RF Monitoring:
2012-2013
RF Monitoring
 RF Monitoring will still have its own
guidance document for 2012-2013
 http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.as
px?id=2147495560&menu_id=214748
3703&menu_id2=2147483719
Staging Criteria for RF
Monitoring
1. Ranking from RF Tracker Data (last year’s data)
a) LRE Calculation
b) Commensurate School Day
c) Related Services
2. Time since last RF Monitoring On-Site Review
3. New Residential Facilities Present in the LEA
4. 2011-2012 PBMAS SPED Stage
5. History of Noncompliance in special education
6. Current Escalated Oversight
7. RF Tracker Data Quality
Staging “Levels”
• Based on points assigned in matrix of
staging criteria (“selection rubric”
– Not Staged
– Stage 1
– Stage 2
– Stage 3
– Stage 4
– Stage 4A
– Stage 4B
Submission Window
 Submission Window
 (begins when staging is released in ISAM
(likely in September) and ends on
December 7, 2012*
 Stage 1 – will complete all documents by
December 7, 2012 and retain locally
• Subject to submission request by TEA
PBMAS: An Evolution
Staging for PBMAS
• 4 program areas
– BE/ESL
– CTE
– NCLB
– SPED
Staging for PBMAS (cont)
• Each program area has indicators
• Each indicator is assigned a
performance level (“PL”) of 0, 1, 2, or
3
– PL increases from 0-3 based on
variance from state “standard” or
“target”
• i.e., 0 = within state “standard” or “target”;
PL increases as variance increases from
state “standard” or “target”
Staging for PBMAS (cont)
• Based on the numbers of PLs 2 or 3
per program area, staging is
assigned
• Staging is separate for each program
area
– Not staged
– Stage 1
– Stage 2
– Stage 3
– Stage 4
PBMAS Manual
• 2012 Manual Organization
– Section I: Introduction
– Section II: Components of the 2012
PBMAS
– Section III: BE/ESL Indicators
– Section IV: CTE Indicators
– Section V: NCLB Indicators
– Section VI: SPED Indicators
– Section VII: Appendices
Section VI: SPED
Indicators
• Pages 82 – 119
• 18 indicators
Name &
Description
of Indicator
Indicator
Calculation
Minimum Size
Requirements
& Special
Analysis
Data Source
for Indicator
Additional
Notes
Performance
Level
Assignments/
Determinations
Information
regarding
special
analysis, etc.
Standards (if
applicable to
the indicator)
Major Changes for 2012-2013
 One Guidance Document (regardless
of single program or integrated
interventions)
 http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=2147504027&men
u_id=2147483703&menu_id2=2147483708
 District AYP staging
 District AU status
 BE/ESL
 CTE
 NCLB/ESEA
 SPED*
Texas Accountability
Intervention System
Changes for 2012-2013
 One CIP, One CAP for PBMAS, AU, AYP
 RF still separate for 2012-2013
Improvement Plan Workbook
(district)
 data analysis
 needs assessment
 improvement plan
 corrective action plan (CAP), if
noncompliance is identified
Submission Window
 Submission Window
 (begins when staging is released in ISAM
(likely in September) and ends on
December 7, 2012*
 Submission window is same for all staged
LEAs, regardless of staging “levels” or
programs

Note: Earlier (October 15) “submission window”
for districts who are staged for AYP/AU only
Staging and Submission
• If staged in two or more PBMAS
program areas with no stage of
intervention higher than a Stage 1,
conduct all activities, complete CIP,
and retain locally
Texas Accountability
Intervention System
ISAM
Updates
Hot off the Press…
Hot off the Press…
Noncompliance Module
Hot off the Press…
Noncompliance Module
Hot off the Press…
Noncompliance Module
Hot off the Press…
Noncompliance Module
2012-2013 SPED Monitoring TETNs
September 13, 2012
November 8, 2012
January 29, 2013
March 21, 2013
May 14. 2013
All sessions will be from 1:00-3:00
32