Regional and local economics Lecture 7a. The early years: Regional policy and its effectiveness in the UK up to 1979. Aims & Outcomes Aims To examine policy options To review policy development up to 1979 To examine how policies should work, in theory To examine the outcomes from regional policy up to 1997 Outcomes To be aware of the options open to policymakers and how these have evolved To have a working knowledge of generic policy instruments and their effect Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 1 Regional and local economics What were the theoretical Policy Instruments? Those that change the level of income or expenditure in specific regions (MACRO instruments) Regional Policy Options Co-ordination options MICRO options Relocate labour Different MICRO options Relocate capital Within Jurisdictions MICRO & MACRO options Trans national Central control Discriminating tax and expenditure Automatic stabilisers Discriminating monetary policy Discretionary Between Jurisdictions Within the nation MACRO options Tariff & trade Adapted from Armstrong and Taylor (2000) pp 233 Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Devolved Slide 2 Regional and local economics Those designed to influence the location decisions of firms or individuals (MICRO instruments) Micro policy options Policies to reallocate labour In situ Migration policies Policies to reallocate capital Spatial reallocation Mobility policies LM efficiency policies Inputs Labour Efficiency of capital mkts. Capital Efficiency of firms Taxes & Subsidies Output Other Social capital Admin controls Technology Adapted from Armstrong and Taylor (2000) pp 233 Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 3 Regional and local economics The main historical approaches Policies to relocate labour have been small-scale in expenditure terms 1945 -1960 inter-regional movement of firms regulated through IDCs backed up by the use of small-scale loans/grants and advance factory building on new industrial estates. 1963 - 1975 IDCs strengthened, tax breaks on capital investment and automatic capital grants, labour subsidies after 1967, growth poles. Area of UK eligible for assistance increased substantially DAs and SDAs Discretionary grants for businesses available throughout the period. Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 4 Regional and local economics What was the rational for location controls? 2 forms - land use planning regulations, industrial development certificates. Aimed at manufacturing - later to include office development. Designed to divert industry into DAs to diversify the regional economy Carrot and stick approach Advantages Effective, Cheap, Flexible, Dialogue Disadvantages Effect on efficiency Reduced investment Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 5 Regional and local economics What was the rational for capital subsidy? Tax incentives and capital grants. Induce firms to relocate by reducing the cost of investment Encourage existing firms to modernise Net new investment extra capacity new products improve BoP Replacement investment improve capital stock (technology) Two effects - Output - Substitution Advantages Higher gross investment, more jobs, improved efficiency, increased output Disadvantages Employment reduction through substitution Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 6 Regional and local economics What was the rationale for labour subsidy? Regional Employment Premium Counterbalance substitution effect from increased capital investment Need a short-term solution to shift stubborn unemployment Two effects Output Substitution - acts mainly on the output effect Advantages Businesses get a clear cost advantage over those elsewhere Disadvantages May not produce large enough cost reductions to encourage employment Firms may not lower prices but increase profits or wages Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 7 Regional and local economics Capital Income and substitution effects k2 k1 I200 I150 I100 l1 l2 Labour substitution output Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 8 Regional and local economics Other instruments Growth poles Built on dominant propulsive firm(s) Takes advantage of strong input output linkages to spread benefits Leading edge firms likely to be at forefront of innovation Advantages Growth transmitted down the supply chain Localised and urbanised economies of scale Concerns Do industries need growth poles after initial stage of development Growth of “Branch Plants” Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 9 Regional and local economics The impact of regional policy 1945 -1979 Prelude Scott P, The Audit of Regional Policy 1934-1939, Regional Studies, Vol 34.1 pp 55- 65. Industrial transference Government Factory Building at growth points (same as growth poles) Economic Problems and Policy (REGPP) Lecture notes – Lecture 4. Page 1 Regional Loans to industry The cost effectiveness of 1930s Special Areas policy instruments Initiative Gross Net cost per Employment expenditure job created (£) Factory development 4,500,000 12,000 81 SARA 754,000 12,500 17 Nuffield trust 1,914,000 16,800 85 Treasury Fund* 1,161,000 10,200* 85* Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 10 Regional and local economics Overview of all regional policy Moore, Rhodes & Tyler (1986), The Effects of Government Regional Economic Policy, DTI. 604,000 gross manufacturing jobs created in DAs (450,000 net) Subject to multiplier of 1.4 Most jobs from indigenous firms Immigrant firms more important in the first period but accounted for most of the subsequent losses. (Net) Manufacturing jobs created by regional policy in development areas (000s)1 60 - 71 71 - 81 Loss 71 - 81 Total Immigrant firms 170 48 -45 173 Indigenous firms 139 173 -35 277 Total net 309 221 -80 450 Multiplier 124 88 -32 180 Grand total 433 309 -112 630 Moore, Rhodes & Tyler (1986) 1 The difference between gross and net jobs is 74,000 Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 11 Regional and local economics Impact of industrial development certificates Introduced in 1948 withdrawn in 1982 Responsible for 74,000 surviving jobs by 1981 Estimated that 600 firms relocated to DAs as a result of IDCs Low cost to the exchequer and a powerful policy at its height Instrument By 1971 IDC jobs 89,000 IDC firm moves 474 Moore, Rhodes & Tyler (1986) By 1981 74,000 126 Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 12 Regional and local economics IDC’s, the real reasons why firms relocate Regional development Incentives: Minutes of evidence, House of Commons Expenditure Committee (T & I sub-committee) 1973-74, HCP85-1) & Heron (1981) quoted in Table 29, Regional Industrial Policy, DTI, (1983) Factors Labour availability Regional Incentives IDC Access to markets Transport Site Characteristics (1968) % respondents 80 (1976) % respondents 69 81 50 24 33 21 64 21 32 42 19 Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 13 Regional and local economics Detrimental effects of IDC’s % of potential manufacturing Jobs lost in SE and Midlands as a result of IDCs 35 % of potential manufacturing jobs Only 18% of firms refused IDCs moved to acceptable areas 13.6% of potential jobs that could have been created in SE were lost Impacted disproportionately on large firms Problem of the “Branch Plant” firm 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 14 Regional and local economics Impact of capital subsidies Bulk of policy expenditure and majority of surviving jobs Responsible for 350,000 jobs in indigenous and immigrant firms Reasonably inexpensive in terms of cost per job Expenditure peaked after 1979 RDG RSA Firm moves Indigenous 1971 1981 99,000 235,000 42,000 Immigrant 1971 1981 58,000 72,000 534 Cost per job £ 25,000 17,000 434 Source Moore, Rhodes and Tyler Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 15 Regional and local economics Regional Distribution of IDC and Capital Subsidy 1960-77 Region Scotland Wales North South West East Anglia North West Yorkshire/Humber side East Midlands West Midlands South East UK Total number of moves into region Total due to Regional Policy Investment incentives % of moves due to policy 264 331 250 333 359 217 143 213 167 156 116 110 94 79 109 57 80 16 81% 50% 62% 35% 31% 43% 55% 251 71 124 2343 33 9 977 29 8 % of policy moves due to capital subsidy 51.2% 34.1% 51.3% 13.8% 30.9% 10.1% 13% 13% 299 42% 30.6% Source Twomey & Taylor (1985), adapted from Armstrong and Taylor (1993) Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 16 Regional and local economics Capital Subsidies as an aid to Diversification Subsidy became important factor in firms investment planning Peripheral areas became less specialised Grants aided re-structuring of firms Problems Too much investment – deadweight loss Displacement of jobs in non-assisted areas and smaller firms Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 17 Regional and local economics Impact of labour subsidies Designed to offset displacement (substitution) effect of RDG/RSA Used for a decade 1967-78 Still 27,000 jobs induced by REP surviving @ 1981 Expensive to the exchequer (£150million p.a.) REP Firm moves Indigenous 1971 40,000 1981 Immigrant 1971 1981 23,000 27,000 240 180 Cost per job £ 73,000 Source Moore, Rhodes and Tyler Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 18 Regional and local economics Sectors that benefited from the £10bn regional subsidies between 1966 & 1976 Regional Capital Assistance by industry sector 1966 - 76 Sector Capital % Sector £m Leather 20 0.4% Vehicles Instruments 51 1.0% Electrical Clothing 56 1.1% Textiles Timber & furniture 76 1.5% Coal & Petroleum Shipbuilding 127 2.5% Mech. Engineering Other metal 153 3.0% Food Drink & Tobacco Other manufacture 168 3.3% Metal manufacture Bricks, cement etc 204 4.0% Chemicals Paper & printing 239 4.7% Total Capital £m 285 305 326 337 366 468 % 5.6% 6.0% 6.4% 6.6% 7.2% 9.2% 830 1079 5090 16.3% 21.2% 100.0% Source Moore, Rhodes & Taylor (1987) Regional Labour Assistance by industry sector 1966 - 76 Sector Labour % Sector £m Leather 10 0.2% Shipbuilding Coal & Petroleum 36 0.7% Paper & printing Instruments 84 1.7% Chemicals Timber & furniture 154 3.1% Textiles Bricks, cement etc 164 3.3% Electrical Other manufacture 183 3.7% Food Drink & Tobacco Other metal 213 4.3% Metal manufacture Vehicles 258 5.2% Mech Engineering Clothing 273 5.5% Total Labour £m 297 307 332 382 456 476 % 6.0% 6.2% 6.7% 7.7% 9.2% 9.6% 639 12.9% 674 13.6% 4938 100.0% Source Moore, Rhodes & Taylor (1987) Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 19 Regional and local economics What were the problems with REP? The small impact on production costs was rapidly reduced by inflation Prone to leakage 39% used REP to boost profit levels 12% paid out higher wages 49% lowered prices or promoted sales – what it was intended for Seen as “compensation” to cover cost of being in a DA Had little affect on restructuring of firms as they continued to replace labour with capital Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 20 Regional and local economics Conclusions (1) There are many ways regional policy can be used UK “active” policy has tended to use the MICRO instruments Three main policy strands - controls on location - capital subsidies - labour subsidies. Location controls - cheap - effective - open dialogue downsides - sub optimal - curtailed some investment. Capital subsidies ran throughout the period - designed to make industry more viable and competitive in world markets. Labour subsidies were short lived and designed to off-set the substitution effect of capital subsidies. Growth pole policies good idea but attracted mono industries and branch plants. Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 21 Regional and local economics Conclusions (2) Early policy experiments before 1945 successful Regional policy had a positive affect in DAs Location controls, effective and cheap but cost to potential jobs in nonassisted areas problem with “Branch Plants Capital subsidies, the backbone of policy, majority of spending and jobs. Expenditure concentrated in a small number of manufacturing sectors. Problem of deadweight and displacement Labour subsidies, short lived, expensive, little effect on production cost, prone to leakage. Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 22 Regional and local economics Further reading Harris, (1991), Regional Economic Policy in Northern Ireland 1945- 1988, Gower Publishing Company Ltd., Chapter 3. Armstrong & Taylor, (2000), Regional Economics & Policy, Blackwell, Chapter 9, pp 232 – 258. Scott,P, (1994) British Regional policy and Structural Change in the Development areas: 1945:51, University of Portsmouth Department of Economics Discussion Paper Number 39. Scott,P, (1994) The costs of ‘passive’ British regional policy 1951-64, University of Portsmouth Department of Economics Discussion Paper Number 45. Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 23 Regional and local economics Further reading Scott P, (2000) The Audit of Regional Policy 1934-1939, Regional Studies Vol. 34.1 pp 55-65 Moore, Rhodes & Tyler (1986), The Effects of Government Regional Economic Policy, DTI Armstrong & Taylor, (1993), Regional Economics & Policy, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Chapter(s) 9, 10 & 14 (selective). Armstrong & Taylor, (2000), Regional Economics & Policy, Blackwell, Chapter(s) 9. Harris, (1991), Regional Economic Policy in Northern Ireland 1945- 1988, Gower Publishing Company Ltd., Chapter 4 & 7 Regional Industrial Policy: Some Economic Issues, DTI, (1983) Harris, (1991), The employment Creation Effects of factor Subsidies: Some Estimates for Northern Ireland Manufacturing Industry, Journal of Regional Science Begg and McDowall (1987) The Effect of Regional Investment Incentives on Company Decisions, Regional Studies Vol. 21.5 pp 459 – 470 Wren & Taylor (1999) Industrial Restructuring and Regional Policy, Oxford Economic Papers pp 487 - 516 Regional and Local Economics (RELOCE) Lecture slides – Lecture 7a Slide 24