6202: Advanced Cost and Management Accounting Introduction DEFINITION OF ACCOUNTING Accounting is the process of identifying, measuring and communicating economic information about an entity to permit informed judgments and decisions by users of the information (Anthony et al, 1995) What economic information? Examples • Assets of the entity Liabilities of the entity Expenses & income of the entity Performance of the entity Financial position of the entity economic information users of the information Liquidity position of the entity Users of accounting information Management Investors: Shareholders/owners & lenders Creditors/ suppliers Debtors/customers Government The public/ Community Financial analysts Employees Branches of Accounting Financial Accounting Cost Accounting Management Accounting Accounting: Financial Accounting: (Stewardship Accounting) limits its activities in recording business transaction and determining financial results and position. Cost Accounting: (Control Accounting) takes the responsibility of determining cost of products and services and controlling costs with a view to maximizing profit. Management Accounting: (Decision making Accounting) takes the duty of helping management in planning and decision making. Relationship of Financial, Management, and Cost Accounting Product Costs FINANCIAL COST MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTIG ACCOUNTING Definition “Cost Accounting is the identification, • “It is the process of identifying, accumulation, assignment and analysis of production and activity cost data to measuring, accumulating, analyzing, provide information for external preparing, reporting, internal planning and control communicating interpreting, information and that of ongoing operations and special decisions.” managers use to fulfill organizational objectives.” Comparison of Financial and Managerial Accounting Financial Accounting Managerial Accounting External persons who make financial decisions Managers who plan for and control an organization Historical perspective Future emphasis 3. Verifiability versus relevance Emphasis on verifiability Emphasis on relevance for planning and control 4. Precision versus timeliness Emphasis on precision Emphasis on timeliness 5. Subject Primary focus is on the whole organization Focuses on segments of an organization 6. GAAP Must follow GAAP and prescribed formats Need not follow GAAP or any prescribed format Mandatory for external reports Not Mandatory 1. Users 2. Time focus 7. Requirement Difference Between Cost Accounting and Managerial Accounting Base Cost Accounting Managerial Accounting Meaning Cost Accounting is ascertaining the cost of Managerial accounting is one which enables management in doing its functions efficiently. Objects The primary object of Cost accounting is Managerial accounting is aims at representation of cost data or accounting information for management use. a process to determine the records, cost of products and services. Scope The scope of Cost accounting is not wide, it is apart of Managerial accounting Managerial accounting has wider scope. It includes Financial accounting, Cost accounting an statistics etc. Principles Under this system of cost accounting certain principles are followed. No principles is followed under the system of managerial accounting. Parties Both parties, internal and external have interested in costing Managerial accounting is specially designed for management or internal use. Principles and formats Cost accountancy have some established and set accounting principles and formats it is not so in the case accounting of the management Historical Perspective Cost and management information was considered to be of great importance in supporting the growth of large transportation, production and distribution enterprises during the 1850-1925 period in US. Historians have found examples of cost management information in records of 19th century manufacturers of textiles, machine tools, steel, nails and petroleum products. Textile Industry: the demand for the information can be traced back to the early stages of the industrial revolution in textile mills. Records of early 19th century textile mills show that textile mill managers received information about the hourly cost of converting raw material (cotton) into intermediate product (threads & yarn) & finished products (fabric) & the cost per pound of output by department and for each worker.The owner used such information for two different purposes: =>To control & improve efficiency =>For pricing & product mix decisions Railroad Industry: Due to the emergence of Railroad industry in the mid 19th century, new measures such as cost per gross ton mile, cost per passenger mile & the operating ratio were developed to help to evaluate the efficiency of their operating processes. Managers used these measures both for => operational control (to evaluate the efficiency of operations of local managers) => product costing (to measure the profitability of various types of business) Other Companies: Steel Mills measured daily the cost of materials. Labors & energy inputs used to produce steel & rails. They used the information: => to evaluate the performance of dept. managers, foreman & workers & to check the quality & mix of raw materials. => to evaluate investments that offered improvements for processes & products => for non-standardized products this information was the basis for pricing decisions 20th Century Developments During 20th century the large, diversified & complex companies required or demand more information to help them allocate physical, financial & human resources among their operating divisions & to monitor & control their diverse operations. Du Pont Company: A vertically integrated manufacturing organization using advanced techniques to generate and collect information to: => coordinate operations => monitor production & sales efficiencies => plan the growth among the company’s diverse activities => evaluate & control the performance of the company’s three main functional operating dept. manufacturing, distribution & purchasing. General Motors: the guiding operating philosophy of GE - “centralized control with decentralized responsibility ” Centralized control is accomplished by having periodic financial information about divisional operations & profitability. Characteristics of early centuries manufacturing environment & information requirements Mass production of few standardize products. Widely accepted the concepts of ‘economies of scale’. Developing measures to motivate & assess the efficiency of only the internal operating processes. There was little concern with measuring the costs of different products or even the periodic profit of the enterprise. One common characteristic was that all the companies measured the efficiency by which input resources were converted to finished products or sales revenue The organizations had a narrow product focus that enabled them to use simple summaries of output. Focused on directly measured cost The narrow product line created little demand to attempt to assign indirect costs to output product. Changing Manufacturing Environment Automation & cost concepts Flexible manufacturing systems Total quality management Value added activities Just-in-time concepts Activity based management Life cycle costing Target costing Management Accounting Management accounting, which is a more elaborate version of cost accounting needs to take a multidimensional focus in order to better serve the various and complex needs facing the management accountant. As a result, management accounting rests not only in accounting but also on organizational, behavioral, decisional, strategic and other foundations and dimensions. The Multidimensional Scope of Management Accounting Management accounting is generally understood as a process or as referring to the use of techniques. It has been defined as “the application of appropriate techniques and concepts in processing the historical and projected economic data of an entity to assist management in establishing a plan for reasonable economic objectives and in the making of rational decisions with a view towards achieving these objectives.” the emergent conceptual framework of management accounting started by the National Association of Accountants (NAA) defines it as: “the process of identification, measurement, accumulation, analysis, preparation, interpretation and communication of financial information used by management to plan, evaluate, and control within an organization and to assure the appropriate use of and accountability for its resources.” In fact, the 1961 AAA Management Accounting Committee, charged with determining the relevance of financial accounting concepts to management accounting, concluded that 1. the concepts underlying internal reporting differ in several important respects from those of external public reporting; 2. these differences are due to differences in the objectives of both areas; and 3. it is justified to develop a separate body of concepts applicable to internal reporting The objectives of management accounting are the first and essential steps to understand and interpret management accounting techniques. The management accounting concepts become true because they are based on accepted objectives. In spite of the importance of management accounting objectives, there has never been a formal attempt to accomplish this task. AAA committee 1972: Related to the planning functions of the managers. Related to organizational problem areas. Related to management control functions. Related to operating systems management by function, product, project or other segmentation of operations. More specifically the true objectives are defined as providing information and participating in the management process. Qualitative Characteristics of Management Accounting Information Management accounting information should have certain desirable properties so that benefits are achievable. In 1974 AAA Committee on Concepts and Standards—Internal Planning and Control offered certain closely related properties as representatives of the benefits of information or information systems: 1. Relevance/mutuality of objectives 2. Accuracy/precision/reliability 3. Consistency/comparability/uniformity 4. Verifiability/objectivity/neutrality/traceability 5. Aggregation 6. Flexibility/adaptability 7. Timeliness 8. Understandability/acceptability/motivation/fairness Management accounting concepts Management accounting concepts based on both the objectives and qualitative characteristics of management accounting process. In 1972, AAA identified measurement, communication, information, system, planning, feedback, control, and cost behavior as some of the management accounting concepts “which represent a necessary, if not minimum, foundation for the body of knowledge contained within the structure.” measurement has been defined as “an assignment of numerals to an entity’s past, present, or future economic phenomena, on the basis of past or present observation and according to rules.” This concept is very essential to management accounting. communication encompasses “the procedures by means of which one mechanism affects another mechanism.” Information represents significant data upon which action is based. It refers to those data that reduce the uncertainty on the part of the user. Thus, data produced by management accounting should be evaluated in terms of their informational content. Although not exhaustive, management accounting information includes the following categories: financial information resulting from the flow of financial resources within the organization, production information resulting from the physical flow of resources within the organization, personnel information resulting from the flow of people within the organization, and marketing information resulting from the interaction with the market for the organization’s products. System refers to an entity consisting of two or more interacting components or sub- systems intended to achieve a goal. Management accounting is generally a subsystem of the accounting information system, which is itself a subsystem of the total management information system within the organization. A management accounting system may be defined as the set of human and capital resources within an organization that is responsible for the production and dissemination of information deemed relevant for internal decision making. Planning refers to the management function of setting objectives, establishing policies, and choosing means of accomplishment. Planning may be practiced at different levels in the organization, from strategic to operational, and may have behavioral implications. Feedback refers to the output of a process that returns to become an input to the process in order to initiate control. It is basically a revision of the planning process to accommodate new environmental events. Control refers to monitoring and evaluation of performance to determine the degree of conformance of actions to plans. Ideally, planning precedes control, which is followed by a feedback corrective action or a feed-forward preventive action. Cost behavior cost results from the use of an asset for the generation of revenues. The identification, classification, and estimation of costs are essential to any evaluation of courses of action. DECISIONAL DIMENSIONS Anthony Framework - The decision systems are categorized as strategic planning, management control, and operational control. Simon Framework - Simon’s framework focuses on the question of problem solving by individuals regardless of their position within an organization. Simon maintains that all problem solving can be broken down into three distinct phases: intelligence, design, and choice. Simon’s framework also makes the distinction between programmed and nonprogrammed decisions Gorry–Scott Morton Framework - The Gorry–Scott Morton framework provides a combination of both Anthony and Simon’s frameworks in the form of a matrix that classifies decisions on both a structured-to-unstructured dimension and an operational-to-strategic dimension. This implies that the design of a management accounting support system is flexible enough to cope with the various complex demands. Forrester Framework - As developed by Professor Jay Forrester, the essence of industrial dynamics is that social systems such as business organizations can be understood through nonlinear feedback systems concepts. Decisions are made at multiple points throughout the system. Each resulting action generates information that can be used at several but not all decision points. This structure of cascaded and interconnected informationfeedback loops, when taken together, describes the industrial system. Forrester viewed management in terms of the sequence information-decision-action, with the decision-making process as a response to the gap between the objectives of the organization and its actual progress toward the accomplishment of these objectives. Thus, industrial dynamics views organizations from a control perspective. It is intended mostly as a method of designing organizational policies. Nevertheless, industrial dynamics is a useful framework for management accounting in several ways: 1. It places information as an explicit and integral part of organizational decision making. 2. The information’s function is to represent the physical values of the levels of various activities and entities in the organization. 3. It emphasizes the identification of decision points, objectives, and information requirements Dearden Framework - John Dearden observes that the concept of a single information system is “too large and all-encompassing to be a meaningful and useful classification.” He suggests to break down the systems and dataprocessing activities both horizontally and vertically. Horizontally, systems activities can be classified by the type of work performed; vertically, systems activities can be classified by the kind of information handled. The horizontal classification includes three stages: systems specification, data processing implementation, and programming. The vertical classification is based on the presence of three major information systems include financial, personnel, and logistics. THE BEHAVIORAL DIMENSION Management accounting is built on behavioral foundations. Its explicit aim is to affect the behavior of individuals in a desirable direction. To accomplish this purpose, management accounting has to be adapted to the different characteristics that shape the “cognitive makeup” of individuals within an organization and affect their performance. In general, these characteristics pertain to three factors: (1) the perception by the individual of what should be the objective function or goals in the firm; (2) the various factors likely to motivate the individual to perform; and (3) the decisionmaking model most relevant to particular contexts and most preferred by the individual. Thus, management accounting requires a good grasp of the behavioral concepts, namely, the objective function in management accounting, motivation theories, and models of decision making. Each of these concepts identifies factors and situations that influence individual behavior and indicates avenues for management accounting to adapt its services. The Shareholder Wealth Maximization Model - In a management accounting context, SWM implies an acceptance by management of budgeting and control standards, a rejection of slack budgeting or any sub optimizing behavior, and an adoption of management accounting techniques that are in the best interests of the owners of the firm. The Managerial Welfare Maximization Model – management may be tempted for personal benefits to pursue an objective other than shareholder welfare maximization. So rather than maximizing profits, the managers may maximize sales or assets, the rate of growth, or managerial utility. As a consequence, managers may engage in sub optimization schemes as long as they contribute to their own welfare. In a management accounting context, MWM implies a lesser acceptance by management of budgeting and control standards, a recourse to slack budgeting and any sub optimization behavior, a manipulation or avoidance within legality of full disclosure in order to present the firm’s operation favorably and, finally, adoption of management accounting techniques that are in the best interest of managers The Social Welfare Maximization Model - Under SOWM, the firm undertakes all projects that, in addition to the usual profitability objective, minimize the social costs and maximize social benefits created by the productive operations of the firm. Thus, under SOWM the firm is liable not only to the shareholders and managers, but also to the society at large. In adopting a more socially responsible attitude and responding to the pressures of new dimensions—social, human, and environmental— organizations may have to alter their main objective to include as an additional constraint the welfare of society at large. In a management accounting context, SOWM implies the developing of a social reporting system oriented toward the measurement of social performance, including not only social costs but also social benefits. It suggests the development of a new concept of organization performance that will be more indicative of the firm’s social responsibility than is provided by conventional accounting. Motivation Theories Need Theory Two-Factor Theory Value/Expectancy Theory Achievement Theory Equity Theory Models of Decision Making - The identification of the decision-making models most relevant to particular contexts and most preferred by particular individuals allows the management accountant to adapt the services to offer to the realities of the decision situation. The literature on decision making identifies five main perspectives: the “rational” manager view, the “satisficing” process-oriented view, the organizational proceedures view, the political view, and the individual differences view. THE STRATEGIC DIMENSION Management accounting is built on strategic foundations. First, management accounting provides a framework and a language of discourse for the three stages of strategy: preenactment, resolution, and implementation. Second, the conduct of management accounting differs for different distinctions in the strategic decision-making process. Third, it works best when there is a consequence between the decision of management control systems and types of control strategies. Finally, the new area of strategic management accounting requires management accounting to its competitors and to monitor the firm’s performance using strategic rather than tactical indicators. Accounting plays a role in the three stages of strategic change: preenactment, resolution, and implementation. Accounting provides “a framework for a language of discourse [and] the power to establish and maintain the credibility of issue allocations through its authority structures, accountability measures, and performance evaluations.” Basically, strategies need to be framed in an accounting language and supported by the authority of accounting techniques, indicators, and reports. Strategic accounting will supplant managerial accounting as a decisional framework because managerial accounting lacks strategic relevance. While cost analysis provides an assessment of the financial impact of managerial decision alternatives, strategic cost analysis will provide cost data for the development of the right strategy necessary to gain competitive advantage. THE ORGANIZATIONAL DIMENSION Organizational Structure - Management accounting rests not only on accounting but also on organizational foundations. It is this form of organizational structure that management often seeks to change to improve the organization’s functioning. In turn, elements of the organizational structure may affect cost accounting—its techniques, approaches, and role in the firm. The strongest influences on cost accounting are the organizational chart, the line and staff relationships, and the role of the controller in the organization.