LEZZGO Batch TRES! RTRP ✨Cutie✨ | @venceoy Cardio-Pulmonary Pathophysiology and Disease Management PULMONARY EDEMA & ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME (ARDS) Overview : Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure may develop in many clinical settings and is common for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Hypoxemia occurs when oxygen is unable to reach the blood in enough quantity to allow function. Several causes of acute hypoxemia includes: Abnormalities involving the airway (tumor, mucus plugging) Pulmonary vasculature (pulmonary embolus) Abnormal leakage of fluid from the vascular space into the alveoli (pulmonary edema)← most common cause One of the most common cause of Pulmonary Edema is ARDS. The lung lymphatic drainage system is the primary system for removing the filtered fluid and protein from the lungs. Drainage is assisted by the presence of a modest pressure gradient within the interstitium: HIGH pressure near the alveolus LOW pressure near the nonalveolar interstitium and terminal lymphatic vessels + changes in intrathoracic pressure during inspiration Once the capacity of the interstitium to capture fluid is surpassed and the rate of fluid accumulation exceeds the rate of lymphatic drainage, Pulmonary Edema occurs. The accumulation of intra-alveolar fluid typically results in a far more serious impairment of oxygenation and ventilation. Hydrostatic vs. Nonhydrostatic Edema PULMONARY EDEMA Pathophysiology : The walls of the alveolus are separated from the capillary walls by a very thin lung interstitium which minimizes the distance for gases to diffuse between the airspace and blood. There is a balance between a normal physiologic amount of fluid that leaks into the alveoli and a mechanism that clears it. If the balance is broken, pulmonary edema results. The surface area of the capillary network provides a low-hydrostatic pressure (5-12 mm Hg) for the blood to come into close contact with the alveolar gas. The interstitial space (Interstitium) between the alveolus and capillary is very thin (<0.5 μm) and is separated into two compartments : 1) The relative stiff alveolar side between the capillaries and alveolar epithelium 2) The more compliant nonalveolar side around the capillary wall The physical properties of the interstitium allow absorption of water and solutes. Interstitial Fluid leads to a Hydrostatic Pressure (aka. Interstitial Pressure) - similar to but opposes the hydrostatic pressure in the vascular space. The nonalveolar component of the interstitium is highly compliant and is able to accommodate relatively large increase in fluid volume in the interstitium without significant change In interstitial hydrostatic pressure or leaking of fluid into the alveolar space. The net exchange of fluids between the capillaries and the interstitium of the lungs is determined by the combined influences of hydrostatic and osmotic forces within each compartment. The intact dam (A) represents the normal condition in which oncotic and hydrostatic forces (Starling forces) are balanced, keeping the town dry (where the town represents the alveolar space). (B) The dam remains intact but the water level has risen, overwhelming the dam (i.e., exceeding the forces that resist alveolar flooding) and flooding the town representing the alveoli. This condition resembles hydrostatic pulmonary edema. (C) A crack in the dam (simulating the alveolar-capillary interface) allows water through the dam, flooding the town. Note that the water flooding the town is darker because it contains more sediment and mud from the lake. The condition in (C) simulates the damage to the alveolar-capillary interface that accompanies inflammation in acute respiratory distress syndrome, causing nonhydrostatic pulmonary edema. The muddier water flooding the town (representing the alveolar space) in (C) than in (B) represents the more proteinaceous, inflammatory nature of the fluid that floods the alveoli in nonhydrostatic pulmonary edema. 1 LEZZGO Batch TRES! RTRP ✨Cutie✨ | @venceoy HYDROSTATIC PULMONARY EDEMA Aka. Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema or Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) - because of its close association with cardiac abnormalities in intravascular hydrostatic pressures that cause edema. Increased hydrostatic pressure in the pulmonary veins ↓ Increased hydrostatic pressure in the alveolar capillaries ↓ Increase fluid leakage out of the capillary In most patients, elevation of pulmonary venous pressures is caused by increased pressures in the left-sided heart pressures (left atrial or left ventricular end-diastolic pressures), which are key characteristics of left-sided heart failure (CHF), both diastolic and systolic. In the setting of increased hydrostatic pressure, the endothelial and epithelial barriers remain INTACT and IMPERMEABLE to large proteins and molecules, thus, the fluid that accumulates in the alveoli (measured using BAL), has characteristics identical to those of normal interstitial fluid, which typically contain minimal cells and low protein levels - can also be referred as transudative fluid collections or transudate. Causes of Hydrostatic Pulmonary Edema Cardiac Volume Overload Left ventricular Failure Excessive fluid - Systolic (MI, administration myocarditis) Renal failure - Diastolic (left Hepatic failure ventricular Hypoalbuminemia hypertrophy) (malnutrition) Valvular heart disease (aortic, mitral) NONHYDROSTATIC PULMONARY EDEMA Aka. Noncardiogenic Pulmonary Edema Results from injury to the vascular endothelium and/or alveolar epithelium which creates a loss if integrity in the barrier between the vascular and alveolar spaces. Associated with increased total lung water despite normal microvascular hydrostatic pressure. All causes of ARDS feature disruption of endothelial and epithelial barriers and typically occur under conditions associated with widespread microvascular injury to the lungs. Vascular endothelial injury in the lungs causes increased permeability and allows fluid to pass from the capillaries to the interstitial space. As protein-rich fluid enters the alveolar interstitium from the vasculature, the osmotic gradient is drastically changed and no longer opposes fluid movement from the capillary into the lung. This process s likely aided both by: 1. Damage to the normally impermeable alveolar epithelial barrier - key feature of ARDS, and; 2. Impaired alveolar fluid clearance Regardless of cause, ARDS is typically associated with an influx of polymorphonuclear neutrophils, which release inflammatory bi-products such as proteases, phospolipases, and oxygen radicals into the lung. These processes lead to degradation of the endothelial and epithelial barriers and recruit additional neutrophils to continue the inflammatory cascade. The alveolar fluid that accumulates in ARDS typically demonstrates very high levels of protein, neutrophils, and total cells -comparable to and consistent with exudative fluid collection or exudates. Neutrophils play a central role in the development of ARDS. Other causes of inflammatory cascade that damages the alveolar membrane integrity and contribute to the hemodynamic and inflammatory events in ARDS: a. Chemical insults (gastric aspiration) b. Inhalation injury of noxious gas such (chlorine) c. Immunologic pathway (tumor necrosis factor [TNF] or interleukin-8 [IL-8]) Sepsis - one of the most common cause of ARDS; features activation of inflammatory pathways. Acute illnesses associated with the development of ARDS also can lead to widespread systemic organ injury (e.g., renal failure, encephalopathy), which is caused by the same inflammatory pathways leading to vascular injury, local tissue injury, and fluid leak in those organs, as seen in the lungs. Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS) - syndrome of diffuse organ impairment. ARDS is the pulmonary manifestation of MODS. Gas Exchange and Lung Mechanics in Pulmonary Edema Pulmonary edema is characterized by reduced lung and chest wall compliance (restrictive physiology) and refractory hypoxemia. The stiff lung and chest wall lead to increased work of breathing. Patients with pulmonary edema of any cause use a higher fraction (25%-50%) of their total metabolic output to support their increased WOB. If the insult is not reversed, the combination of hypoxemia and increased WOB leads to respiratory failure and the need for ventilatory assistance. NOTE : In most cases, the severity of lung dysfunction and hypoxemia is MORE SEVERE and MORE PROLONGED in the the nonhydrostatic pulmonary edema compared with the hydrostatic pulmonary edema caused by CHF. In addition to the replacement of air with fluid, the problems with gas exchange and increased WOB 2 LEZZGO Batch TRES! RTRP ✨Cutie✨ | @venceoy seen in ARDS are also caused by the inflammatory nature of the intra-alveolar fluid causing impaired surfactant synthesis, secretion and function. The resulting surfactant abnormalities lead to increased alveolar collapse (atelectasis), due to the loss of surfactant’s natural effects on lowering surface tension at the air-liquid interface in the alveolus. The negative effects of alveolar consolidation and atelectasis on pulmonary gas exchange are worsened by a loss of the normal vascular response to alveolar hypoxemia. Normally, pulmonary arteries in areas of alveolar hypoxia will CONSTRICT as a physiologic response to preserve ventilation/perfusion V̇/Ȯ matching. However, in ARDS, this normal vasoconstrictive response is impaired in hypoxic areas; thus nonaerated alveoli receive higher blood flow than needed, which contributes to severe V̇/Ȯ mismatching and an intrapulmonary right-to-left shunting of blood flow (leading to hypoxemia. The principal mechanism for the respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in neonates was identified as a deficiency of surfactant. ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME (ARDS) Overview : AMERICAN-EUROPEAN CONSENSUS CONFERENCE (AECC) Was created in 1994 with the collective input of established experts from EU and USA. AECC definition included all patients beyond newborns and discontinued use of the term adult in ARDS. Five Central Components: 1. Reduced lung compliance 2. Hypoxemia (ratio of PaO2/FiO2 <300) 3. An acute illness associated with the development of ARDS that can trigger the onset of ARDS. 4. No evidence of CHF (typically based on direct measurements from an invasive pulmonary catheter of vascular filling pressures on the left side of the heart) Acute Lung Injury - shares all characteristics of ARDS except the severity of hypoxemia in ALI is LESS SEVERE (P/F ratio of <300) as compared with ARDS (P/F ratio of <200). The AECC definition served as “gold standard” for identifying and enrolling patients with ARDS into clinical trial for almost 20 years. BERLIN CRITERIA In 2012, the definition of ARDS was revised and updated by a new international consensus group that met in Berlin, Germany, in 2011. The updates were made in response to the limitations of AECC criteria that had been identified. Key Features: 1. Discontinuation of the us the term “acute lung injury” (ALI), which had proven to be nothing more than redundant terminology without adding meaningful value. 2. Creation of three categories for ARDS disease severity (mild, moderate, severe) based on ranges of PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio and levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). 3. Inclusion and acceptance of noninvasive techniques to estimate left heart pressures including echocardiography. 4. Enhanced specificity for interpretation of chest radiographs when determining the presence of bilateral infiltrates or opacities most characteristic of nonhydrostatic pulmonary edema. 5. Greater specificity regarding the time frame by which the development of the disease may still be considered “acute” (<1 wk of the triggering condition). ARDS Severity PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) Ratio 201-300 ---------------------- Mild ARDS 101-200 ---------------------- Moderate ARDS <100 ---------------------- Severe ARDS NOTE : the P/F ratio is calculated using the PaO2 obtained from an arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis and FiO2 at the time ABG value was obtained. Example: A PaO2 value of 90 mm Hg was obtained through ABG analysis from a px who is receiving 50% supplemental O2. 90/.50 = 180 (the px has Moderate ARDS) Distinguishing ARDS from Nonhydrostatic Pulmonary Edema in Clinical Practice Patients presenting with hydrostatic pulmonary edema are much more common than ARDS and should be considered whenever the history or physical examination findings suggest on the of the causes of CHF. A clinical history of infection, recent trauma, or risk factors for aspiration may be present in either groups, but the presence of these risk factors (triggers) favors a diagnosis of ARDS. Pulmonary Artery Catheter (aka. Right Heart Catheter or Swan-Ganz Catheter) used to measure invasively the hemodynamic variables and can differentiate hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic edema. NOTE: Shown not to be essential in the diagnosis of ARDS or beneficial in the management. Echocardiography when combined with other physical examination features (capillary refill and 3 LEZZGO Batch TRES! RTRP ✨Cutie✨ | @venceoy mottling), can provide reliable information that can effectively guide clinical decision making. Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) can be used to obtain the composition of alveolar edema fluid and differentiate CHF from ARDS. Increased inflammatory cells and serum proteins (exudative fluid) are seen on ARDS. Clinical Signs and Symptoms of ARDS Anatomic Alterations in ARDS The lungs of patients affected by ARDS undergo similar anatomic changes, regardless of the cause of the disease. In response to injury, the pulmonary capillaries become engorged and the permeability of the alveolar-capillary membrane INCREASES. Interstitial and intraalveolar edema and hemorrhage ensue, as well as scattered areas of hemorrhagic alveolar consolidation. These processes result in a decrease in alveolar surfactant and in alveolar collapse, or atelectasis. As the disease progresses, the intraalveolar walls become lined with a thick, rippled hyaline membrane identical to the hyaline membrane seen in newborns with respiratory distress syndrome (hyaline membrane disease). The membrane contains fibrin and cellular debris. In prolonged cases there is hyperplasia and swelling of the type II cells. Fibrin and exudate develop and lead to intraalveolar fibrosis. In gross appearance the lungs of patients with ARDS are heavy and “red,” “beefy,” or “liverlike.” The anatomic alterations that develop in ARDS create a restrictive lung disorder. Major Pathologic/Structural Changes Associated with ARDS : ― Interstitial and intraalveolar edema and hemorrhage ― Alveolar consolidation ― Intraalveolar hyaline membrane formation ― Pulmonary surfactant deficiency or abnormality ― Atelectasis The illustration compares a normal alveolus (A) and an alveolus with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (B). The normal alveolus includes intact type I and II pneumocytes along with a layer of surfactant at the air-liquid interface over the epithelium. In ARDS, there is injury and loss of type I cells through apoptosis and necrosis, some preservation of typically dysfunctional type II cells and depletion and inactivation of surfactant. The alveolar lumen becomes filled with protein-rich fluid from leak of serum, activated neutrophils releasing mediators like matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and neutrophil elastases (NE), and leak of serum coagulation factors that form fibrin-rich hyaline membranes lining the alveolar wall. The clinical manifestations associated with ARDS usually appear within 6 to 72 hours of an inciting event, and worsen rapidly. Patient typically presents with: Dyspnea Cyanosis Bilateral crackles Tachypnea, tachycardia Diaphoresis Use of accessory muscles Cough and chest pain may also be present The general clinical course is characterized by several days of hypoxemia that requires moderate to high concentrations of inspired oxygen. The bilateral alveolar infiltrates and diffuse crackles are persistent during this period, and the patient’s overall health status is often fragile as a result of severe hypoxemia. Arterial Blood Gases in ARDS Mild to Moderate ARDS Acute Alveolar Hyperventilation with Hypoxemia (Acute Respiratory Alkalosis) ↑pH ↓PaCO2 ↓HCO3* ↓ PaO2 ↓ SaO2 / SpO2 Severe ARDS Acute Ventilatory Failure with Hypoxemia (Acute Respiratory Acidosis) ↓pH ↑PaCO2 ↑HCO3* ↓PaO2 ↓SaO2 / SpO2 *Decreased but NORMAL Clinical Features of CHF and ARDS Features Common to Both Symptoms of anxiety, dyspnea, tachypnea Decreased compliance and reduced lung volumes Hypoxemia (mild to severe), often requiring ventilator assistance CXR shows diffuse alveolar and interstitial infiltrates Features Favoring CHF Suggestive clinical history (see causes of hydrostatic pulmonary edema) Symmetric pulmonary infiltrates, cardiomegaly, or pleural effusions on CXR Elevated pulmonary artery catheter wedge pressure (1830 mm Hg) Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: LOW protein and minimally increased cellularity Prompt (<12-24 h) and lasting response to diuretics and CHF therapy Features Favoring ARDS Clinical history of a risk factor for ARDS Asymmetric, peripheral infiltrates on chest radiograph Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: VERY HIGH protein level and marked cellular influx Transient improvement with CHF therapy, but uncommon to significantly improve during initial trial 12-36 h. 4 LEZZGO Batch TRES! RTRP ✨Cutie✨ | @venceoy Histologic Findings in ARDS The changes in the lung tissue in ARDS are typically separated into two phases based on the overall duration of the disease process: (1) Acute Exudative Phase (1-7 days) Exudative phase is characterized by diffuse damage to alveoli and blood vessels and the influx of proteinaceous fluid and inflammatory cells into the interstitium and alveolar spaces. There is capillary congestion, intra-alveolar edema, and injury/death of pneumocytes that form the alveolar wall which includes type I pneumocytes (the predominant structure cells lining the alveoli) and type II pneumocytes (makes and secretes surfactant). Cellular injury to the lining (endothelium) of the pulmonary capillaries. The alveolar spaces are lined with hyaline membranes - composed of cellular debris and condensed plasma proteins. Thus, the early name for ARDS is “Hyaline Membrane Disease” The exudative phase is typically short, lasting only a few days, and is fully reversible. (2) Fibroproliferative Phase aka. Organizing Phase (3 days to weeks) After the cause of lung injury is controlled, a process of lung repair begins. This appears as an overabundance of alveolar type II pneumocytes and infiltration or proliferation by fibroblasts within the alveolar basement membrane and intra-alveolar spaces. Fibroblasts drive intra-alveolar and interstitial fibrosis. The extent of fibrosis determines the degree of pulmonary disability in patients who survive ARDS. Typically, patients have nearly complete normalization of lung compliance and oxygenation 612 months after the illness. However, a small percentage (5-10%) of patients do not fully return to normal and can experience chronic respiratory disability related to pulmonary fibrosis and obliteration of pulmonary vasculature. Secondary forms of lung injury include nosocomial infection, O2 toxicity, and forms of ventilatorinduced lung injury (VILI). Risk Factors (Triggers) and Host Susceptibility Risk Factors / Triggers - refers to acute illnesses that stimulates an acute inflammatory response that leads to lung injury. Direct Injury - occurs as the result of triggers that begin in the lung (e.g., pneumonia and aspiration) and create an acute inflammatory reaction, within the lung, that initially leads to injury of the alveolar epithelium and subsequent damage to the interstitium and capillary endothelium injury. ― Pneumonia (viral, bacterial, fungal) ― Gastric aspiration ― Toxic inhalation (phosgene, cocaine, smoke, high O2 concentration) ― Near drowning ― Lung contusion Indirect Injury -caused by acute illnesses that begin outside of the lung (e.g., pyelonephritis, trauma or massive hemorrhage) and trigger and acute inflammatory reaction that initially injures that capillary endothelium via circulating inflammatory mediators, which leads to subsequent injury of the interstitium and alveolar epithelium. ― Sepsis and prolonged shock ― Burn injury (chemical or heat induced) ― Multiple trauma ― Transfusions (TRALI) ― Pancreatitis ― Gynecologic causes (abruptio placentae, amniotic embolism, eclampsia) ― Drug effect (trans-retinoic acid for acute leukemia) ― Sickle cell crisis The key factor that determine which patients will develop ARDS are the severity and duration of the risk factors, and variables that lead some patients to be more susceptible. Sepsis is the most common cause ; among all patients with sepsis, fewer than 20% will develop ARDS ; as the severity of sepsis increases, the likelihood of ARDS developing also increases (up to 50%). Pneumonia is the most common direct insult cause of ARDS Important host factor susceptibility: Increased age (age >50 yrs) Liver disease Alcoholism Genetic polymorphisms related to inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-1, TNF, surfactant) 5 LEZZGO Batch TRES! RTRP ✨Cutie✨ | @venceoy Treatment and Management The hallmark of treatment of ARDS is supportive care with mechanical ventilation with disease specific treatment. Identifying and treating the cause of ARDS is an important step to stop progression of the lung injury. Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Goals and Priorities for Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS 1. Lung Protective Strategy a) Low Tidal Volume - using predicted body weight b) Low plateau or driving pressure c) PEEP titration - minimize derecruitment 2. Goals for Gas Exchange a) Permissive hypercapnia b) Avoidance of hyperoxia and hyperoxemia MECHANICAL VENTILATION MV is the cornerstone of supportive care for patients with ARDS. Goals of Mechanical Ventilation: 1. Safety - encompasses two main clinical objective: a) ensuring gas exchange; b)preventing further lung injury or VILI. 2. Comfort - focuses on ensuring synchrony with the VR and balancing the WOB distribution. 3. Liberation NOTE: Safety is main goal during early exudative phase while comfort and liberation are the main goals as the disease processes. Setting Tidal Volume Barotrauma - is the rupture of alveolar structures, presumably due to excessive airway pressure, that results in gross leakage of air outside of the lung parenchyma into adjacent tissue spaces (pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum). Volutruama - is a form of injury to the alveolar structure; there is a microscopic cellular injury to the alveolar and capillary walls causing them to become leaky. This becomes the trigger for an inflammatory cascade that may trigger or worsen ARDS. Lung Protective Ventilation (LPV) - aka. Low Tidal Volume Ventilation (LTVV) a strategy of using a tidal volume (VT) that avoids volutrauma. Made by a landmark trial known as the ARMA trial (2000). Use of VT = 6 mL/kg PBW Formula: PBWMEN = 50.0 + 0.905 x (Height in cm - 152.4) PBWWOMEN = 45.5 + 0.905 X (Height in cm - 152.4) Pressure-Volume (P-V) Curve Has an S or Sigmoid Shape Can be established by measuring lung volume during step increases in airway pressure. Can help us understand the rationale for using PEEP. Initial Limb - has large changes in pressure that are associated with only small increase in volume; inspiratory pressure increases faster than lung volume; have high surface tension. Middle Limb - has the best change in pressure per volume; represents the most compliant portion of the curve. Compliance = ΔV/ΔP Final Limb - similar with Initial Limb; large changes in pressure with small increase in volume. Lower Inflection Point (LIP) - the point where the lower limb shifts to middle limb. Represents at which the recruitment (opening) of the alveoli units begin and point below where the units close (collapse, atelectasis) if the airway pressure at end expiratory drops below. Upper Inflection Point (UIP)-point which expansion of the alveoli units becomes more difficult and may cause injury from overdistention. PEEP Reduces lung collapse thereby increasing the amount of aerated lung, a phenomenon known as recruitment. During mechanical ventilation, the goals for titration of PEEP are staying above the LIP to avoid repeated cycles of alveolar collapse. In ARDS, the P-V curves are flatter and more deviated to the right thus making it challenging to determine the best PEEP. The P-V relationships in ARDS are highly dynamic and and depends on the px’s overall condition, can change rapidly due to fluctuations in the patient’s lung compliance (pneumonia, pulmonary edema), synchrony with the vr, and many more. NOTE: the use of PEEP is further complicated by the potential adverse hemodynamic effect of PEEP to decrease venous return to the right heart. 6 LEZZGO Batch TRES! RTRP ✨Cutie✨ | @venceoy Higher levels of PEEP in more severe disease (P/F ratio <150) may lead to decreased mortality and less use of rescue strategies. NOTE: when decreasing PEEP, the changes in physiology become evident usually within 5 minutes; when increasing PEEP, the changes in physiology usually take at least 60 minutes. Recruitment Maneuver - use of transient large increases in PEEP to generate greater recruitment that may be sustained even after return of PEEP to their prior levels. Discontinued due to lack of evidence (ARDS Network ALVEOLI Trial). In most patients with ARDS, PEEP levels less than 20 cm H20 are generally preferred. Use of PEEP >20 cm H2O should not the routinely used. Managing Airway Pressures Plateau Airway Pressure (Pplat) - the goal is to maintain a Pplat of <30 cm H2O. Driving Pressure - (ΔP) represents the airway pressure during inspiration (above PEEP) that is not influenced by airway resistance (which affects the peak inspiratory pressure but not Pplat). Driving Pressure = Pplat - PEEP Ideally should be ≤15 cm H2O NOTE: Increasing the PEEP may improve lung recruitment and oxygenation but may also increase the Pplat, which may indicate the UIP of the P/V curve is being reached or exceeded and creating risk for VILI from overdistention. Selecting the Mode of Ventilation The mode of ventilation should principally serve the goals of safety (avoiding VILI) while also ensuring adequate ventilation and oxygenation to maintain the patient’s frequently evolving cardiorespiratory and metabolic needs. The mode that most directly achieves the goal of controlling the Vt is Volume Control Mode. In this mode, the clinician sets the VT (6 mL/kg of PPBW) and the ventilator delivers the target VT on every breath, whether the patient-initiated or not. Cons : patient-ventilator dyssynchrony->patient discomfort, increased WOB, increased O2 consumption, and delivery of large (unsafe) VT. As an alternative to volume control, patients may be placed on Pressure Control Mode, the VT depends on the set inspiratory pressure above the PEEP and a set inspiratory time. To resolve dyssynchrony, sedation, analgesia and or neuromuscular blockade (NMD) are used to blunt patient respiratory effort. Respiratory Rate and Inspiratory Time ARDS is associated with alveolar consolidation, V/Q mismatching, increased physiologic shunt, and deadspace ventilation. Critically ill patients typically have elevated rates of metabolism and CO2 production, thus, requiring higher minute ventilation to maintain PaCO2 in the normal range. Conventionally, respiratory frequency is kept <35 breaths/min. NOTE: Faster respiratory rates will not allow adequate time for exhalation, leading to air-trapping (auto-PEEP) and overdistention which can worsen oxygenation and reduce cardiac output. Permissive Hypercapnia is allowed in the absence of contraindication (elevated intracranial pressure); the goal is to maintain the arterial pH at no less than 7.15 - 7.20. Correction of pH can also be achieved either pharmacologic supplementation (IV or oral) of bicarbonate or physiologic retention of bicarbonate by the kidneys. In rate instances, extracorporeal removal of CO2 is considered. Closely related to the ventilator rate is the Inspiratory Time (Ti), which is the means by which clinicians and RTs adjust the Inspiratory-toExpiratory Ratio (I:E) Ratio. Intubated patients with COPD require LONGER expiratory time. Intubated patients with ARDS use an I:E ratio of 1:1 due to their stiffer lungs and required less time for exhalation and are achieved decreasing inspiratory flow rates which results in desirable reductions of Pplat and driving pressures to maintain targets of LPV. NOTE: As RR is increased and Ti is prolonged, risk for air trapping and auto-PEEP will naturally increase. Diligent monitoring of auto-PEEP during the management of mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS is ESSENTIAL. Oxygen Titration Administering high levels of supplemental O2 (FiO2) can cause direct lung injury as a result of O2 Toxicity. O2 toxicity is time and dose dependent. Continuously titrate and minimize the FiO2 and PEEP while targeting SpO2 between the range of 88%-96%. 7 LEZZGO Batch TRES! RTRP ✨Cutie✨ | @venceoy Adjunctive Strategies to Improve Lung Function a. Prone Positioning The distribution of lung injury in patients with ARDS is heterogeneous and changing the position of the patient can result in improved V/Q mismatching within the lungs. Alveolar consolidation is ARDS tends to be more pronounced in the dependent lung zones (posterior regions when then patient is lying supine), where blood flow is greatest. Proning (placing chest and face down) - “put the good lung down”. Mechanism include: improved V/Q matching, increased FRC, increased CO, more effective drainage of upper and lower airway secretions, and improved diaphragmatic excursion. Ventilation in the supine position causes compressive forces on dorsal airspaces, resulting in “derecruitment” of lung units, and the phenomenon is reversed by ventilation in the prone position. Some patients may not tolerate prone ventilation or may have relative contraindication such as open surgical wounds or late-trimester pregnancy. Three Theoretical Benefits of Prone Positioning: 1. The posterior lung has a larger surface area for gas exchange which reduces V/Q mismatch 2. Shifting the heart anterior offloads its weight from the surrounding lung tissue 3. The large airways move to a gravitationally dependent position that better facilitates drainage of posterior and lower-lobe secretions. b. Neuromuscular Blockade Used to enhance compliance and synchrony with mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS. Patients who continue to be hypoxemic despite optimizing ventilator settings and adequate ventilation, a trial of NMB by bolus or continuous IV infusion is frequently performed. Similar to prone positioning, the benefit of NMD was most evident in patients with severe ARDS (P/F ratio <120). Use of NMD in patients with only mild to moderate ARDS who are stable on conventional ventilation should be AVOIDED. c. Inhaled Vasodilators The potential benefits of pulmonary vasodilators delivered via airway is based on deliver of the vasodilator will be distributed to well-ventilated portions of the lung, where the vasodilator leads to local vasodilation. In this way, well-ventilated ares of the lung receive a greater potion of the total pulmonary blood flow, which results in improved oxygenation by reducing shunt factor and V/Q mismatch. Nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin are naturally occurring potent vasodilators that play a critical role regulating blood flow within the normal lungs. NO is highly soluble gas that diffuses readily through various tissues. Prostacyclin is a naturally occurring prostaglandin and sever analogues have been pharmacologically developed (epoprostenol [Flolan]) and are standard of care in pulmonary arterial hypertension - can be nebulized and provide effects similar to inhaled NO. NOTE: It is recommended that the use of inhaled vasodilators be limited to patients with most severe forms of ARDS (P/F <80) and used only as abridge to maintain oxygen while initiating more invasive adjunctive therapies. d. Beta-2 Agonists In addition to their effects as bronchodilators, high dose of beta-2 agonists (albuterol, salbutamol) have been shown to accelerate clearance of alveolar edema by the epithelium of the alveolar wall in animal models. However, clinical trial in humans prove to have no significant effect. NOTE: Thus, the use of beta-2 agonist therapy for improving alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS is NOT RECOMMENDED. e. Exogenous Surfactant Administration Surfactant dysfunction and deficiency is a wellestablished component of RDS in premature infants, as well as in children and adults with ARDS. Surfactant abnormalities contribute to the development of ARDS by promoting instability of the alveolar units (airway shear trauma, atelectasis, and right-to-left shunt) and by allowing inflammatory injury to alveoli to continue unchecked. Delivery of exogenous surfactants via direct intratracheal administration has become a cornerstone of therapy in RDS since the early 1990s. Surfactant Preparations I. Natural surfactant (harvested from lungs of animals) II. Synthetic surfactant (created artificially) The depletion of surfactant in RDS of prematurity is secondary to the lack of lung maturation and surfactant production. In contrast, the surfactant depletion of ARDS (in adults) is caused by inflammation of the alveolus and subsequent degradation of the endogenous surfactant. Clinical trials have demonstrated improvement in oxygenation with intratracheal surfactant administration (natural & synthetic). However, it is 8 LEZZGO Batch TRES! RTRP ✨Cutie✨ | @venceoy proven to be short lived (24-72 hours) and have NOT demonstrated significant impact on clinical outcomes such as mortality or duration of mechanical ventilation in survivors. These negative results in ARDS (in contrast to clear benefit in neonatal RDS) are most likely explained by degradation of the exogenously administered surfactant via the same inflammatory mechanisms that depleted the patient’s native surfactant. Alternative and Rescue Ventilation Strategies In those uncommon scenarios, alternative ventilatory strategies are available and may prove beneficial in selected patients but are less well-studied or standardized. These therapies are often referred as “rescue” and “salvage” therapies. The thresholds for using alternative approaches differs across medical institutions but are typically defined by persistent markers of unsafe ventilation, such as excessive plateau pressures (e.g., >35 cm H2O), FiO2 (e.g., >80%), PEEP (e.g., 20 cm H2O), or hemodynamic instability caused by positive pressure ventilation. a. Inverse-Ratio Ventilation (IRV) During inverse ratio ventilation (IRV), the inspiratory time on the ventilator is prolonged so that the I:E ratio is reversed (i,e., the inspiratory time now exceeds expiratory time). The mechanism for benefit of IRV likely include some combination of increased percent of time during each respiratory cycle that alveoli remain patent to reduce V/Q mismatch and increasing mean airway pressure to recruit alveolar units. NOTE: Increased mean airway pressure results from incomplete lung emptying (air trapping, auto-PEEP, intrinsic PEEP). b. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) Is a form of pressure control intermittent mandatory ventilation with IRV (I:E ratio of ≥4:1). The aim of APRV is to increase the mean airway pressure for alveolar recruitment while allowing the patient to spontaneously breath. Two levels of PEEP: a. HIGH PEEP (25-30 cm H2O for 5-6 s) b. LOW PEEP (0-5 cm H2O for 0.5-1 s) Cons: risk for large tidal volumes, leading to VILI and high transpulmonary pressures. Shown to improve small case series of patients during H1N1 influenza pandemic. c. High Frequency (HFV) Uses a rapidly moving piston to create movement of air through a circuit. Allows setting a mean airway pressure over which oscillations happen. Tidal volumes generated by HFV are typically smaller than the patient’s anatomic dead space and use higher mean airway pressures to maintain alveolar patency and theoretically prevent VILI and minimize hemodynamic compromise caused by larger inspiratory pressures of conventional modes. NOTE: HFV was initially devised as a method to minimize the hemodynamic effects of conventional mechanical ventilation (i.e., the large inflating pressures and volume). Patients on HFV will be exposed to high mean airway pressures and PEEP, which may reduce CO and overall O2 delivery despite elevated arterial oxygenation. The use of HFV in routine ARDS management is NOT recommended. Although, HFV as a rescue strategy for patients with severe refractory ARDS (P/F<80) remains an option. d. Extracorporeal Support Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) and Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal (ECCO2R) involve establishing a circuit for diverting a large portion of the cardiac output through an artificial gas-exchange device, or “artificial lung,” to facilitate the exchange of O2 and CO2. For respiratory failure, extracorporeal support is typically performed using venovenous circuits (versus venoarterial), which are able to support gas exchange without need for invasive arterial cannulas and hemodynamic support and can currently be offered through single venous cannula. In considering ECMO for patients with refractory severe ARDS (P/F <80), assessment and referral to ECMO center (if needed) should be made early after optimization of conventional approaches and time sufficient is allowed to confirm lack of improvement or worsening. Nonventilatory Supportive Care Checklist Respiratory Neruologic/ Musculoskeletal Gastrointestinal Infection Prevention Fluid conservative management Daily spontaneous breathing trial Minimize sedation and daily awakening Delirium prevention and treatment Early mobilization Gastric ulcer prophylaxis Enteral nutrition Avoid excess caloric intake Remove indwelling catheters Antibiotic deescalation Oral chlorhexidine Head-of-bed elevation Hand hygiene 9 LEZZGO Batch TRES! RTRP ✨Cutie✨ | @venceoy Nonventilatory Supportive Care a. Conservative Fluid Management Critically ill patients receive fluids both IV and oral for a wide variety of indications: ― To maintain perfusion ― IV medications ― Nutrition ― Hydration ― Correct electrolyte imbalance The amount of fluids taken in by critically ill patients invariably exceeds the amount of fluids that the patient loses, and patients often gain approximately 1 L of fluid per day. The conservative strategy was achieved essentially by eliminating maintenance IV fluids and earlier institution of and increased attention toward diuresis. b. Sedation and Analgesia Protocolized sedation and scheduled daily interruptions of sedation (awakenings) lead to shorter times on mechanical ventilation and decreased length of ICU stay. Using benzodiazepines (e.g.,lorazepam or midazolam) carries the greatest risk for these adverse neurocognitive effects. One of the earliest neurocognitive warning signs in the ICU is the development of ICU-associated delirium, which can be caused by several common environmental challenges in the ICU, including lack of sleep, noise, use of restraints, and immobility. Summary Checklist The pathologic findings of ARDS are characterized early by acute alveolar inflammation and injury with neutrophils and cytokines, which can rapidly reverse. In severe and/or persistent ARDS, a fibrotic phase can develop and can lead to a more prolonged course of recovery. The clinical definition and diagnosis of ARDS is based on the presence of a syndrome of characteristics that include abnormalities on the chest x-ray, hypoxemia, and a known risk factor or trigger that generates acute inflammation. ARDS is a common critical illness with high associated mortality and morbidity, but close attention to care protocols for patients with ARDS, in particular lungprotective lung ventilation, has improved survival and reduced recovery time for survivors. Ventilatory strategies for patients with ARDS are designed to minimize VILI by emphasizing low tidal volumes and driving pressures and sufficient levels of PEEP. Multiple modes of mechanical ventilation can be used to achieve LPV, but providers must prioritize avoiding VILI and be willing to tolerate reduced gas exchange, including lower oxygenation and higher PaCO2. c. Nutrition Malnutrition in the ICU leads to poor outcomes, but clinicians including RTs should be aware that excess nutritional supplementation can also lead to adverse consequences. The potential negative impact of overfeeding - increased CO2 production, increased minute ventilation, and potentially delayed liberation from mechanical ventilation. d. Mobility Prolonged period patients spend lying in bed on mechanical ventilation has an adverse effect on the mass and function of muscles for patients in the ICU. Profound and persistent weakness (≥12 months) is a commonly reported long-term outcome in ARDS survivors. This adverse consequence is attributable to inflammatory injury to the muscles and peripheral nerves, pharmacologic agents (i.g., steroids and neuromuscular blockers) and most importantly immobilization. 10