Assessment and future challenges for Pan

advertisement
11th Southeast European Freight Forwarders and Logistics Providers Congress
«SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN INTERMODALITY»
16th & 17th May, 2013
Assessment and future challenges for Pan-European
Corridors IV, V, and VII
Dr. Vasileios Zeimpekis
Design, Operations & Productions Systems Lab
Department of Financial & Management Engineering
University of the Aegean
vzeimp@fme.aegean.gr
Agenda
• The GIFT project: Main aim & objectives
• Assessment Methodology
• List of Key Performance Indicators
• Assessment results
• Proposals for green intermodal freight transport in the S.E.E.
region
Main aim & objectives
The main aim of the current project is:
•
to map, analyze, and evaluate the status of the transport sector in the GIFT
transport network,
– propose new policies and strategies in infrastructure, processes, assets, ICT,
legislation, norms and harmonization/ standardization issues, and
– Develop tools & methodologies for CO2 emissions monitoring
–
.
…..in order to promote innovative green intermodal freight transport corridors.
•
Main objectives
– Identify current status of the freight transport sector
– Improve interoperability and intermodality of freight transport on land, IWW,
and sea
– Identify green corridors in the SEE region by promoting technical innovation and
a shift towards the least polluting and most efficient modes of transport
– Develop an ICT tool for CO2 footprint monitoring & certification
– Develop agreements & MoUs on multi-modal connections
Assessment methodology
o Use of KPIs for the assessment of the corridors based on 6 categories:
service quality & efficiency, infrastructure, environmental sustainability,
ICT, and Transport market/ Business players
o Collection of data from :
o EUROSTAT, EL.STAT., OECD
o Operational data from Key players /stakeholders from S.E.E. region
o EU reports and National Transport studies/roadmaps
o Data from NGOs and Int. Organizations (π.χ. W.H.O)
o Studies from consulting companies (McKinsey, Deloitte)
o Use of transportation models for the calculation of results in Corridor
Level
Categorization of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Service Quality
Service Efficiency
• Relative unit cost
• Transport time
• Frequency of service
Infrastructure
•
•
•
•
•
Refueling stations
Infrastructure charges
Number of accidents
Electrification
Capacity utilization
•
•
•
•
Delay risk
Cargo loss
Cargo damage
Reliability
Transport marketBusiness players
• Corridor
Competitiveness
• Corridor Freight
market
Environmental
Sustainability
• Noise Protection
• Polluter CO2
• Polluter SO2
ICT
• Cargo monitoring
Assessment Results (1/3)
Service Efficiency
Corridor IV
• Relative unit cost
Road
Rail
0.040
0.033
Road
Rail
0.048
0.031
IWW
0.02
Road
Rail
1.49
1.47
Road
Rail
1.40
1.83
IWW
10
Road
Rail
30
9
Road
Rail
50
105
IWW
2.51
(EUR/ton-Km)
• Transport time
(h/100Km)
• Frequency of service
(no. of services/week)
Corridor VII
Corridor V
1
Romania is not included
Service Quality
• Delay risk
(min/100Km)
• Cargo loss
Scale (1-4)
• Cargo damage
Scale (1-4)
• Reliability
(%)
Road
Rail
25.74
25.82
Road
Rail
10.48*
50.31
IWW
93.392
Road
Rail
2
1
Road
Rail
1*
1
IWW
13
Road
Rail
2
1
Road
Rail
2
1
IWW
13
Road
Rail
96.5
92.9
Road
Rail
98.4
74.6
IWW
91.32
*
Italy is not included
2
3
Hungary and Romania not included
Serbia is not included
Assessment results (2/3)
Infrastructure
• Refueling stations
Road
0.06
Road
• Infrastructure charges
Road (€/km)
Rail (€/ton-km)
0.000
0.003
Road (€/km)
Rail(€/ton-km
• Number of accidents
Road (serious)
Road (non-serious)
Rail (serious)
Rail (non-serious)
0.11
0.38
0.04
0.19
• Capacity utilization
Road (HCM)*
Rail (%)
• Electrification
Rail
(stations/Km)
(%)
Corridor VII
Corridor V
Corridor IV
0.09
IWW
N/A
0.1371
0.0011
IWW (€/ton-km)
0.01
Road (serious)
Road (non-serious)
Rail (serious)
Rail (non-serious)
0.001
1.13
0.001
1.65
IWW (serious)
IWW (non-serious)
0.001
0.002
2
44.1
Road (HCM)*
Rail (%)
2
56.52
IWW (%)
40.32
89.3
Rail
88.93
IWW
N/A
(%)
* HCM-> Road capacity expressed
in HCM level of service (A, B, C, D,
E, F) / 2: describes reasonable
free-flow operations
ICT
• Cargo monitoring
Road
Rail
36.0
21.2
1
Italy is not Included
2 Slovakia is not included
3 Slovakia and Croatia are included
Road
Rail
---
1
Serbia and Hungary are not
included
2 Serbia is not included
Road
Rail
---
Assessment results (3/3)
Environmental
Sustainability
• Noise Protection
(Scale 1-5)
• Polluter CO2
(gr/tn-Km)
• Polluter SO2
(gr/tn-Km)
Corridor IV
* : Scale 2 -> 20% - 40%
protected population along
the section
Slovakia is included
Italy is not included and
Slovakia is included
2
1
Slovakia is included
Road
Rail
2*
2*
Road
Rail
31
22
IWW
41
Road
Rail
72.76
19.66
Road
Rail
68.64
17.65
IWW
56.961
Road
Rail
0.09
0.06
Road
Rail
0.09
0.09
IWW
0.251
Transport marketBusiness players
• Corridor
Competitiveness
Corridor VII
Corridor V
1
1
Rail
Italy is not included
1
Romania is not Included
3
Rail
51
IWW
7
32
63.3
Rail
61.01
IWW
57.81
(no. of providers)
• Corridor Freight
market
(%) of annual turnover that comes
from international transport
Road
Rail
Proposals for green intermodal freight transport in the
S.E.E. region
Infrastructure / State
•
•
•
•
•
Finalization of the electrification of the
rail network
Simplification of custom formalities and
minimization of borders-crossing time
Establishment of logistics areas (Greece)
Creation of new logistics hubs / freight
villages that support combined transport
operations
Creation of a stable tax environment
Environment
•
•
•
Financial incentives for new generation
truck fleets (EURO V)
Green certification and measurement of
carbon footprint
Shift to co-modality
Stakeholders / Transport market
• Increase vehicle utilization by:
o Decreasing the proportion of empty running
miles
 Increase authorized vehicle weights
(44Tn trucks)
 Deliver only when a truck is fully loaded
o Increasing the payloads
 Flexibility in pick-up & delivery time
windows
 Cooperation between logistics service
providers
• Improve scheduling & routing
ICT
•
•
Use of integrated information systems
• Track & trace
• Proof of Delivery (PoD)
Rail network: Introduction of ERTMS
Dr. Vasileios Zeimpekis (vzeimp@fme.aegean.gr)
Design, Operations, & Production Systems Lab
University of the Aegean
Green Intermodal Freight Transport (GIFT) project
http://www.gift-project.eu
Download