Enterprise
Peg David
AIM Technical Program Manager
NETPDTC N621
23 APRIL 2013
Overview
•
Enterprise AIM I/AIM II & CPM eDMZ Transition
•
Authority to Operate (ATO)
•
SSC NOLA Enterprise Data Center Migration
•
SSC NOLA Citrix – Risk
•
Issues
•
Non-NETC Sites/Commands
•
AIM Content Repository Requirements
•
Configuration Control Board (CCB)
2
AIM Central Site Hosting
at NETPDTC
•
NETC N74/N6, NETPDTC & NAWCTSD Migration Plan

18 FEB – 24 APR - Completed eDMZ Migration



All NETC Learning Centers and SSP
Content, databases, processing, Citrix NTSS Accounts
Benefits

Simultaneous access by geographically dispersed Center and
contractor personnel for collaborative development and
maintenance

Positions AIM Enterprise for SPAWAR New Orleans (NOLA)
Enterprise Data Center Transition (NEDC)

Lessons Learned

RADM Quinn – BZ!
3
Government CPM Hosting
•
CPM in Aimereon/vendor site – Sunset 12 APR
•
CPM in NETPDTC eDMZ deployed – 15 APR
•
https://cpm.prod.aim.netc.navy.mil
•
Benefits

Enterprise production hosting and support vs current
contractor environment with limited server
configuration and bandwidth

Leverages NETC domain Sys Admin, Database
Management, and Information Assurance expertise at
NETPDTC and SSC NOLA

Co-located with rest of NETC enterprise IT applications;
secure access from both .mil and .com domains
4
AIM ATO Status
•
3-year ATO granted by FLTCYBERCOM 26 Dec 12
•
Allowed us to proceed with migration of AIM I/II
Central Site instances into NMCI eDMZ and hosting
CPM in eDMZ vs vendor site
•
ATO POAM CAT III – deployment of CAC for
Application Jun/July timeframe (T)
•
Certification & Accreditation (C&A) artifacts are
routinely kept updated; used for annual FISMA
reviews, etc, living documents
•
Migration to SPAWAR NOLA requires modified ATO to
support NEDC environment
5
AIM Central Site Migration
to NOLA NEDC
•
Goal: Hardware/system software infrastructure in
place SSC NOLA by 30 SEP 13
•
Schedule for operational transition/deployment from
current NETPDTC eDMZ host to NOLA host TBD
 Lessons Learned - Transition plan similar to recent
eDMZ migration – Application Functional Testing (AFT);
Production cutover
•
Management of AIM I/II/LO Module Central Sites and
CPM will remain with NETPDTC; only physical hosting
moves to NOLA
•
NEDC Remote Access: GFE or CFE required for
SPAWAR CITRIX access – discussions in progress
6
Risk Management
NEDC Remote Access
Description:
High
70
90
Medium
30
50
1
(1) For Off-site Users - GFE or CFE is required for SPAWAR
CITRIX access
-- Govt Furnished Equipment (GFE) = property acquired
directly by Govt and made available to contractor; and,
-- Corporate Furnished Equipment (CFE) = equipment
purchased by DoD/Govt contracted company specifically in
support of DoD/Govt contract; used only by personnel
supporting that contract
Mitigation Plan:
10
Probability
Low
1
2
3
4
Impact
5
-- NETPDTC team provided current AIM Citrix STIG
mitigations; architecture to NOLA team
-- SPAWAR NOLA team discussed separate AIM APP Citrix
instance vs shared Citrix Farm
-- Technical options for AIM Users – discussions forthcoming
AIM Engineering Mtgs Apr; arrive at consensus
7
Issue:
Privilege Levels
•
5 levels implemented in Central Site AIM II per
CNATT request
•
3 levels implemented in Central Site AIM I per SSP
request
•
CPM-style role/privilege structure tasked and funded
by NETC N74/NAWCTSD
8
Issue:
Hosting Test Environment
•
NMCI AIM users needed to test ongoing system
enhancements as part of formal Govt Acceptance
Testing (GAT) process
•
Cannot install in-process AIM updates on local
NMCI PCs or access contractor-hosted virtual
server to conduct tests
•
NETPDTC to establish Test Environment to support
ongoing requirement
9
Issue:
Blocking Word Macros
•
NMCI does not allow MSWord macros to be
enabled on NMCI desktop PCs once Win 7/Office
2010 is installed
•
This poses crippling limitation on TG functionality
for stand-alone desktop installations of AIM under
NMCI; no work-around has yet been identified
•
Does not affect AIM Central site instances inside
eDMZ
10
Issue:
Software Release Process
•
All Central Site instances now migrated to Rel 5.0
•
CNATT requirement to maintain local NMCI AIM II
instances to support effective community-wide
business process
•
Discussion re NMCI certification process / schedule
•
Impact of NMCI certification delay / push of Rel 5.0
11
Issue:
NOFORN NNPI
•
Affects primarily non-SWS undersea community –
NAVSEA 07TR, SLC & SLC learning sites
•
Stringent data handling controls re unclassified No
Foreign Dissemination Navy Nuclear Power
Information (NNPI), mandated by NAVSEA 08
•
NETC/NETPDTC stood up TRANET-C NNPI COI to host:

SLC reference materials, e-library, IETMs, course
curriculum info, AIM content, used by SLC/DETs

TRANET-C NNPI COI use/rqmts by other LCs TBD

POC: Bruce Bare, NETC
12
Non-NETC Commands
Implementation
•
Non-NETC Commands interest in AIM Enterprise
•
Prioritizing in Process
 NSTC (OTC/RTC) – in process
 Navy Medicine
 NAVSPECWARCEN (hosted by NAVSOC)
 NAVRES
 DANTES
 Regional Maintenance Centers – Norfolk / San Diego
 Naval Shipyards - hosted Norfolk
13
AIM Content Repository
•
Enterprise Requirements’ for Ancillary Data
Storage Area
•
•
•
AIM Enterprise has multiple components: AIM I, AIM
II, CPM, LO and ancillary file shares
Requires configuration management; search; access by
enterprise users
Notional Plan
Complete Functional Requirements Document
• H2 assisting – collate input/requirements provided
from LCs
• FY14 goal/priority
•
14
Configuration Control
Board (CCB)
•
•
•
NETC Instruction 5200.3 – established authoritative framework for effective &
innovative configuration compliance for IM/IT as it relates to NETC WD Line of
Business -- Each T&E App has Charter; Chairpersons: PM and TPMs
Purpose of CCB: ensure programmatic changes (i.e., consideration of proposed
cost and schedule changes) and related technical changes to information systems
are processed in a visible and traceable manner
AIM CCB membership – commands/vendors (as applicable):










NETC N74 Program Manager (PM) – Michael Mosley
NETC N741A Deputy Program Manager (DPM) – Leslie Desenburg
NETPDTC N621 Technical Program Manager (TPM) – Peg David
NETPDTC Information Assurance (IAM/IAO) – Kelley Harris or designated IAO
NETPDTC System Development Team – Christopher Stark; when applicable
NAWCTSD Application Technical Program Manager (TPM) – Tiffany Dombrowski
NAWCTSD System Dev/Trng Team – Mike Matzko / Mike Coyle
AIMEREON Application Team – Jim Ferrall and AIMEREON staff as identified; when applicable
NETC Learning Centers – Representatives as identified via the AIM FRB; when applicable
SSP and other Navy Commands Using Enterprise AIM – Representatives as identified via the AIM
FRB – when applicable
15
CCB (cont)
•
•
•
•
•
CCB Forum
 Participants get together discuss (specified work/projects) which need
to be completed
 Responsible agents are assigned for performing agreed-upon work
 Decisions/assigned actions are recorded when completed
 Includes: providing tech support during development of decision support
documentation such as: Requests for Information Services (RIS), System
Functionality Assessments (SFA), Analysis of Alternatives (AOA), Independent
Cost Estimates (ICE), and Software Change Requests (SCR), etc.
CCB shall review, adjudicate, elevate, or place on hold proposed changes for
adjudication as required
CCB shall reach a decision after a period of presentation and discussion, at which
time the Chairperson may poll members for their position or recommendation
CCB Chairperson(s) shall make all final decisions
Held ICW AIM FRB Meetings; or on more frequent basis; when applicable
16
AIM Central Site
Implementation
•
•
Points of contact:

NETC N74: Mike Mosley, Leslie Desenburg

NETPDTC: Peg David, Christopher Stark

NAWCTSD: Tiffany Dombrowski, Mike Matzko

AIMEREON: Jim Ferrall, Steve Wicinski, Mike Coyle
NETPDTC Enterprise/Central Site specifics, narrated help
videos, lessons learned - available on AIM information
Web page:
http://aim.aimereon.com/aim/AIM-Central-Site-Hosting-atNETPDTC.ashx
17
Questions?
18
Enterprise Training Management Framework
Continuous Process Improvement
ETMF Status Update
Bruce Bare, NETC N62
Jon Sullivan, H2 Performance Consulting, Corp
23 April 2013
Topics




ETMF Phase II Goals & Deliverables
Roadmap Results to Date
Current Roadmapping Activities
Roadmap Development Schedule
20
ETMF – Phase II
Goals
 Document and analyze “As-Is” state of core business processes required to
develop, manage and deliver training curricula
 Identify duplication, inefficiencies, process improvement opportunities
 Determine most efficient alignment of core training management systems
 Recommend strategies that will support NETC’s ability to continue quality &
quantity of education while controlling (reducing) costs
Deliverables
1. Inventory Management Process Recommendation – Delivered Mar 2013
2. Assessments Tool Recommendation – Planned Jun 2013 Delivery
3. NETC Enterprise Technology Roadmap – Planned Sep 2013 Delivery
21
Roadmap Results To-Date
Participants by Group
Responses by Group
CID
22%
CID
25%
CPPD
25%
NETC N72
8%
CNATT
17%
NETC N74
11%
NETC N73
13%
CPPD
17%
CNATT
15%
NETC N72
9%
NETC N73
13%
NETC N74
13%
NETPDTC
N612
4%
NETPDTC
N612
8%
Business / Service Workshops: COMPLETED
Technology Workshops: COMPLETED
Participating Teams
Sample Data Pool







NETC N72, N73, N74

CPPD

CNATT
CID
LAS Team
NETPDTC N612
NETPDTC N621 *Data not represented
53 Participants
328 Responses
22
Roadmap Responses to
Date
Number of Responses
Gap Areas by Category
23
Current Roadmapping
Activities
 Data Gathering
 Remaining Technical Workshop Input
 Data Validation
 Workshop & Focus Group Data Analysis
 Findings Validation Survey Analysis
 Gap Analysis
 Results Documentation
 Roadmap Initiative Groupings
 Roadmap Initiative Worksheets
 Charting Workshop Planning
 Customizing Roadmap Templates
 Identifying Industry Trends
24
Roadmap Development
Schedule
Documentation,
Validation &
Analysis
June
July
Validation &
Draft Prep
August
Charting
September
Final Deliverable
May
Draft Review
Workshop 3
Technology
Documentation
& Validation
April
Workshop 4
Charting
March
Constraint Review
Feb
Workshops
1&2
Progress as of
23 April 2013
Documentation &
Validation
25
Questions?
26