Bell Ringer: Write a 2-3-sentence explanation describing America’s actions as an imperial power using each of the following terms: 1. Foraker Act 2. Platt Amendment 3. Protectorate Open Door Policy What was the purpose of the Open Door Policy? Main Idea: The United States pursued an Open Door policy to allow all nations access to China’s markets. What was the purpose of the Open Door Policy? 1. Spheres of Influence 2. Existing Chinese Tariffs remain the same 3. Unchanged railroad and harbor fees pg. 505 Boxer Rebellion Secret Chinese societies organized to fight foreign control -> -> Ex: Society of Harmonious Fists= the Boxers Boxers -> Decide to destroy both the “foreign devils” and their Chinese Christian converts = believed they were corrupting Chinese Society Boxer Rebellion: - Boxers besieged foreign embassies in Beijing and Tianjin - 8 Nations intervene- Including the U.S. - Hay convinces other nations not to break up China into European controlled colonies. -> U.S. retains trade! Roosevelt’s Diplomacy Main Idea: Presidents Roosevelt and Taft continued to support a policy of expanding United States influence in foreign countries. Theodore Roosevelthttp://www.glencoe.com/video_library/index_with_mods.php?PROGRAM=978007 8745218&VIDEO=2878&CHAPTER=14 - Was part of the Rough Riders during the Spanish-American War. - Roosevelt favored increasing American power on a world stage. - Americans should care about what happens beyond… - Accepts Anglo-Saxon ideas= U.S. has a duty to shape “less civilized” corners of the earth - Accepts Open Door policy in China = prevent any monopolization of trade there - Nobel Peace Prize in 1906 Panama Canal 1. Acquire Canal Zone Hay- Pauceforte Treaty- signed by U.S. and Great Britain Gives the U.S. the exclusive right to build any proposed canal through Central America French company sells to U.S. 2. Two canal site considerations: Nicaragua vs. Panama French company sells rights and property in Panama to the U.S. Hay offers Colombia $10 million and a yearly $250,000 1. Rent for rights to construct the canal 2. Control a narrow strip of land on either side of it. Colombia says No = afraid of losing control of Panama and says price is too low. Panama Canal 3. Uprising in Panama- Philippe Bunau –Varilla (French Company’s Agent) revolt against Colombia-> Panama needs to make own deal with U.S. U.S. sends warships-> help Panama get independence 4. U.S. and Panama Sign a treaty-> canal can be built! Critics - Roosevelt used unjustifiable aggression against Colombia Roosevelt – “advanced the needs of collective civilization” http://www.glencoe.com/video_library/index_with_mods.php?PROGRAM=9780078 745218&VIDEO=2879&CHAPTER=14&MODE=2 American Diplomacy Bell Ringer: - 3 min- Finish up worksheets. Take out your books. - Go over worksheets. Roosevelt’s Diplomacy Main Idea: Presidents Roosevelt and Taft continued to support a policy of expanding United States influence in foreign countries. Theodore Roosevelthttp://www.glencoe.com/video_library/index_with_mods.php?PROGRAM=978007 8745218&VIDEO=2878&CHAPTER=14 - Was part of the Rough Riders during the Spanish-American War. - Roosevelt favored increasing American power on a world stage. - Americans should care about what happens beyond… - Accepts Anglo-Saxon ideas= U.S. has a duty to shape “less civilized” corners of the earth - Accepts Open Door policy in China = prevent any monopolization of trade there - Nobel Peace Prize in 1906 Big Stick Policy Roosevelt’s “Big Stick Policy” - “Speak Softly and carry a big stick” Displaying American power to the world would make nations think twice about fighting, and thus promote peace. – pg. 507 Intervention? http://www.history.com/videos/roosevelts-big-stick-foreign-policy#roosevelts-bigstick-foreign-policy American Diplomacy Roosevelt Corollary- Teddy Roosevelt- pg. 508-509 Latin America Dollar Diplomacy- William Howard Taft- pg. 509-510 Latin America Moral Diplomacy- Woodrow Wilson= pg. 510-511 Mexico- Victoriano Huerta/Pancho Villa/ Guerrillas http://www.history.com/videos/the-most-panchovilla#the-most-pancho-villa Criticisms