ppt

advertisement

Inventory and Procurement

Dickson K.W. Chiu

PhD, SMIEEE

Text: Ballou Business Logistics Management, 5/E (Chapter 9-10)

1

Learning Objectives

To understand some basic concepts of inventory

To anticipate typical problems involved in supply scheduling decisions

To understand some basic concepts of purchasing

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-2

4c.1 Inventory Fundamentals

Business Logistics Management, 5/E (Chapter 9)

3

What are Inventories?

Finished product held for sale

Goods in warehouses

Work in process

Goods in transit

Staff hired to meet service needs

Any owned or financially controlled raw material, work in process, and/or finished good or service held in anticipation of a sale but not yet sold

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-4

What are Inventories?

Material sources

Inbound transportation

Production Outbound transportation

Finished goods warehousing

Customers

Production materials

Inventories in-process

Finished goodsS

Inventory locations

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-5

Reasons for Inventories

Improve customer service

Provides immediacy in product availability

Encourage production, purchase, and transportation economies

Allows for long production runs

Takes advantage of price-quantity discounts

Allows for transport economies from larger shipment sizes

Act as a hedge against price changes

Allows purchasing to take place under most favorable price terms

Protect against uncertainties in demand and lead times

Provides a measure of safety to keep operations running when demand levels and lead times cannot be known for sure

Act as a hedge against contingencies

Buffers against such events as strikes, fires, and disruptions in supply

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-6

Reasons Against Inventories

They consume capital resources that might be put to better use elsewhere in the firm

They too often mask quality problems that would more immediately be solved without their presence

They divert management’s attention away from careful planning and control of the supply and distribution channels by promoting an insular attitude about channel management

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-7

Types of Inventories

Pipeline

Inventories in transit

Speculative

Goods purchased in anticipation of price increases

Regular/Cyclical/Seasonal

Inventories held to meet normal operating needs

Safety

Extra stocks held in anticipation of demand and lead time uncertainties

Obsolete/Dead Stock

Inventories that are of little or no value due to being out of date, spoiled, damaged, etc.

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-8

Nature of Demand

Perpetual demand

Continues well into the foreseeable future

Seasonal demand

Varies with regular peaks and valleys throughout the year

Lumpy demand

Highly variable (3   Mean)

Regular demand

Accurately forecasting demand is singly the most important factor

Not highly variable (3  < Mean)

Terminating demand

 in good inventory

Demand goes to 0 in foreseeable future management

Derived demand

Demand is determined from the demand of another item of which it is a part

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-9

Pull vs. Push Inventory Philosophies

PUSH - Allocate supply to each warehouse based on the forecast for each warehouse

PULL - Replenish inventory with order sizes based on specific needs of each warehouse

Demand forecast

Warehouse #1

Q

1

Plant

A

1

A

3

A

2

Q

2

Warehouse #2

Q

3

A = Allocation quantity to each warehouse

Q = Requested replenishment quantity by each warehouse

Warehouse #3

Dickson Chiu 2006

Demand forecast

Demand forecast

Inventory-10

Inventory Management Philosophies

Pull

Draws inventory into the stocking location

Each stocking location is considered independent

Maximizes local control of inventories

Push

Allocates production to stocking locations based on overall demand

Encourages economies of scale in production

Just-in-time

Attempts to synchronize stock flows so as to just meet demand as it occurs

Minimizes the need for inventory

Supply-Driven

Supply quantities and timing are unknown

All supply must be accepted and processed

Inventories are controlled through demand

Aggregate Control Classification of items

Groups items according to their sales level based on the 80-20 principle

Allows different control policies for 3 or more broad product groups

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-11

Costs Relevant to Inventory Management

Carrying costs

Procurement costs

Out-of-stock costs

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-12

Procurement costs

Price of the goods

Cost of preparing the order

Cost of order transmission

Cost of production setup if appropriate

Cost of materials handling or processing at the receiving dock

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-13

Carrying Costs

Cost for holding the inventory over time

The primary cost is the cost of money tied up in inventory, but also includes obsolescence, insurance, personal property taxes, and storage costs

Typically, costs range from the cost of short term capital to about 40%/year. The average is about 25%/year of the item value in inventory.

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-14

Out-of-stock costs

Lost sales cost

Profit immediately foregone

Future profits foregone through loss of goodwill

Backorder cost

Costs of extra order handling

Additional transportation and handling costs

Possibly additional setup costs

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-15

Inventory Management Objectives

Good inventory management is a careful balancing act between stock availability and the cost of holding inventory.

Service objectives

Setting stocking levels so that there is only a specified probability of running out of stock

Cost objectives

Balancing conflicting costs to find the most economical replenishment quantities and timing

Customer Service , i.e., Stock Availability

Inventory Holding costs

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-16

Typical Inventory Conflicting Cost Patterns

Total cost

Minimum cost reorder quantity

Replenishment quantity

Dickson Chiu 2006

Procurement cost

Stockout cost

Inventory-17

Pull - Single Order Purchasing

Make a one-time purchase of an item. How much to order?

Procedure:

Balance incremental profit against incremental loss .

Estimated these expected values …

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-18

Simple Two-Bin Pull Method

Develop a simple control system by finding the replenishment quantity ( Q ) and the reorder point ( ROP ).

Applicability: no uncertainty in demand or lead time: manage regular (cycle) stock only

Quantity on-hand plus on-order

Q

Reorder point, R

0

Order

Placed

Lead time

Order Order

Received Placed

Dickson Chiu 2006

Lead time

Order

Received

Time

Inventory-19

ROP

0

Reorder Point Control for a Single Item

Place order

Q

Receive order

Stockout

LT

Time

Dickson Chiu 2006

LT

Q

Inventory-20

Demand

During

LT

P

ROP

Reorder Point Control for a Single Item (2)

Quantity for control

Quantity on hand

+on order

 backorders

Actual on hand

Q

0

LT

Safety stock

Time

Dickson Chiu 2006

LT

Inventory-21

Reorder Point Control for a Single Item (3)

Finding the reorder point requires an understanding of the demand-during-lead-time distribution

P

DDLT

Week 1 Week 2 Week 3

+ + s d

=10 s d

=10 s d

=10 d =100 d =100 d =100

Weekly demand is normally distributed with a mean of d = 100 and a standard deviation of s d

= 10

Lead time is 3 weeks

Dickson Chiu 2006

=

S

=17.3

z

X = 300 ROP

X

 d

LT

100(3)

300 s

'  s d

LT

10 3

17.3

Inventory-22

Pull Methods

Non-instantaneous re-supply At times, production or supply continues while demand is depleting inventories.

Reorder point control with demand and lead time uncertainties

The combined effect of these two uncertainties is particularly hard to estimate accurately.

It is the standard deviation of the demand-during-lead-time distribution that is the problem, especially if the level of demand and the length of the lead time are related to each other.

Ideally, we would simply observe the actual demand occurring over each lead time period.

If the demand and lead time are independent of each other and each are represented by separate distributions, we may estimate the standard deviation ( s ) from s '

LT ( s 2 d

)

 d 2 ( s 2

LT

)

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-23

Periodic review control with demand uncertainty

The inventory is reviewed at the time interval (

T

) to determine the quantity on hand. The replenishment quantity ( ordered is the difference between a target level called

MAX

Q

) to be and the quantity on hand.

Good method for products:

Of low value

That are purchased from the same vendor

Having economies of scale in production, purchasing, and transportation

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-24

M

Periodic review control with demand uncertainty (2)

Q

2

Q

1 q

Stock level reviewed

0

M = maximum level

M q = replenishment quantity

LT = lead time

LT

T

Order received

Dickson Chiu 2006

LT

T

Time

T = review interval q = quantity on hand

Q i

= order quantity

Inventory-25

Joint ordering

Perpetual inventory control for most firms is the problem of managing items jointly rather than singly.

This occurs since more than one item is typically purchased from the same vendor.

The approach to joint ordering is to find a common order review interval ( target levels ( service levels.

MAX

T ) and then to set separate

) based on specific item costs and

A common review time may be specified, or it may be computed based on appropriate economics.

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-26

The Min-Max variant

• basically a reorder point system, but the order quantity is incremented by the amount of the difference between the reorder point quantity and the quantity on hand + quantity on order  backorders.

• takes into account that demand does not decrement inventory levels evenly. Therefore, inventory levels may fall below the reorder point at the time that it is reached.

Add increment ROP

 q to order size

M

~

Q * Q

1

Q

2

ROP q

LT

Dickson Chiu 2006

LT Time

Inventory-27

The T, R, M variant

a combination of the min-max and the periodic review systems. stock levels are reviewed periodically, but control the release of the replenishment order by whether the reorder point is reached. useful where demand is low, such that small quantities might be released under a periodic review method.

T,R,M variant

Q

1

Inventory not below

R , so don’t place an order

Q

2

R q

LT

R = reorder point

T = review time

T

LT

Time

Dickson Chiu 2006

T

M

– Q

= replenishment quantity

Inventory-28

Stock to demand - a periodic review method

This is an important periodic review method, not so much because of its accuracy but because of its popularity in practice.

The method is synchronized with the period of the forecast. The target quantity ( follows.

MAX ) is developed as

Set the period of the forecast, say 4 weeks

Add time for lead time, say 1 week

Add an increment of time for safety stock, say 1 week

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-29

Multiple item, multiple-location control

The theory that has been discussed previously is useful when designing inventory control systems for the practical problem of controlling many items at many locations.

Consider how a specialty chemical company designed such a practical system.

TASO is the time to accumulate a stock order (truckload) for all items in warehouse.

M

Q

3

Q

1

Q

2

Stock order

0

TASO

LT

TASO

M = maximum level

TASO = time to accumulate stock order

Order received

Dickson Chiu 2006

LT

TASO

Time

Q i

= order quantity

LT = lead time

Inventory-30

Customer Service Level

The service level (stock availability) actually achieved by inventory control methods is by the probability ( not best represented

P ) of a stockout during the lead time.

This actual level is higher that was used to set the inventory level.

The reason is that there are periods of time when the stock level is above the reorder point and there is no risk of being out of stock.

Methods for defining stock availability include:

Probability of filling all item demand

Probability of filling an order completely

Probability of filling a percent of all item demand

Weighted average of items filled on an order (fill rate)

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-31

Multi-Echelon Inventories

Control the entire channel inventory levels, not just a single echelon.

How much stock here when retailers also carry stock?

Warehouse echelon

S

Warehouse lead-time, LT w

W

Ret ail l ead

LT R

tim e,

R

1

R

2 d , s

1 d

1 d

2

, s d

2

Supplier Warehouse

R

3 d , s

3 d

3

Retailer

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-32

Aggregate Inventory Control

Product items can be grouped according to 80-20 curve, each with different stocking policies

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

0

A items B items

20 40 60

Total items (%)

C

Dickson Chiu 2006 items

80 100

Inventory-33

Inventory Consolidation

(“Risk Pooling”)

There is a

reduction

in the average inventory level of an item as the number of stocking points in the supply channel is

decreased

.

Both regular stock and safety stock decline.

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-34

Virtual Inventories

Stockouts are filled from other stocking locations in the distribution network

Customers assigned to a primary stocking location

Backup locations are usually determined by

“zoning” rules

Expectation is that lower system-wide inventories can be achieved while maintaining or improving stock availability levels

Total distribution costs should be lower to support the cross filling of customer demand

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-35

Cross Filling Virtual Inventory

Suppose that an item is stocked at a fill rate of 80% in

4 stocking locations. If cross filling is used, what is the effective fill rate for the customer?

Fill rate = [1 – (.20)(.20)(.20)(.20)] x 100 = 99.8%

Customer service levels can be quite high even if the item fill rate is low!

location A location B

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-36

Safety Stock Reduction due to Cross

Filling

FR =70%

Lower safety stocks from lower fill rates

FR =90%

0 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 100

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-37

Performance Metrics - Turnover Ratio

Turnover ratio

Annual sales

Average inventory

$ are at cost

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-38

4c.2 Supply Scheduling Decision

Business Logistics Management, 5/E (Chapter 10)

39

A Typical Scheduling Diagram

Forecast

Inventory

Build schedule

Orders

Bill of materials

Shortages

Purchase order releases

The point: Supply is to inventory or to requirements

Production release

To vendors

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-40

Supply to Requirements

Methods of scheduling

Just-in-time concept

Material requirements planning (MRP)

KANBAN

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-41

Just-in-time Philosophy

A philosophy of scheduling where the entire supply channel is synchronized to respond, in as short a time as possible, to the requirements of operations

Close relationship with a few suppliers and transport carriers

Information is shared between buyers and suppliers

Frequent production/purchase and transport of goods in small quantities

Minimum inventory levels

Uncertainties are to be eliminated wherever possible throughout the supply channel

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-42

Requirements planning

A formal, mechanical method of scheduling whereby the timing of purchases or supplies is determined by offsetting the requirements in the master production schedule.

Why requirements become lumpy for the materials manager

Setting the master schedule

 through derived demand patterns and bill of materials explosion

 forecasting orders on hand

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-43

Why demand becomes lumpy

( a ) Field inventory (Finished product in warehouse)

Order point

0

Order placement

( b ) Factory inventory (Finished product at plant)

Time

Order point

Production order release

0

( c ) Component inventory (Supply stocks at plant) Time

Order point

0

Purchase order release

Dickson Chiu 2006

Time

Inventory-44

MRP Scheduling

The mechanics of lot-for-lot scheduling given certain requirements and lead times

Purchase orders are matched on a one-for-one basis with requirements.

Determining lot sizes

Trading purchase price for inventory carrying cost

Vendors can set order minimum quantities to avoid the high cost of handling small orders.

This will usually force some inventory into the system.

The economically best order quantities can be set by balancing the cost of processing an order with the cost of carrying the inventory associated with ordering more than what is immediately needed.

Handling uncertainties in the master schedule

Minimum inventory levels

Part-period cost balancing

Handling lead time uncertainties

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-45

KANBAN

Toyota’s method of scheduling using the order point inventory control procedure, but with very low setup costs and very short leadtimes

Models are repeated frequently in the master schedule.

A typical master schedule for economies of scale might look like

AAAAAABBBBBBAAAAAABBBBBB but a KANBAN schedule would approach

ABABABABABABABABABABABAB

Lead-times are predictable because they are short and because suppliers are located near the site of operations

Order quantities are small because setup or procurement costs are kept low

Few vendors are used with high expectations of vendors and high level of cooperation with them

Classic reorder point inventory control is used to determine reorder quantities and timing of purchases

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-46

KANBAN vs. Supply to Inventory

Factors KANBAN/JIT scheduling

Set Ups Make them insignificant. This requires either extremely rapid changeover to minimize the impact on operations, or the availability of extra machines already set up. Fast changeover permits small lot sizes to be practical, and allows a wide variety of parts to be made frequently.

Queues Eliminate them. When problems occur, identify the causes and correct them. The correction process is aided when queues are small. If the queues are small, it surfaces the need to identify and fix the cause.

Supply to Inventory

Low priority. Maximum output is the usual goal. Rarely does similar thought and effort go into achieving quick changeover.

Necessary investment. Queues permit succeeding operations to continue in the event of a problem with the feeding operation. Also, by providing a selection of jobs, the factory management has a greater opportunity to match up varying operator skills and machine capabilities, combine setups and thus contribute to the efficiency of

Inventory-47

KANBAN vs. Supply to Inventory (2)

Factors

Vendors

Quality

Equipment mainten-

KANBAN/JIT Scheduling

Co-workers. They're part of the team.

Multiple deliveries for all active items are expected daily. The vendor takes care of the needs of the customer, and the customer treats the vendor as an extension of his factory.

Zero defects. If quality is not 100%, production is in jeopardy.

Constant and effective. Machine breakdowns must be minimal.

ance

Lead times Keep them short. This simplifies the job of marketing, purchasing, and manufacturing as it reduces the need

Supply to Inventory

Adversaries. Multiple sources are the rule, and it's typical to play them against each other.

Tolerate some scrap. Scrap is tracked and formulas are developed for predicting it.

As required. But not critical because of queues available.

The longer the better. Most foremen and purchasing agents want more lead time, not less.

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-48

KANBAN vs. Supply to Inventory (3)

Factors

Workers

KANBAN/JIT Scheduling

Management by consensus. Changes are not made until consensus is reached, whether or not a bit of arm twisting is involved. The vital ingredient of "ownership" is achieved.

Supply to Inventory

Management by edict. New systems are installed in spite of the workers. The concentration is on measurements to determine whether or not they're doing it.

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-49

Supply Chain Dynamics “Bullwhip Effect”

Supply channel

Customer Customer

Firm A Firm C

Firm B

Firm A

Firm C

Demand on upstream firms varies greatly with small changes in downstream demand

Dickson Chiu 2006

Time

Inventory-50

Bullwhip Effect

Internal reasons for the effect

Demand shifts

Product/service changes

Late deliveries

Incomplete shipments

External reasons for the effect

Supply shortages

Engineering changes

New product/service introductions

Product/service promotions

Information errors

Dickson Chiu 2006

Remedies

Centralize demand forecasting

Improve forecasting accuracy

Reduce lead-time uncertainties throughout the channel

Smooth response to change

Inventory-51

Vendor Managed Inventory

The supplier usually owns the inventory at the customer’s location

The supplier manages the inventory by any means appropriate and plans shipment sizes and delivery frequency

The buyer provides point of sale information to the supplier

The buyer pays for the merchandise at the time of sale

The buyer dictates the level of stock availability required

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-52

4c.3 Purchasing

Business Logistics Management, 5/E (Chapter 10)

53

What is Purchasing?

Primarily a buying activity

A decision area to be integrated with overall materials management and logistics

At times, an area to be used to the firm’s strategic advantage

Mission: Securing the products, raw materials, and services needed by production, distribution, and service organizations at the the right place quantity .

, the right time right quality

, the

, and in the right price right

,

Importance

Decisions impact on 40 to 60% of sales dollar

Decisions are highly leveraged

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-54

What is purchased?

Price

Cost of goods

Terms of sale

Discounts

Quality

Meeting specifications

Conformance to quality standards

Service

On-time and damage-free delivery, order-filling accuracy, product availability

Product support

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-55

Activities of purchasing

Selects and qualifies suppliers

Rates supplier performance

Negotiates contracts

Compares price, quality, and service

Sources goods

Times purchases

Sets terms of sale

Evaluates the value received

Measures inbound quality if not a responsibility of quality control

Predicts price, service, and sometimes demand changes

Specifies form in which goods are to be received

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-56

Criteria for selecting suppliers

Past or anticipated relations

Honesty

Financial viability

Reciprocity

Measured performance

Price

Responsiveness to change or requests

On-time delivery

Product or service backup

Meeting quality goals

Weighted average of ratings

Operational compatibility

Informational compatibility

Physical compatibility

Ethical and moral issues

Minority vendors

Lowest price bidding

Patriotic purchasing

Open bidding but a preselected vendor

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-57

Single vs Multiple Vendors

Single vendors

Allows for economies of scale

Consistent with the justin-time philosophy

Builds loyalty and trust

May be only source for unique product or service

Multiple vendors

Encourages price competition

Diffuses risk

May disturb supplier relations, reduce loyalty, reduce responsiveness, and cause variations in product quality and service

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-58

Finding Suppliers

Personal contacts

Trade publications

Web sites, catalogs, and directories

Advertisements and solicitations

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-59

Qualifying suppliers

Previous experiences and formal rating schemes

Word of mouth

Samples of product

Reputation

Site visits and demonstrations

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-60

Allocation to Suppliers

Company policy considering risk, fairness, ethics, etc.

Definitive methods

Is buying based on lowest price a good strategy – consider other costs too…

Allocate using linear programming

Asking “what if” questions can provide insight into good allocation plans

 weak supplier - perhaps some price concessions can be negotiated valuable supplier and more capacity should be sought

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-61

Timing of Purchases

Through just-in-time planning

Material requirements planning for continuous work

Gantt charts and CPM/PERT for project work

Through inventory management

Push methods

Pull methods

According to market conditions

Speculative buying

Forward buying

Hand-to-mouth buying, or buying to current requirements

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-62

Speculative buying

Buying more than the foreseeable requirements at current prices in the hope of reselling later at higher prices.

Some of the purchased quantities may be used in production and some simply resold.

Generally a financial activity, not a materials management one.

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-63

Hand-to-mouth buying

Buying to satisfy immediate needs such as those generated through MRP.

Advantageous when prices are

dropping

May improve cash flow by temporarily reducing expenses of carrying inventory

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-64

Forward buying

Buying in quantities exceeding current requirements, but not beyond foreseeable needs.

Takes advantage of favorable prices in an unstable market, or takes advantage of volume transportation rates

Reduces risk of inadequate delivery

Dollar Averaging

Spend the same amount on each purchase with the idea of buying more when prices are low and less when they are high.

This is a good strategy when prices are expected to rise over the long term and there is substantial uncertainty as to the actual price level.

Because under-supply may occur, some level of inventory will need to be maintained.

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-65

Effect of Quantity Discounts –

Inclusive Price Breaks

Quantity, Q

Price break curves

P i i

Price,

0 < Q i

Q i

Q

< Q

1

P

1

1

P

Curve for Q<500

Total cost

$

Feasible curve

Curve for Q

500

Q

2

Q

1

Dickson Chiu 2006

500

Order quantity, Q

Inventory-66

0

Effect of Quantity Discounts –

Non-inclusive Price Breaks

Price break curve: non-inclusive discounts

Cost for

0

Q i

Q

1

Price discount only applies to the items beyond the price break quantity.

Q

1

Purchase quantity, Q i

Dickson Chiu 2006

Cost for

Q i

Q

1

Inventory-67

Deal Buying

A one-time buying opportunity.

Determining the quantity to purchase requires balancing the benefits of a price discount against extra inventory holding costs.

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-68

4c.4 Summary

69

Summary

Inventories is a major use of capital in the supply channel.

Key tradeoff: lead time, demand, service, cost

Key difficulties: demand uncertainty together with lead time

Push vs pull

Purchasing and scheduling involve decisions that affect the efficient movement and storage of goods.

Just-in-time scheduling procedures become popular

Toyota’s KANBAN and MRP scheduling

Combining Distribution and Materials Requirements Planning

(DRP and MRP) allows integration of the supply chain from suppliers to customers.

Purchasing is important, accounting for 40-60% of dollar sales typically.

Impact on the efficiency of logistical activities

Key purchasing decision: quantities, timing, and sourcing

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-70

Summary (2)

Again much domain knowledge is required.

Note the data / information requirements and how IT helps to collect / integrate the data for calculations and decision making.

Capture forecasting and ordering signals (either determined by a business analyst or automatically by a sub-system) as events / exceptions / alerts and forward them to the appropriate system and personnel for decision

/ action.

Effective collaboration with retailers and suppliers requires much new IT in the process and information integration, as well as relying on integrating with existing enterprise systems (e.g., MRP / DRP).

Note the difficulties in integrating with multiple suppliers, especially dynamic ones.

Dickson Chiu 2006 Inventory-71

Download