NGS Bioinformatics Workshop 2.5 Meta-Analysis of Genomic Data May 30th, 2012 IRMACS 10900 Facilitator: Richard Bruskiewich Adjunct Professor, MBB Acknowledgment: Several slides courtesy of Professor Fiona Brinkman, MBB Today’s Agenda A brief overview of the bioinformatics for SNP detection software Proteins Systems biology Metagenomics (some resources; very brief…) Group feedback: bioinformatics needs at SFU? NGS-based SNP Analysis Programs From: Nielsen et al. 2011. Nature Reviews Genetics 12:443-451 NGS Bioinformatics Workshop 2.5 Meta-Analysis of Genomic Data BIOINFORMATICS OF PROTEINS From DNA to Protein to Systems ATGGAATTC… 5 Amino Acid Properties – Venn Diagram Polypeptides O H3 N + H R1 H N H R2 H N O H O H R4 O R3 N H O Ramachandran Plot Secondary Structure (SS) Prediction Note major assumptions in all Entire information for forming ss is contained in the primary sequence Side groups of residues will determine structure Pattern recognition Looks for patterns in common ss’s like amphipathic alpha-helices (e.g. pattern of polar and non-polar residues) Homology Predict ss of the central residue of a given segment from homologous segments (neighbors) Based on alignments of homologous residues from a protein family Assumption: homologous proteins = similar structure Extension: Use BLOSUM to detect similarity, or, better, use Position Specific Scoring Matrix (PSSM) SS Prediction Programs • PredictProtein-PHD (72%) – http://www.predictprotein.org/ • PREDATOR (75%) – http://www-db.embl heidelberg.de/jss/servlet/ de.embl.bk.wwwTools.GroupLeftEMBL/argos/ predator/predator_info.html • PSIpred (77%) – http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/ (PSSM generated by PSI-BLAST, better sequence database, won CASP competition for many years) • Jpred (81%) – http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/jpred/ Tertiary Structure Lactate Dehydrogenase: Mixed a / b Immunoglobulin Fold: b Hemoglobin B Chain: a Tertiary Structure: Protein Folds Holm, L. and Sander, C. (1996) Mapping the protein universe. Science, 273, 595-603. Protein Folds Folds: definition difficult and different criteria used for different classification systems – Normally formed around a separate hydrophobic core Current protein fold taxonomy – Very roughly … – Approx. 1000-2000 different estimated folds, depending on method of analysis – of which about half are estimated to be known (500-1000) – Average domain size approx. 150 aa (50 – 250 aa approx std dev) Protein Fold Major Classes All alpha proteins (all a) All beta proteins (all b) Alpha/beta proteins (a/b) - Parallel strands connected by helices (bab motifs) Alpha plus beta proteins (a+b) - More irregular a and b combinations “Other” - Often subclassified now Protein Fold Classification • Curated/Semi Manual Classification – SCOP (Structural Classification Of Proteins) http://scop.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scop/ – CATH (Class, Architecture, Topology, Homologous superfamily) http://www.cathdb.info/ SCOP classification Family: clear evolutionarily relationship – – Residue identities >= 30% OR known similar functions and structures (example: globins form family though some only 15% identical) Superfamily: Probable common evolutionary origin – Low sequence identities, but structural and functional features suggest common evolutionary origin. (example: actin, ATPase domain of heat shock proteins, and hexakinase form a superfamily). Fold: major structural similarity – Same major ss in same arrangement with the same topological connections – May occur by convergent evolution SCOP example 17 CATH example 18 Protein Fold Classification • Automated Classification – DALI http://ekhidna.biocenter.helsinki.fi/dali – VAST (Vector Alignment Search Tool) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/ VAST/vast.shtml DALI/FSSP – Automated classification Exhaustive all-against-all 3D structure comparison of protein structures currently in the PDB Domain Classification # (DC_l_m_n_p) l: fold space attractor region m: globular folding topology/fold type (clusters of structural neighbours in fold space with average pairwise Z-scores, by Dali, above 2) n: functional family (PSI-Blast, clusters of identically conserved functional residues, E.C. numbers, Swissprot keywords) p: sequence family (>25% identities) VAST – Automated classification http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/VAST/vasthelp.html All against all BLAST comparison of NCBI’s MMDB (database of known protein structure at NCBI, derived from the PDB) Clustered into groups by a neighbor joining procedure, using BLAST p-value cutoffs of C or less (where C=10e-7, 10e-40 or 10e-80, to reflect three different levels of redundancy). A fourth level of classification is based on sequence identity Motif and Domain Searching • InterPro – an integration of tools (PROSITE, PFAM, PRINTS, PRODOM) – http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/ • Expasy Tools has more… – PATTINPROT, to search for patterns in proteins yourself, etc… But first… Check if the analysis you want to do has already been done! i.e. www.ebi.ac.uk/proteome/ db.psort.org 22 Phylofacts http://phylogenomics.berkeley.edu/phylofacts/ PhyloFacts includes hidden Markov models for classification of usersubmitted protein sequences to protein families across the Tree of Life. Subcellular Localization Prediction – Example of the benefit of integrating results with a Baysian approach Localization Prediction - methods Several programs analyze single features: TargetP Initially one program analyzed multiple features: PSORT I (eukaryotes and prokaryotes) Developed in 1990 PSORT I prediction method: Rule based Nakai & Kanehisa, Proteins: Structure, Function, Genetics (1991) Compositional Analysis Molecular Weight Amino Acid Frequency Isoelectric Point UV Absorptivity Solubility, Size, Shape 27 NGS Bioinformatics Workshop 2.1 Meta-Analysis of Genomic Data SYSTEMS BIOLOGY Systems Biology What is systems biology? ① Considers all (or many) of the proteins and genes in the system ② Links proteins and genes using interactions and functions ③ Uses computational models to study system ④ Provides insights into mechanisms, system dynamics, global properties Molecular Interaction (MI) Network Nodes = Gene / Protein Edge = Interaction Possible interactions: phosphorylation physical binding transcriptional regulation others? Cytoscape Cytoscape supports many use cases in molecular and systems biology, genomics, and proteomics: Load molecular and genetic interaction data sets in many formats Project and integrate global datasets and functional annotations Establish powerful visual mappings across these data Perform advanced analysis and modeling using Cytoscape plugins Visualize and analyze humancurated pathway datasets such as Reactome or KEGG. http://www.cytoscape.org/ Cytoscape Control tabs: Network, VizMapper, plugin tabs Search for nodes Visible networks Network navigation Change visible attributes Attributes for highlighted nodes / edges Cytoscape – Loading Data Data Files: 1. Network (Simple Interaction Format) 2. Node attributes (tab-delimited) 3. Gene expression (tab-delimited) Cytoscape – Loading Data 1. Network (Simple Interaction Format) • Format: gene1 interaction_type gene2 • E.g.: C1QB C1R C2 pp pp pp … C1R C2 C4 Cytoscape – Loading Data 2. Gene Attribute (tab-delimited table) • Maps data values to nodes Load File Check off “Show Text File Import Options” Check off “Transfer first line as attribute names..” Preview Cytoscape – Loading Data 3. Gene expression (tab-delimited table) • Format: gene1 exp_cond1 exp_cond2 … sig_cond1 sig_cond2 … • Expression value: fold-change or intensity from microarray • Significance value: P-value indicating how likely the expression value is different between conditions. Cytoscape – Network Style In “Vizmapper” tab… Double-click “Node color” Select expression fold-change values (CMexp) Select “Continuous Mapping” as mapping type Can change color by double-clicking on arrows Systems Biology Analyses 1. Differentially-expressed subnetworks • jActiveModules 2. Functional enrichment • BiNGO Differentially-Expressed Subnetworks Search for sub-networks that contain a significant number differentially-expressed genes (nodes) All genes in sub-network interact… SO these highly differentially-expressed sub-networks may represent a critical pathway or complex involved in a condition of interest Differentially-Expressed Subnetworks jActive algorithm: Searches for sub-networks that contain a significant number differentially-expressed genes (or nodes) Heuristic – won’t always find the optimum result Z-score signifies how likely to find a subnetwork with a similar number of DE genes. jActive - Inputs Select expression significance (p-values) Search from highlighted nodes jActive - Results Subnetworks listed here Highlight result and click “Create Network” Functional Enrichment Functional Enrichment: Also called over-representation analysis Searches for common or related functions in a gene set Is there a common annotation (e.g. pathway, GO term) for a set of genes that is more frequent than you would expect by chance? Gene Ontology • Controlled vocabulary describing functions, processes and cell components • Consistency between organisms and gene products • GO terms linked by relationships (is-a, part-of) and have hierarchy (parent – child) protein complex organelle mitochondrion [other protein complexes] fatty acid beta-oxidation multienzyme complex [other organelles] is-a part-of Functional Enrichment BiNGO: Looks for GO terms that are over-represented in a set of genes. Displays the results in two ways A table with p-values A graph showing relationships between terms Uses the hypergeometric test to statistically test for overrepresentation of each GO term. Performs multiple hypothesis correction (since we are testing multiple GO terms for over-representation). BiNGO - Inputs Fill in Name Lower significance level Select “Custom” and then load go.annot file Click Start BiNGO BiNGO - Results BiNGO - Results General GO Terms Significance Specific GO Terms EGAN: Exploratory Gene Association Networks http://akt.ucsf.edu/EGAN/ NGS Bioinformatics Workshop 2.5 Meta-Analysis of Genomic Data METAGENOMICS What is Metagenomics? The culture-independent isolation and characterization of DNA from uncultured microorganism communities Nice reading list on the topic: http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/confcour/CMSC828Gmaterials/reading-list.html See also: Torsten Thomas Jack Gilbert and Folker Meyer. 2012. Metagenomics - a guide from sampling to data analysis. Microb. Inform. Exp. doi:10.1186/2042-5783-2-3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3351745/ I will just mention a few relevant bioinformatics tools here (no specific endorsements implied). MG-RAST server http://metagenomics.nmpdr.org/ Meyer, F. et al. 2008. The metagenomics RAST server – a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 9:386 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-386 MEGAN - MEtaGenome ANalyzer http://ab.inf.uni-tuebingen.de/software/megan/ Huson DH et al. 2007. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res. 17: 377-386