Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Plan Study Acronym / Short Title R&D Number Protocol Version Date CRAMP version number NB: Refer to Phase I Additional Information form for further details on phase I studies NB: Refer to Risk Assessment for an Activity Involving Gene Therapy and Genetically Modified Micro-organisms form for all GMO studies Risk category Hazard identified Unmitigated impact (see tables below) Risk Mitigation Mitigated impact (see tables below) Study Team Experience Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Training/supervision required Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Starting dose selection Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Dose escalation plan Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Drug administration: route and rate Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: IMP details Pre-clinical Data, class, novelty etc. Refer to phase I additional information form for phase I study details IMP dosing ICRF-OR09 Form 3 v2 Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Plan March 2015 Page 1 of 6 Interval between subjects Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Staffing level required (during/after dosing & other visits. State requirement for 1st and subsequent doses) IMP/Pharmacy Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Storage Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Handling requirements Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Prescribing Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: AE/SAE reporting system Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Independent data/safety monitoring committee Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Unblinding procedure Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Safety: general IMP Safety: Adverse reactions Add extra rows for all notable AEs AR 1: name, probability, seriousness, potential long term consequences ICRF-OR09 Form 3 v2 Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Plan March 2015 Page 2 of 6 AR 2: name, probability, seriousness, potential long term consequences AR 3: name, probability, seriousness, potential long term consequences AR 4: name, probability, seriousness, potential long term consequences Invasive procedures/NIMPs adverse reactions Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Procedure/NIMP 1: name, probability, seriousness, potential long term consequences Procedure/NIMP 2: name, probability, seriousness, potential long term consequences Procedure/NIMP 3: name, probability, seriousness, potential long term consequences Participants Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Patient/HV, special requirements, GP medical history, TOPS etc. CRF requirements Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Add extra rows for all notable ARs ICRF-OR09 Form 3 v2 Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Plan March 2015 Page 3 of 6 Facilities: specified rooms or other requirements Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Staff: training etc. Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Consequence: Likelihood: Risk score: Additional Risks Overall risk (highest impact score if more than one field completed) Completed by Revised Risk Score (Post mitigation) Principal Investigator ICRF sign off Post/role in study Name (in capitals) Date Signature Consequence Score 1. Insignificant - no obvious harm 2. Minor - non-permanent harm 3. Moderate – semi-permanent harm 4. Major – major permanent harm or death 5. Extreme – multiple deaths Likelihood score 1. Rare- Not expected to occur for years 2. Unlikely- Expected to occur approx. annually 3. Possible- Expected to occur approx. monthly 4. Likely- Expected to occur approx. weekly 5. Almost certain- Expected to occur approx. daily ICRF-OR09 Form 3 v2 Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Plan March 2015 Risk score Consequence Score x Likelihood score Page 4 of 6 Risk Matrix Consequence Likelihood 1 Insignificant 2 Minor 3 Moderate 4 Major 5 Extreme 1 2 3 4 5 5 (almost certain) 5 (M) 10 (H) 15 (E) 20 (E) 25 (E) 4 (likely) 4 (M) 8 (H) 12 (H) 16 (E) 20 (E) 3 (possible) 3 (L) 6 (M) 9 (H) 12 (E) 15 (E) 2 (unlikely) 2 (L) 4 (L) 6 (M) 8 (H) 10 (E) 1 (rare) 1 (L) 2 (L) 3 (M) 4 (H) 5 (H) ICRF-OR09 Form 3 v2 Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Plan March 2015 Page 5 of 6 Guidance Notes for CRAMP When completing the form please avoid copy and pasting from the protocol. The Clinical Risk Assessment & Management Plan breaks the risk assessment up into specific groups, namely, Study Team, IMP details, IMP dosing, Pharmacy, General Safety, Adverse Reactions, Invasive Procedures, Participants, CRF and any additional risks. These notes are to act as a guide to help improve completion and consistency. Hazard Identified: It is impossible to identify every possible risk, the aim of the CRAMP is to identify the most likely to occur and highest risks applicable to the particular research project. Below are some areas to consider. This is not intended to be definitive. Study Team: Any experience working in early phase? Experience of being a Principal Investigator? Number of studies conducted. Have received training on the protocol? Have received training on ICRF SOP’s or study specific procedures? IMP Details: Pre clinical toxicology data – did it identify any particular concerns? Any downstream cascade affects from the molecule? Is this a novel compound or has this been used and developed before in previous trials? IMP Dosing: Is there a clear process and reason for dose selection based on pre-clinical or subject safety data? IDMC and/or steering group over seeing dose escalation decisions. Is the drug administered IV or aerosol? Will there be a staged dosing to allow for identification of any untoward reaction? The number & skill of staff required should there be a reaction. Pharmacy: Temperature storage monitoring? Reconstitution process is this simple? Aseptic preparation required? Dose the dose need to be calculated before admin or simple dosing instructions? Safety General: Any specific safety reporting processes – is there a medical monitor? If blinded – who, where and how accessible are the un-blinding codes? Are un-blinding procedures tested? Adverse Reactions/ Invasive Procedures: Anaphylaxis will be the most common and obvious, but are there any specific areas of caution from previous safety data or pre-clinical data such as liver, kidney or cardiac reactions? Venepuncture, cannulation are the most common – are there any study specific procedures like central line insertion? Participants: How will past medical history be confirmed – from GP? Could participants have been part or are part of another clinical trial? Is this a particular high risk group with respect to mobility, capacity, vulnerability, cross infection? CRF Facilities: Is there a need for a specific room/nurse etc which could prevent bookings if not available? Any equipment that if broken could delay procedure? Risk Mitigation: Risks will vary across each project and it is impossible to remove risk entirely. Mitigations can take the form of adhering to SOP’s for procedures to detailing specific staffing requirements or training that will be undertaken before carrying out particular study procedures. ICRF-OR09 Form 3 v2 Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Plan March 2015 Page 6 of 6