Top pair resonance searches with the ATLAS detector

advertisement

Top pair resonance searches with the ATLAS detector

钟家杭

University of Oxford

Jiahang.Zhong@cern.ch

Frontier Physics Working Month

Outline

 Background information

 Top reconstruction

 Top pair resonance searches

 Boosted tops

1 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Top quark

 Lifetime ~ 5x10 -25 s

 Decay before hadronization

 Almost exclusively via t -> W + b

 Spin=1/2, charge=2/3

2

The heaviest known quark

 m(t)=173.2±0.9 GeV (Tevatron) jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

e

11%

μ

11%

τ

11% hadron

67%

31 Aug 2012

The energy frontier at TeV

3 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Beyond the Standard Model

 Two benchmark BSM models used in experiments

 Z’ in a leptophobic topcolor model

Proxy to narrow resonance: Γ/m=1.2%

 Kaluza-Klein gluon (KKG) in Randall-Sundrum extra dimension models

Proxy to broad resonance: Γ/m=15.3% KKG branching ratio

Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 015003

 Generic search, applicable to other BSM models

 Spin-0 Lee-Wick Higgs

Spin-2 KK graviton

4 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

The ATLAS detector

5 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Leptons in ATLAS

 Only prompt leptons are considered signal

Electron:

Energy cluster of high EM fraction, matching to a track

Muons:

Combined tracking in both Inner Tracker and Muon Chambers

 Fixed-cone isolation to suppress QCD contribution

Mostly real leptons from heavy-flavor quark

Both calo-based and track-based

 Hadronic tau channel not included

6 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Jets in ATLAS

 Sequential clustering algorithms : Kt, C/A, anti-Kt

 AntiKt as the mainstream jet algorithm

R=0.4 as the standard jet

R=1.0 known as the fat jet (boosted hadronic top jet)

C/A algorithm with R=1.5 used for HEPTopTagger

 B-tagging

For antiKt4 jets

Using tracks associated with the jet

Secondary vertices

Impact parameter

 Multivariate algorithms, 70% efficiency

7 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Leptonic top reconstruction

 t -> W + b -> l+v+b

 One Lepton

High missing transverse energy (MET)

High transverse mass MT between lepton and MET (due to W mass) m

T

2 p

T l

E

T miss

( 1

 cos

 

)

One b-tagged antiKt4 jet.

 Neutrino reconstruction

Assuming MET fully from neutrino, solve p z

(v) using W-mass

Under-constrained in di-lepton channel

8 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Hadronic top reconstruction

 t -> W + b -> q+q+b

 Resolved:

3 antiKt4 jets

2 antiKt4 jets, if one has high mass.

 Boosted:

 One energetic antiKt10 jet with substructure cuts

One energetic C/A1.5 jet using HEPTopTagger

Discrimination against QCD

9 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

R ~ m / p

31 Aug 2012

Hadronic top reconstruction

 Jet substructure

 Jet mass> 100 GeV

 𝑚 2 = ( 𝐸 𝑖

)

2

−( 𝑝 𝑖

)

2

 First splitting scale 𝑑

12

>40 GeV

 Re-clustering jet constitutes with Kt algorithm.

The splitting scale of the last step.

𝑑 𝑖𝑗

=min(p

Ti

, P

Tj

) x ΔR ij m t m t

/2

10 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Top pair resonance search

 Select ttbar-like events

 Di-lepton

1 lepton + 4(3) jets (resolved)

1 lepton + 1 jet + 1 fat jet (boosted)

 Fully hadronic (HEPTopTagger)

2 fb -1 , EPJC72 (2012) 2083

2 fb -1 , arXiv:1207.2409

5 fb -1 , ATLAS-CONF-2012-102

 Reconstruct 𝑀 𝑡 𝑡 or equivalent

 Look for peaks in 𝑀 𝑡 𝑡 spectrum

τ (had)

14%

Di-lepton

6%

Fully hadronic

46%

1-lepton

(e, µ)

34%

11 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Single Lepton Boosted ttbar

 Single lepton trigger

 Exactly one offline lepton

Electron p

T

> 25 GeV

Muon p

T

> 20 GeV

E

T miss >35GeV, M

T

>25GeV

 Solve neutrino p z mass constraint with W

 Closest antiKt4 jet as from the leptonic top

 p

T

> 30 GeV

0.4 < ΔR(lepton, jet) <1.5

 One antiKt10 fat jet

 p

T

> 250 GeV m > 100 GeV

 𝑑

12

> 40 GeV dR(akt4, akt10)>1.5

12

Signal selection efficiency jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Single Lepton Boosted ttbar

M=2.5 TeV

13 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Single Lepton Boosted ttbar

 tt= l + v + akt4 + akt10 (4-vector sum)

Leptonic top mass

(l + v + akt4)

14

Hadronic top mass

(fat jet) jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Single Lepton Boosted ttbar

 W+jets background

 Data-driven normalization

 Multijets

 Fully data-driven

15

Can be further improved by b-tagging jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Single Lepton Boosted ttbar

16 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Single Lepton Boosted ttbar

 Search for local data excess with BumpHunter

 Set 95% CL upper limits on xsec

17

Replace the theoretical line with your favorite model jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Top pair resonance search

Di-lepton

One-lepton

(Resolved)

One-lepton

(Boosted)

Fully hadronic

Integrated luminosity

2 fb -1 2 fb -1 2 fb -1 4.7 fb -1

Z’ limits 0.5 – 0.88 TeV 0.6 – 1.15 TeV 0.7 – 1.3 TeV

KKG limits 0.5 – 1.08 TeV 0.5 – 1.13 TeV 0.6 – 1.5 TeV 0.7 – 1.5 TeV

18

More results are coming… jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top

 New challenge: TeV frontier

 Top decay products are more collimated

ΔR ~ m/P

19 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: Leptonic

 Lepton collinear with the b-quark

 Signal acceptance suffers from the fixed-cone isolation cuts

Signal selection efficiency

20 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: Leptonic

 Mini-isolation

JHEP 1103:059 (2011)

Variable-cone size ΔR=K

T

/p

T

 Parameter K

T

, e.g. 15 GeV

 Lepton p

T

(easier than top p

T

)

Sum up tracks pt within the cone

 Sufficient angular resolution

Fixed-cone isolation

Isolation cut

Boost, dR=m top

/E top b-jet lepton

Mini-isolation

21 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: Hadronic

 Three jets tend to overlap.

 Use single jet with large radius

 Need rejection against QCD

=> Substructure variable

 Need to get rid of soft component from underlying event and pileup

=> Jet Grooming

 Not limited to top decay

22 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: Jet grooming

 Algorithms to reduce soft components from UE and PU

 Jet kinematics more close to the constituents of hard scattering

 Better resolution/discrimination of the substructure variables

I.

II.

III.

Mass drop/filtering

Trimming

Pruning

23 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: Jet grooming

Mass drop/filtering

 Works on C/A jet

Phys.Rev.Lett.100:242001 (2008)

(J. Butterworth, A. Davidson, M. Rubin, G. Salam)

 More optimized for two-body hadronic decay

 W/Z -> qq, H -> bb

Mass drop

24 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

Filtering

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: Jet grooming

Trimming

JHEP 1002:084 (2010)

(D. Krohn, J. Thaler, L. Wang)

Use jet constituents to build Kt subjets (e.g. R=0.2)

 Remove soft subjets

 Applicable to any jet, any physics scenario

25 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: Jet grooming

Pruning

 arXiv:0912.0033 (2009)

(S. Ellis, C. Vermilion, J. Walsh)

Recluster jet constituents with C/A or Kt algorithm

(no need of subjets)

 Veto wide angle and soft constituents during jet formation

26 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: Jet grooming

 Reduce unnecessary catchment area

27 antiKt R=1.0 (ungroomed) antiKt R=1.0 (trimmed) jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: Substructure

 Jet mass are more discriminating after trimming

28 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: Substructure

 Splitting scale

 Re-clustering jet constitutes with Kt algorithm.

The splitting scale of the last step. 𝑑 𝑖𝑗

=min(p

Ti

, P

Tj

) x ΔR ij 𝑑

12

≈ 𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑝

/2 𝑑

23

≈ 𝑚 𝑊 /2

29 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: Substructure

 N-subjettiness ( τ

N

)

 Re-clustering with Kt algorithm until exactly N subjets are formed

 Smaller τ

N+1

N

=> Structure described better with additional sujet

30 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Boosted Top: HEPTopTagger

A multi-step algorithm starting from a large-R

C/A jet

Grooming: filter out soft component

Form up subjets

Impose Top and W mass constraints

JHEP 1010:078 (2010)

ATLAS-CONF-2012-065

31 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Summary

 ttbar resonance are searched in all channels at ATLAS

 Unfortunately, we don’t have the luck yet…

 Systematics still have large impact on the sensitivity

Uncertainty of performance at high pt

Understanding realistic performance of new techniques

Rooms to improve…

 New techniques for new challenges

Boosted top/object

Increased luminosity

32 jiahang.zhong@cern.ch

31 Aug 2012

Download