Tab. 1. Models of survival () and reencounter (p) probabilities for Dupont’s lark males
at the Ebro valley. Subscripts denote constant (.), time (t), and subpopulation (n) effects.
The Cormack-Jolly-Seber model with subpopulation-specific rates in survival and
reencounter  (n * t) p (n * t) fit the data adequately (global test, chi-square = 10.43, d.f. = 10,
P = 0.403; one-tailed directional test for transience, Z = 1.63, P = 0.051; signed test for
trap-dependence, Z = -0.49, P = 0.63) and was used as the starting point in model
selection. We show AICc values, differences in AICc with respect to the top-ranked
model (AICc), relative weight of evidence (AICc weight), number of parameters (np),
and deviance of each candidate model. Only the 14 most probable models (with highest
AICc) are shown.
Model
 (t1(t2=t3)) p (.)
 (t1(t2=t3)) p (t1(t2=t3))
 (t1(t2=t3)) p (t)
 (t) p (.)
 (t) p (n)
 (t) p (t)
 (.) p (.)
 (n * t) p (n)
 (.) p (n)
 (n * t) p (.)
 (n) p (n)
 (n) p (.)
 (n * t) p (t)
 (n * t) p (n * t)
AICc
AICc
AICc weight
np
Deviance
275.76
277.71
277.84
277.89
277.98
289.94
286.51
286.98
287.16
287.85
288.32
288.50
290.96
291.42
0.00
1.95
2.07
2.12
2.21
4.17
10.74
11.21
11.39
12.08
12.55
12.74
14.09
15.71
0.392
0.148
0.139
0.135
0.129
0.049
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
2
3
4
4
6
5
2
12
4
10
6
4
11
15
36.5
36.4
34.4
34.5
30.3
34.4
47.2
26.1
43.7
31.5
40.6
45.1
31.3
23.7
1