Structured Performance Record
College of the Sciences
Name of Candidate:
Date:
Department:
Rank:
Period under Review1:
11. Effectiveness in Instruction2
A.
Course-related items.
1. List all courses taught during this evaluation period and append a syllabus for each.
2.
Indicate mean student rating for each class you have taught for SEOI items #28 (Course as a
Whole) and #29 (Instructor’s Teaching Effectiveness). Append summaries of numerical
evaluations & the text of written evaluations.
For those using the revised SEIO form (these forms do not contain items 28 and 29): How
would you summarize your SEOI results for this review period? What trends do you see and how
are you addressing this information? Please limit your response to one page. Append summaries
of numerical evaluations & the text of written evaluations.
B.
3.
List new courses (new preparations or substantially so).
4.
Describe substantive course or curriculum innovation that you have developed, (e.g., lab
manuals, videos, extensive study guide materials) and append materials as appropriate.
Faculty-directed student research.
1. Credit-bearing independent study, research projects, field experiences or internships that
you have directed. (Indicate student name, class status, topic, and your role).
Year, Type, Number of students
2.
On-campus student research presentations that you have directed (including SOURCE).
Year, Type, Number of students
3.
Student research presented in professional venues.
Year, Type, Number of students
4.
Other student research activities.
Year, Type, Number of students
C. Identify your role in advising or advising seminars and if appropriate, append a list of students for
whom you serve as advisor.
1. For each activity:
Year, Type, Number of students
D. Identify your role in graduate thesis supervision.
1. As thesis committee chair, for each student:
1
Probationary faculty members report cumulative record at CWU, with activities of the most recent year clearly identified. Note
products or other disposition of in progress activities previously reported. The SPR forms submitted for review in prior years should
also be provided behind the current cumulative record.
2 Supporting materials provided under tab 11 in the supplementary binder.
http://www.cwu.edu/~cots/docs/StructuredPerformanceRecord.doc
Structured Performance Record
1
Form Revised September 14, 2012
Student name, Supervision start date, Degree Sought, Student Status/Progress
2.
As committee member, for each student:
Student name, Supervision start date, Degree Sought, Student Status/Progress
E.
List any workshops or seminars you have attended on teaching effectiveness.
F.
Note teaching awards and append documentation.
G. Describe peer evaluation of teaching and implementation of its results.
H. Describe any other efforts you have made to enhance your teaching effectiveness, and append
appropriate documentation.
12. Research/Scholarly Achievement3
A.
List Research Products that have been published or accepted for publication. Each item should
specify:
1. Category A – Publications
a. For each product:
i. Month and year
ii. Citation (full authorship in publication order, student authors noted with bold or similar;
title of article, chapter, or book; full name of serial or book in which an article or chapter
appears; publisher; editor for edited book; volume, number, page range, and publication
date including month and year),
iii. Type (refereed journal article, research monograph, scholarly book or chapter, textbook,
juried exhibitions and performances, peer-reviewed external grant (for the lead principal
investigator))
iv. Level (regional, national, international)
v. Review mechanism (e.g., peer review, regional, national, international)
2.
B.
Category B – Other scholarly activity
a. For each product:
i. Month and year
ii. Citation/Nature of Activity
iii. Type (peer-reviewed conference proceedings, peer-reviewed external grant proposal for
lead PI, co-investigator or co-principal investigator on funded external peer-reviewed
grant, other grants and contracts for lead PI, authoring publicly available research and
technical papers, conference presentations, textbook chapters, externally published study
guides, book reviews)
iv. Level (regional, national, international)
v. Review mechanism, if any
List on-going research or writing projects, including topic and schedule for completion.
1. Submitted manuscripts or other research products (append submitted draft and letter of receipt from
publisher).
2.
Manuscripts or other research projects in preparation.
3.
Projects in other stages of development.
C. List workshops and conferences attended, citing names and dates.
3
Supporting materials provided under tab 12 in the supplementary binder.
http://www.cwu.edu/~cots/docs/StructuredPerformanceRecord.doc
Structured Performance Record
2
Form Revised September 14, 2012
D. Note research awards or recognition and append documentation.
13. Service to the University, Profession and Public4
A.
University Service (such as department chair, director, program coordinator, or governance assignee; accreditation;
program development; work on recognized administrative, department, college, school or university committees; and other
tasks as deemed necessary by the University).
1.
B.
For each activity:
Activity, Duration, Your role
Professional Service (such as on grant, journal, or accreditation review boards, or as an ad hoc reviewer, in the
faculty’s area of expertise; as an officer in a professional society; organizing and/or chairing conferences, symposia,
seminars, etc.; teaching short courses, seminars, etc. that are not regular academic courses; editing journals, books, special
volumes of papers, etc.).
1.
For each activity:
Activity, Duration, Your role
C. Public Service (organized, non-remunerated educational and consulting activities related to a faculty member’s
professional expertise and further the interests or prestige of the University).
1.
For each activity:
Activity, Duration, Your role
D. Note service awards or recognition and append documentation.
14. Remunerated consulting activities and overloads
A. List all professional consulting for which you were remunerated.
1. For each activity:
Activity, Duration, Level of effort (FTE), Your role
B.
List any university overload for which you were remunerated.
1. For each overload:
Academic year, Level of effort (FTE or workload units), Activity
15. External Evaluations5
A. Note any external evaluations provided in supplementary materials.
4
Supporting materials provided under tab 13 in the supplementary binder.
Supporting materials sent to the candidate may be provided under tab 15 in the supplementary binder. Departments requiring
external evaluation of scholarship for promotion review are to follow chair-initiated procedures outlined in college level policy.
5
http://www.cwu.edu/~cots/docs/StructuredPerformanceRecord.doc
Structured Performance Record
3
Form Revised September 14, 2012