Performance Based Monitoring 2014 Overview • PBMAS Staging • Onsite Visits • Intervention Activities • PBMAS Changed Roles • Support Partners/Resources • TCDSS Updates • Submission Calendar • Improvement Plan • ISAM Updates • PMI Contacts • Q&A • Wrap-Up Norms • Start and end on time • Take care of yourself • Help each other • Actively participate • Avoid using technology as a distraction • • • • • Ask questions Learn together Honor perspectives Honor confidentiality Share what you have learned with others • Actively listen to the what people say 3 PBMAS Analysis and Intervention Systems • PBMAS / PBMI Interventions (BE/ESL, CTE, NCLB, Special Education) • ESEA/NCLB Flexibility Waiver: Title I (Priority/Focus/Reward) Schools • State Accountability / Accountability interventions 4 http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=3846&menu_id=2147483683 PBM/RFM Staging PBMAS and Staging A To the Administrator Addressed letter was posted to the TEA website on Monday, October 6 informing LEAs of staging for PBM interventions, posted criteria, and pending ISAM posting. PBMAS and Staging • Each program area is staged separately. • Cut points are determined for each individual stage within a program area. # of PL 3s # of PL 2s Stage of Intervention Mayberry ISD 12 3 4 Bedrock ISD 9 5 4 Whoville ISD 4 2 3 Rocketville ISD 3 9 3 Big City Charter School 3 0 3 Bluesville ISD 2 5 2 Dillion ISD 1 8 2 LEA PBMAS and Staging LEA Mayberry ISD Bedrock ISD Whoville ISD Rocketville ISD Big City Charter School Bluesville ISD Dillion ISD # of PL 3s # of PL 2s Stage of Intervention 12 9 4 3 3 3 5 2 9 0 4 4 3 3 3 2 1 5 8 2 2 PBMAS and Staging PBMAS and Staging * An LEA in other stages of intervention that fails to meet two or more ICR indicators also will be required to engage in compliance-related intervention activities. PBMAS and Staging RF Staging Calculations from RF Tracker Least Restrictive Environment % of RF students in instructional arrangements of 86, 96, 01, 02, 30, 43, 44, 84, 85, 94, 95 % of RF students receiving a full school day % of RF students receiving less than half of the full school day RF Staging If % is: • • • • • • • • • • • Percentages for full school Day are converted to a value. ( 1-10) greater than 99 = 10 points greater than greater than 89, but less than 99 = 9 greater than 79, but less than 89 = 8 greater than 69, but less than 79 = 7 greater than 59, but less than 69 =6 greater than 49, but less than 59 =5 greater than 39, but less than 49 = 4 greater than 29, but less than 39 = 3 greater than 19, but less than 29 = 2 greater than 9, but less than 19 = 1 less than 9 = 0 RF Staging Percentages for LRE and less than half a school day are converted to a value. If % is: • greater than 99 = 0 points • greater than greater than 89, but less than 99 = 1 • greater than 79, but less than 89 = 2 • greater than 69, but less than 79 = 3 • greater than 59, but less than 69 =4 • greater than 49, but less than 59 =5 • greater than 39, but less than 49 = 6 • greater than 29, but less than 39 = 7 • greater than 19, but less than 29 = 8 • greater than 9, but less than 19 = 9 • less than 9 = 10 Data Integrity Indicator If LEA completed end-of-year RF Tracker data entry by closing date and did not have to reenter RFT to make corrections, district will receive 5 points. RF Staging % of RF Value Points Earned: LRE + Full School Day + Less Than ½ School Day + Data Integrity % 35 possible points RF Staging Students who reside in a facility where they cannot leave due to detention, corrections or security personnel and mechanical barriers such as cells, secured windows and doors, and/locked fences are not counted in the LRE calculation. For LEAs that have only facility where students are prevented from leaving, they will be monitored on a cyclical basis. PBM On-Site Visits PBM On-Site Visits Role of ESCs in On-site Visits • Assist district to properly prepare • Participate as requested To be in a position to advise TEA team of training/support available to provide solutions, and to be fully prepared to provide assistance to the District Strategies employed can be used with other districts 21 On-Site Visits Risk Analysis for Onsite Criteria for Selection for On-Site Visits • Risk points of 9-15 • Risk points of 8 and at least one program staged at 4 • Any RF stage 4 Intervention Activities Handout Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS) Handout Intervention Activities Intervention Activities All stages engage in the TAIS process: Analyzing data Assessing needs Developing targeted plan Implementing and monitoring plan SPED Stage 3 and 4 must also complete the compliance review. RF interventions as stated in RF Manual will be conducted and data analyzed with all other program areas and incorporated into the targeted improvement plan Data Analysis Summary PBM Questions • In reviewing the summary page of the PBMAS report, what patterns and trends across program areas did the data reveal? • What campus/es is/are contributing to each indicator with a PL of 2 or 3? • How does each indicator rated PL 2 or 3 impact student performance? • What other insights did the LEA identify related to student performance for PL 2s or 3s? • How do the indicators rated PL 1, 0RI, or NA impact student performance? • What does longitudinal PBMAS data from past 2 years reveal when compared to current year’s report? Data Analysis Summary RF Questions • What patterns and trends do the data reveal regarding the performance of RF students? • How do the trends identified impact the performance of RF students? • Based on the data, what are the strengths or weaknesses of the district’s support for RF students? PBMAS Changed Roles PBMAS Changed Roles • It is about continuous program evaluation and support of program improvement strategies. • It is about supporting programs in the creation of data systems that allow continuous program monitoring. • It is about the ongoing use of data to make informed decisions about the effectiveness of programs. • It is about proactive technical assistance/support. PBMAS Changed Roles • It is about support of positive instructional strategies that impact student results. • It is about ongoing interactions with LEAs. • It is about program expertise and leadership. • It’s not about mock monitoring or preparing districts for visits from the agency. • It is about partnership and shared responsibility based on a collaborative focus on what matters most. Support Partners and Resources Support Partners •LEAs •TEA •TCDSS •ESCs •PSPs •DCSI TCDSS Homepage www.tcdss.net www.taisresources.net DEMO 38 TCDSS 39 TCDSS www.taisresources.net Content aligned to the TAIS Framework: • • • • • Expert videos “From the Field” videos Critical Success Factor (CSF) Planning Resources Extended Learning Guides Guided Practice 40 Submission Calendar Submissions LEAs who are only staged at 1 and/or 2— retain all documents, submitting only if requested LEAs who have any program staged at 3 or 4 will submit the targeted improvement on or before November 21 Improvement Plan Targeted Improvement Plan- Instructions Tab • Enter in all fields applicable • Helpful tools/Reminders are available • FAQ document will be available to assist LEAs/campuses Targeted Improvement Plan- Instructions Tab • Improvement Plan tips are included on the instructions tab • Explanation and Screenshots are also included on the instructions tab • List of Acronyms are included on the instructions tab Targeted Improvement Plan- Instructions Tab • LEAs/Campuses must complete a separate Targeted Improvement Plan • Formulas carry over from the Data Analysis tab to the Needs Assessment Summary and IP • Reconstitution tab is to be completed by campuses who are 2nd year Improvement Required • CAP tab must be completed by LEAs who have identified noncompliance Targeted Improvement Plan- Data Analysis Tab • Remember to complete the appropriate Data Analysis depending on LEA/campus • Please read the instructions, definition/purpose • General Questions section is different depending on LEA/campus Targeted Improvement Plan- Reminders/Help indicators • • • • Red font indicates helpful information Black font indicates Reminders Select boxes allows more than one selection choice if applicable Additional text boxes for explanations as needed Targeted Improvement Plan- Reminders/Help indicators • Additional Help information is available, please look for the circle with Red question mark • Hover over the question mark to see the text available • To view all comments at once, select the Review tab and then select “Show All Comments” Targeted Improvement Plan- Problem Statements and Root Causes • Problem Statements are carried over from Section V of the Campus Data Analysis or Section VI of the District Data Analysis tab. Targeted Improvement Plan- Needs Assessment and IP • Contact the support specialist assigned to the review if more than 10 Root Causes are needed • Support Specialist will contact a member of the team if additional Root Causes are needed • Please remember to complete the Attestation Statement ISAM- Updates ISAM- Resources Page • Resources are displayed based on level of intervention • Resources can be downloaded all at once or individually Note: Ex of 1st Year resources, FIR and 2nd Year resources vary ISAM- Review Summary Page • • • • • All reviews default to Awaiting Review Submission Due Date 11/21/2014 PBM 10/31/2014 State Accountability is a roll-up date Submission Status is Pending until a submission is received TEA/TCDSS Contact(s) are listed in the Review Contacts box ISAM- Review Contacts • Review contacts are displayed on the right-hand side of the Review Summary Page • Review contacts information (phone and e-mail) is displayed once a person “clicks” on the link ISAM- Submissions Page • Required Submissions are marked with an orange asterisk • Submission Status defaults to Pending until a submission is received • DCSI Qualifications (if applicable) due 10/10/2014 • Targeted Improvement Plan due 10/31/2014 IR 11/21/2014 PBM Note: Ex of 1st Year Submissions, FIR and 2nd Year submissions vary ISAM- Indicators Page • Indicators page shows a copy of the LEA/campus Accountability Report • Click the link under available reports to view Note: This is the masked report on the public Accountability site ISAM- Feedback/Follow-Ups Page • Feedback/Follow-Ups for all submissions are new for 2014-2015 • There is a 1:1 Ratio between submissions to the feedback/follow-ups • Status will default to “Not Started” until a support specialist enters data • Click “View” to read all entered data Note: Ex of 1st Year Feedback/Follow-Ups, FIR and 2nd Year Feedback/FollowUps vary Assigning Program Contacts At least one contact must be assigned for each review before submissions are accepted by the system. If no contact is assigned, an error indicating that “no contact is assigned” will appear on the page. One program contact must be identified before documents may be submitted to the ISAM system. Assigning Program Contacts Current Contacts are listed on the Events Summary Page on the right-hand side of the webpage under “Program Contacts: 2014-2015.” To add a contact from the Events Summary page, select “Contacts” to view a current contact or add a new contact. Assigning Program Contacts Enter all new contacts at the LEA level, then assign the contact to specific campus(es) and specific LEA program(s). All contacts that are expected to receive automated emails must have a profile setup in ISAM. Select “Create New” on the “Contacts” page to add a new contact. The page will refresh to a form to be completed. Assigning Program Contacts Enter all contact information for the new program contact and click “Save.” Select the organization(s) associated with the contact. Select the appropriate position(s). Select the current to present year. Select the program area(s) assigned to the contact. Assigning Program Contacts For previously-added contacts: Assign the contact to the review (“Review Contacts” link). Two-step process for new contacts: Add the contact to the list (“Contacts” link located on the Events Summary Page). Assign the contact to a review (“Review Contacts” link). Assigning Program Contacts While viewing an LEA or campus review, “select ‘Review Contacts” from the left-hand navigation bar Then, click “Edit” to add an individual as a contact. Updating Contact Information It is important that information in the “Review Contacts” box is correct in order to receive automated emails Automated emails are sent to contacts once changes are made within ISAM. Contacts assigned to specific program areas will receive automated emails regarding only those program(s). Updating Contact Information From the Events Summary page, select the Contacts link. Select the View link of the profile being edited. ISAM Additional Resources Helpful links are posted in the “Intervention Links” section on the Event Summary page. See the step-by step guide in ISAM. Links For TEASE Access http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=2728 For TEAL Access https://pryor.tea.state.tx.us/TSP/TEASecurePortal/Access/LogonServlet • Questions/Feedback related to ISAM isam@tea.state.tx.us • Questions/Feedback related to documents pmidivision@tea.state.tx.us • Questions/Feedback related to TEASE/TEAL computer.access@tea.state.tx.us PBMI Contacts Region One ESC Integrated Support Team Omar Chavez, NCLB, Migrant, ochavez@esc1.net Ed Garcia, CTE, edgarcia@esc1.net Belinda Gorena, School Improvement, bgorena@esc1.net Virginia Champion, Bil/ESL, Title III, vchampion@esc1.net Margaret Barrera Special Ed., mabarrera@esc1.net Carmen Garcia, Director Brownsville Area 956 984- 6191 cagarcia@esc1.net Dr. Tina McIntyre, Administrator Edinburg ESC 956 984-6027 tmcintyre@esc1.net Dr. Sylvia Rios, Director Laredo Area 956 795-0000 srios@esc1.net Questions? Contacts Division of Instructional Support Office of School Improvement, Accountability and Compliance Dr. Tina McIntyre, Administrator 956 984-6027 tmcintyre@esc1.net Margie Barrera, Special Education Program, Director 956 984-6180 mabarrera@esc1.net Ruth Solis, Special Education Program, Coordinator rsolis@esc1.net Dr. Omar Chavez, Migrant Education Program, Coordinator 956 984-6240 ochavez@esc1.net Virginia Champion, Bilingual/ESL/Title III, Part A Program, Director 956 984vchampion@esc1.net Eduardo Garcia, Career Technology, Specialist 956 984-6243 edgarcia@esc1.net