UNIVERSITY OF MALAWI School of Oriental & African Studies Chancellor College Agricultural Livelihoods and Food Security: Malawi Agricultural Input Subsidy Programme and Cash Transfers Ephraim Chirwa Wadonda Consult & Chancellor College, University of Malawi Andrew Dorward School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London Presented at a Policy Dialogue and a South-South Learning Event on Long-Term Social Protection for Inclusive Growth, Johannesburg, South Africa, 11- 14 October 2010 1 Outline of Presentation Role of agriculture in Malawi Agricultural Input Subsidy Programme Cash Transfer Programme Issues and Challenges 2 Role of Agriculture and Challenges in Malawi Agriculture is the main source of livelihoods in rural Malawi where 88% reside. Agriculture contributes 35-39% to GDP and generates 90% of the foreign exchange earnings. Tobacco is the main cash and export crop – generating more than 60% of foreign exchange earnings; 15% of smallholder farmers grow tobacco. Maize is the main staple food – largely grown by smallholder farmers for subsistence consumption – only 15% is marketed. Food security in Malawi is largely defined by the availability and access to maize. Johannesburg 11-14 October 2010 3 Malawi rural economy: poverty & the low maize productivity trap High poverty rates (50% <$0.40 in 2004) Small holdings (50% < 1.0ha) Continuous maize cultivation Declining soil Limited agric. fertility credit Recurring food insecurity Highly variable Low producer maize prices investment 97% farmers grow maize (half also buyers) >70% cultivated land under maize Johannesburg 11-14 October2010 Unstable maize prices Consumer ‘lock in’ to low productivity maize Low maize & agric productivity Low & vulnerable real incomes Low demand for non-agric goods & services 4 Agricultural Input Subsidy Programme Implemented since 2005/06 season as a targeted programme using coupons, following a poor harvest in the 2004/05 agricultural season. The objective is to improve access to and use of fertilizers in order to increase agricultural productivity and food security (national and household food self-sufficiency). Initially, the subsidy covered both maize and tobacco fertilizers but since 2009/10 only maize fertilizers are subsidized. Targets poor and vulnerable smallholder farmers with land and able to redeem coupons, and special consideration of vulnerable groups (female/elderly headed, orphans, affected by HIV and AIDS). Each household receives two fertilizer coupons for 1 bag of 50 kg of basal and 1 bag of 50 kg bag of urea, and a maize seed coupon. Funded mainly from the national budget, with donor budget support. Johannesburg 11-14 October 2010 5 Coverage and Size of Programme 2005/6 2006/7 2007/8 2008/9 n/a 54% 59%* 65% 131,388 174,688 216,553 202,278 Fertiliser cost (US$/mt) 393 490 590 1250 Subsidy % (approx) 64% 72% 79% 91% 32 73.9 95.4 241.7 Households receiving >= 1fertiliser coupons Total fertiliser sales (mt) Programme cost , net (US mill) Johannesburg 11-14 October 2010 6 Johannesburg 11-14 October 2010 7 Planning & budgeting Input purchase Input distribution (transport & storage) Secure coupon printing Farmer registration Coupon allocations Coupon distribution Beneficiary identification Coupon issue Coupon redemption INPUT USE, PRODUCTION, FOOD SECURITY Implementation achievements Payments & control Coordination & control Stakeholders FARMERS MoAFS: HQ, LU, ADDs, DADOs, Ass, FAs DCs, TAs, VDCs, Police, CSOs Fertiliser importers, retailers Seed producers, importers, retailers ADMARC: HQ, districts, markets SFFRFM: HQ, depots, markets Transporters Donors Estimates of incremental maize production over 2002/3 & 3/4, net exports & prices 9 Other impacts Greater village maize availability (focus group discussions), lack of evidence of food shortages despite high prices Significant rising nominal wage rates from 2005/6 (greater than 2006/7 maize prices rises, matched 2005/6 -8/9) Poverty incidence estimates fallen from 52% in 2004/5 to 40% in 2007/8 and 2008/9 Economic growth impacts? Other contributors are high tobacco prices macro-economic stabilisation good weather Indicative modelling: poor beneficiary households real income increases of 10% to 100%, poor non-beneficiary households real income increases 0% to 20% Johannesburg 11-14 October 2010 10 11 Social Cash Transfer Programme Implemented since 2006, first as a pilot in 1 district but it has been extended to cover a total of 7 districts of 29 districts. The objectives are to reduce poverty, hunger and starvation among labour constrained and ultra-poor households; to increase school enrolment and attendance. Uses proxy means test to target: 1 meal per day, begging, no valuable assets, dependency ratio > 3 On average households receive MK1 700 ($12) per month (inclusive of bonus payments for children in primary ($1.4) and secondary ($2.8) school) Cash transfer costs about $3.6 million and is funded by the Global Fund. Johannesburg 11-14 October 2010 12 Coverage and Impacts Reaches about 24 000 households in 7 districts. Several positive impacts have been attributed to cash transfers Less incidence of disease compared to control group Low malnutrition rates Greater demand for health care Increased expenditure on children education – 4.9% higher enrolment Significant accumulation of household assets and livestock Increased agricultural production High monthly expenditures on food Johannesburg 11-14 October 2010 13 Issues and Challenges Institutional challenges – coordination of various programmes, tag of war & vested interests (FISP), lack of registry (multiple access). Implementation challenges – identification of beneficiaries – high targeting errors. Financial and economic challenges – huge resources required if all poor and vulnerable households were to be reached. Design issues – multiple objectives, poor monitoring of outcomes; no graduation benchmarks. Elite and political capture - everybody claims to be poor in rural areas. Johannesburg 11-14 October 2010 14 UNIVERSITY OF MALAWI School of Oriental & African Studies Chancellor College THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION Ephraim Chirwa Wadonda Consult & Chancellor College, University of Malawi Andrew Dorward School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London Presented at a Policy Dialogue and a South-South Learning Event on Long-Term Social Protection for Inclusive Growth, Johannesburg, South Africa, 11- 14 October 2010 15