Lecture No.3 Inference For Two Population Mean The paired t test for two population means (critical-value approach) Assumptions 1.paird samples 2.normal populations or large samples Step 1: the null hypothesis is H O : 1 2 and the alternative hypothesis is H a : 1 2 (two tailed ) H O : 1 2 (left tailed ) H O : 1 2 ( right tailed ) Step 2 : decide on the significance level, Step 3: compute the value of the test statistic T Where d d n d Sd / n where d = paired difference Step 4: the critical value (s) are t / 2 (two tailed ) or 1 t (left tailed ) or t (right tailed ) with degrees of freedom (df= n-1) 2 Step 5 : if the value of the t test statistics falls in the rejection region, reject HO ; otherwise, fail to reject H0 Step 6 : interpret the results of the hypothesis test. The paired t test for two population means (p-value approach) Assumptions 1.independent samples 2.normal populations or large sample Step 1: the null hypothesis is H O : 1 2 and the alternative hypothesis is H a : 1 2 (two tailed ) H O : 1 2 (left tailed ) H O : 1 2 ( right tailed ) Step 2 : decide on the significance level, Step 3: compute the value of the test statistic T Where d d n d Sd / n where d = paired difference 3 Step 4: the value of t-statistics has df= n-1. Use a table to estimate the p-value or obtain it exactly by using technology. 4 Step 5 : if the P- value less than or equal , ( p value ), reject HO ; otherwise, fail to reject H0 Step 6 : interpret the results of the hypothesis test. Example : the gas mileages of 10 randomly selected cars, both with and without a new gasoline additive, are displayed in the second and third columns in table below. At the 5% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that, on average, the gasoline additive improves gas mileage? Car Gas mileage with additive Gas mileage without additive 1 25.7 24.9 Paired difference 0.8 2 20.0 18.8 1.2 3 28.4 27.7 0.7 5 4 13.7 13.0 0.7 5 18.8 17.0 1.8 6 12.5 11.3 1.2 7 28.4 27.8 0.6 8 8.1 8.2 -0.1 9 23.1 23.1 0 10 10.4 9.9 0.5 Solution: Step 1: state the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis 1 denote the mean gas mileage when the additive is used 2 denote the mean gas mileage when the additive is not used H O : 1 2 H a : 1 2 ( mean gas mileage with additive is not greater) (mean gas mileage with additive is greater) Note that the hypothesis test is right-tailed because a greater than sign (>) appears in the alternative hypothesis. Step 2 : decide on the significance level, 0.05 6 Step 3: compute the value of the test statistic d 7.4 d 0.74 n Sd d T 2 ( d ) 2 / n n 1 10 8.36 (7.4) 2 / 10 0.566 10 1 d 0.74 4.134 Sd / n 0.566 / 10 Critical-value approach Step 4: the critical value (s) are t (right tailed ) with degrees of freedom (df= n-1) 7 From a table the critical values wit (df = 10-1=9) are t t0.05 1.833 Step 5 : if the value of the t test statistics falls in the rejection region, reject HO ; otherwise, fail to reject H0 From step 3 the value of the test statistics is t =4.134, which fall in the rejection region, thus we do reject HO . Step 6 : interpret the results of the hypothesis test. at 5% significance level, the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that, the gasoline additive improves gas mileage p-value approach Step 4: from a table(with df = 10-1) the p-value ( in right tailed) is the probability of observing a value of t of 4.134 or greater, we find that p < 0.005 ( using technology, we obtain p = .0013) Step 5: p value < 0.05) so we reject HO at 5% significance level, the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that, the gasoline additive improves gas mileage use SPSS program use the SPSS program to perform the hypothesis in previous example STEP 1: Enter The Data As Shown Below 8 Step 3 : the result shown below T-Test Paired Samples Statistics Pair 1 ADDITI WITH.ADD Mean 18.9100 18.1700 N Std. Deviation 7.47209 7.42848 10 10 9 Std. Error Mean 2.36288 2.34909 Pa ired Sa mples Correlations N Pair 1 ADDITI & W ITH.ADD 10 Correlation .997 Sig. .000 Pa ired Sa mples Test Pair 1 ADDITI - W ITH.ADD Paired Differences Mean St d. Deviat ion .7400 .56608 Example: 10 t 4.134 df 9 Sig. (2-tailed) .003 11 W Ri 6 W Ri 99 W min( W , W ) 6 12 From wilcoxon signed ranks table we fined the critical value at N=14 and 0.05 WL 21 . WU 84 , so W = 6 < 21 so we reject null hypothesis Note : if n > 15 we can use normal distribution for testing wilcoxon signed ranks where the Z statistic as follow: Z W W W Where W n(n 1) 4 , W n(n 1)(2n 1) 24 And we reject H0 if absolute value of Zcal > critical value Ztab Example using SPSS program 13 Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test 14 Ra nks N 3a 9b 0c 12 DRUG_B - DRUG_A Negative Ranks Positive Ranks Ties Total Mean Rank 2.33 7.89 a. DRUG_B < DRUG_A b. DRUG_B > DRUG_A c. DRUG_A = DRUG_B Test Statisticsb Z As ymp. Sig. (2-tailed) DRUG_B DRUG_A -2.511a .012 a. Based on negative ranks . b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test 15 Sum of Ranks 7.00 71.00 SPSS output Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Ra nks N Cases per 100,000 population, 1993 Cases per 100,000 population, 1992 Negative Ranks Positive Ranks Ties Total 56 a 89 b 62 c 207 Mean Rank 79.35 69.01 Sum of Ranks 4443.50 6141.50 a. Cases per 100,000 populat ion, 1993 < Cases per 100,000 population, 1992 b. Cases per 100,000 populat ion, 1993 > Cases per 100,000 population, 1992 c. Cases per 100,000 populat ion, 1992 = Cases per 100,000 population, 1993 Test Statisticsb Z As ymp. Sig. (2-tailed) Cases per 100,000 population, 1993 - Cases per 100,000 population, 1992 -1.678a .093 a. Based on negative ranks. b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test 16 17 Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test Ra nks N 11 a 1b 0c 12 Pronet halol - Placebo Negative Ranks Positive Ranks Ties Total a. Pronet halol < Placebo b. Pronet halol > Placebo c. Placebo = Pronethalol 18 Mean Rank 6.09 11.00 Sum of Ranks 67.00 11.00 Test Statisticsb Z As ymp. Sig. (2-tailed) Pronethalol Placebo -2.201a .028 a. Based on positive ranks. b. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test 19