improving-science-communication-skills-in

advertisement

Improving Science Communication

Through Scenario-Based Role-Plays

Dr Erik Brogt & Dr Jacqueline Dohaney

Who are we?

Multi-disciplinary Research Team

Erik Brogt, Jacqueline Dohaney, Tom Wilson,

Mark Quigley, Ben Kennedy, Brendon Bradley

University of Canterbury

Emma Hudson-Doyle, David Johnston – Massey

Jan Lindsay – University of Auckland

Educational researchers, Geologists, Engineers,

Risk Communication and Hazard researchers

Improving Communication Skills

 Graduates have poor communication skills

 Communication not embedded systematically or explicitly in tertiary science / engineering curricula

 Poorly constrained communication best practices

 Poorly constrained communication performance measures

Disaster context – Crucial skill needed in times of crisis and business-as-usual. Expectations from the public and policy-makers that scientists must communicate well.

Civil Defence

Emergency

Management

How can we prepare/prime society?

Media

What does this mean?

Public

What should I do to be ‘safe’

Seismologists and Geologists

Will this lead to a future Alpine Fault

EQ?

Responding to an event

Business

What should we do to survive, and thrive?

What variables contribute to communication?

Communication

Performance

Communication

Experience

Scientific

Content

Knowledge

Perceived

Communication

Competence

Perceptions of Science

Communication

How can we assess communication performance?

Proxies for performance (i.e., variables to explore...)

Communication Competence (i.e., confidence)

Communication Experience

Perceptions of Science Communication

Earthquake Content Knowledge

Measures (Self-reported questionnaires)

-> Competence Survey (SPCC; validated)

-> Experience & Perceptions Surveys (created for this study)

-> Earthquake scenario pre-post interview

How can we assess communication performance?

(Actual) Communication Performance

Observations and in-class performances (i.e., press conferences, interviews, media statements)

Pre-post communication interviews (videotaped)

Scored with validated rubric (2PS)

Why Scenario-Based Role-Plays?

 Real-time feedback, authentic, active

 Flexible: pace, scaffolding and difficulty can be adjusted on the fly

 Complexity and cognitive load under the control of facilitators

 Can serve different target audiences

 Previously designed and tested SBRP: Volcanic

Hazards Simulation

 Established method in other fields (e.g. business, medical sciences, military)

Scenario

Learning Goals

Explain and communicate (in plain speak) the geology of a given earthquake event.

Predict, list and describe impacts to infrastructure and society from a large earthquake near

Greymouth NZ.

Propose appropriate recommendations to the public before, during and after an earthquake event

Learning Goals

Compose and deliver multiple formats and styles of communications and to diverse stakeholders.

Effectively communicate the scientific uncertainties associated with an ongoing earthquake event and the likelihood of a future earthquake event.

Communicate effectively in all scenarios.

Criteria for effectiveness includes information which is organised, accurate, relevant, readily understood and delivery which is competent and culturally inclusive.

Customized GIS-based tools & datasets

Perceived Benefits:

Providing experience and feedback to learners

 Learners’ confidence with communicating improves

 Multiple opportunities to watch and participate in authentic communication styles, formats, and contexts

– Interviews, Team discussions, Press conferences

– Participants will have a higher confidence with science communication

 Quality of communication increases

– Appropriate to stakeholders information needs

– Appropriate to stakeholders’ backgrounds

– Transparency of decision-making

Project Outcomes

 Robust science communication measures

 Flexible curricular design with can be used in different contexts, with different users

Progress to date

 Learning goals discussed with instructors and defined

 Basic version of simulation developed

 Tested in four iterations (to different groups of students, and instructors)

 Communication proxies in development

 Two international conference presentations given as well as several international research talks

Next steps

 Data analysis of the first version of the simulation underway

 Data gathering for research purposes in the next few months

Thank you!

Contacts:

Erik Brogt erik.brogt@canterbury.ac.nz

Jackie Dohaney jdohaney@gmail.com

Download