Team FRN Antoine Woods Darrell Boyd Jason Griffin Ryne Joyner Throughout the book we have seen many examples of the benefits of using wikinomics. Overall the best example of this is of Rob McEwen, the former visionary CEO of Goldcorp. http://www.goldcorp.com/ McEwen created a contest to get help finding the best spots to mine on Goldcorp's property. (example) The results of the contest made Goldcorp an overnight center of excellence in Canadian mining and now the world. The contest allowed the company to slash the cost of production by over 600 percent in just four years. The company soon stockpiled more gold than the Bank of Canada. Goldcorp was able to buyout it’s biggest competition, which gave them a huge boost in world of gold mining. By 2006, Goldcorp was North America’s thirdlargest gold producer And Red lake mine became the richest gold mine in the world. Again, this all occurred due to one man stepping out of the box and trying something unproven. With the success of companies that use wikinomics becoming greater, new models have been developed to follow. Peer producers are now applying open source principles to create products made of bits from operating systems… to encyclopedias. Ideagories give companies access to a global marketplace of ideas, innovations, and uniquely qualified minds that they can use to extend their problem solving capacity Prosumer communities can be an incredible source of innovation if the companies give customers the tools they need to participate in value creation. The New Alexandrians are ushering in a new model of collaborative science that will lower the cost and accelerate the pace of technological progress in their industries. Platforms for participation create a global stage where large communities of partners can create value and, in many cases, new businesses in a highly synergistic ecosystem. Global plant floors harness the power of human capital across borders and organizational boundaries to design and assemble physical things. Wiki workplaces increase innovation and improve morale by cutting across organizational hierarchies in all kinds of unorthodox ways. These new forms of peer production enable firms to harvest knowledge, resources, and talent on a scale that was previously impossible. It’s hard for senior executives to imagine a world where their companies could lose control of the very resources they have monopolized for so long. The companies that adopt these models can drive important changes in their industries and rewrite the rules of competition. But in order to do so they must first discard some of the conventional business wisdom that companies have used for years. The four principles of wikinomics; openness, peering, sharing, and acting globally. Will drive innovation and wealth creation to new highs. In the new world of wikinomics, it turns out that just about anyone can be a leader. Many telephone companies around the world are in jeopardy. In the world of free internet telephony, a major source of revenue is set to disappear altogether. Ex. Telephone companies are trying to compete with Skype but failing Telecommunication companies face a genuine business problem. They need to salvage their investments in maintaining and upgrading their telecommunication infrastructures. But with free services cutting into their revenue they have deemed their service fees they charge customers and businesses for internet connections too insignificant by way of compensation. So they want to create a tired Internet with different levels of service akin to first class, business, and coach. CTO of BellSouth Will Smith has already proposed to charge fees in exchange for giving one web vendor’s traffic priority over the traffic of a competitor. Example: If Yahoo pays the freight, BellSouth users will find Yahoo’s search engine works faster than Google’s. So, in effect, BellSouth becomes a gatekeeper for the types of services that will thrive on the internet- and internet where bandwidth and content delivery rights are auctioned off to the highest bidders. This poses a grave threat to the internet- a threat that could extinguish the fire of innovation that has spurred countless new businesses, including most of the examples discussed in this book. This is not just a war against the open internet; it’s a war against economic development, competitiveness, and a war against innovation. A WAR AGAINST THE FUTURE!!!!!!!!!!! Google CEO Eric Schmidt says: “Providing tiered service is not a good strategy, it could materially and negatively affect the adoption rate.” If Microsoft had launched an aggressive attack on Linux in 1996, for example, it might not have won , but it could have changed the future landscape. It didn’t do that, and today it’s busy adopting open source tactics in its businesses as fast as it possibly can. Some telecom companies are trying to fight the internet back with laws and regulations to prevent them from entering their market. The best route is to move early to participate in building a brand-new business. By joining with a community of new innovators, you might end up at the front of the parade. This is what Red Hat and IBM have done with Linux. www.redhat.com In order to be successful in today’s economy businesses must not remain stagnate. They have to be willing to adapt to technology. “Blacksmiths weeping in their beer about their inability to sell hoseshoes in the era of railroads, doesn’t make horseshoes more popular. Blacksmiths learning how to become auto mechanics, on the other hand, puts food on their table.”—Cory Doctorrow, Blogger/SciFi Writer A growing number of smart companies are learning that openness is a force for growth and competitiveness. Amazon, eBay, flickr open up their applications and business infrastructures to increase the speed, scope, and success of innovation. Proctor and Gamble Had not been open to the idea of openness, this led to a near death experience in early 2000. Profits were down and its stock was going downward. Their Solution Putting more money into internal R&D wasn’t working, so………. The company opened up and outsourced about 50% of its new innovation from outside the company. They constantly search for new innovations using InnoCentive, NineSigma, and yet2.com. French Government Vs Ipod Boeing reached beyond its walls to cocreate the 787 with a network of partners that stretches over six countries. It gave up control over a large proportion of the thousands of components that make up its airplane and sacrificed some critical engineering knowledge. In the process Boeing is transitioning into a smaller, more capable workforce that is honing new skills to manage a globally distributed team made up of different companies, cultures and disciplines. Flickr started in 2003 as an online multiplayer game in which the phototrading feature was almost an after thought. Once it took off it changed the direction of the company. Soon hundreds of thousands of members were uploading, annotating , and commenting on each other’s photos The secret to successful peering is building a critical mass of participants that attracts more and more people Few projects survive without ongoing funding and support and a core group of leaders that provide guidance and manage interactions For example the ongoing development of Wikipedia relies heavily on the vision, values, and commitment of Jimmy Wales and a core of Wikipedians An important part of creating critical mass involves cooperating to supply the open standards, shared IP, legal foundations and collaborative infrastructures that will support the innovation process. The Apache web server would be nowhere if not for the leadership and resources IBM dedicated to help establish it The SNP Consortium took over a year to flesh out its model of collaborative research and development In the end the collaborative research effort more than repaid the time and effort required to get the processes right by dramatically lowering their cost and speeding the industry toward a new era of personalized medicine Providing the right for everyone to enjoy noncommercial benefits keeps the barriers to participation low. Reserving the right to appropriate private returns to those who make substantial contributions will reward those who put in the most effort There are written and unwritten rules that govern issues such as communications, appropriation, and the form and manner of contribution. Firms that want to participate in peer production need to understand and abide by the norms that govern the community IBM chose evolution when it decided to join, not fight, peer production. The firm did study open source and set appropriate goals to guide its activities, but it learned how to succeed through trial and error. Engaging in collaborative communities means ceding some control, sharing responsibility, embracing transparency, managing conflict, and accepting that successful projects will take on a life of their own It means learning new skill sets that emphasize building trust, honoring commitments, changing dynamically, and sharing decision making with peers Mass collaboration is the new way for people to socialize, entertain, innovate, and transact in self organizing peer to peer communities of their choosing Peering is giving away software and resources to support them (IBM and Linux specialize in this) Ultimately harnesses human skill, ingenuity, and intelligence more efficiently and effectively than before. Saves on development costs and generates billions in revenue from Linux-related services and hardware for IBM. Linden Labs enables users to “co-create” Second Life (It produces less than 1% of the actual game content) They in turn give scripting tools to users This allows users to basically create their own virtual world Second Life has a $100 million turnover Focuses on lowering costs, building communities, and accelerating discovery California Department of Education saved taxpayers $400 million a year by open sourcing its textbooks More companies and organizations are looking towards open sourcing. (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) Sharing rules of thumb: