Musculoskeletal MR and US Imaging Course
EVALUATION
Goals and Objectives of the Event
At the end of the course, the participant should be able to:
1.
Assess the technical requirements of MRI and Ultrasound to optimally assess patients with disorders of the musculoskeletal system.
2.
Diagnose normal anatomy, common variants and imaging pitfalls in the MR and ultrasonographic imaging assessment of major joints.
3.
Identify common forms of pathology involving the musculoskeletal system, their pathophysiology, implications for clinical management, and
imaging strategies in their staging and evaluation.
4.
Comprehend the role and potential benefits/limitations of MR and Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of the
musculoskeletal system.
5.
Hands-on Ultrasound Course: Identify and institute key strategies in ultrasound image optimization in evaluation of the MSK system in
normal subjects, and successfully identify key structures on live-scanning.
Program Needs Assessments: The organizing committee has assembled an excellent faculty who will present educational material which is both
practical review and cutting edge, chosen based on the current literature, expert opinion and needs assessment from attendees of prior courses.
Target Audience: General radiologists involved in protocolling, imaging and assessment of Musculoskeletal injuries and disease. Medical Imaging
Technologists and Sonographers.
Please return the completed evaluation form to the registration desk at the end of the course to receive your accreditation certificate
We appreciate your effort and assistance!
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
To be completed at the beginning of the Course
What are your main learning objectives or questions to be addressed at this event?
1.
2.
3.
To be completed at the end of the Course
Motivates me
to adjust
my practice
Confirms what I
currently do in
my practice
What are the key messages applicable for your practice?
� No relevant messages for my practice
Motivates me to gather
more information
on the subject
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1.
2.
3.
In retrospect, this activity has helped me achieve the goals I had set at the beginning of the Course
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Saturday, February 1, 2014
4:00 – 4:30 PM
Meniscal Morphology and Attachment
G. Andrews
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives - At the end of the session, the
participant should be able to:
1. Increase familiarity with normal meniscal
appearance.
2. Better assessment of meniscal
attachments.
3. Improve awareness of meniscal variants.
Saturday, February 1, 2014
4:30 – 5:00 PM
Imaging cartilage and Patterns of injury:
What does the clinician want to know?
R. Morrison
General comments:
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
5
1 2 3
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives - At the end of the session, the
participant should be able to:
1. Assess the different manifestations of cartilage
injury on MRI.
2. Diagnose the medical and surgical implications
of cartilage injuries.
3. Implement into practice the proper descriptors
for different cartilage injuries on MRI.
General comments:
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Saturday, February 1, 2014
5:00 – 5:30 PM
ACL: Patterns of injury & postoperative
assessment
L. White
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
1 2 3
5
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of this session,
participants should be able to:
1. Review the MR imaging signs of ACL injury.
2. Identify the expected appearance of an ACL
reconstruction as well as associated patterns of
potential complication.
Saturday, February 1, 2014
5:30 – 5:50 PM
Posterolateral corner: Anatomy & injury
assessment
A. Naraghi
General comments:
I attended
Yes
No
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
1 2 3
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
Yes
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
No
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
L. participant
White
the
should be able to:
1. Describe the normal anatomical structures
responsible for stability of the posterolateral
General comments:
corner of the knee.
2. Discuss the clinical features and importance of
posterolateral corner injuries of the knee.
3. Interpret the imaging features of
posterolateral corner injuries on MRI.
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Saturday, February 1, 2014
5:50 – 6:10 PM
Posteromedial corner: Anatomy & injury
assessment
R. Bleakney
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
1 2 3
5
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Assess the complex anatomy of the
posteromedial corner.
2. Recognize the posteromedial corner
anatomy on MRI.
3. Diagnose the pattern of injuries to the
posteromedial corner.
Saturday, February 1, 2014
6:10 – 6:30 PM
Shin Splints & Stress Injuries of the Tibial in
Runners B. Forster
General comments:
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
5
1 2 3
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Review the epidemiology and mechanism
of tibial stress injuries.
General comments:
2. Diagnose the imaging findings associated
with the spectrum of such injuries.
3. Develop a best practice imaging algorithim
for work-up, and understand the role imaging
plays in return to sport.
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Sunday, February 2, 2014
7:00 – 7:30 AM
FAI: what is it and what does the clinician
want to know?
R. Morrison
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
5
1 2 3
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Identify the imaging appearance of femoralacetabular impingement and dysplasia.
2. Realize the consequences and outcomes of this General comments:
anatomic variation.
3. Explain the different surgical treatments
available for FAI and dysplasia.
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Sunday, February 2, 2014
7:30 – 8:00 AM
Muscle tears: What does the clinician want
to know?
A. Naraghi
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
1 2 3
5
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
S There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Describe the role of imaging in assessment of
patients with muscle trauma.
2. Evaluate the imaging findings associated with General comments:
muscle tears.
3. Establish the prognostic value of MRI following
muscle tears.
Sunday, February 2, 2014
8:00 – 8:30 AM
Athletic Pubalgia
G. Andrews
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
5
1 2 3
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Assess regional anatomy.
2. Diagnose typical injury locations and
patterns.
3. Demonstrate understanding of imaging
strategies for optimizing diagnosis.
General comments:
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Sunday, February 2, 2014
8:30 – 8:50 AM
Approach to MSK Tumors
R. Bleakney
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Explain the role of MRI in MSK tumor
assessment.
2. Recognize the usefulness of MRI in locally
staging MSK tumors.
3. Identify the limitations of MRI in the
characterization of MSK tumours.
Sunday, February 2, 2014
8:50 – 9:10 AM
MRA for FAI: FYI on non-impingement
causes of pain
B. Forster
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
1 2 3
5
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
General comments:
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
5
1 2 3
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Diagnose non-labral intra- and extra-articular
sources of hip pain that may present at hip MR
arthrography (MRA).
2. Assess the most common incidental findings
seen outside the musculoskeletal system at hip
MRA.
3. Provide relevant differential diagnoses, where
applicable.
General comments:
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Sunday, February 2, 2014
9:10 – 9:30 AM
MSK tendon intervention: What works and
how do I do it? C. Harris
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
1 2 3
5
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Analyze the pathogenesis of tendinopathy.
2. Diagnose the different treatment options in
tendon intervention.
3. Explain the approach for injection of the
common tendinopathies.
Sunday, February 2, 2014
4:00 PM – 4:30 PM
How I do it: Real-time Ultrasound
assessment Ankle. A. Grainger
General comments:
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
5
1 2 3
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Diagnose the normal ultrasound anatomy of
the ankle.
2. Assess the techniques needed to optimally
demonstrate the normal ankle structures with
ultrasound.
3. Explain artefacts and limitations found when
undertaking ankle ultrasound examination.
General comments:
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Sunday, February 2, 2014
4:30 – 5:00 PM
MRI: Ankle: patterns of impingement
R. Morrison
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
1 2 3
5
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Assess the patho-etiology of impingement
syndromes of the ankle.
2. Diagnose the MR imaging appearances of
impingement patterns.
3. Be able to differentiate different forms of
impingement at the ankle.
Sunday, February 2, 2014
5:00 – 5:30 PM
Ice Hockey: High ankle sprains
L. White
General comments:
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Diagnose the etiology of high ankle sprains in
ice hockey players.
2. Describe the spectrum of MR imaging findings General comments:
seen in athletes with high ankle sprains.
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Sunday, February 2, 2014
5:30 – 5:50 PM
Soccer: Anterior ankle impingement
C. Harris
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Analyze the aetiological mechanisms of
anterior impingement.
2. Identify the spectrum of imaging features seen General comments:
in soccer players with anterior impingement.
3. Identify the clinical features and plan
management options in anterior impingement.
Sunday, February 2, 2014
5:50 – 6:10 PM
Turftoe / Baxters neuropathy
A. Naraghi
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Diagnose the anatomy and
pathophysiology associated with turf toe.
2. Assess the normal neural anatomy of the
ankle and hindfoot.
3. Evaluate the imaging findings in turf toe
and Baxter’s neuropathy.
General comments:
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Sunday, February 2, 2014
6:10 – 6:30 PM
Osteochondral injuries of the ankle
B. Forster
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Diagnose the epidemiology/pathophysiology
of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT).
2. Illustrate the multi-modality imaging findings
of OLT, including predictors of clinical outcome.
3. Establish treatment options and role of
imaging in decision-making.
Monday, February 3, 2014
7:00 – 7: 30 AM
How I do it: Real-time Ultrasound
assessment Shoulder M. Cresswell
General comments:
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
5
1 2 3
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Analyze shoulder anatomy.
2. Assess the sonographic appearance of
General comments:
shoulder structures.
3. Explain the key components of a
comprehensive shoulder ultrasound examination.
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Sunday, February 3, 2014
7:30 - 8:00 AM
Elbow: Everything you were too afraid to
ask about B. Forster
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Assess and diagnose the technical and
procedure-related considerations in MR imaging
General comments:
of the elbow.
2. Diagnose the normal anatomic structures and
variants within the four compartments of the
elbow.
3. Diagnose common sports injuries of the elbow,
using this compartmental approach.
Sunday, February 3, 2014
8:00 - 8:30 AM
Imaging of the fingers: tendons, ligaments
and pulleys R. Morrison
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met*
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
5
1 2 3
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – For each anatomical area
taught, the participant will be able to:
1. Summarize the basic anatomy and pathology
occurring in the digits.
2. Be able to identify common tendon
abnormalities of the fingers on MRI.
3. Diagnose the patterns of ligament and pulley
injuries and optimal imaging planes.
General comments:
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Monday, February 3, 2014
8:30 – 8:50 AM
Rotator Interval G. Andrews
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Diagnose the regional anatomy.
2. Summarize the typical injury locations and
patterns.
3. Identify imaging strategies for optimizing
diagnosis.
Monday, February 3, 2014
8:50 - 9:10 AM
Neural impingement of the upper limb
M. Cresswell
General comments:
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
Yes
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
No
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – For each anatomical area
taught, the participant will be able to:
1. Diagnose the ultrasound technique for
evaluating the Brachial plexus and upper limb
General comments:
nerves
2. Assess the normal anatomical structures and
the pitfalls during ultrasound assessment.
3. Relate with the common sites of impingement
and their imaging appearances.
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Monday, February 3, 2014
9:10 – 9:30 AM
Sports: Intercostal/Abd wall injury &
Pectoralis tears L. White
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Associate the patterns of injury sustained
in sports related injuries of the chest and
abdominal wall, and associated MR imaging
features.
2. Define the etiology and MR imaging
appearance of pectoralis major injuries.
Monday, February 3, 2014
4:00 - 4:15 PM
Shoulder intervention: Where why and
how M. Cresswell
General comments:
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
5
1 2 3
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – For each anatomical area
taught, the participant will be able to:
1. Diagnose the ultrasound technique for
evaluating subacromial, bicipital groove and
General comments:
glenohumeral injections.
2. Identify the normal anatomical structures
and the pitfalls during ultrasound assessment.
3. Apply how and when to perform calcific
barbotage.
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Monday, February 3, 2014
4:15 - 4:30 PM
Sternoclavicular, Acromio-calvicular and
subacromial assessment A. Naraghi
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Define the normal anatomy of the
sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints.
2. Detect the role of different imaging
modalities in assessment of these structures.
3. Interpret imaging features of traumatic
and non-trauumatic conditions involving
these areas.
Monday, February 3, 2014
4:30 – 5:10 PM
Ultrasound Hands-On Teaching
M. Cresswell, A. Grainger, C. Harris, A.
Naraghi, R. Bleakney
Learning Objectives – For each anatomical area
taught, the participant will be able to:
General comments:
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
5
1 2 3
4 5
Relevance to my
practice
1
2
3
4
5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
1. Identify the differences in technique, patient
positioning and probe selection compared to
general ultrasound.
General comments:
2. Appraise the normal anatomy of the
joint and peri-articular soft tissues of the region
demonstrated.
3. Able to position the patient to optimally
demonstrate the structure of interest.
4. Recognize the common specific locations of
injury / pathology and their expected appearances
at the demonstrated joints.
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Monday, February 3, 2014
5:10 – 5:30 PM
The elbow from a different angle
A. Grainger
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Diagnose the normal anatomy of the distal
biceps tendon and understand the problems
General comments:
faced with its demonstration at ultrasound.
2. Define the techniques available to the
sonographer for assessing the distal biceps
tendon.
Monday, February 3, 2014
5:25 – 5:40 PM
Ultrasound of wrist pain
R. Bleakney
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – For each anatomical area
taught, the participant will be able to:
1. Define the common causes of wrist pain.
2. Assess the complex wrist tendon anatomy.
3. Apply the common imaging finding of
conditions causing wrist pain.
General comments:
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Monday, February 3, 2014
5:40 - 6:30 PM
Ultrasound Hands-On Teaching
M. Cresswell, A. Grainger, C. Harris, A.
Naraghi, R. Bleakney
Learning Objectives – For each anatomical area
taught, the participant will be able to:
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
1. Differentiate in technique, patient
positioning and probe selection compared to
general ultrasound.
General comments:
2. Identify the normal anatomy of the
joint and peri-articular soft tissues of the region
demonstrated.
3. Able to position the patient to optimally
demonstrate the structure of interest.
4. Describe the common specific locations of injury
/ pathology and their expected appearances at the
demonstrated joints.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
7:00 -7:15 AM
The snapping hip
A. Grainger
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – For each anatomical area
taught, the participant will be able to:
1. Diagnose the causes of snapping symptoms at the
hip.
2. Measure the advantages and disadvantages of
ultrasound for investigating snapping symptoms at the
hip.
3. Demostrate the ultrasound techniques and review
the ultrasound anatomy and appearances of iliopsoas
and iliotibial band snapping syndromes.
General comments:
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
7:15 – 7:30 AM
Hamstring enthesopathy and muscle tears /
” jumpers knee”
C. Harris
Learning Objectives – For each anatomical area
taught, the participant will be able to:
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
.1. Assess the ultrasound technique for
evaluating the proximal hamstrings tendon /
muscle, patella tendon and pes anserine
General comments:
tendons.
2. Diagnose the normal anatomical structures
and the pitfalls during ultrasound assessment.
3. List the common pathologies of the
proximal hamstrings tendon / muscle, patella
tendon and pes anserine tendons and their
sonographic appearances.
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
7:30 – 8:20 AM
Ultrasound Hands-On Teaching
M. Cresswell, A. Grainger, C. Harris, A.
Naraghi, R. Bleakney
Learning Objectives – For each anatomical area
taught, the participant will be able to:
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
1. Differentiate in technique, patient
positioning and probe selection compared to
general ultrasound.
General comments:
2. Identify the normal anatomy of the
joint and peri-articular soft tissues of the region
demonstrated.
3. Able to position the patient to optimally
demonstrate the structure of interest.
4. Describe the common specific locations of injury
/ pathology and their expected appearances at the
demonstrated joints.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
8:20 – 8:35 AM
Tennis leg & Achilles tendon
M. Cresswell
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
1
2
3
4
1
1
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
2
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – At the end of the session,
the participant should be able to:
1. Diagnose the normal anatomical structures
of the calf.
General comments:
2. Illustrate the ultrasound technique for
evaluating the gastrocnemius, soleus and
plantaris muscles and Achilles tendon.
3. Define the various pathology and clinical
presentation of “tennis leg”.
3
4
5
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
8:35 – 8:50 AM
Morton’s neuromas and what to do with
them R. Bleakney
I attended
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
Learning Objectives – For each anatomical area
taught, the participant will be able to:
1. Diagnose the aetiology of mortons neuromas.
2. Demostrate the appearances of mortons
General comments:
neuromas on both ultrasound and MRI.
3. Discuss the role of image guided intervention in
mortons neuromas.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
8:50 – 9:40 AM
Ultrasound Hands-On Teaching
M. Cresswell, A. Grainger, C. Harris, A.
Naraghi, R. Bleakney
Learning Objectives – For each anatomical area
taught, the participant will be able to:
I attended
Objectives
were stated
and clear
Yes
1 2 3
No
4 5
Presentation
was clear and
precise
Objectives
were met
Did you feel there
was commercial
bias?
Relevance to my
practice
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
There was
adequate time for
Q &A
1 2 3
1
2
3
4
5
4 5
What changes do you anticipate bringing to your practice as a result of this session?
1. Differentiate in technique, patient
positioning and probe selection compared to
general ultrasound.
General comments:
2. Identify the normal anatomy of the
joint and peri-articular soft tissues of the region
demonstrated.
3. Able to position the patient to optimally
demonstrate the structure of interest.
4. Describe the common specific locations of injury
/ pathology and their expected appearances at the
demonstrated joints.
MSK MR and US Imaging Course, Whistler, February 1-4, 2014 (Each lecture contains at least 5 minutes of Q & A)
Evaluation Form
Please return completed evaluation form to registration desk
Grading 1 to 5, 1 being poor and 5 being excellent
Location/City
1
2
3
4
5
Registration Representatives
1
2
3
4
5
Quality of the facilities
Choice of dates
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
Choice of topics
Choice of speakers
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
Pre-training arrangements
1
2
3
4
5
Time for questions & discussions
1
2
3
4
5
Meeting rooms/audio visual
1
2
3
4
5
Up-to-date information
1
2
3
4
5
Meals served
1
2
3
4
5
Quality and quantity of syllabus
1
2
3
4
5
This event was credible and
unbiased
1
2
3
4
5
This event met the overall stated
learning objectives
1
2
3
4
5
There was adequate time for
questions and answers
1
2
3
4
5
General meeting comments:
Needs Assessment:
List the areas in which you are most uncomfortable in your practice and in which you would appreciate CPD activities:
1
4
2
5
3
6
In what areas would you like further information or CPD activities:
1
CMPA issues
5
Plain Radiology
9
Other:
2
MSK US
6
MSK Intervention
10
Other:
3
MSK MRI
7
Surgical Treatment of Athletic Injuries
11
Other:
4
Standards & Guidelines
8
Medical Treatment of Athletic Injuries
12
Other: