ROAD SAFETY AUDIT Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line Town of Winchendon June 2012 Prepared for: Massachusetts Department of Transportation Prepared by: Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates 38 Chauncy Street Boston, MA 02111 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Table of Contents Background ................................................................................................................................. 2 Project Data................................................................................................................................. 5 Project Location Description ..................................................................................................... 5 Road Safety Audit Observations ...............................................................................................6 Safety Issue #1. Safety Issue #2. Safety Issue #3. Safety Issue #4. Safety Issue #5. Safety Issue #6. Safety Issue #7. Safety Issue #8. Access Management ........................................................................................... 7 Drowsy and/or Distracted Drivers ...................................................................... 9 Passing Zones ................................................................................................... 10 Climbing Lanes/Merge Areas ........................................................................... 11 Deceleration Lanes ........................................................................................... 12 Signage ............................................................................................................. 13 Drainage............................................................................................................ 13 Pedestrian Conditions ....................................................................................... 14 Potential Safety Enhancements ...............................................................................................14 List of Appendices Appendix A. Appendix B. Appendix C. Appendix D. RSA Meeting Agenda RSA Audit Team Contact List Detailed Crash Data Additional Information List of Figures Figure 1. Figure 2. Locus Map.............................................................................................................................. 3 Gardner Road at Commercial Street/Dunkin Donuts/Irving Gas Station ............................... 4 List of Tables Table 1. Table 2. Participating Audit Team Members ....................................................................................... 5 Summary of Potential Safety Enhancements ....................................................................... 16 Page 1 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Background The Road Safety Audit (RSA) focused on the segment of Gardner Road (Route 140) in Winchendon, Massachusetts from just south of Teel Road to the Gardner City line. Within this segment, #93 Gardner Road has an equivalent property damage only (EPDO) that qualifies it as a top 5% high crash location within the Montachusett Regional Planning Commission (MRPC) area. The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) has determined that the Town of Winchendon would be eligible to receive Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding for resurfacing of this roadway segment if a RSA were conducted and the proposed design incorporated the safety improvements identified in the RSA. The RSA study area is illustrated in Figure 1. According to crash records provided by the Town of Winchendon Police Department, 15 crashes (or 45%) occurred in the vicinity the Dunkin’ Donuts/Irving Gas Station Driveways located at #93 Gardner Road from March 2008 to December 2010 (see Figure 2). Since 2010, Commercial Drive was constructed opposite the #93 Gardner Road southern driveway and provides access to an approximately 176-acre business park that is only currently occupied by a small manufacturing facility with a deck hockey recreational facility; the facility manufactures deck hockey blades and pucks and has national deck hockey league games on weekends. According to Town officials, additional future development is planned off of Commercial Street within the business park. Meanwhile, 18 other crashes were reported along the approximately 2.5 mile stretch of Gardner Road between just south of Teel Road to the Gardner city line during the same time period. The segment of Gardner Road from just south of Teel Road to the Gardner city line is an approved Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) project due to be redesigned by MassDOT District 2 (Project #607219). The District 2FFY2013 TIP project will consist of safety improvements and roadway resurfacing; the project is partially programmed with Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds, eligible due to crash history in the corridor. While not included as part of the current safety and resurfacing project, the RSA team noted safety issues north of Teel Road and south of the Gardner city line. To the north of Teel Road, Gardner Road falls under Town of Winchendon jurisdiction; safety enhancements along that stretch of roadway could be considered for implementation by the Town. South of the Gardner city line, a previously identified high lane-departure crash corridor, Route 140 (Green Street) lies within MassDOT District 3 and falls under City of Gardner jurisdiction. District 2 should consider the feasibility of expanding the resurfacing project into Gardner in coordination with District 3 and the City of Gardner. The MRPC conducted a corridor study along Route 140 in January 2012 (Westminster – Gardner – Winchendon Route 140 North Corridor Profile) that included the section of Gardner Road evaluated as part of this RSA. The study included an evaluation and recommendations of environmental, traffic, and safety conditions along the corridor. The study is included in Appendix D. In general, the RSA is intended to identify potential safety improvements that can be evaluated and included as part of current and/or future design efforts for resurfacing/reconstruction. The short-term, low-cost potential improvements could be considered by the responsible agency for implementation prior to resurfacing, as appropriate. Page 2 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner Town Line, Winchendon Old Gardne r Rd. Figure 1. Locus Map Rd. Gard athway ral P ent th C Nor ner R d. (Ro ute 1 40) WINCHENDON 93 Gardner Rd. Dunkin’ Donuts/ Irving Gas ASHBURNHAM Teel N DO R NC NE WI D R GA N HE Not to scale. Source: Mass GIS Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Not to scale. Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner Town Line, Winchendon Figure 2. Gardner Road at Commercial Street/Dunkin’ Donuts/Irving Gas 93 Gardner Rd. Dunkin’ Donuts/ Irving Gas Co m m er al Dr iv e Gar den er R oad (Ro ute 140 ) ci Source: Google Earth Not to scale. Not to scale. Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Project Data The audit team conducted an RSA for the Gardner Road corridor between Teel Road and the Gardner city line in Winchendon, Massachusetts, on Thursday, June 14, 2012. The RSA agenda appears in Appendix A. Table 1 lists the audit team members and their affiliations. Appendix B provides contact information for all team members. Prior to the RSA, in order to begin assessing possible safety issues, the team reviewed collision diagrams and a crash detail summary based on crash records supplied by the Winchendon Police Department for the corridor. Appendix C provides the detailed crash data for the study area. Table 1. Participating Audit Team Members Audit Team Member Ellen DeCoteau David Walsh Thomas Smith Scott Livingston John M. Deline Jr. John White George Snow Ron Muller Tom Healey Laurie Scarbrough John Larareo Bao Lang Douglas Halpert Corey O’Connor Bonnie Polin Lisa Schletzbaum Ted Brovitz Joe SanClemente Agency/Affiliation Town of Winchendon – Planner Winchendon Police Department Winchendon Fire Department Winchendon Police Department Winchendon Public Works Department Winchendon Planning Board Montachusett Regional Planning Commission Ron Muller & Associates Nouria Energy – Irving Site MassDOT, District 2 MassDOT, District 2 MassDOT, District 2 MassDOT Highway Division Safety Section MassDOT Highway Division Safety Section MassDOT Highway Division Safety Section MassDOT Highway Division Safety Section Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates Project Location Description The RSA focused on Gardner Road (Route 140) between Teel Road and the Gardner city line in Winchendon. Gardner Road generally runs north-south between Spring Street (Route 12) and the Gardner city line, where it turns into Green Street. According to MassDOT Office of Transportation Planning 2010 Road Inventory File, Gardner Road is classified as a rural principal arterial and falls under MassDOT jurisdiction between Teel Road and the Gardner city line; the jurisdiction of Gardner Road was Page 5 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. transferred from the Town of Winchendon to MassDOT approximately 10 years ago. North of Teel Road, Gardner Road falls under Town of Winchendon jurisdiction. In Gardner, Green Street (Route 140) lies within MassDOT District 3 and falls under City of Gardner jurisdiction. Within the vicinity of the study area, Gardner Road generally consists of one travel lane in each direction with passing zones and climbing lanes provided at several locations to allow motorists to pass slower vehicles. The speed limit is posted at 50 miles per hour (mph) in both directions. Route 140 serves as a primary north-south connection through the study area and provides a connection to other key regional roadways such as Route 2, Route 12, and Route 101. According to team members, the corridor is well utilized in the fall during foliage season; the winter as a route to ski areas in New Hampshire and Vermont; and other destinations throughout the year such as Mount Monadnock in Jaffrey, New Hampshire and two local State Parks, including Lake Dennison and Otter River State Parks. Route 140 also serves as the main roadway linking Winchendon and Gardner and provides a connection to major employment centers in the area such as Heywood Hospital in Gardner and Wachussett Community College. There are numerous driveways throughout the corridor serving private residents and some small businesses. The North Central Pathway, a paved multi-use path runs north-south between Gardner and Winchendon just to the east of Route 140. Road Safety Audit Observations Based on field observations on Thursday, June, 14, 2012, the RSA team determined that segment of Gardner Road (Route 140) between Teel Road and the Gardner city line in Winchendon have the following issues that affect safety: Access Management; Drowsy Drivers and/or Distracted Drivers; Passing Zones; High Travel Speeds; Climbing Lanes/Merge Areas; Deceleration Lanes; Signage; Drainage; and Limited Pedestrian Accommodations. The following sections describe in more detail the safety issues and potential enhancements determined during the RSA. Several of these issues require further study and engineering judgment to determine the feasibility of implementing the improvements to address them. Page 6 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Safety Issue #1. Access Management Observations: According to crash records provided by the Town of Winchendon Police Department from January 2008 through December 2010, 15 of the 33 crashes (45%) reported along the corridor occurred in the vicinity of #93 Gardner Road. While note included in the detailed crash data, team members also noted that a fatal crash involving a tractor trailer occurred at this location in April 2012 that resulted in the truck knocking down the gas station sign. Large curb cuts and confusing/hard to read signage at #93 Gardner Road Of the 15 crashes reported at this location, 8 were rear-end type involving motorists traveling along Gardner Road northbound and attempting to make a left-turn into #93 Gardner Road. The property, which is located along the west side of the roadway, is currently occupied by a convenience store/Dunkin’ Donuts with drive through and a Irving Gas Station with separate pump stations for diesel and regular fuel. In the vicinity of this property, Gardner Road consists of one travel lane and a wide shoulder in each direction; however, dedicated turning lanes are not provided and vehicles are allowed to pass in both directions along this segment of the roadway – the passing zone ends just north of #93 Gardner Road. Team members noted that these rear-end crashes, which the Police noted 6 of the 8 crashes reported were the result of driver inattention, are likely due to motorists unexpectedly slowing down (from the 50 mph speed limit) in the Gardner Road northbound through travel lane to make a left-turn into the Dunkin’ Donuts/gas station. During field observations, team members noted that motorists traveling along Gardner Road northbound must use the shoulder to pass left-turning vehicles. Team members also observed that undefined site access and unclear signage at the Dunkin’ Donuts/gas station add to driver confusion and hesitation for motorists making a leftturn into the site from Gardner Road northbound. This likely further contributes to the occurrence of rear-end crashes at this location, specifically: A motorist using the shoulder to pass a left-turning vehicle along Gardner Road northbound Page 7 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. The Dunkin’ Donuts/gas station is currently provided with 3 wide curb cuts, including two on the north and south ends of the site that are each approximately 80 to 90 feet in width and one in the center of the site that is nearly 140 feet in width. The wide curb cuts allow motorists to enter the site at high speeds (often diagonally through the driveway) and also result in undefined entry and exit points that cause conflicts between entering and exiting motorists. There are commonly multiple vehicles exiting at the same time; Internal circulation at the Dunkin’ Donuts/gas station site is segmented due to the drive-through configuration located in the middle of the site between the store/nondiesel gas pumps (southern side of site) and the diesel filling area (northern side of site). For example, motorists that use the non-diesel fuel pumps near the southern end of the site that then wish to use the drivethrough, must travel northbound through the center driveway parallel to the edge of the roadway; landscaping and drive-through. Do Not Enter (R5-1) signs located at the center driveway directly in front of the Dunkin’ Donuts drive-through entrances are positioned too far back from the edge of roadway and are positioned such that they are not visible to motorists making a right-turn into the site from Gardner Road southbound. Furthermore, team members noted that these signs are generally ignored by motorists because it is unclear how they can access the drivethrough or drivers that do obey the sign generally recognize it too late after slowing down only to speed up to turn at the next driveway entrance. A representative for the Irving Gas station noted that the signage was added a few months ago following the fatal crash in April at the request of the Town in an effort to try to improve site circulation; however, based on field observations the team noted that they are generally ignored and only add to motorist confusion; Signage for the gas station is currently missing after being knocked down by a tractor trailer during the fatal crash that occurred in April; and Wayfinding signage for the drive-through directing motorists to the northern driveway is small and difficult to read, particularly given the 50 mph speed limit on the roadway. Circulation at #93 Gardner Street is segmented by While not included in the crash history reviewed by the RSA team, Commercial Drive was recently constructed (shown under construction in Figure 2) on the eastern side of Gardner Road opposite the #93 Gardner Road southern driveway. Commercial Drive provides access to an Page 8 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. approximately 176-acre business park that is currently partially occupied by a small manufacturing facility with a deck hockey recreational facility. Town officials noted that additional development was planned within the business park that would increase traffic volumes at the intersection and may add to motorist confusion at the intersection. Potential Enhancements: 1. Evaluate the feasibility/appropriateness of providing a dedicated left-turn lane at the Gardner Road northbound and southbound approaches to provide a safe location for motorists to make left-turns into #93 Gardner Road and Commercial Drive. Consider the safety benefits of maintaining a wide shoulder along each side of the roadway to facilitate right-turns (and reduce the potential for rear-end crashes) and consider providing a raised median in advance of turning lane(s) to help the transition. Storage lanes should consider potential future increase in traffic demand at Commercial Drive. 2. Work with landowner of #93 Gardner Road to evaluate ways to improve site circulation, replace wayfinding signage, and narrow/consolidate driveways, in accordance with the access management guidelines per the MassDOT Project Development and Design Guide, in conjunction with the road resurfacing project to reduce driver confusion and improve safety. Consider heavy vehicle access requirements at the diesel fueling area. 3. Remove “Do Not Enter” (R5-1) signs at #93 Gardner Road center driveway to reduce motorist confusion. Landowner to contact Town authority that requested this signage prior to removing and note the recommendation from this RSA. Safety Issue #2. Drowsy and/or Distracted Drivers Observations: Of the 33 crashes reported along the Route 140 corridor, 4 (or 12%) involved driver fatigue and/or falling asleep. All of these crashes occurred during daylight hours on dry pavement; two of the crashes involved the motorist crossing the centerline, while the other two involved the motorist running off the road on the right-hand side. From review of the crash data, the team noted a high incidence of crashes throughout the corridor occurring during October (6 or 18%) and November (8 or 24%), which is likely due to an increase in traffic volume through the area as a result of tourists destined for New Hampshire and Vermont during the fall foliage season; 2 of the 4 crashes involving driver fatigue/falling asleep occurred during October/November. Team members noted that driver fatigue along the corridor may also be the result of shift changes at the nearby Heywoord Hospital and North Central Correctional Institute in Gardner. Similarly, a team member suggested that the monotonous nature of the corridor may also be a contributing factor to driver fatigue. Page 9 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Potential Enhancements: 1. Consider the appropriateness/ feasibility of installing centerline rumble stripes and shoulder rumble strips/stripes along Route 140 to alert fatigued drivers when they leave the travel way and reduce the occurrence of crossover and run-off-the-road crashes. Sample of a shoulder rumble strip (left) and a centerline rumble stripe (right). Source: FHWA, http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/memo071008/npccacsc/ 2. Consider appropriateness of installing recessed retroreflective centerline markers to improve visibility of centerline markings in low light conditions. Safety Issue #3. Passing Zones Observations: Sight distance for passing zone along Gardner Road (Route 140) appears to be limited by horizontal curve Passing zones are currently provided at several locations in both directions along the approximately 2.5 mile long corridor. According to police records 2 crashes involved motorists attempting to pass another vehicle and then failing to return to their lane in time. One of the crashes involved a motorcycle traveling along Gardner Road southbound attempting to pass a vehicle and resulting in a sideswipe same direction crash, while the other crash involved a motorist traveling along Gardner Road northbound and forcing a vehicle traveling in the opposite direction off of the road. During field observations, team members noted several existing passing zones located on or near horizontal and vertical curves in the roadway alignment that appeared to have limited sight lines, particularly given the prevailing travel speeds. Page 10 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Lastly, a passing zone is currently provided in both directions in the vicinity of #93 Gardner Road/Commercial Drive; however, passing is generally prohibited just north or south of that location. Team members commented that the presence of passing zone at this particular location seemed the opposite of what one would expect given the potential for conflicts with left-turning vehicles entering or exiting #93 Gardner Road and Commercial Drive. Potential Enhancements: 1. Consider restricting passing in the vicinity of #93 Gardner Road/Commercial Drive to reduce the potential for conflicts with left-turn turning vehicles at the adjacent businesses and to improve overall safety. 2. Re-evaluate passing zone warrants along the entire corridor in accordance with the current American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Policy on Geometric Design of Streets and Highways. Consider the appropriateness of passing zones in the vicinity of driveways/side streets and horizontal/vertical curves. Safety Issue #4. Climbing Lanes/Merge Areas Observations: Given the rolling terrain along the Gardner Road corridor, uphill truck climbing lanes are provided at several locations. According to the crash data, 2 sideswipe same direction crashes were reported just north of the Gardner city line involving motorists in the merge area of a climbing lane. During field observations the team noted that the merge locations at the end of the climbing lanes appeared to be according to a previous MassDOT truck climbing lane detail but not in accordance with current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for passenger vehicles given the prevailing travel speeds along the corridor and the prevalence of motorists passing other slower vehicles. Some of the team members questioned whether the lanes were necessary and noted that the addition of the lanes only results in aggressive driving as motorists race to pass as many vehicles as possible before the merge area. It was noted by the District Traffic Engineer that signage and pavement markings of the climbing lanes do not appear to meet current MUTCD standards. Team members also noted that the location of the merge areas with respect to the crest vertical curves along the roadway alignment may reduce the ability for a motorist to perceive and react to an upcoming merge area. Lastly, a climbing lane merge area along Gardner Road southbound is located in the vicinity of a driveway that provides access to a church along the eastern side of the roadway just north of the Gardner city line. Motorists attempting to merge in this area are often traveling fast to pass another vehicle and are caught by surprise when drivers in front of them slow down to turn left into the church. Team members also noted problems with speeding in the vicinity of the lane drop areas as motorists try to pass slower vehicles before the climbing lane ends. Page 11 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Potential Enhancements: 1. Review roadway grades and heavy vehicle truck activity along the corridor and determine if the climbing lanes are still warranted in accordance with current AASHTO standards. If warranted, consider the appropriateness/feasibility of lengthening the merge areas to improve safety. 2. Review, and update where appropriate, pavement markings and signage for climbing lanes per current MUTCD standards. 3. Re-evaluate the location of the climbing lanes and merge areas with respect to side streets and driveways along the corridor to reduce the potential for conflicts with merging and turning vehicles. 4. Continue to enforce travel speeds along the corridor. Safety Issue #5. Deceleration Lanes Observations: A deceleration lane is currently provided along Gardner Road northbound for Old Gardner Road; team members commented that the taper length for the deceleration lane seemed short given the prevailing speeds along the corridor. Vehicles were observed to be driving/ decelerating along the shoulder prior to turning. Potential Enhancements: Consider the appropriateness of improving the deceleration lane along Gardner Road northbound for the intersection with Old Gardner Road. Taper length of deceleration lane appears to be short along Gardner Road northbound at Old Gardner Road Page 12 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Safety Issue #6. Signage Observations: Currently no advance warning signage is provided for Commercial Drive, which provides access to the newly constructed business park, or the businesses at #93 Gardner Road. Team members commented that it would be helpful to provide advance signage to alert approaching motorists of entering and exiting vehicles at these locations. Team members also commented that the Commercial Drive sign located on the northeast corner of the intersection is difficult to see due to the coloring/design of the sign and its placement with respect to the edge of the roadway. Finally, members noted that a monument sign for the industrial park was under consideration at the corner of Gardner Road/Commercial Drive. Potential Enhancements: 1. Consider the appropriateness of installing intersection warning signs such as a cross road symbol (W2-1) along Gardner Road northbound and southbound in advance of #93 Gardner Road Driveways/Commercial Drive (short-term). If Commercial Drive is accepted by the Town in the future (currently private), then consider safety benefits of installing a more detailed warning sign indicating the name of the roadway and illustration of intersection configuration (long-term). 2. Consider the appropriateness of replacing the Commercial Drive street sign with a more legible sign and relocating to a more visible location. 3. Ensure that proposed monument sign for the industrial park is positioned such that it is not located within the state highway layout and does not impact sight lines. Safety Issue #7. Drainage Observations: According to RSA team members, drainage is generally good along the corridor although the pavement condition along Gardner Road north of Teel Road is in poor shape. Of the 33 crashes reported along the corridor, 7 (or 21%) occurred on wet pavement including; one of these crashes involved a single vehicle that hydroplaned in the vicinity of #114 Gardner Road. Potential Enhancements: Evaluate drainage conditions along the corridor during next rain event to identify any areas subject to ponding that could result in loss of control of a vehicle. Page 13 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Safety Issue #8. Pedestrian Conditions Observations: The North Central Pathway runs north-south between Gardner and Winchendon just to the east of Route 140. During the RSA, team members commented that cyclists using the pathway occasionally try to cross Gardner Road in the vicinity of Commercial Drive to access the convenience store and Dunkin’ Donuts located at #93 Gardner Road; however, pedestrian accommodations across Gardner Road are not provided. Subsequent to the RSA, a Town of Winchendon Planning Board member reported that pedestrians originating from the deck hockey recreational facility on Commercial Drive have been observed crossing Gardner Road to access the food attractions at the #93 Gardner Road. Food concessions are currently planned at the facility in the future; however, they may not completely eliminate the pedestrian demand across Gardner Road. Town officials expressed concern about cyclists/pedestrians crossing at this location, particularly given the high vehicle travel speeds along Gardner Road (the posted speed limit is 50 mph) and the history of crashes. Potential Enhancements: Review pedestrian/bicycle crossing conditions on Gardner Road in the vicinity of Commercial Drive/#93 Gardner Road. Potential Safety Enhancements Based on its observations and discussions, the RSA team identified the issues and possible enhancements that could improve safety along Gardner Road (Route 140) between Teel Road and the Gardner city line in Winchendon. Many of the enhancements identified during the RSA have already been evaluated as part of the design process, although further design work or consideration may be necessary to determine the feasibility of making some of the improvements. Short-term enhancements include: Remove confusing signage; and Restrict passing near #93 Gardner Road/Commercial Drive. To enhance the safety of the intersection, the long-term enhancements are to: Improve access management; Evaluate feasibility of dedicated left-turn lanes; Install centerline rumble stripes and shoulder rumble strips/stripes; Page 14 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Re-evaluate passing zones; Re-evaluate truck climbing lanes and merge areas; Improve signage; Improve drainage; and Review pedestrian conditions. Table 2 summarizes these safety issues, possible enhancements, estimated safety payoff, time frame, cost, and responsibility. Safety payoff estimates are based on engineering judgment and are categorized as low, medium, and high. The time frame is categorized as short-term (<1 year), mid-term (1 to 3 years), or long-term (typically >3 years). Long-term improvements are typically considered to be substantial improvements with an expected time frame for implementation greater than 3 years; however, Gardner Road corridor from just south of Teel Road to the Gardner city line is scheduled for improvement as part of the 2013 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). While not included as part of the resurfacing project, the RSA team noted safety issues north of Teel Road and south of the Gardner city line. To the north of Teel Road, Gardner Road falls under Town of Winchendon jurisdiction; safety enhancements along that stretch of roadway could be consider for implementation by the Town. South of the Gardner city line, Route 140 (Green Street) lies within MassDOT District 3 and falls under City of Gardner jurisdiction. District 2 could consider the feasibility of expanding the resurfacing project into Gardner in coordination with District 3 and the City of Gardner. Therefore, the improvements categorized as long-term may be implemented in less than 3 years. The costs are categorized as low (<$10,000), medium ($10,000 to $50,000), or high (>$50,000). It is the responsibility of MassDOT to ensure that the designer incorporates the relevant safety enhancements identified as part of this RSA. The RSA is intended to identify potential safety improvements that can be evaluated and included as part of the design process for the resurfacing. The short-term low-cost potential improvements could be considered by the responsible agency for implementation prior to resurfacing. Page 15 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Table 2. Summary of Potential Safety Enhancements Safety Issue Safety Enhancement Evaluate the feasibility/appropriateness of providing a dedicated left-turn lane at the Gardner Road northbound and southbound approaches to provide a safe location for motorists to make leftturns into #93 Gardner Road and Commercial Drive. Consider the safety benefits of maintaining a wide shoulder along each side of the roadway to facilitate right-turns (and reduce the potential for rear-end crashes) and consider providing a raised median in advance of turning lane(s) to help the transition. Storage lanes should consider potential future increase in traffic demand at Commercial Drive. Access Work with landowner of #93 Gardner Road to evaluate ways to Management improve site circulation, replace wayfinding signage, and narrow/consolidate driveways, in accordance with the access management guidelines per the MassDOT Project Development and Design Guide, in conjunction with the road resurfacing project to reduce driver confusion and improve safety. Consider heavy vehicle access requirements at the diesel fueling area. Remove “Do Not Enter” (R5-1) signs at #93 Gardner Road center driveway to reduce motorist confusion. Landowner to contact Town authority that requested this signage prior to removing and note the recommendation from this RSA. Consider the appropriateness/feasibility of installing centerline rumble stripes and shoulder rumble strips/stripes along Route 140 to alert fatigued drivers when they leave the travel way and reduce the occurrence of cross-over and run-off-the-road Drowsy and/or Distracted Drivers crashes. Consider appropriateness of installing recessed retroreflective centerline markers to improve visibility of centerline markings in low light conditions. Safety Payoff Time Frame Cost Responsible Party1 High Long-term High MassDOT/ #93 Gardner Road Property Owner High Long-term Medium MassDOT/ #93 Gardner Road Property Owner/ Town of Winchendon Medium Short-term - #93 Gardner Road Property Owner/ Town of Winchendon High Long-term High MassDOT Low Short-term Low MassDOT Page 16 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Table 2. Summary of Potential Safety Enhancements (continued) Safety Issue Passing Zones Climbing Lanes/ Merge Areas Deceleration Lanes Safety Enhancement Consider restricting passing in the vicinity of #93 Gardner Road/Commercial Drive to reduce the potential for conflicts with left-turn turning vehicles at the adjunct businesses and to improve overall safety. Re-evaluate passing zone warrants along the entire corridor in accordance with the current AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Streets and Highways. Consider the appropriateness of passing zones in the vicinity of driveways/side streets and horizontal/vertical curves. Review roadway grades and heavy vehicle truck activity along the corridor and determine if the climbing lanes are still warranted in accordance with current AASHTO standards. If warranted, consider the appropriateness/feasibility of lengthening the merge areas to improve safety. Review, and update where appropriate, pavement markings and signage for climbing lanes per current MUTCD standards. Re-evaluate the location of the climbing lanes and merge areas with respect to side streets and driveways along the corridor to reduce the potential for conflicts with merging and turning vehicles. Continue to enforce travel speeds along the corridor. Consider the appropriateness of improving the deceleration lane along Gardner Road northbound for the intersection with Old Gardner Road. Safety Payoff Time Frame Cost Responsible Party1 High Short-term Low MassDOT High Long-term Low MassDOT Medium Long-term Medium MassDOT Medium Long-term Medium MassDOT Medium Long-term Medium MassDOT Low Short-term Medium Low Short-term Low Town of Winchendon Town of Winchendon/ MassDOT Page 17 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Table 2. Summary of Potential Safety Enhancements (continued) Safety Issue Signage Drainage Pedestrian Conditions Safety Enhancement Consider the appropriateness of installing intersection warning signage such as a cross road symbol (W2-1) along Gardner Road northbound and southbound in advance of #93 Gardner Road Driveways/Commercial Drive (short-term). If Commercial Drive is accepted by the Town in the future (currently private), then consider safety benefits of installing a more detailed warning sign indicating the name of the roadway and illustration of intersection configuration (long-term). Consider the appropriateness of replacing the Commercial Drive street sign with a more legible sign and relocating to a more visible location. Ensure that proposed monument sign for the industrial park is positioned such that it is not located within the state highway layout and does not impact sight lines. Evaluate drainage conditions along the corridor during next rain event to identify any areas subject to ponding that could result in loss of control of a vehicle. Review pedestrian/bicycle crossing conditions on Gardner Road in the vicinity of Commercial Drive/#93 Gardner Road. Safety Payoff Time Frame Cost Responsible Party1 Low Short-term/ Long-term Low MassDOT/ Town of Winchendon Low Short-term Low MassDOT/ Town of Winchendon Low Short-term Low MassDOT/ Town of Winchendon Low Long-term Low MassDOT High Long-term Low MassDOT Note: 1. MassDOT District 2 should coordinate with the District 3 office to identify the feasibility of incorporating the identified improvements in the City of Gardner, where applicable/appropriate. Page 18 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Appendix A. RSA Meeting Agenda Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Appendix B. RSA Audit Team Contact List Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Appendix C. Detailed Crash Data To see all the details that are visible on the screen, use the "Print" link next to the map. Go gle ." it: '­ ~ ~-?. 0' !i ~ 'C 0 gla --- ~·) lo ..e• 0 C/) 14- • C) \1 • j W!llch~<lon i3 Slate Forest t I,;).. / ~ ..1 / / ./ \3 @ ./ / lb 0 - , [A)Yl OL-.I 1'1-e. ' 0"' .8 "'~tS> 0 __. 11401 "- · Co\\<.!e •_0_ Pone - - Map data (02012 Google • A-wroKt~o)r~ lo c..a.-il~s oF cxnsh.es, fua:+ occ_vfre_c\ u.iOY\.5 ~ \tto s~-\~ ~ Tee \ R.oo.cl . I 1 ~J Crash Data Summary Table Along Route 140; Winchendon, MA Jan. 2008 - Dec. 2010 # Crash Date Crash Day m/d/y 1 3/5/08 2 3 4 5 6 8/5/08 9/1/08 10/27/08 11/20/08 11/25/08 7 1/18/09 Time of Day Manner of Collision Type Light Condition Type Weather Condition Type Road Surface Type Driver Contributing Code Type D1 Wednesday 7:30 AM Sideswipe, same direction Daylight Rain Wet Tuesday Monday Monday Thursday Tuesday 6:13 PM 11:40 AM 4:39 PM 7:04 AM 10:05 AM Sideswipe, same direction Rear-end Rear-end Single Vehicle Crash Single Vehicle Crash Daylight Daylight Daylight Daylight Daylight Cloudy Clear Clear Clear Rain Dry Dry Dry Dry Wet Sunday 1:18 PM Sideswipe, same direction Daylight Cloudy Wet Unknown Operating Vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent, or aggressive manner Inattention Inattention No Improper Driving No Improper Driving Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings 30 55 42 21 26 17 34 46 32 48 33 58 38 25 8 3/28/09 Saturday 6:34 PM Sideswipe, opposite direction Daylight Cloudy Dry Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, nonmotorist in roadway, etc. 46 9 4/1/09 Wednesday 8:00 AM Sideswipe, opposite direction Daylight Clear Dry Fatigued/asleep 19 10 7/9/09 Thursday 9:41 AM Single Vehicle Crash Daylight Clear Dry Inattention 20 Dry Operating Vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent, or aggressive manner 21 11 10/15/09 Thursday 5:02 PM Single Vehicle Crash Daylight Cloudy Comments D4 happened at merge point of climbing lane happened at merge point of climbing lane wating to turn left at #161 north of Teel Road hit an animal vehicle hydroplaned at #114 50 60 north of Teel Road Motorcycle traveling south passing in passing zone didn't return to lane in time Driver of Northbound vehicle fell asleep and crossed center line at #144 Driver dropped cigarettes/ attention diverted Driver of Northbound vehicle fell asleep and ran off road right At the self storage bldg, a northbound vehicle was passing - forcing southbound vehicle off road. lost control of vehicle on slippery road lost control of vehicle on slippery road Daylight Dark - roadway not lighted Clear Dry Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, nonmotorist in roadway, etc. 49 Snow Snow Driving too fast for conditions 21 Snow Snow Driving too fast for conditions 20 Single Vehicle Crash Dusk Dark - roadway not lighted Clear Dry Over-correcting/over-steering 37 Single Vehicle Crash Daylight Clear Dry Inattention 59 Cloudy Dry Operating Vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent, or aggressive manner 33 swerved to avoid beaver Southbound vehicle turned left quickly into a tag sale at a residence, following motorcycle failed to slow in time Driver of southbound vehicle fell asleep and crossed the center line. Clear Dry No Improper Driving hit an animal north of Teel Rd. 12 10/21/09 Wednesday 6:49 AM Single Vehicle Crash 13 12/9/09 Wednesday 5:50 AM Angle 14 2/16/10 Tuesday 4:29 PM Single Vehicle Crash 15 4/2/10 Friday 3:06 AM 16 7/24/10 Saturday 11:46 AM 17 11/9/10 Ages D2 D3 Tuesday 8:42 AM Single Vehicle Crash 18 11/22/10 Monday 6:09 PM Single Vehicle Crash Daylight Dark - roadway not lighted Summary based on Crash Reports obtained from the Winchendon Police Department 27 34 60 Crash Data Summary Tables and Charts: RTE 140; Winchendon, MA CRASH MONTH 25% 22% 20% 17% 15% 10% 11% 6% 11% 11% 6% 6% 6% A S 6% 5% 0% 0% M J 0% J F M A J O N D CRASH DAY OF WEEK 22% 25% 20% 22% 17% 17% 15% 11% 10% 6% 6% 5% 0% Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday CRASH TIME OF DAY 40% 33% 30% 22% 17% 20% 17% 11% 10% 0% 0% 6-10AM 10-2PM 2-6PM 6-10PM 10-2AM 2-6AM CRASH MANNER OF COLLISION 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 56% 11% Single Vehicle Crash Rear-end Along Route 140 4-26-2012.xls 17% 11% 6% Angle Sideswipe, same direction Sideswipe, opposite direction 1 of 2 0% 0% 0% Head on Rear to Rear Unknown 5/30/2012 Crash Data Summary Tables and Charts: RTE 140; Winchendon, MA CRASH LIGHT CONDITION 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 78% Daylight 17% 0% 6% 0% Dawn Dusk Dark Lighted Roadway Dark Roadway not lighted 0% 0% 0% Dark unknown roadway lighting Other Unknown CRASH WEATHER CONDITION 50% 28% 11% 0% Other Blowing sand, snow 0% 0% Unknown 0% Severe Crosswinds 0% Sleet, Hail, Freezing Rain Snow Rain Cloudy 0% Fog, Smog, Smoke 11% Clear 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% CRASH ROAD SURFACE 80% 72% 60% 40% 17% 20% 11% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Slush Other Unknown 0% Dry Wet Snow Ice Sand, Water mud, dirt, (standing, oil, gravel moving) CRASH DRIVER AGES 28% 30% 28% 17% 20% 10% 14% 7% 7% 0% 0% 70-79 80+ 0% 15-20 Along Route 140 4-26-2012.xls 21-29 30-39 40-49 2 of 2 50-59 60-69 5/30/2012 • #}JJ!!li!~!I2Q! ~ ; ighway Division COLLISION DIAGRAM CITY/TOWN : Winchendon DATE PREPARED: REGION: PREPARED BY: ~~~~~-------------- MRPC D. Halpert Gardner Road (Rte. 140) ROADWAY NAMES: TIME PERIOD ANALYZED: May-12 3/1/08- Dec. 2010 ~~~~~~~----------------------------------------------------- SOURCE OF CRASH REPORTS: Winchendon Police Department i North t. c. .• ~ t r~ 1 .._ f, 'a, .. ~ .' l- e; Combined access points to plaza based on vague crash data SYMBOLS ________.,. TYPES OF CRASH Moving Vehicle Head On Backing Vehicle Non-Involved Vehicle Angle Pedestrian Turning Move Parked Vehicle Fixed Object Rear End Bicycle Sideswipe Animal Out of Control SEVERITY 0 Injury Accident 0 Fatal Accident Crash Data Summary Table Brian's Place/Irving Gas; Winchendon, MA Jan. 2008 - Dec. 2010 Crash Date Crash Day m/d/y 1 3/29/08 Saturday 1:37 PM Manner of Collision Type Head on Light Condition Type Daylight Weather Condition Type Clear Road Surface Type Dry 5:28 PM 12:36 PM Sideswipe, same direction Rear-end Dark - roadway not lighted Daylight Clear Clear Dry Dry Tuesday Saturday Saturday Saturday 6:10 AM 1:25 PM 5:14 PM 8:50 AM Rear-end Rear-end Rear-end Rear-end Dark - lighted roadway Daylight Other Daylight Clear Clear Clear Clear Dry Dry Dry Dry 8 2/22/10 9 7/5/10 Monday Monday 7:36 AM 10:59 AM Single Vehicle Crash Rear-end Daylight Daylight Clear Clear Dry Dry 10 8/4/10 Wednesday 9:02 AM Angle Daylight 8:55 AM Rear-end Daylight Clear Fog, Smog, Smoke # 2 11/5/08 Wednesday 3 11/10/08 Monday 4 5 6 7 11/18/08 12/13/08 1/3/09 5/9/09 11 10/25/10 Monday Time of Day 12 10/26/10 Tuesday 9:29 AM Single Vehicle Crash 13 10/28/10 Thursday 2:10 PM Sideswipe, same direction 14 11/9/10 Tuesday 15 12/28/10 Tuesday 5:55 PM 12:19 PM Rear-end Rear-end Driver Contributing Code Type D1 Two-way radio 74 Operating Vehicle in erratic, reckless, careless, negligent, or aggressive manner 48 Followed too closely 20 Ages D2 D3 83 56 67 27 42 55 45 74 24 Dry Followed too closely Inattention Inattention Inattention Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road Inattention Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings Wet Inattention Daylight Clear Wet Daylight Dark - roadway not lighted Daylight Clear Rain Clear Summary based on Crash Reports obtained from the Winchendon Police Department 44 26 Vehicle stalled while turning 32 Operator fell asleep while driving & hit snow banks on side of road 30 60 24 32 57 77 47 Hit brakes to avoid stopped vehicle. Lost control of vehicle and hit large boulder. Dry Over-correcting/over-steering 18 Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, nonmotorist in roadway, etc. 59 51 Wet Wet Inattention Glare 53 17 17 56 Comments 46 Crash Data Summary Tables and Charts: Brian's Place/Irving Gas; Winchendon, MA CRASH MONTH 30% 27% 25% 20% 20% 13% 15% 10% 7% 7% 7% 7% 5% 7% 0% 7% 0% 0% 0% J F M A M J J A S O N D CRASH DAY OF WEEK 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 27% 27% 27% 13% 7% 0% Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday 0% Friday Saturday Sunday CRASH TIME OF DAY 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 40% 33% 6-10AM 10-2PM 27% 2-6PM 0% 0% 0% 6-10PM 10-2AM 2-6AM CRASH MANNER OF COLLISION 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 60% 13% Single Vehicle Crash Brian's Place 4-26-2012.xls 7% Rear-end Angle 13% 0% Sideswipe, same direction 1 of 2 Sideswipe, opposite direction 7% Head on 0% 0% Rear to Rear Unknown 5/30/2012 Crash Data Summary Tables and Charts: Brian's Place/Irving Gas; Winchendon, MA 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% CRASH LIGHT CONDITION 73% Daylight 0% 0% Dawn Dusk 13% 7% Dark Lighted Roadway 7% 0% Dark Roadway not lighted Dark unknown roadway lighting Other 0% Unknown CRASH WEATHER CONDITION 0% ow n 0% U nk n 0% Sn t, ow H ai l, Fr ee zi ng R ai Fo n g, Sm og ,S m ok Se e ve re C ro ss w in Bl ds ow in g sa nd ,s no w 0% er 7% 0% Sl ee R ai n C lo ud y 0% O th 7% 0% C le ar 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 87% CRASH ROAD SURFACE 80% 73% 60% 40% 27% 20% 0% 0% Snow Ice 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Slush Other Unknown 0% Dry Wet Sand, Water mud, dirt, (standing, oil, gravel moving) CRASH DRIVER AGES 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 23% 20% 17% 10% 10% 10% 7% 3% 15-20 Brian's Place 4-26-2012.xls 21-29 30-39 40-49 2 of 2 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ 5/30/2012 Road Safety Audit Route 140 – South of Teel Road to Gardner City Line, Winchendon Prepared by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc. Appendix D. Additional Information TECHNICAL APPENDIX Published Under Separate Cover HSIP Criteria Traffic Volumes Speed Data Vehicle Classification Turning Movement Counts Capacity Analysis Lane Departure Road Safety Audit for Route 140 Gardner, MA Crash Tables Rt. 140 North Corridor Profile Montachusett Regional Planning Commission Appendix -1 Westminster-Gardner-Winchendon January 2012