Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up

advertisement

Creating and Implementing an

Online Orientation from the

Ground Up

Clay Adams

Assistant Dean for New Student Programs

Duke University clay.adams@duke.edu

Katie Granholm

Assistant Director of Orientation and the Transfer Experience

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities granh013@umn.edu

Jessica Hale, Ed.D

Professional Services Faculty

Washtenaw Community College jhale15@wccnet.edu

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Mission:

The mission of the National Orientation Directors

Association is to provide education, leadership and professional development in the fields of college student orientation, transition and retention

Core Values:

Community, Diversity, Integrity, Learning, Scholarship,

Service.

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

NODA Home Office

University of Minnesota

1313 Fifth Street SE

Suite 323A

Minneapolis, MN 55414

Toll free: 866-521-NODA or 612-627-0150

612-627-0153 (fax) noda@umn.edu

www.nodaweb.org

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Learning Outcomes

 Engage in discussion of the key components of online orientation creation.

 Interact with orientation professionals who have experience with successful online orientation programs.

 Create a plan for implementing your own online orientation.

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Introduction and Background

The goal of orientation is to help students integrate socially and academically into college environment

(Tinto, 1975)

 Over the last few decades orientation programs have experienced rapid growth and evolved to meet the changing needs of students

(Strumpf, Sharer, & Wawrzynski, 2003)

Online education is growing at a rate that far outpaces faceto-face higher education

(Allen & Seaman, 2009)

 Online orientations are emerging as an acceptable means to facilitate the transition process

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Online Orientation : A web-based orientation program that occurs synchronously or asynchronously

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Current Online Orientation Practices

Online Orientation programs are utilized at all types of institutions

Used for many different student populations

Utilize various platforms

Synchronous

Asynchronous

Three Primary Types of Online Orientation Programs (Page, 2009)

Pre-Orientation

Replacement

Hybrid

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Relevant theories:

• Participatory Learning

(Shirky, 2008)

• Active Learning

(Astin, 1999)

• Web 2.0

(Yuen, 2010)

• Concept of Cognitive Surplus

(Shirky, 2010)

Take Home Point:

• Learning is an interactive and participatory process facilitated by media

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Overview of the Planning Process

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Set Goals

Identify Key Players and Collaborators

Evaluate Resources

Explore the Technology

Develop a Process and Timeline

Create an Assessment Plan

Maintain and Revise

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Set Goals

What is the purpose of your online orientation?

 What population(s) will the online orientation serve?

 How will the online orientation relate to existing programs?

 How will you make your online orientation participatory and interactive?

 What are your learning outcomes?

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Goal Setting at Duke

Action Item Response

What is the purpose of your online orientation?

What population(s) will the online orientation serve?

How will the online orientation relate to existing programs?

How will you make your online orientation participatory and interactive?

• Assist in the overall transition of our students through added, intentionally designed, touch points

• Primary – Undergraduate, traditional, firstyear students

• Secondary - International students

(undergraduate, graduate and professional)

• Tertiary – Parents, guardians, family members

• Amplify or enhance the messages currently being shared

• Supplemental

• Q/A

• Polls

• Documents sharing

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Set Goals: Learning Outcomes

Duke

Overarching Learning Outcomes

(Synchronous programs)

• Students will learn to proactively participate in their education process

(through collaboration with university officials and peers)

Nine Modules – Separate Learning

Outcomes for each session

Example – Academic Advising Module

• Understand the First Year academic requirements

UMN-TC

Overarching Learning Outcomes

(Asynchronous Program)

• Understand the academic and community expectations of a University of Minnesota student.

• Become acquainted with the resources available to University of Minnesota students.

• Have a better understanding of the University of Minnesota student experience.

• Be prepared to take responsibility while enrolled at the University of Minnesota.

• Develop an overall working knowledge of our online scheduling system

• Feel more prepared to transition into the

University.

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

What are your desired learning outcomes?

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Identify Key Players and Collaborations

Who needs to involved to make an effective online orientation a reality?

Internal

Your office

College constituents

Departmental partners

Web Services/Information Technology

External

New students

Parents and supporters

Sponsors

Other

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Key Players and Collaborations at WCC

Internal

Your office

College constituents

Departmental partners

Web Services/Information

Technology

Key Players and Collaborators

• New Student Orientation

• President

• Dean of Support Services and Student Advocacy

• Counselors/Advisors

• Students

• Admissions

• Enrollment Services

• Public Relations and Marketing

• Director

• Wed Designers

• Programmers

• Videographers

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Who might fall into the “other” group of key collaborators?

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Evaluate Resources

 What resources are available?

Immediate vs. long-term

Internal vs. external

What is your budget?

Start-up costs

Maintenance costs

What human resources are needed?

Editing, graphic design, web design, programmer, etc.

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Resources at UMN-TC

Action Item

What resources are available?

Response

• Transfer student confirmation fee: $80

• No additional funding; Need to work within existing budget for initial start-up

• Long-term: Account for needs in each 3-year budget cycle

• External funding: Instructional Technology Grant of $10,000

What is your budget?

What human resources are needed?

• No additional financial resources

• Utilize existing staffing and technology resources

• Internal: graphic design (limited), orientation professional for content development and editing

• External: WebCT/WebVista central support/troubleshooting, Instructional Technology support, content experts

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

What is your budget for online orientation?

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Explore the Technology

What capabilities do you require based on your goals?

Customization

Participation tracking

Interactive components like videos, quizzes, etc.

What type of platform will you use?

Synchronous vs. Asynchronous

What products/tech support is available through your institution?

In-house vs. third party vendor

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Technology Exploration at WCC

Action Item

What capabilities do you require based on your goals?

Response

• Customization with Banner

• Tracking of participation

• Interactive components like videos, quizzes, etc.

What type of platform will you use? • Asynchronous

What products/tech support is available through your institution?

• In-house design

• In-house server

• Web Services/Information Services

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

What type of platform would you like to use?

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Develop a Process and Timeline

How will content be developed and edited?

Content driven by your learning outcomes

Individual vs. collective process

Is special expertise needed?

Graphic design, web design, database building

If so, what does this timeline look like?

 When will online orientation be available?

Allow time for usability testing, editing, demonstration, etc.

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Process and Timeline at Duke

Action Item

How will content be developed and edited?

Is special expertise needed?

When will online orientation be available?

Response

Content is a shared responsibility in our platform as it combines both the university

“expert” and the student participants

Technology – no!

Content – yes, and this is why….

May-August to coincide with action-item due dates

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Sample Timeline

Action Item

Outline current challenges/opportunities in current work

Define goals and constraints

Approach key players

Timeline

Working knowledge – tangibly defined in

November/December

See above

Mid-December, February, April & May

Explore technologies

Content development

Training & Pilot

Evaluate & revise

Implement

Mid-December – Late January (asked for

6 weeks) – followed up in 2

March & April

May & June

July & September

Following summer

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

What is your timeframe from conception to implementation?

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Create an Assessment Plan

What determines success?

Accomplishment of learning outcomes, participation rate, etc.

How will success be measured?

When will success be measured?

What do you need to know?

May be driven by stakeholders/campus constituencies

What methods of evaluation will you use?

Online questionnaire, paper form, follow-up survey, focus groups, usability testing, etc.

Does the evaluation method align with desired outcomes?

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Assessment Plan at WCC

Action Item Response

What determines success?

How will success be measured?

• 100% mastery of quizzes

• 95% completion rate

• Statistics from the online orientation

• Clicker results from in-person orientation

• Focus groups

• Qualitative feedback provided in in-person orientation

When will success be measured? • Immediate feedback for each student

• Beginning of each in-person orientation

• Annual review and update process

What do you need to know?

What methods of evaluation will you use?

• Success rate

• Completion rate

• Attempts per question

• Percentage correct at beginning of in-person orientation

• Multiple choice

• True/False

• Sequencing

• Likert scale

• Open-ended evaluation

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

How will you define success?

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Maintain and Revise

• How will content be maintained? o What is involved in this process? o What is the timeline? o Who is responsible?

• How will technology be maintained? o What is the process? o What is the timeline? o Who is responsible?

• How often will major revisions take place?

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Maintenance and Revision at UMN-TC

Action Item Response

Who will maintain the content? • Each department asked to review content each orientation cycle. Orientation staff member provides guidance, edits and compiles the content.

• Content updates/revisions obtained 3-4 weeks prior to launch

Who will maintain the technology? • Course management system maintained by Office of Information Technology

• Online orientation course maintained by in-house technology specialist

How often will major revisions take place?

• Plan for major changes and revisions every 2 years

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

What challenges do you foresee in maintaining your online orientation?

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Tips for Success

 Set clear goals

Identify key players and collaborators early

Evaluate resources

Explore technological options

Create an assessment plan during product development

Plan a staged implementation

Build an exaggerated timeline

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Learning Outcomes Revisited

 Engaged in discussion of the key components of online orientation creation.

 Interacted with orientation professionals who have experience with successful online orientation programs.

 Created a plan for implementing your own online orientation.

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

References

Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2009). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Needham, MA:

Sloan-C. Retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/survey04a.asp

 Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student

Development, 40(5), 518-529.

 Page, D. (2009). Online orientation program research summary. Minneapolis, MN: National Orientation Directors

Association.

Shirky, C. (2008) . Here comes everybody: The power of organisation without organisations . London: Allen Lane.

 Shirky, C. (2010). In Tantor Media. (Ed.), Cognitive surplus [sound recording]. Old Saybrook, Conn. : Tantor Media.

 Strumpf, G., Wawrzynski, M., & Sharer, G. (2003). 20 years of trends and issues in orientation programs. In (Eds).

Designing successful transitions: A guide for orienting students to college. The Freshman Year Experience Monograph

Series. South Carolina University, Columbia. National Resource Center for the Freshman Year Experience. National

Orientation Directors Association.

 Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of

Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125.

Yuen, S.C. (2010). Collective intelligence and e-learning 2.0 : Implications of web-based communities and networking .

In Yuen S. C. (Ed.), Hershey, PA : Information Science Reference.

Creating and Implementing an Online Orientation from the Ground Up – December 10, 2010

Download