rd
th
13,000
12,000
11,000
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
Allogeneic Transplants for Age
>
20yrs,
Registered with the CIBMTR
1992-2009
- by Donor Type and Graft Source -
Related BM/PB
Unrelated BM
Unrelated PB
Unrelated CB
*
1992-93 1994-95 1996-97 1998-99 2000-01 2002-03 2004-05 2006-07 2008-09
* Data incomplete
12-Apr-20 4
T-cell Depletion
Relapse
Unmanipulated marrow
GVHD
1899
• Ground rat spleens
> injected into guinea pigs
• Hyperimmune serum > agglutinate and destroy rat leukocytes
Elie Metchnikoff
(1845-1916)
Polyclonal antibodies
Produced by immunizing rabbits/horses with human thymocyte/lymphocyte cell suspensions
Bind to broad array of surface antigens
Apoptosis
– Complement dependent cell lysis
– T cells, (B cells/NK cells/DCs at higher doses)
Down modulation of surface molecules
– PB and lymphoid tissue
– Down regulation of inhibitory T cell activity
– Inhibits adhesion molecules/leukocyte inflitration
Generic Name Producer
Horse ALG (Lymphoglobulin)
Rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin)
Genzyme, Sangstat, France
Rabbit ATG (Fresenius) ATG Fresenius, Germany
Horse ATG Pharmacia ATGAM, Pharacia Upjohn,
USA
Different sources and immunogens used
Multiple target antigens: immune response, adhesion and cell trafficking, heterogeneous cell pathways
Batch-to-batch variability
Doses and duration of therapy vary considerably and have not been systematically compared.
Weiden PL, Doney K, Storb R, Thomas ED. Antihuman thymocyte globulin for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease. A randomized trial in patients with leukemia treated with HLA- identical sibling marrow grafts.
Transplantation. 1979;27:227- 230.
Ramsay NKC, Kersey JH, Robinson LL, et al. A randomized study of the prevention of acute graft versus host disease. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:392-397
109 patients with haematological malignancies
All received cyclophosphamide/TBI conditioning
GvHD prophylaxis with CyA
2 trials:
Trial A: ATG (3.75 mg/kg x D-4,-3) vs no ATG
Trial B: ATG (3.75 mg/kg x D-5 to -2) vs no ATG
Impact of ATG on Grade III-IV aGvHD
Overall Survival
From bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org
by guest on February 17, 2012. For personal use only.
BLOOD, 15 NOVEMBER 2001 z VOLUME 98, NUMBER 10 Causes of Death on Overall Cohort 2945
Figure 4. Causes of death in 109 patients randomized to receive no ATG
(n 5 53), 7.5 mg/kg ATG (n 5 29), or 15 mg/kg ATG (n 5 27).
Acute GVHD was the cause of death in 36% of patients not receiving ATG, 28% of patients receiving 7.5
mg/kg ATG, and 11% of patients receiving 15 mg/kg ATG. Infections were, on the contrary, more frequent in patients receiving high-dose ATG.
Figure 2. Actuarial probability of TRM in trial 1 (upper graph) and in trial 2 (lower graph).
There is no difference in TRM for patients receiving or not receiving ATG in the 2 trials.
Chronic GVHD
Seventy-five (69%) of 109 patients were alive on day 100 and were at risk for chronic GVHD. In trial 1, extensive chronic GVHD was diagnosed in 65% of patients in the non-ATG group and in 38% of patients in the ATG group ( P 5 .08). In trial 2, extensive chronic
GVHD was diagnosed in 59% of patients in the non-ATG group and in 41% of patients in the ATG group ( P 5 .3); of course, the follow up of patients in the second trial was shorter than in the first.
Overall, 62% of patients not receiving ATG acquired extensive chronic GVHD compared with 39% of patients receiving ATG
( P 5 .04).
Univariate analysis
We looked for variables predictive of acute GVHD and TRM in univariate analysis in all 109 patients. GVHD grade III-IV was significantly reduced in patients younger than 35 ( P 5 .02) and in patients receiving ATG ( P 5 .05). TRM was predicted by age
( P 5 .003) and disease phase ( P 5 .03). Median number of cells grafted was 3.2
3 10 8 /kg. TRM was 47% versus 36% for patients receiving more than or less than 3.2
3 10 8 /kg ( P 5 .2). The advantage for the higher cell dose was more evident in patients with early-phase disease (TRM, 26% vs 50%; P 5 .09) than with advanced disease (TRM, 44% vs 44%; P 5 .9). There was an advantage for high cell dose, though not significant, in patients randomized not to receive ATG (TRM, 38% vs 47%; P 5 .5) or to receive ATG (TRM, 34% vs 47%).
Multivariate analysis
Phase of disease (early, advanced), patient age (continuous),
TBI regimen (2 Gy 3 2 3 3/others), cells dose infused 3 10 8 / kg (continuous), conditioning with ATG, CMV status of donor
(CMV-positive, CMV-negative), and CMV status of recipient
(CMV-positive, CMV-negative) were entered in a multivariate
COX analysis with grade III-IV acute GVHD as an end point:
ATG had a significant impact on acute GVHD when tested as
ATG versus no ATG ( P 5 .005) and when tested according to dose intensity (no ATG vs 7.5 mg/kg ATG vs 15 mg/kg ATG;
P 5 .01). Similar variables were entered in a multivariate analysis on 73 patients alive and evaluable on day 100, with extensive chronic GVHD as an end point (yes vs no). ATG had a protective effect on patients with extensive chronic GVHD when entered as ATG versus non-ATG ( P 5 .03) and when entered according to dose intensity ( P 5 .05). ATG was not a predictor of TRM in multivariate analysis.
Event-free survival
Finally, patients were studied for event-free survival. Events included acute GVHD grade III-IV, extensive chronic GVHD, relapse, death from leukemia, and death from transplant-related causes. Actuarial event-free survival at 2 years was 20% in the non-ATG patients and 34% in the ATG patients in trial 1 ( P 5 .6) and 15% versus 17% in the second trial ( P 5 .8).
Figure 3. Actuarial probability of survival in trial 1 (upper graph) and in trial 2
(lower graph).
There is no difference in survival for patients receiving or not receiving
ATG in the 2 trials.
We have explored the role of ATG in the conditioning regimen for patients undergoing transplantation from unrelated donors. Our
Update of original Italian randomised study
75 patients surviving more than 100 days (ATG 38 vs non ATG 37)
Median follow-up 5.7 years
Assessment of
long-term risk of chronic GVHD
chronic lung dysfunction
quality of life
ATG use associated with a lower incidence of cGvHD
ATG and impact on Overall Survival
Pilot Study
FBATG Sibling Allograft protocol for patients with high risk AML/MDS
Retrospective analysis on
62 patients with high risk
AML/MDS
HLA-matched sibling donor
RIC HSCT
41 patients received alemtuzumab (20mg x 5 days intravenously) followed by cyclosporin A post-transplant.
21 patients received ATG
(total 6mg/kg over 3 days intravenously)
2 yrs OS:
56.1%+/-8% vs 73.7%+/-10%, p=0.25
Pilot Study
FBATG Sibling Allograft protocol for patients with high risk AML/MDS
2 yrs TRM
(19.5%+/-7% vs 10.6% +/- 7%, p=0.43)
2 yrs Relapse
(28.4%+/-15% vs 51.5%+/-8%, p=0.04)
Patients who received ATG had a significantly higher incidence of chronic extensive GvHD (34% vs 6%, p=0.03).
Significantly larger proportion of patients receiving alemtuzumab required subsequent DLI therapy (68% vs 19%)
Donor Source Regimen ATG Outcomes
Lee KH 2011 Haplo-related
(n=83)
Sanz J 2012
Ciurea SO
2010
Single UCBT
(n=88)
Haplo-related
(n=26)
Flu-Bu-ATG
Flu-Bu-Thio-
ATG
Flu-Mel_Thio-
ATG
3mg/kg x4d aGvHD 20% cGvHD 34%
OS 45%
2mg/kg x4d aGvHD 24% cGvHD 24%
5-yr DFS 11-
44%
1.5mg/kg x4d aGvHD 7% cGvHD 14%
Lu DP 2006 Haplo-related
(n=135)
Bu Cy2 -ATG 2.5mg/kg x4d aGvHD 40% cGvHD 55%
2-yr LFS 64%
Marked increased risk of EBV-related complications with addition of ATG to nonmyeloablative conditioning prior to UCB transplantation
Brunstein et al. Blood 2006; 108: 2874-2880
Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of Epstein-Barr virus-related complications
Brunstein, C. G. et al. Blood 2006;108:2874-2880
Copyright ©2006 American Society of Hematology. Copyright restrictions may apply.
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier probability of overall survival
Brunstein, C. G. et al. Blood 2006;108:2874-2880
Copyright ©2006 American Society of Hematology. Copyright restrictions may apply.
ATG effective in reducing acute and chronic GvHD
Differences between ATG/ALG preparations and lack of comparative data
Balance of ATG usage depends on trade off between anticipated risks and benefits of T-cell depletion
Use of ATG and dose of ATG dependent on both donor and host factors
More studies are required to determine optimum timing and dose of ATG