Infliximab for intensification of primary therapy for Kawasaki disease: a phase 3 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Journal Club General Medicine C- 4/3/14 Background- Mx of KD Treatment resistance •Fever persists or returns in 10 -20 % of patients with KD who are initially treated with IVIG and aspirin •Subset of IVIG resistant patients is at highest risk of coronary artery aneurysms Proposed Mx of treatment resistant KD •Corticosteroids •TNFα inhibitors e.g. infliximab Clinical Question P- Population • children aged 4 weeks–17 years who had a fever (3-10 days) and met (modified) American Heart Association criteria for Kawasaki disease I- Intervention • addition of infliximab to standard therapy (IVIG and aspirin) C- Comparison • Placebo O- Outcome • Reduction in the rate of treatment resistance Participants • Key Selection Criteria • Children aged 4 weeks – 17 years • Fever (temp > 38) for 3-10 days • Adapted American Heart Association Criteria for Kawasaki disease • Presenting to two tertiary paediatric hospitals in USA Inclusions / exclusions appropriate for study question? Interventions and Comparison • Assignment to intervention and comparison groups • Permuted block design (block size 2 and 4) stratified by age, sex, centre • Allocation- 1:1 • Randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups infliximab 5mg/kg at 1 ml IV over 2 hrs placebo: normal saline Randomised Randomisation concealed • Baseline characteristics were similar between 2 study groups Randomisation successful Interventions and Comparison • Modified intention to treat (analysed 97/98 who received placebo) X Participants analysed in groups to which randomised • Patients, treating physicians and staff, study team members, and echocardiographers were all masked to treatment assignment Randomisation blind Interventions and Comparison • Apart from study interventions, were groups treated equally? Antihistamine Paracetamol Study drug IVIg Aspirin Outcomes • Primary outcome measures • Difference in treatment resistance defined by: temperature of >38 between 36 hrs – 7 days post completion of infusion of IVIg without another likely source Well defined: • however no indication of what investigations would be done to rule out another source of fever • article defined treatment resistance as fever 36h – 7 days post IVIg however guardian measured temp for 3 days post discharge Outcomes • Secondary outcomes • • • • • • • Coronary artery Z score (pRCA and LAD) Change in coronary artery Z score from baseline to weeks 2 and 5 Change in concentrations of age-adjusted Hb, CRP, ALT, albumin, GGT, ESR, platelet count, WCC, absolute cell counts No days with fever > 38C from enrolment Duration of hospital stay IVIg reactions Infliximab reactions ? Well defined - Z scores well defined, same echo cardiographer - IVIG reaction? ? Replicable ? secondary outcomes clinically relevant Outcomes • Follow Up Primary Outcomes • Family were contacted by study coordinator 3 days and 10 weeks after discharge to monitor child’s progress • All 196 were successfully contacted at 3 days • 94/98 who received treatment completed 10 wk f/u • 93/97 who received placebo completed 10 wk f/u Completion: sufficient Blind outcome assessment ? Adequate time-course Outcomes • Follow Up Primary Outcomes • Family were contacted by study coordinator 3 days and 10 weeks after discharge to monitor child’s progress • All 196 were successfully contacted at 3 days • 94/98 who received treatment completed 10 wk f/u • 93/97 who received placebo completed 10 wk f/u Completion: sufficient Blind outcome assessment ? Adequate time-course Outcomes • Follow up of Secondary Outcomes • Lab data: at baseline, 24hr after completion IVIg, week 2, week 5 • Echo: initial hospitalisation, week 2, week 5 Completion: sufficient Blind outcome assessment ? Adequate time-course Primary Outcome • Modified ITT • Logistic regression model • No difference in outcome • p = 0.81 Illness days ALT, GGT Age-adjusted Hb bands • ? Insufficient power – based on reduction from 20%-5% but treatment resistance only 11% in this study Secondary Outcomes • Days of fever • • • • ITT Wilcoxon rank sum test Median p = <0.0001 • Days of hospital • ITT • Wilcoxon rank sum test • Not significant Secondary outcomes - IVIG • IVIG reaction = “fever with chills or hypotension for age that warranted interruption of IVIG” • Modified ITT • Fishers exact test • None in infliximab, N = 13 (13.4%) control • p = <0.0001 Secondary Outcomes - Coronary • Zmax • • • • Linear regression model Only included if well seen No significant difference Mean Z 1.8 (p = 0.87) Secondary Outcomes - Coronary • Change in Z scores from baseline • Mixed model reported measures • Unstructured variance/covariance error matrix • 2-fold greater decrease in mean Z score of proximal LAD @ 2/52 • p = 0.045 (nb. CI crosses 0) • No change in L MCA or proximal RCA Secondary Outcomes - Lab • Mixed model / ANCOVA analysis • Few reached statistical significance • Absolute neutrophil • CRP @ 24 hours • ESR @ 2/52 Safety • Data and safety monitoring board r/v • Fishers exact test • P values not reported • No of pts with 1 or more adverse events p=0.18 • “No serious adverse event related to study drug” Applicability • Source population not specifically described but presumably similar • Inpatient setting in 2 paediatric referral centres in San Diego and Columbus • Different criteria for Dx • Adapted from AHA guidelines • Complete KD fever >/= 5/7 – in this study >/= 3/7 Applicability • Important outcomes considered? • Cost? • Some benefit in reducing IVIG reactions, but implication in clinical practice?