3 SCG’s Practice: Collaboration in R&D 1 SCG’s Collaboration Portfolio External Collaboration Collaboration Portfolio by expenses (770 MB) Others, 1% Customer, 15% Supplier , 22% International Institute/ University, 14% Local Institute/ University, 47% Source: R&D report 2009 – 2012 included both completed & ongoing projects SCG’s Collaborative Network: International Build relationships and collaborate with all stakeholders - “Win-Win strategy” International Partners: British Columbia CAL TECH UC Berkley Stanford IPST 78 projects Zhejiang U. Technique U of China Academy of Science Darmstadt Waterloo ABDN OXFORD Osaka U. Tianjin U. EPFL D Tech CIRAD KYOTO U MIT CBMA Aachen Certech TITECH GATECH Ecole des JAIST Fraunhofer Karlsruhe Mines Albi UFL HiBot IFP PSU WASEDA KAIST, National Inst. Of standard and tech. KIST, STEPI Collaborative partners Developing project partners Relationship partners Source: R&D report 2009 – 2012 included both completed & ongoing projects SCG’s Collaborative Network: Domestic Build relationships and collaborate with all stakeholders - “Win-Win strategy” Domestic Partners: 169 projects 4 SCG’s Collaboration with Universities University Industry Co-Research Lab: For researchers & students - Extended research facility - Industrial experienced students Green Building Marine Cement: Cement composition that resist against chloride ingress from external marine environment Organic fertilizer: Utility of waste material from paper for agricultural usage - Reducing landfill - Improving plant growth - Lowering cost of chemical fertilization 5 4 How to… Enhance Effective Collaboration 6 How to Enhance our Effective Collaboration Establish Common Interests Share Resource Be Fair & Respect 7 Collaboration between University & Industry Conducting research for commercialization to support business and social needs University & Frontier or Self-interest Industry Business and Social needs Publishable Research VS. Commercialization 8 Collaboration between University & Industry Resource sharing between University and Industry University & Industry Access to technical information Access to business & social needs Scientific expertise Engineering expertise Pools of education networks Some testing & lab equipment and capital 9 Collaboration between University & Industry Gaps in Intellectual Property (IP) Management University & Industry Own IP for career advancement Own IP for organization asset KPI-driven IP Business-driven IP Prefer co-ownership of IP Prefer exclusive ownership of IP Prefer royalty fee Prefer royalty Free! 10 Commercialization Plan and Production Prototype Product Development Product Research by University Research by Corporate Concept Development R&D Collaboration and Business Process % of investment By Corporate By University/Institute IP Benefit Sharing often becomes obstacle of R&D collaboration 11 Final Thoughts on Collaboration Create real value of R&D through Commercialization with Fair & Respect 12 Thank you 13