Research Service - Universitat Pompeu Fabra

advertisement

How to prepare a proposal for

H2020 collaborative projects

UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA

Research Service

May 2014

BEFORE YOU START

Servei de Recerca Abril 2014

Keys to prepare a proposal

 Having a clear idea of the project results;

 Verify the level of innovation of the idea

 Establish the ideal consortia;

 Obtain support from the institution

 Plan.

specific objectives and expected go beyond the state of the art;

UPF Research Service;

Research Service May 2014

Search for calls: Participant Portal

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal//desktop/en/home.html

Research Service May 2014

List of all open calls

Search calls by key words

Research Service May 2014

Pillar to which the call belongs

Deadline of the call

Title of call

Official reference

Research Service

Open calls

Filter by type of project

May 2014

Topics: available research lines

Research Service

Information on call

May 2014

Research line within call

Title of call

Official reference

Research Service

Buscar convocatòries per paraules clau

Keyword

May 2014

Specific challenge

How they want the challenge solved: budget, specific conditions...

What needs to be achieved

Type of project

Research Service

Informació d’una convocatòria

May 2014

PREPARING THE

PROPOSAL

Research Service May 2014

How to start

 Ensure that the project fits within the call;

 Prepare a good synthesis of the project (abstract);

 Define the profile of the necessary partners and look for them;

 Plan;

 START!

Contact the Research Service

Research Service May 2014

The abstract

 Fundamental tool to “sell” your project;

 Encompasses the project and its area;

 How the project fits in the call specificities;

 Mentions the potential impact of the project;

 It can be used to identify which consortium will be needed.

• Search for partners;

• Check with National Contact Points whether the project fits in the objectives of the call.

Research Service May 2014

The consortium

Items to consider:

 Experience and technical and scientific know-how;

 Entities: universities, research centres, SMEs, NGOs, institutes, government agencies...

 Geographical distribution: > 3 EU countries should be represented;

 What can each partner provide? Infrastructures, management, knowledge;

Principal consortium

• Core of the project;

• Basic partners to build the project;

• With previous joint work experience (preferred).

Research Service

Global consortium

• Implements the project;

• It has to comply with all requirements of call;

• Representative composition of

EU.

May 2014

Search for partners

 Personal and/or professional contacts;

 National Contact Points (experts for each topic);

 CORDIS:

• Search for partners

• Partners or coordinators from previous projects

 Infodays;

 Specialised websites for each knowledge area:

• Social challenge 1 (Health)

Research Service May 2014

Back to the Participant Portal

The full submission is online

Research Service May 2014

Contact the

Research

Service

Deadline of call

Acronym and summary of project. They can be modified anytime

Research Service May 2014

Part A:

• A1: general information

• A2: information on partners

• A3: budget (for each partner and total)

• A4: ethical aspects

Part B1:

• Scientific excellence

• Impact

• Implementation of project

Part B2:

• Description of consortium

• Ethical and security aspects

Part B3 (if applicable):

• Ethical annex

Research Service

One proposal, two parts

May 2014

Part A

For the coordinador and partners, the data must coincide with Part B.

Research Service May 2014

Part B

Clear description of the project objectives, work plan, expected impacte, consortium...

 The template that can be found at the Participant Portal must be followed;

 The idicated format must be respected:

• Size of font: minimum 11;

• A4 page with 15 mm margins;

• Limit of pages in each section.

 Put yourself in the evaluator’s shoes:

• Make an attractive and easy to read proposal: graphs, tables, diagrams;

• Write in standard English (evaluators come from all around the EU).

Research Service May 2014

Scientific Excellence

1.1 Objectives: define scientific objectives based on the expected impact

 1.2 How it relates to the work programme

 1.3 Concept and scientific approach:

• Describe the global concapt and the most representative ideas;

• Mention interdisciplinary elements;

• Define the global strategy, work plan, methodology... graphs

 1.4 Ambition

• Detail the state of the art and how the project goes beyond it;

• Which innovations does the project provide compared to other projects;

• Mention potential scientific/technological risks related to the project.

Research Service May 2014

Impact

2.1 Expected impact:

• Define how the project will achieve impact established in the work program. The impact must be quantified to the extent possible;

• Describe obstacles and regulations that could diminish impact.

 2.2 Mesures to maximize impact:

• Dissemination and result exploitation:

 Establish a dissemination plan and result exploitation during and at the end of the project: publications, congresses, web, associations...

 Publications must be in Open Access;

 Management of intellectual property: Consortium Agreement.

• Communication strategy: it is important that knowledge will be transferred to non-scientific or academic public.

Research Service May 2014

Open Access

 It is compulsory that H2020 beneficiaries deposit all scientific

publications within the H2020 financed research in open access

 In the social challenge VI calls, it is compulsory to deposit in open access all research data produced within the project framework.

Research Service May 2014

Beneficiares of Horizon 2020 grants should:

• Ensure open access of all peer-reviewed papers accepted for journal publication

• As soon as possible, within 6 months (or 12 months for SSH)

• At an OpenAire complaint institutional repository 

OA to publications mandate in H2020

1

Submit publication to journal of choice

• OA = good! (but not necessary )

• Publishing fees are considered eligible grant expense

2

Deposit open access version in repository

• Almost all publishers allow this!

• Embargo’s are allowed

3

OpenAIRE harvests publications from network

• Makes them visible through OpenAIRE portal

• Researchers use the persistent identifier

(handle URL) for their reports

Before publication

At the paper, ensure the correction of:

- Author’s name

- Affiliation

- Name of the action, acronym and grant number

(Acknowledge / Sponsorship)

Exemple: This work has been supported by the XXXX project, grant agreement number YYYY, funded by the EC Seventh Framework

Programme theme FP7-ENERGY-XXXX.

Choosing a journal

Devon Greyson, University of British Columbia 26

How to achieve open access

University of Essex http://www.essex.ac.uk/reo/research_community/university_of

_essex_research_repository/open_access/

Logistics of OA for Authors

1. Identifying Gold/Green journals

1. Sherpa/Romeo

2. Journal websites (“for authors” section)

3. Ask the library

2. Navigating Copyright

Ask about options, most publishers will grant some rights (via APCs payments)

3. Deposit at institutional repository

Send your postprint to repositori@upf.edu

http://repositori.upf.edu/

Publication version

Submitted

• Preprint

• Before peer-review

Accepted

• Postprint

• After peerreview

Published

• PDF

• Editor version

It’s very important that you keep a copy of your work

• Pay attention to the publisher’s agreements

• Use SHERPA/RoMEO website to know about publishers policies http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/

• Save a copy of your pre-prints and postprints

• License your works with when possible

• Ask the library!

More information:

• EC Guidelines on Open Access in H2020 https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/sites/horizon2020/files/F actSheet_Open_Access.pdf

• Open Access Guidelines for researchers funded by the ERC http://erc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/file/ERC_Open_Access

_Guidelines-revised_2013.pdf

• Open Access in Horizon 2020 https://www.openaire.eu/openaccess-in-horizon-2020

repositori@upf.edu

Implementation

3.1 Work plan:

• Global strategy of the work plan;

• Work packages (WP), tasks, deliverables, milestones and Gantt chart;

• Exhaustive description of each WP following the template;

• Interrelation of different components through a Perth diagram.

Research Service May 2014

Work Package

Research Service May 2014

Work Packages

Research Service May 2014

Work Package

Research Service May 2014

Implementation

 3.2 Administration:

• Describe the consortium and the decision making system: Consortium

Agreement;

• Risk analysis and contingency plans.

 3.3 The consortium:

• Describe the global consortium, how the common work will be carried out, control and management mechanisms...

• Capacity of the consortium to achieve objectives;

• Complementarity among participants.

Research Service May 2014

Consortium description

 Each partner of the consortium describes what they contribute with and that their presence is essential:

• Description of the institution and the main tasks that will carry out, detailing how these relate to their profile;

• Detail the profit that the project generates the scientific team;

Curriculum Vitae or description of the main members of the team;

• A maximum of 5 publications related to the project objective;

• A maximum of 5 participations in other projects related with this one;

• Detail available infrastructure that might be essential for the objectives.

 There is no page limit.

Research Service May 2014

Consortium description

Research Service May 2014

Implementation

 3.4 Resources:

• Detail the work and capital effort contact with the R.S.

ALWAYS contact the Research Service to prepare the budget, both for partners and coordinators.

 Calculate the budget based in total costs.

 Always check that:

• The resources have to fit the real needs of the project;

• Personnel costs (work and capital) reflect the task distribution by partner;

• The cost breakdown has to be well structured for activities and participants;

• The equipment acquisition and subcontracting must be justified;

• The inclusion of every partner in the project is well justified.

Research Service May 2014

Budget

 Which expenses are eligible?

• Own and contracted personnel (PI + team);

• Equipment;

• Travel, research stays, assistance to congresses, conferences...

• Organization of conferences, congresses...

• Publications (Open Access)

Compulsory expense: whenever the EC funds over 325.000€ there must be a financial audit. Its cost is paid by the project;

 Proposals with an “inflated” budget will be poorly evaluated.

Research Service

ALWAYS contact the Research Service

May 2014

Ethics

 Mention any ethical aspect that there might be:

• Use of personal data, either collected within the project or re-using previous data;

• Studies involving children;

• Animal research;

• Participation of countries outside the EU;

• Military potential;

• Others.

 There is no page limit.

Research Service May 2014

THE EVALUATION

Research Service May 2014

Evaluation criteria

 Excellence:

• Clarity of objectives;

• Soundness of concepts, bearing in mind the interdisciplinary nature;

• Credibility of approach;

• Go beyond the state of the art.

 Impact:

• The expected impact for each topic, depending on the work program;

• Improvement of the innovation capacity and integration of new knowledge;

• Efficacy of proposals and dissemination of the project and results exploitation.

 Quality and efficiency of implementation

• Coherence and efficacy of the work plan, including the distribution of tasks and resources;

• Quality, experience and complementarity among participants and of global consortium;

• Quality of management of the project and risk control.

Research Service May 2014

IMPORTANT!!

 Proposals are evaluated by at least 3 experts, although in most cases there will be more than 5.

 Experts have strict guidelines:

Ignore pages beyond the limit;

Evaluate the proposal as is presented, without considering the potential it might have if some small changes were made.

 In H2020 there will not be a lot of margin for evaluators to make recommendations to improve the proposals, even regarding the budget.

Research Service May 2014

ONCE THE PROJECT HAS

BEEN SUBMITTED...

Research Service May 2014

The outcome...

Notification of the result of the evaluation: up to 5 months after the call closure;

Negotiation with the EC: up to 3 more months;

Beginning of the project: up to 12 months after the signature of the contract.

Research Service May 2014

Conclusions

 The objectives must be described clearly and understandably;

 The objectives must fit within the topic;

 The consortium must be strong and balanced;

 The work plan must be realistic and complete;

 Try to quantify the expected impact;

 A realistic and feasible result exploitation strategy must be included;

 Use clear and simple language;

 Use visual tools (graphs, diagrams...) to facilitate the evaluators’ work;

 Plan your work: the elaboration of a proposal takes time!

 The abstract is the essence of the project: it must attract the evaluator;

Use the Research Service and the National Contact Points.

Research Service May 2014

Thank you for your attention

WE ARE AT YOUR DISPOSAL!

UPF RESEARCH SERVICE projectes.recerca@upf.edu

Research Service May 2014

Download