Nora Rachman Securities Expert Post-Doctoral Fellow Sao Paulo Law School - Fundação Getulio Vargas, Brazil November 2013 Introduction Specific approach of ABS legal framework: categories of assets Export assets Agribusiness Real state Finance Other corporate assets Practice Questions to future work Securities Assignment Creditor Assets / services $ Credits Debtors SPE $ Investors No unified regulation Targeted to specific categories of assets Export assets Agribusiness Real state Finance Other corporate assets Well established and common mechanism but restricted to large-sized corporations. Cross-border issuance of securities: no definition on structure to be used, trust as SPE securities issued are trust certificates The introduction of specific securities for agribusiness securitization in Brazil aims to foster investments and finance businesses related to agricultural products, by-products, and waste of economic value. The launching platform of securitization in Brazil Evolution with different rules and formats: 1) Mutual investment funds (via real estate investment funds) 2) Securitization of receivables (via securitization companies or via FDIC) 1997: CRI - certificates of real estate receivables. Real estate securitization companies as the securitization vehicles. Low volume of securities due to: lack of knowledge within the local investor community as to how to analyze and price assetbacked securities. Lack of standardized financing documents among originators. Need to incentivate a secondary market of CRIs 2001 – Creation of the receivables investment fund (FIDC): investment funds regulated by CVM. Managed by financial institutions FIDC must invest at least 50% of its assets in credit rights or instruments representing such rights. Qualifying assets: financial, commercial and industrial sectors. Only qualified investors, as defined by CVM, can buy securities from these funds. A relatively straight-forward registration process for public offerings of securities issued by these funds, A large, well-established and highly disseminated fund industry. Credits and other assets of the portfolio shall be kept in custody Shares may be traded on the secondary market Further regulation: increased disclosure of information, definition of third party responsibilities, portfolio composition and concentration limits. Funds cannot enter into bankruptcy, thus mitigating issuer risk. (court tested) They cannot issue or contract debt. High level of tax efficiency Financial institutions are the originators, who assign their credits to securitization companies, which in turn issue securities backed by these receivables An important provision is the assignor’s joint liability for the payment of receivables. Concerns of Central Banks: capital requirements more off-the balance assets Combination of legal instruments assignment of credits and issuance of securities. Mostly used: negotiable instruments from retail sales, revenue from services, credit card invoices, receivables from the automotive sector and commercial aviation . Fraud allegations at Banco Cruzeiro do Sul: allegation of capital shortfall and suspicions of using FDICs to inflate assets. This is currently being investigated Breach of obligations related to the FDIC management (including custody services) Sale of FDIC shares to non-qualified investors Irregularity in the opinion of FDIC independent auditors Broad principles of civil law x importance of specific regulation (by type of asset) 1) Real estate financing: legislation contributes to the development of the real estate market, and at the same time to the creation of secondary trading of securities issued in these processes. 2) Banking securitization: legislation does not target the development, but the controlled use of this type of operation. Market regulation x development 1) development of securitization in each country depends less on the law that governs the operation internally and more on the degree of development of its capital market. 2) Use of available mechanisms available in Law have bigger impact than the creation of new statutes. What is the legal nature of securities issued? How to enable a single model for the effectiveness of the assignment of receivables? It is feasible to require mandatory rating? Considering that the over-reliance on credit ratings has been one of the factors cited as contributing to the global financial crisis, should we replace them with alternative standards? Which ones? When it comes to financial conglomerates, there may be a potential conflict of interests due to the proximity between the bank institution (issuer of securities) and the fund managers? How can the interests of the fund and its shareholders be preserved? nora.rachman@gmail.com