Uploaded by kagithalakiran9016

Dyspepsia (1)

advertisement
DYSPEPSIA
DYSPEPSIA
Dr Rakesh
1st year Gastroenterology Resident
Definition
Un-investigated Dyspepsia
Organic Causes of Dyspepsia
Functional Dyspepsia
Pathophysiology of FD
Approach to Un-investigated Dyspepsia
Treatment
DEFINITION
• Dyspepsia is derived from the Greek words
δυς- (dys-) and πέψη (pepse)  means
“difficult digestion.”
• The Rome III Consensus Committee, which defined dyspepsia
as the presence of symptoms that are considered to originate
from the gastroduodenal region
• Only 4 symptoms are now considered to be specifically of
gastroduodenal origin:
1. Postprandial fullness
2. Early satiation
3. Epigastric pain
4. Epigastric burning
Uninvestigated dyspepsia
• The term uninvestigated dyspepsia refers to
dyspeptic symptoms in persons in whom no
diagnostic investigations have yet been performed
and a specific diagnosis that explains the dyspeptic
symptoms has not been determined
ORGANIC CAUSES OF DYSPEPSIA
Functional Dyspepsia
Functional dyspepsia
• Also known as non ulcer dyspepsia
• No organic abnormality is identified by routine
clinical evaluation
• Commonest cause of dyspepsia in Western
countries
ROME IV criteria
• Includes 1 or more of the following:
1. Bothersome postprandial fullness
2. Early satiation
3. Epigastric pain
4. Epigastric burning
• For past 3 months with onset at least 6 months
before diagnosis
• No evidence of structural disease (including at upper
endoscopy) that is likely to explain the symptoms
• ROME III consensus proposed Functional dyspepsia be used as
an umbrella term that includes:
1. Postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) characterized by meal
related dyspeptic symptoms, postprandial fullness, and early
satiation
2. Epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) characterized by mealunrelated dyspeptic symptoms, epigastric pain, and
epigastric burning
• ROME IV Committee:
• When epigastric pain occurs postprandially in patients with
early satiation or postprandial fullness, the patient is still
categorized as having the PDS
DYSPEPSIA Symptom complex
• The dyspepsia symptom complex is broader than the four
cardinal symptoms and it includes multiple symptoms such as
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Epigastric pain
Early satiation
Fullness,
Epigastric burning
Upper abdominal bloating
Belching,
Loss of appetite,
Nausea and Vomiting.
Epidemiology
•
•
•
•
10% to 45%
F>M
More common in smokers and NSAID users.
When heartburn is excluded, the frequency of uninvestigated
dyspepsia in the general population ranges from 5% to 15%
• Quality of life is significantly affected by dyspepsia, especially
FD.
Pathophysiology
Delayed Gastric
emptying
Impaired Gastric
Accommodation
Miscellaneous
Functional
Dyspepsia
Hypersensitivity
to gastric
distention
Altered
Duodenal
Sensitivity
Low grade
Mucosal
inflammation
Impaired Gastric Accommodation
• Motor Function of proximal and distal stomach
• Impaired accommodation
• Antral distention
Hypersensitivity to Gastric Distension
• Visceral hypersensitivity, defined as abnormally enhanced
perception of visceral stimuli, is considered one of the major
pathophysiologic mechanisms
• The level at which visceral hypersensitivity is generated is
unclear:
– Evidence for involvement of tension-sensitive mechanoreceptors
– Alterations at the level of visceral afferent nerves or of the central
nervous system.
Low grade Mucosal Inflammation in
Duodenum
• Presence of increased duodenal mucosal mast cell and
eosinophil counts and these findings are most clearly
associated with symptoms of early satiation.
• The inflammatory cell infiltrate (eosinophils and mast cells) in
the duodenum has been correlated with:
1. Increased mucosal permeability
2. Altered expression of tight junction proteins
3. Impaired activity and integrity of neurons in the
submucous plexus
Altered Duodenal Sensitivity to Lipids
or Acids
• Perfusion of the duodenum with nutrient lipids, enhances the
perception of gastric distention through a mechanism that
requires lipid digestion and subsequent release of CCK
• Duodenal infusion of hydrochloric acid induces nausea in
patients with FD but not in healthy subjects, suggesting
duodenal hypersensitivity to acid.
Delayed Gastric Emptying
• Delayed gastric emptying of solids are more likely to report
postprandial fullness, nausea, and vomiting
Miscellaneous
1. Rapid gastric emptying that was correlated with the intensity
of postprandial Symptoms.
2. Abnormalities in the control of gastric myoelectrical activity.
3. Small bowel motor alterations, most commonly hypermotility
with burst activity and an increased proportion of duodenal
retrograde contractions.
Pathogenic Factors
1. Genetic susceptibility
2. Infection
3. Psychological factors
• Genetic Predisposition
– Polymorphisms of the G-protein beta polypeptide 3
(GNB3) gene have been associated with the risk of
functional dyspepsia
• Hp Infection
– Statistically significant beneficial effect of eradication of Hp
therapy on symptoms in patients with FD
– Kyoto consensus which defines Hp-associated dyspepsia
as dyspepsia in an Hp-infected person with the absence of
an alternative cause of dyspepsia on endoscopy and
sustained control of symptoms after eradication of Hp
• Post Infectious FD:
– More likely to report symptoms of early satiation, weight
loss, nausea, and vomiting
– Significantly higher frequency of impaired accommodation
of the proximal stomach, which was attributed to
dysfunction at the level of gastric nitrergic neurons.
– More prominent mucosal inflammation in the duodenum
• Psychosocial factors
– The most common psychiatric comorbidities in patients
with FD are
1. Anxiety
2. Depressive or somatoform disorders
3. Recent or remote history of physical or sexual abuse.
• The presence of psychosocial comorbidities is associated with
greater symptom severity in patients with FD, and this
association may be mediated in part by visceral hypersensitivity.
APPROACH TO UNINVESTIGATED
DYSPEPSIA
History
Symptoms
Systemic
illness
Stress
H/o
Gi
Infections
Drugs
Diet
Additional Investigations
• Testing for celiac disease and Giardia infection is useful for
patients with refractory symptoms, especially when
accompanied by weight loss.
• In patients with severe pain or weight loss, US or CT can rule
out pancreaticobiliary disease and screen for stenosis of large
abdominal arteries.
• In case of severe postprandial fullness, and refractory nausea
and vomiting, a gastric emptying study using scintigraphy or a
breath test can be considered.
• In cases of refractory intermittent epigastric pain or burning,
esophageal pH with impedance monitoring is useful for
diagnosing atypical manifestations of GERD.
• Psychological or psychiatric assessment is recommended for
patients with long-standing refractory or debilitating symptoms.
Management Strategies
Endoscopy and Directed Treatment
• Advantages of endoscopy:
1. Detection of organic causes of dyspepsia
2. Gastric mucosal biopsies facilitate diagnosis of Hp
infection
3. Detect gastric cancer at an early curable stage
Endoscopy vs Noninvasive
management
• Available data, do not support early endoscopy as a costeffective initial management strategy for all patients with
uncomplicated dyspepsia.
• Most relevant practice guidelines advocate early endoscopy:
1. In patients younger than age 45 who have a family history of
gastric cancer
2. Emigrated from a country with a high rate of gastric cancer
3. Have undergone partial gastrectomy
• In a young dyspeptic patient (<age 45 y) without alarm
features, initial endoscopy cannot be recommended because
the yield is low
Test And Treat Hp Infection
• Several consensus panels and guidelines have advocated
noninvasive testing for Hp in young patients (<45 to 60 years
of age) with uncomplicated dyspepsia
• In a population with a high prevalence (>20%) of Hp infection,
the test-and-treat approach remains attractive because
patients with PUD will be cured.
• The test-and-treat strategy as an initial approach to
uninvestigated dyspepsia is most likely to be beneficial in
areas where the Hp infection rate is high.
Empirical Antisecretory Drug Therapy
• In populations in which the prevalence of Hp infection is low,
empirical antisecretory therapy (a PPI for 1 to 2 months)
appears to be the preferred option
• Disadvantages of empirical PPI therapy:
1. Rapid symptomatic relapse after therapy is discontinued
2. Potential for rebound gastric hypersecretion, so many
patients require long-term PPI therapy
Treatment of FD
1. General measures
2. Pharmacological Treatment
3. Psychological Intervention
Lifestyle Modifications
• Reassurance and education is of primary importance in
patients with FD.
• Advising patients to eat more frequent, smaller meals seems
logical.
• Because the presence of lipids in the duodenum enhances
gastric sensitivity, avoiding meals with a high fat content may
be advisable.
• Discourage consumption of spicy foods containing capsaicin and
other irritants.
• Coffee may aggravate symptoms in some cases and should be
avoided.
• Cessation of smoking and consumption of alcohol.
• Avoidance of aspirin and other NSAIDs is commonly
recommended and seems sensible, although not of established
value.
Pharmacological Treatment
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Hp Eradication
Acid Suppressive Drugs
Prokinetic agents
Agents that enhance gastric accommodation
Centrally acting Neuromodulators
Other Pharmacological Approaches
Hp Eradication
• Although H pylori–associated dyspepsia is not technically
considered under the umbrella of functional dyspepsia
• H pylori infection is identified in approximately 5% of dyspepsia
cases.
• A meta-analysis found that 9% reduction in the frequency of
dyspepsia after Hp eradication, with a NNT 12.5.
• A trial evaluating improvement in specific dyspepsia
symptoms following H pylori therapy demonstrated
improvement in epigastric pain and burning, but not early
satiety or postprandial fullness.
• Another study suggested that female sex is a risk factor for
persistent dyspepsia symptoms despite H pylori eradication
Rationale for Acid- suppressive therapy
• Overlap of GERD and dyspepsia symptoms
– Gastric acid secretion in patients with FD similar to
that in controls1
• Acid hypersensitivity
– Lowers threshold of mechanosensitive afferents
– Increases nausea with duodenal acid infusion
• Abnormal clearance from the duodenum
– Decreases fasting clearance of exogenous acid
– Decreases fasting duodenal motor activity
.
Acid Suppressive Drugs
• Based on meta-analyses of therapeutic outcomes in FD, the
efficacy of antacids, sucralfate, and misoprostol has not been
demonstrated.
• A meta-analysis of 12 randomized placebo-controlled trials
that evaluated the efficacy of H2RAs in patients with FD
reported a significant benefit over placebo, with a relative risk
reduction of 23% and a number needed to treat of 7.
• A meta-analysis of 15 placebo-controlled, randomized trials of
PPIs for FD also confirmed that this class of agents is superior
to placebo, with a number needed to treat of 10
• PPI therapy to be most effective in the group with overlapping
reflux, less effective in the group with EPS, and lacking a
statistically significant effect in the with PDS
Prokinetic Agents
• A meta-analysis has suggested that therapy with a prokinetic
agent is superior to placebo in patients with FD, with a NNT of 7
• Metoclopramide and domperidone are dopamine receptor
agonists with a stimulatory effect on UGI motility.
• On the basis of a systematic analysis, the efficacy of prokinetic
agents is not thought to be driven by their stimulatory effect
on gastric emptying, but rather by effects on accommodation
and visceral hypersensitivity.
Enhance Gastric Accommodation
• Impaired gastric accommodation is the most commonly found
motor abnormality in FD.
• The first-in-class agent acotiamide is both a presynaptic
muscarinic autoreceptor inhibitor and a cholinesterase
inhibitor and enhances both gastric emptying and
accommodation.
Acotiamide
• Acotiamide is an oral prokinetic drug , acting as gastric motility
modulator
• Approved in India for “treatment of bloating after meals,
epigastric bloating and early satiety in function dyspepsia”
• The drug modulates upper gastrointestinal motility to alleviate
abdominal symptoms resulting from hypo motility and delayed
gastric emptying by increasing cholinergic activity.
Mechanism of Action
1.
Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase
(AChE) activity in the stomach
2.
Inhibition of M2,M1 Muscarinic
receptors (Auto Receptors) at
presynaptic terminal enhancing
Ach release
Centrally Acting Neuromodulators
• Psychotropic agents like antidepressants, anxiolytics, and
antipsychotics are commonly used for the treatment of
functional GI disorders that do not respond to initial
conventional approaches.
• The rationale for their use is their potential to alter painprocessing pathways in the brain and, based on this concept,
they are now referred to as centrally acting neuromodulators
Other Therapies
1.
2.
3.
4.
Bismuth Salts
Peppermint Oil
Rifaximin
Herbal Preparation – Japan and china
Psychological Interventions
• Psychological interventions such as group support with
relaxation training, cognitive behavioral therapy,
psychotherapy, and hypnotherapy have been used in patients
with FD.
• Evidence to confirm the efficacy of psychological interventions
in FD is insufficient.
Download