to enable researchers with a PhD to develop their research careers at an advanced level in Ireland. Each year a number of these awards are in the public health sphere.
The purpose of these awards is 1) to address priority research needs of the health services in Ireland, 2) to provide capacity bridging higher education and health care to perform large-scale research projects underpinning clinical, health systems and health services research, and 3) to facilitate dissemination of the knowledge base and to increase its impact on health policy and health practice.
The objective of each Health Research Centre (HRC) is to undertake research and dissemination activities that will improve the health and/or care of the population. A HRC is intended to foster collaborative research and critical mass within the relevant research community to underpin translational, clinical, health systems and health services research and to ensure that new knowledge is translated into practice. Funding is available to support research consortia that enhance our ability to address health issues and that are aligned with national/international research and funding priorities. There are currently two HRC awards in Diet and Health and Primary Care. Consideration of further HRC awards is actively being reviewed.
The HRB funds three of the seven clinical research facilities (CRFs) on the Island of Ireland, as collaborative initiatives with either the Department of Health or the Wellcome Trust UK. The HRB provides the running costs over a 5 year period, while the DoH or the Wellcome Trust provides the capital. The Dublin St. James and Galway CRFs were launched in 2007, while the Cork CRF was launched in 2008. These key clinical infrastructures aim to build world-class clinical research capability in Ireland to support bench-to-bedside initiatives and improve translation of the results of health research into treatments and techniques that are provably effective in the clinic. The Galway
CRF has, as part of its research portfolio, strands in health services research and primary care research.
The HRB has committed almost €600k to the provision of methodological support to the broader research community through the Research Methodology Support Centre (CSTAR) which is intended to provide health and
73
social care practitioners and academic colleagues with methodological support to strengthen quality in health services, primary care and clinical research on a national basis, across health service and academic institutions.
The aim of the Centre is to strengthen research quality by providing advice, consultancy, training and education in research methodologies (both quantitative and qualitative), study design, project management, analysis, reporting and other support services. The HRB is currently examining a Hub and Spoke model to embed methodological design, statistics and data management in the health research infrastructure in the Republic of Ireland.
1.
The Drug-Related Deaths Index (NDRDI) which is a census of drug-related deaths (such as those due to accidental or intentional overdose) and deaths among drug users (such as those due to hepatitis C and HIV) in
Ireland. It also records alcohol-related deaths.
2.
The National Drug Treatment Reporting System (NDTRS), which is an epidemiological database on treated drug and alcohol misuse in Ireland. It was established in 1990 in the Greater Dublin Area and was extended in
1995 to cover all areas of the country.
3.
The National Intellectual Disability Database (NIDD) and the National Physical and Sensory Disability Database
(NPSDD), which collect information on the demographic profile , receipt of, or need for, specialised health services for people with intellectual disability (NIDD) and physical or sensory disability (NPSDD).
4.
The National Psychiatric In–Patient Reporting System (NPIRS) and national psychiatric inpatient database in
Ireland records data on all admissions to, and discharges from, psychiatric inpatient facilities in Ireland annually.
The HRB is also the Irish national focal point for the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction
(EMCDDA).
74