Oldham Doing It Differently Dr Hugh Sturgess Director, Pennine MSK Partnership Context • New White Paper – Root and branch reform of NHS in England – Unprecedented financial challenge for NHS • Deep seated failings in the NHS – Model of Care – System of Care What’s wrong with the system? • System of Care • “Disintegration!” • Micro-commissioning complex pathways • Perverse incentives – PbR • KPIs process driven not population level improvement or patient experience • No effective performance management of care Variation in MSK Spend Programme Budget Commissioning • Different from standard approach – Commission with the lead accountable provider for defined programmes of care with a defined budget – Commissioners have population quality based KPIs – Lead accountable provider shares responsibility for care co-ordination, quality and performance management across the entire pathway One thing I have always found is that you have got to start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology. Steve Jobs 1955-2011 Patients want more involvement 8 9 Analysis: Satisfaction with Total Knee Replacement (NJR) Satisfaction questions were completed by 8095 patients Overall - 81.8% were satisfied - 11.2% were unsure - 7.0% were not satisfied The OKS varied according to patient satisfaction (p<0.001) Source: National Joint Registry Challenges • • • • • • Lack of faith in new system Lack of interest/support from grass root GPs Dismantle existing systems Financial instability Threat of competition Ageing population, more expensive treatments, increasing co-morbidities and LTCs • Lack of integrated care – Much spoken of – hardly ever delivered – Need to shift investment from Acute trusts to community and primary care Oldham Pennine MSK Partnership • Primary Care based organisation commissioned by NHS Oldham to provide non admitted care in rheumatology, orthopaedics and chronic pain • Consultant led – provide 97% rheumatology and take patients to point of listing in Orthopaedics • From May 2011 control £23m programme budget for MSK using prime vendor model • Psychological medicine for chronic pain • 11,000 new referrals a year • Deliver traditional hospital based services from community – biologics and infusions • GP and Specialist training • Research Referral triage Primary care holistic assessment and care COMMUNITY MULTIDISCIPLINARY SPECIALIST SERVICE (Pathway Hub) Referral Highly specialised, intensive, episodic hospital care Prime contractor SUBCONTRAC TING Hub functions: •Referral triage •Skilling up 1’ care •Specialist Assessment •Specialist integrated care •Shared Decision Making •Personal Health Planning •Supported Self Care •Patient & carer support •Voluntary sector provision PATHWAY MANAGEMENT NHS Oldham Programme Budget • MSK - £23m - Pennine MSK 1st May 2011 – Primary Care • Local enhanced services – Community Care • Pennine MSK • Physiotherapy, podiatry – Secondary Care • All activity included Outcomes Of Programme Budget • We are incentivised to performance manage the entire pathway • Invest in Shared Decision Making and Self Management • Work with primary care to reduce variation • Work with secondary care to ensure best practice is followed • Work with commissioner – high value care within budget Delivering Integration • Commissioner will focus on clinical outcomes rather than process metric • Patients at the centre of our redesign • Work with third sector • Use self management and self referral were clinically appropriate Challenges and Opportunities • • • • Acute Trust attitude Change in commissioning Financial constraints GP support – Initial suspicion – Wider support as triage spreads to all referrals • Clinician support Knee Pathway (O/A) Triage of Referral within 24 hours on CaB – Signpost patient to NHS PDAs Face to face assessment ESP with 2 weeks with diagnostics – telephone FU if needed Listing – after choice – 18 week compliance by week 7 Shared Decision Making – Tested and Implemented the AQuA model past 2 years – Looked at impact of implementing SDM on patient reported outcomes for those who have had knee arthroplasty, year before implementation compared to the two years since – Already know SDM results in patient expectations being more realistic – High dissatisfaction in knee arthroplasty (19% of patient ambivalent about or regret surgery) – Joint project with NHS England Shared Decision Making Implementation • Developed and trialed the NHS patient decision aids • Staff training • Organisation changes – standard board reports, staff induction, measuring decisional conflict • Patient empowerment – Ask three questions • AQuA collaborative • All patients: – Given A3Q leaflets – Signposted to PDAs – All front line staff trained in SDM, many in Motivational Interviewing too Better Health Outcomes Used Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data on EQ-5D index to show: • Oldham’s knee replacement patients received an average health gain of 0.27 in 2009/10 and 0.35 by 2011/12. • A statistically and clinically significant increase in Oldham’s patients health outcomes. • The England average health gain was 0.30 throughout the period. Period of improvement matches the introduction of SDM. • Involving patients in decision to treat appears to lead to better outcomes. • Treated increasingly sicker patients in Oldham, but restored to same good health level. Improvement delivered within financial constraints in period with: • Arthroscopies growing at 8% in Oldham compared to 12% nationally. • Musculoskeletal spend per head decreasing by £10 in Oldham compared to an increase of £10 nationally. Pennine MSK Impact Reducing per capita cost whilst maintaining quality Pennine MSK Impact Reducing per capita cost whilst maintaining quality Thank You Dr Hugh Sturgess Tel: 0161 628 3628 Mob: 0780 893 7788 E-mail: hugh.sturgess@nhs.net