How to Write a Winning Grant Proposal C. Dianne Martin Associate Vice President Graduate Studies and Academic Affairs Seminar Series: Academic Success and Professional Development Getting Started - ATTITUDE! • A good proposal has “attitude” • Don’t assume the reader will grasp • • the significance of your idea Give context, explain fully, convince the reader you know what you are doing. Marketing yourself and your idea Type of Proposal Individual Team Group Program Project Research or Education Target Organization Next, What do You Want? Defining the Project • Choose a problem/idea you wish to • • • • • pursue Survey the literature Contact established investigators in the area Prepare a brief concept paper Discuss your idea with others Get started on the project Your Proposal Should Answer These Questions • • • • • • • • • What are you going to do? Why is this important? What is your unique contribution? Is it feasible? Why are you the best person to do it? What are others doing in this area? How will you do it? How will you evaluate your results? How will you disseminate your results? Proposal Writing Hints • Present your ideas clearly and succinctly • Present the main thrust of the project at the beginning - don’t bury your lead! • Use a concise writing style • Show relevance with specific examples • Organize to permit skimming - use headings • Add a timeline with specific deliverables • Include a bibliography of related work • Have someone else read it before submitting Remember that you are selling an idea to the REVIEWERS and the FUNDER Attributes of a GOOD Proposal • • • • • • • • Innovative Comprehensive - understands all issues Experience - has expertise to do it Preparation - clear you know funding requirements and related work Cooperation - done “with” not “to” target group Beneficiaries - who will gain? Commitment and Continuation Evaluation and Dissemination of Impact Know the Requirements (read the program announcement!) •Format • Due date • Funding timeframe/ limits • Statement of problem • Research goals • Research methods • Team members/ expertise • Deliverables • Budget Grant Opportunities and Support • Internal grants (College & University) • Individual grants • Federal and National grants • Foundation awards • Fellowships/ scholarships • Industry contracts • Societies • Foundations Types of Proposals Letter of proposal: usually expanded Statement of Work Preliminary proposal: used by agency to decide if proposer should develop it further Expanded proposal: contains all of the necessary information to be used in the review process Revised proposal: modified subject to comments by reviewers Guidelines for Proposals • • • • • Vary by institution and agency Outline proposal format Set conditions on requests Set conditions on use of funds Set conditions on review process and negotiations • FOLLOW THESE GUIDELINES TO THE LETTER ! (even font size) Good Proposals • • • • • Capture the reviewer's attention Aim for clarity Establish the context Identify the payoff Use a fresh approach, but don't stray from accepted methodologies • Give yourself plenty of time! Peer reviews before submission are important! Proposal Components • Executive Summary and/or • • • • • Introduction Problem/Needs Statement and Objectives Research Methods Evaluation Procedures Other Funding Sources (Current/Future) Budget Introduction • • • • • • • • Organization history Statement of purpose and goals Current activities Constituency Funding sources Evaluations Quotes or letters of support Relevant publications summary Problem Statement • • • • State the problem simply & concisely Relate it to your purpose and goals Provide evidence of importance Provide justification that you can solve the problem • Make certain that the scope of the problem is focused • State it in the terms of your constituents Methodology Methods need to support the objectives! • Who: team selection and sampling • How: what will occur over the life of the • • project When: task order and timing Why: defend your chosen methods and provide assurance that these methods will lead to anticipated outcomes Evaluation Types: • Product - has the research achieved its objectives? • Process - was the research consistent with the plan? Questions: • who will do the evaluation? • method of data collection • method of data analysis • method of reporting evaluative information Know the Evaluation Criteria !!! ZU RIF Budget: What Do You Need? (know what is allowed) • Equipment • Salary • Facilities • Services • Travel • Expenses • Other Budget • Be specific - do NOT use ball-park • • • • figures! Be precise - make sure your accounting is in order Be complete - make sure there are no hidden costs Be honest - don't make up matching costs Be convincing - argue why a line item is needed Advice on Budgets • • • • • Request realistic items / amounts Justify anything that is unusual Include only necessary items Remain within grant guidelines Indicate time and cost sharing if required Excessive budgets irritate reviewers! Advice on Timelines • Provide one! • Be realistic • Within time frame of the funding • Include research methods used • Show progress along the way • Show rollout of deliverables Supporting Documentation • Letters of support • Compliance documentation • Vitas of principle researchers • Related publications • Equipment quotations General Tips • • • • • • • • • • • Network with people in your field Call the program officer or funding representative Propose results Don't assume the justification is obvious Don't assume all reviewers will agree with your position Read and reference all relevant literature Get letters of support from collaborators Identify how the funding will be spent Identify why you have the expertise to do this research Identify what exactly is your plan Identify what methodologies you will use Common Problems of Non-Winning Proposals • Key points are buried, no highlights, no impact • No innovative topic or approach • Difficult to read, full of jargon, too long, too technical • Misspellings, grammatical errors, wrong client name, and inconsistent formats • Failure to differentiate your work from others. e.g., no reference to relevant literature If Your Proposal is Declined REMEMBER • • • • You are in good company Awards are often highly competitive Budgetary limitations exert influence Funding agency priorities exert influence Read the reviews and TRY AGAIN! Volunteer to be a Reviewer You will: • • • • • Read good and bad proposals See the review process in action Write better proposals next time Get a good view of what is being funded Give back to the community Sources of Information • US National Science Foundation http://www.nsf.gov • Grantsandfunding.com http://www.grantsandfunding.com/libraries/grantseeking/wings/GFindex.html • Online Proposal Writing Handbook http://www.ecf.utoronto.ca/~writing/handbook-proposals.html • Writing a Good Grant Proposal (Simon Peyton Jones and Alan Bundy, Microsoft Research) http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/papers/Proposal.html • Grantwriting 101 Workshop by Wayne Carlson, The Ohio State University http://design.osu.edu/carlson/grantwriting.html Grant Writing as a Courtship • Get to know the funding organizations • Find the “best match” • Talk to the funding officer if possible to establish a personal relationship • If you visit in person, be nice to the receptionist or secretary! • Reduces the chance of a bitter rejection or a bad divorce!