Lecture 5: DC & Transient Response Outline Pass Transistors DC Response Logic Levels and Noise Margins Transient Response RC Delay Models Delay Estimation 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 2 Pass Transistors We have assumed source is grounded What if source > 0? VDD – e.g. pass transistor passing VDD VDD Vg = VDD – If Vs > VDD-Vt, Vgs < Vt – Hence transistor would turn itself off nMOS pass transistors pull no higher than VDD-Vtn – Called a degraded “1” – Approach degraded value slowly (low Ids) pMOS pass transistors pull no lower than Vtp Transmission gates are needed to pass both 0 and 1 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 3 Pass Transistor Ckts VDD VDD VDD VDD VDD VDD Vs = VDD-Vtn VDD-Vtn VDD-Vtn VDD VDD-Vtn VDD-Vtn Vs = |Vtp| VDD VDD-2Vtn VSS 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 4 DC Response DC Response: Vout vs. Vin for a gate Ex: Inverter – When Vin = 0 -> Vout = VDD – When Vin = VDD -> Vout = 0 VDD – In between, Vout depends on Idsp transistor size and current Vin Vout – By KCL, must settle such that Idsn Idsn = |Idsp| – We could solve equations – But graphical solution gives more insight 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 5 Transistor Operation Current depends on region of transistor behavior For what Vin and Vout are nMOS and pMOS in – Cutoff? – Linear? – Saturation? 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 6 nMOS Operation Cutoff Linear Saturated Vgsn < Vtn Vin < Vtn Vgsn > Vtn Vin > Vtn Vdsn < Vgsn – Vtn Vout < Vin - Vtn Vgsn > Vtn Vin > Vtn Vdsn > Vgsn – Vtn Vout > Vin - Vtn VDD Vgsn = Vin Vdsn = Vout 5: DC and Transient Response Vin Idsp Vout Idsn CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 7 pMOS Operation Cutoff Linear Saturated Vgsp > Vtp Vin > VDD + Vtp Vgsp < Vtp Vin < VDD + Vtp Vdsp > Vgsp – Vtp Vout > Vin - Vtp Vgsp < Vtp Vin < VDD + Vtp Vdsp < Vgsp – Vtp Vout < Vin - Vtp VDD Vgsp = Vin - VDD Vdsp = Vout - VDD 5: DC and Transient Response Vtp < 0 Vin Idsp Vout Idsn CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 8 I-V Characteristics Make pMOS is wider than nMOS such that bn = bp Vgsn5 Idsn Vgsn4 Vgsn3 Vgsn2 Vgsn1 -Vdsp Vgsp1 Vgsp2 -VDD 0 VDD Vdsn Vgsp3 Vgsp4 -Idsp Vgsp5 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 9 Current vs. Vout, Vin Idsn, |Idsp| Vin0 Vin5 Vin1 Vin4 Vin2 Vin3 Vin3 Vin4 Vin2 Vin1 Vout 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. VDD 10 Load Line Analysis For a given Vin: – Plot Idsn, Idsp vs. Vout – Vout must be where |currents| are equal in Idsn, |Idsp| Vin0 Vin5 Vin1 Vin4 Vin2 Vin3 Vin3 Vin4 Vin2 Vin1 Vout 5: DC and Transient Response VDD Vin Idsp Vout Idsn VDD CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 11 Load Line Analysis Vin = 0V 0.4V 0.6V 0.8V .2V DD DD DD | Idsn dsn, |Idsp dsp Vin0 Vin5 in5 Vin1 Vin4 Vin2 Vin3 Vin3 Vin4 Vin2 Vin1 in0 Vout out 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. VDD DD 12 DC Transfer Curve Transcribe points onto Vin vs. Vout plot Vin0 Vin5 Vin1 Vin4 Vin2 Vin3 Vin3 Vin4 Vin2 Vin1 Vout 5: DC and Transient Response VDD Vin0 Vin1 Vin2 B A Vout C Vin3 D 0 VDD Vtn VDD/2 Vin4 E VDD+Vtp Vin5 VDD Vin CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 13 Operating Regions Revisit transistor operating regions VDD Vin Region nMOS pMOS A Cutoff Linear B Saturation Linear C Saturation Saturation D Linear Saturation E Linear Cutoff Vout VDD A B Vout C D 0 Vtn VDD/2 E VDD+Vtp VDD Vin 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 14 Beta Ratio If bp / bn 1, switching point will move from VDD/2 Called skewed gate Other gates: collapse into equivalent inverter VDD bp 10 bn Vout 2 1 0.5 bp 0.1 bn 0 Vin 5: DC and Transient Response VDD CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 15 Noise Margins How much noise can a gate input see before it does not recognize the input? Output Characteristics Logical High Output Range VDD Input Characteristics Logical High Input Range VOH NMH VIH VIL Indeterminate Region NML Logical Low Output Range VOL Logical Low Input Range GND 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 16 Logic Levels To maximize noise margins, select logic levels at – unity gain point of DC transfer characteristic Vout Unity Gain Points Slope = -1 VDD VOH b p/b n > 1 Vin VOL Vout Vin 0 Vtn 5: DC and Transient Response VIL VIH VDD- VDD |Vtp| CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 17 Transient Response DC analysis tells us Vout if Vin is constant Transient analysis tells us Vout(t) if Vin(t) changes – Requires solving differential equations Input is usually considered to be a step or ramp – From 0 to VDD or vice versa 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 18 Inverter Step Response Ex: find step response of inverter driving load cap V i n ( t ) u ( t t 0 )V D D Vin(t) V out ( t t0 ) V D D d V out ( t ) I d sn ( t ) dt I ds n ( t ) b Vout(t) Cload Idsn(t) C loa d Vin(t) t t0 0 V 2 DD b V 2 V (t ) V D D V t out 2 5: DC and Transient Response V out V D D V t V out ( t ) V out V D D V t CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. Vout(t) t0 t 19 Delay Definitions tpdr: rising propagation delay – From input to rising output crossing VDD/2 tpdf: falling propagation delay – From input to falling output crossing VDD/2 tpd: average propagation delay – tpd = (tpdr + tpdf)/2 tr: rise time – From output crossing 0.2 VDD to 0.8 VDD tf: fall time – From output crossing 0.8 VDD to 0.2 VDD 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 20 Delay Definitions tcdr: rising contamination delay – From input to rising output crossing VDD/2 tcdf: falling contamination delay – From input to falling output crossing VDD/2 tcd: average contamination delay – tpd = (tcdr + tcdf)/2 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 21 Simulated Inverter Delay Solving differential equations by hand is too hard SPICE simulator solves the equations numerically – Uses more accurate I-V models too! But simulations take time to write, may hide insight 2.0 1.5 1.0 (V) Vin tpdf = 66ps tpdr = 83ps Vout 0.5 0.0 0.0 200p 400p 600p 800p 1n t(s) 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 22 Delay Estimation We would like to be able to easily estimate delay – Not as accurate as simulation – But easier to ask “What if?” The step response usually looks like a 1st order RC response with a decaying exponential. Use RC delay models to estimate delay – C = total capacitance on output node – Use effective resistance R – So that tpd = RC Characterize transistors by finding their effective R – Depends on average current as gate switches 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 23 Effective Resistance Shockley models have limited value – Not accurate enough for modern transistors – Too complicated for much hand analysis Simplification: treat transistor as resistor – Replace Ids(Vds, Vgs) with effective resistance R • Ids = Vds/R – R averaged across switching of digital gate Too inaccurate to predict current at any given time – But good enough to predict RC delay 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 24 RC Delay Model Use equivalent circuits for MOS transistors – Ideal switch + capacitance and ON resistance – Unit nMOS has resistance R, capacitance C – Unit pMOS has resistance 2R, capacitance C Capacitance proportional to width Resistance inversely proportional to width d g d k s s kC R/k kC 2R/k g g kC kC d k s s 5: DC and Transient Response kC g kC d CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 25 RC Values Capacitance – C = Cg = Cs = Cd = 2 fF/mm of gate width in 0.6 mm – Gradually decline to 1 fF/mm in nanometer techs. Resistance – R 6 KW*mm in 0.6 mm process – Improves with shorter channel lengths Unit transistors – May refer to minimum contacted device (4/2 l) – Or maybe 1 mm wide device – Doesn’t matter as long as you are consistent 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 26 Inverter Delay Estimate Estimate the delay of a fanout-of-1 inverter 2C R A 2 Y 2 1 1 2C 2C 2C 2C Y R C R C C C C d = 6RC 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 27 Delay Model Comparison 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 28 Example: 3-input NAND Sketch a 3-input NAND with transistor widths chosen to achieve effective rise and fall resistances equal to a unit inverter (R). 2 2 2 3 3 3 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 29 3-input NAND Caps Annotate the 3-input NAND gate with gate and diffusion capacitance. 2C 2C 2 2C 5C 2C 2 2C 2 2C 3C 5C 3C 5C 3C 5: DC and Transient Response 2C 2C 2C 3 3 3 CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 9C 3C 3C 3C 3C 30 Elmore Delay t pd ON transistors look like resistors Pullup or pulldown network modeled as RC ladder Elmore delay of RC ladder R i to source C i nodes i R1C 1 R1 R 2 C 2 ... R 1 R 2 ... R N C N R1 R2 R3 C1 C2 5: DC and Transient Response RN C3 CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. CN 31 Example: 3-input NAND Estimate worst-case rising and falling delay of 3-input NAND driving h identical gates. 2 2 2 Y 3 9C 5hC n2 3C 3 n1 h copies 3C 3 t pdr 9 5 h R C 5: DC and Transient Response t pdf 3 C R3 3 C R3 R 3 9 5 h C R3 R 3 11 5 h R C CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 32 R 3 Delay Components Delay has two parts – Parasitic delay • 9 or 11 RC • Independent of load – Effort delay • 5h RC • Proportional to load capacitance 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 33 Contamination Delay Best-case (contamination) delay can be substantially less than propagation delay. Ex: If all three inputs fall simultaneously 2 2 2 Y 3 9C 5hC n2 3C 3 n1 3 3C t cdr 5: DC and Transient Response 5 R 9 5 h C 3 h R C 3 3 CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 34 Diffusion Capacitance We assumed contacted diffusion on every s / d. Good layout minimizes diffusion area Ex: NAND3 layout shares one diffusion contact – Reduces output capacitance by 2C – Merged uncontacted diffusion might help too 2C 2C Shared Contacted Diffusion Isolated Contacted Diffusion Merged Uncontacted Diffusion 2 2 2 3 3 3C 3C 3C 5: DC and Transient Response CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 3 7C 3C 3C 35 Layout Comparison Which layout is better? VDD A VDD B Y GND 5: DC and Transient Response A B Y GND CMOS VLSI Design 4th Ed. 36