Feasibility of Kraljic’s strategies: Due to the fact that this product is a leverage product, and because the buyer has more power, we originally planned to exploit the supplier. At the same time, we used a strategy of using phony facts to create the illusion that we have already purchased too many products in order to lower the buyer's price. Impact of info sharing and trust: The supplier did not share their costs with us, so we were unable to accurately assess the market price. The supplier initially provided a quote of 1200 Dollars, but due to the lower power of the supplier in the leverage product, we continued to negotiate down to 650 Dollars. However, the supplier's fake quoting during the negotiation process resulted in too significant a reduction in price, which could impact trust between both parties in the future. Ability to handle financial scenarios: If the supplier can provide the cost price, we will use advance payment, paying 80% of the cost upfront, and the remaining 20% after a correct inspection. Negotiation strategies: Despite the buyer having greater power, we are still willing to collaborate with the supplier if they offer a favorable price, similar to the collaboration between AEM and INTEL. Time pressure: Due to the influence of time pressure, we did not proceed with exploiting the supplier as originally planned. Instead, we selected a milder negotiation approach to quickly conclude the contract and transition to negotiations for the final product.