Activity 9: Hot Button Debate in Developmental Sleep
Psychology
Activity Description:
Before lab, you will be assigned a stance on each of three debates and prepare to argue that side
(even if it’s not your personal view). Debates:
1. “Cry-it-out” technique vs. co-sleeping
2. Melatonin vs. natural sleep approaches in children
3. Delayed school start times vs. early-morning seminary
Come to lab having: (a) defined key terms, (b) gathered 2–3 credible sources per stance, (c)
listed assumptions, benefits, risks, equity issues, and (d) drafted likely counterarguments.
In lab, you’ll hold a respectful, structured debate for each topic (brief openings → rebuttals →
cross-questions → team synthesis). Civility, evidence, and clear reasoning are required. After the
lab, submit an individual reflection.
Reflection Prompts (What? → So What? → Now What?)
1. What? (Describe): What prep did you do for each debate (sources, arguments,
counterarguments)? What happened during the debates, and what was surprising or
difficult?
2. So What? (Analyze): Why do these debates matter for developmental sleep psychology
(e.g., child outcomes, family systems, ethics, public health, faith/practice contexts)? How
did evidence, assumptions, and values shape arguments on both sides?
3. Now What? (Apply & Synthesize): Integrate what you learned to articulate your
balanced, reasoned position on each topic. Note any uncertainties and what evidence
would change your mind. Identify one actionable implication (policy, clinical guidance,
or family practice) you would recommend for each debate.