Interpretation of data
The Ferrers Specialist Arts College
NQT and New Staff Training
1
What is the Fischer Family Trust?
•
•
•
•
•
The family behind Research Machines
(RM)
A registered charity now working with
the DCSF on data analysis
Developed a range of analyses to
support the processes of selfevaluation and target-setting.
Use a database which now contains
performance information on over 10
million pupils in England and Wales.
Provide analyses and data which help
LEAs and schools to make more
effective use of pupil performance
data.
2
Sharing the FFT ethos?
• Data provides questions not answers
• Data analysis should be used by schools to promote
discussion, evaluation and planning
• Analyses are available for different groups of pupils, and
a range of indicators, to help identify strengths or areas
for development/intervention
• Use the past to inform the future
3
ABCD? - FFT A
Pupil-level prior attainment data
• ·Overall Key Stage Score using BOTH Teacher Assessment and
Test Data (‘fine graded’ level derived from marks)
• Take into account variations in attainment between different subjects
(E, M, S) – (not just ‘subject to subject’ because attainment in
English can, for example, affect progress in mathematics)
• Gender as a pupil-level indicator
• Month of birth as a pupil-level indicator
Pupil Prior
Attainment
Gender
Month of birth
4
ABCD? - FFT B-D
• SOCIO-ECONOMIC models
• % FSM entitlement, geodemographic data based on aggregated
pupil postcodes and Mean Intake of year group
• Types B, C and D
Pupil Prior
Attainment
Gender
Month of birth
School context
5
ABCD?
Therefore, the 4 estimate types are as follows:
• A PA based upon pupil prior attainment, gender and
month of birth
• B SE based upon pupil prior attainment, gender, month
of birth and school context
• C SE Uses Type B and then take into account the
improvement needed for national or locally negotiated
local authority targets
• D SE Uses Type B but adjusted to be consistent with the
‘top 25th percentile’ schools (based on value added)
6
FFTD
• The Gold Standard?
– Top 25% schools nationally
• Ideal aim as part of high expectations for
The Ferrers
• FFTD data is what we have on the system
– KS3 under FFT folder in staff shared area
– KS4 also available here – even easier under
EXAM DATA folder
7
Using FFT to support pupils in school
• The Fischer data supports prior attainment data by
estimating future performance based on a number of
characteristics.
• It does not replace the wealth of performance data
available to us, but utilises prior attainment to ‘feedforward’.
• One approach
– The Big Picture
– The School Context
– Individual pupils
8
The Big Picture
•
•
•
•
•
We have access to LA estimates and the LA estimates vs actuals
LA estimates can provide an overview based on prior attainment. Always
remember that the estimates are based on the ‘feed-forward' effect from one
Key Stage to the next. Low performance at one Key Stage may result in low
estimates at the next.
LA estimates vs. actuals can provide an overview comparing the estimates
with the final results. This will allow analysis of previous performance and
show VALUE ADDED
Remember that light blue areas show significant high achievement, dark
blue show the opposite
What impressions can I develop in relation to the targets set
nationally?
9
Things to consider – Local Authority
• What were the areas of concern when the estimates
and actual results were compared?
• Are there any local and national strategies in place
for this Key Stage?
• What were the positive messages from the estimates
and actuals?
• How do we compare?
• What intervention strategies lead to these
successes?
• What future intervention is needed?
10
The school context - estimates
11
School context – new DCSF groups
12
Things to consider – whole school
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
What are the estimates suggesting, based on my knowledge of my
school?
How do they compare with school targets?
Are there differences between estimates and targets set? Why?
Are there gender differences in performance for any particular areas?
What is being done to address these?
Why were there differences between teacher assessments and
estimates?
Were the teacher assessments lower than the outcomes for groups of
pupils - if so why?
Did any groups of pupils perform less well than others - if so why?
Does it raise any further questions?
13
Individual pupils - estimates
14
Individual pupils – who are we
concerned about?
• List the pupils who you feel are vulnerable to making the
expected progress, without referring to the estimates
–
–
–
–
what informed your choice of pupils?
are there any reasons for the pupils you have chosen?
what intervention is currently taking place for these pupils?
who else is involved with this group?
• Look at the estimates for each of these pupils
–
–
–
–
what are the range of estimates?
are there any pupils with an estimate higher than 75%?
why are these pupils on your list?
if the estimate is low for one subject - e.g. English - what intervention is
taking place ?
15
Individual pupils – less and more able?
• Look at the estimates for pupils below 40% and add them to the
list if they are not already present
–
–
–
–
why were these pupils not in your original group?
are there any patterns within this additional group?
are these additional pupils involved in any form of intervention?
is the class teacher aware of any difficulties with any of the individuals?
• Look at the estimates of pupils above 90% in both level sets
– are these pupils challenged?
– what strategies worked with these pupils that may help with other groups?
16
Using a pupil progress self evaluation
• Use the pupil estimates handout to note key points
about
• Patterns
• Those ‘at risk’
• Intervention
• Collaboration
17
What’s next?
• Trial the identification exercise in your year
or curriculum area
• Use information currently on SIMs
• Pester for FFT reports in your faculty
18