The Problem with Acceleration James Vesenka (jvesenka@une.edu) Department of Chemistry and Physics University of New England Physics Biddeford, ME 04005 NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 1 Motivation UNE: Modeling Instruction Student centered, guided inquiry Studio physics: observe & analyze 1st Emphasis on Multiple Representations A continuing challenge: The Ratio Velocity, acceleration, etc. (units) Slope of graph (units) Trigonometry & Scaling (comparison) Assessment: TUG&K NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 2 Naïve Physics Student gravity torque F=ma Disconnected Factons kinematics impulse energy projectiles centripetal force vectors momentum rotation units NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 3 Experienced Physicist “Expert” Thinker http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 4 Model Approach: Mechanics Conservation of Energy ΔE = W + Q + R Constant Force Particle v≠constant ΣF=ma Restoring Force Particle: F=-kΔx Free Particle Impulsive Force v=constant ΣF=0 Particle: ΣFΔt=Δp Central Force Particle: F=mv2/r (in) NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 5 E.g. Tumble Buggy Reality <-> Perception <-> Mental Model Verbal Physical Phenomena Diagrammatic Graphical Mental Picture Mathematical NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 6 1. 2. 3. 1. 2. 3. Tumble Buggy Motion What do you observe? Moves at constant speed Moves (mostly) in a line Lights blink, wheels turn, noisy… What can you measure (units too)? Position (“X” in meters) Time (“t” in seconds) Buggy color, blink frequency, etc… What are the constants? (speed) NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 7 How does __ depend on __? So we have “variables” X and t. Which variable is independent (you control). Which variable is dependent upon the variable you control? Depends on how you collect data… We will use a metronome as our timer: http://www.metronomeonline.com/ NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 8 Whiteboard Discourse Diagrammatic 3 +X(m) 2 Graphical y = mx + b X=(+0.4m/s)t+0.5m 2 1 t=0 Δx 1 <-b Mathematical Δt x = vt + xi <v>≡Δx/Δt Average t(s) velocity 0 2 4 Verbal: For every second that passes the buggy travels +0.4 meter every second from an initial position of 0.5 meter in the positive x direction. NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 9 Summary of Modeling Cycle Consensus Pre-lab Paradigm Lab Operational Whiteboard Discourse Application Graph, Math Exam Definitions Diagram, Verbal Refine No Test-Works? NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Yes Page 10 Interactive and Phun constructivist vs transmissionist cooperative inquiry vs lecture/demonstration student-centered vs teacher-centered active engagement vs passive reception student activity vs teacher demonstration student articulation vs teacher presentation lab-based vs textbook-based Satisfies state and national learning results Materials and Assessments: modeling.asu.edu Modeling Workshop Kennebunk Maine: http://www.uukennebunk.org NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 11 The Problem of the Ratio What Arnold Arons has to say. As applied to velocity and accleration. How to help visualize kinematics. The Motion Map. NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 12 Arnold Arons “One of the most severe and widely prevalent gaps in cognitive development of students at secondary and early college levels is the failure to have mastered reasoning involving ratios.” “This disability, among the very large number of students who suffer from it, is one of the most serious impediments to their study of science.” Teaching Introductory Physics – Chapter 1 Section 6 NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 13 Verbal Representation Arons: “Linguistic elements play an essential, underlying role in the development of the capacity for arithmetical reasoning with ratios and proportion.” Lawson3 (1984): “a necessary … condition for the acquisition of proportional reasoning during adolescence is the prior internalization of key linguistic elements or argumentation.” NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 14 Arons Ctd. Failure to do so Fear of Mathematics “This problem will not be rectified until we, in the colleges and universities, produce elementary teachers who have mastered arithmetical reasoning sufficiently thoroughly to lead their pupils into articulating lines of reasoning and explanation in their own words.” Solution: Use Whiteboards dammit! Teaching Introductory Physics – Chapter 1 Section 10 NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 15 Whiteboards Can examine different dependencies NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 16 Clicker ? A ball is thrown upward (+z) and returns to earth. The motion described below is AFTER the ball leaves the hand to BEFORE it is captured by the hand. What is the direction of acceleration at three parts of its motion? Top Up Down Motion of Ball 1 2 3 4 5 Up down down down up up Top of Flight down 0 0 up 0 Down down down up up down NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 17 Old Lab Dynamics track and cart, photogates or motion detector. Beautiful data and graphs… NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 18 Old Lab …little understanding. …math models can be problematic Slope Value Math Model x vs. t2 (1/4)a 0.092 m/s2 YUCK! v vs. t a 0.24 m/s/s v = at v2 vs. x 2a 0.45m2/s2/m v2=2a∆x Motivation: Annenburg CPB’s Mechanical Universe Online Metronome NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 19 New Lab Low Tech Solution. Beautiful graphs and data… …great math & diagrammatic models using a highly visual and tactile process. Slope Value x vs. t2 (1/2)a 0.024 m/s2 v vs. t a 0.046 m/s/s v = at v2 vs. x 2a 0.089m2/s2/m € v2=2a∆x NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Math Model Δx = 1 2 at2 Page 20 Dangerous Short Cuts An object travels a distance d in an arbitrary time interval t to define the average velocity and acceleration: v = d t →a = v t →d = 1 2 at 2 “The students are not informed that the meaning of the symbols was changed in the derivations that followed, and many emerge with little understanding of either the physical concepts of velocity and € acceleration or the algebraic equations.” It is much safer to be explicit: < v >= Δx Δt →a = Δv Δt → Δx = NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 1 2 aΔt 2 Page 21 Faster and Faster Particle 4 +x 16 x(m) 3 How do we linearize this data? Workshop 9 tomorrow 2 4 1 t=0 1 0 1 NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 2 3 4 t(s) Page 22 “Kinematics Stack” Bonus: a≡ = = = = Δv 4 +x x(m) 16 Δt vf − vi 9 tf − ti − 3 4 1 8 v(m/s) t(s) 0 t(s) 3s − 2s + 3s − 2s 2 1 a v t=0 a(m/s/s) 2 0 NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 t(s) 4Page 23 Motion Map the Following +x x(m) 80 60 40 20 0 v(m/s) t(s) 0 t(s) a(m/s/s) 0 1 NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 2 3 4 t(s) Page 24 t=0 a v a≡ = = = = Δt vf − vi Motion Map Result 1 x(m) 80 2 60 Bonus: Δv +x tf − ti 40 3 − 20 t(s) t(s) 0 0 3s − 2s + 3s − 2s 4 -40 v(m/s) 0 -10 1 a(m/s/s) NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 2 3 4 t(s) Page 25 “Kinematics Stack” Bonus: a≡ = = = = Δv Δt vf − vi tf − ti − 3s − 2s 4 3 2 1 + 3s − 2s t=0 a v +x x(m) 16 9 4 1 8 v(m/s) 0 -2 a(m/s/s) NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 t(s) t(s) t(s) 4Page 26 TUG&K Results (R Beichner) Test for Understanding Graphs in Kinematics: less (technology) is more (understanding). 9;):)6*." 9-6*:)6*." 748)"2345+." <*=>5-"?2@$'A" BCD)E*=;)"?2@F!A" /)001-"20-66." :;4>5,-+40"?2@&GA" /)001-"2345+." ()*)+,-+." !" #!" $!" %!" NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 &!" '!!" '#!" Page 27 David Dellwo: https://www.iupui.edu/~josotl/index.php NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 28 Acknowledgements Thanks to Danielle Parent, Aubrie Dickinson, Ashley Ruggieara, Kerra Gearinger & Shawna Hatfield Thanks to Susan McKay and Maine RISE Center for the invitation. Thank you for listening. NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 29 Faster and Faster Workshop x(m) Observables: Prediction How does _____ depend on _____ Procedure: NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 0 t(s) - v(m/s) + Constants: t(s) - a(m/s/s) + Measureables: t(s) Page 30 Faster and Faster Workshop Data Table: x(m) 0 Results Linearized t(s) Math Model: 0 - v(m/s) + Math Model: t(s) NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 31 v(m/s) Faster and Faster Workshop Linearized Math Model: ∆x(m) 0 Motion Map: Results Grid: +x 0 Consensus Math Models: slope x vs t2 v vs t v2 vs ∆x NQLB – Orono 6/23-24/11 Page 32