Author's personal copy Psychopharmacology DOI 10.1007/s00213-014-3500-y ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Effect of age on methylphenidate-induced conditioned taste avoidance and related BDNF/TrkB signaling in the insular cortex of the rat B. Bradley Wetzell & Mirabella M. Muller & Jennifer L. Cobuzzi & Zachary E. Hurwitz & Kathleen DeCicco-Skinner & Anthony L. Riley Received: 21 October 2013 / Accepted: 7 February 2014 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Abstract Rationale Drug use and abuse is thought to be a function of the balance between its rewarding and aversive effects, such that the rewarding effects increase the likelihood of use while the drug’s dissociable aversive effects limit it. Adolescents exhibit a shift in this balance toward reward, which may ultimately lead to increased use. Importantly, recent work shows that adolescents are also protected from the aversive effects of many abusable drugs as measured by conditioned taste avoidance (CTA). However, such effects of methylphenidate (MPH, widely prescribed to adolescents with ADHD) have not been characterized. Objectives The effect of age on MPH-induced CTA was assessed. In addition, MPH-induced changes in brainderived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) activity in the insular cortex (IC) and central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), known to be important to CTA, were examined and related to CTAs in adolescents and adults. Methods CTAs induced by MPH (0, 10, 18, and 32 mg/kg) were assessed in adolescent (n = 34) and adult (n = 33) male Sprague Dawley rats. Following MPH CTA, IC and CeA tissue This work was supported by a grant from the Mellon Foundation to ALR and a Dean’s Graduate Research Grant to BBW. B. B. Wetzell (*) : M. M. Muller : J. L. Cobuzzi : Z. E. Hurwitz : A. L. Riley Psychopharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA e-mail: bradley.wetzell@american.edu A. L. Riley e-mail: alriley@american.edu K. DeCicco-Skinner : A. L. Riley Department of Biology, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA was probed for differences in BDNF and tropomyosin-related kinase receptor-B (TrkB) using Western blots. Results Blunted expression of MPH CTA was observed in the adolescents versus adults, which correlated with generally attenuated adolescent BDNF/TrkB activity in the IC, but the drug effects ran contrary to the expression of CTA. Conclusions Adolescents are protected from the aversive effects of MPH versus adults, but further work is needed to characterize the possible involvement of BDNF/TrkB. Keywords Methylphenidate . Adolescent . Age Effect . Rat . CTA . BDNF . TrkB . Insular cortex . Western blot Introduction Evidence from the preclinical model indicates that the adolescent period of development plays a particularly significant role in drug abuse liability (for a review, see Spear 2013). Biochemical processes underlying developmental brain changes during this period result in an enhanced response to rewarding stimuli (for a review, see Spear 2011), which often translates to an increased likelihood for drug use among adolescents (see Doremus-Fitzwater et al. 2010 and Schramm-Sapyta et al. 2009 for reviews). Although drug intake is most often associated with reward, it is actually thought to reflect an affective balance, such that a drug’s rewarding effects increase, while its aversive effects limit, the propensity to self-administer (Riley 2011; Wise et al. 1976). Interestingly, these two constructs are dissociable in that manipulations that affect one often have no effect on the other (Brockwell et al. 1991; King and Riley 2013), and many abusable drugs produce both reward and aversion at the same dose and route of administration (Hunt and Amit 1987; Riley 2011). Thus, variation in self-administration does not Author's personal copy Psychopharmacology necessarily indicate a change in reward, as variation in the drug’s aversive effects may also impact its use and/or abuse. To this end, recent work has characterized age-dependent variations in the aversive effects of various abusable drugs (Doremus-Fitzwater et al. 2010; Schramm-Sapyta et al. 2009) as measured by conditioned taste avoidance (CTA, a measure of the aversive effects of a drug; see Freeman and Riley 2009; Riley and Tuck 1985). Indeed, adolescent rats consistently display attenuated CTA compared to adults with many drugs of abuse, including cocaine (Schramm-Sapyta et al. 2006) and amphetamine (Infurna and Spear 1979) among others (Anderson et al. 2010, 2013; Cobuzzi et al. 2013; Hurwitz et al. 2012, 2013; Merluzzi et al. 2013; Schramm-Sapyta et al. 2007; Shram et al. 2006). One compound that has not been assessed for CTA age effects is methylphenidate (MPH), the most widely prescribed medication for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and young adults (Ritalin®; Volkow et al. 2001). Interestingly, conditioned place preference (CPP) induced by MPH is potentiated in adolescent spontaneously hypertensive rats compared to adults (SHR, believed to model the ADHD phenotype; see dela Peña et al. 2011 for MPH age comparisons; see Sagvolden 2000 for a review of the SHR model). Although this age effect is not evident in the Wistar outbred strain, adolescents exhibit dose-dependent CPP, while adult Wistars trend toward an attenuated, non-dose-dependent response (dela Peña et al. 2011). Additionally, both adolescent and adult rats self-administer MPH (dela Peña et al. 2011), with no direct age comparisons reported. MPH produces dosedependent CTA in adult animals (Riley and Zellner 1978; Wetzell and Riley 2012), and since adolescents display attenuated CTA to other psychostimulants, it is reasonable to expect that the same will be true for MPH. Such a result could indicate an enhanced abuse potential for MPH in adolescents and should be examined further. Although age differences in CTAs are generally well documented, their biochemical underpinnings have yet to be fully characterized. Activity-dependent expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF, a neuropeptide involved in activity-dependent changes in protein expression related to synaptic plasticity; see Barki-Harrington et al. 2009; Ohira and Hayashi 2009) induces long-term potentiation (LTP) of signaling in the insular cortex (IC; see Castillo and Escobar 2011), which is a central mechanism in the acquisition and retention of CTA (Castillo and Escobar 2011; Castillo et al. 2006; Escobar and Bermúdez-Rattoni 2000; MoguelGonzález et al. 2008). Further, Ma et al. (2011) found CTAinduced secretion and expression of BDNF along with one of its target receptors, the tropomyosin-related kinase receptor-B (TrkB, see Fayard et al. 2005; Fryer et al. 1996) in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) and IC. Thus, variable signaling in this system may correlate with CTA age differences, such that adults should exhibit stronger signaling relative to adolescents, which could help further define age-related differences in the response to drugs of abuse and identify targets for future research. Thus, the present study assessed MPH-induced CTA and related BDNF/TrkB signaling in the CeA and IC in adolescent and adult rats. Specifically, 67 Sprague Dawley male rats (34 adolescents and 33 adults) were conditioned with three doses of MPH or vehicle (VEH). Eight hours following the final CTA test, brain tissue was collected and probed for BDNF, TrkB and its activated form, phosphorylated TrkB (p-TrkB), in the CeA and IC using Western blots. It was predicted that adolescents would display attenuated MPH-induced CTA compared to adults, which would correlate with agedependent variations in BDNF/TrkB signaling. Methods Experiment 1: CTA Subjects Sixty-seven experimentally naïve, male Sprague Dawley rats (Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN) arrived at the facility on postnatal day 21 (PND 21). Upon arrival, subjects were grouphoused in polycarbonate bins (23 × 44 × 21 cm, n = 3 per bin) and maintained on a 12:12 light-dark cycle (lights on at 0800 hours) at an ambient temperature of 23 °C. Subjects were weighed daily throughout the study, beginning 7 days immediately prior to CTA training. During CTA adaptation, conditioning and testing procedures (see below), animals were temporarily transferred to individual hanging wire-mesh test cages (24.3 × 19 × 18 cm) located in an adjacent animal testing room. Minimal use of cages with wire-mesh flooring is recommended (National Research Council 2011) due to possible development of foot lesions, which may occur with extended housing in such conditions (Peace et al. 2001). Therefore, the use of wire-mesh cages was restricted to experimental procedures, and subjects were returned to their group-housed bins each day when testing was complete. All procedures occurred during the light phase, and unless otherwise stated, food and water were available ad libitum. The study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at American University and followed the National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (2011) and the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Mammals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research (2003). Drugs and solutions Methylphenidate hydrochloride (MPH, generously supplied by NIDA) was dissolved in isotonic saline at 10 mg/ml, and the solution was passed through a 0.2-μm filter to remove Author's personal copy Psychopharmacology contaminants before being administered intraperitoneally (IP) at doses of 10, 18, or 32 mg/kg. Saline vehicle equivolume to the highest dose of MPH was also filtered before IP administration. Sodium saccharin (Sigma Aldrich) was prepared at 1 g/l in tap water for a 0.1 % (w/v) saccharin solution. All drug weights are expressed as the salt form, and all drugs and solutions were prepared daily. CTA procedure Adolescents Abbreviated CTA procedures designed to maintain proper growth rates in adolescent animals were utilized as published previously (Hurwitz et al. 2013). Specifically, 34 subjects were deprived of water for 24 h prior to the start of habituation, which began on PND 29. Following relocation to test cages, animals received 45-min access to water presented in graduated Nalgene tubes, after which they had ad libitum access to water in their home bins for 23 h. This 2-day cycle, beginning with deprivation, was repeated three more times to ensure adaptation to test cage fluid consumption (final day on PND 36). For conditioning, animals were again deprived of water on PND 37 and a novel saccharin solution was presented instead of water on PND 38. Animals were immediately rank-ordered according to saccharin consumption and assigned to one of four groups [0 (n = 9), 10 (n = 8), 18 (n = 8), and 32 (n = 9), where the group number indicates the dose of MPH], such that mean saccharin intake among groups was comparable. Within 20 min of saccharin access, subjects were injected with drug or vehicle and then given ad libitum water access in their home bins for 23 h. This 2-day procedure was repeated three more times for a total of four conditioning trials (final day on PND 44). For the two-bottle test on PND 45, subjects were given 45min access to two Nalgene tubes (one containing tap water and the other containing saccharin solution) with placement counterbalanced to control for positioning effects. Following fluid access, animals were again injected with drug or vehicle according to their group to facilitate biochemical analysis (see below) and returned to their home bins with ad libitum water access. Adults The procedures for the adult replicate were identical, with the following exceptions: Thirty-three subjects were brought into the facility on PND 21 and maintained on ad libitum food and water with no manipulations until PND 70 when daily weighing began. Water bottles were removed on PND 77, and the habituation phase began on PND 78. Adaptation to the procedure occurred more quickly in the adults, requiring only two 2-day cycles (final day, PND 81). The four CTA conditioning trials occurred from PND 82 to 89. Following the first conditioning trial, consumption was rank-ordered, and group assignments made such that intake was comparable among groups, yielding four groups [0 (n = 9), 10 (n = 8), 18 (n = 8), and 32 (n = 8) where the number indicates the dose of MPH administered]. The final two-bottle test was performed on PND 90. Experiment 2: BDNF/TrkB protein analysis Expression of BDNF and TrkB protein levels were assessed through Western blotting. Eight hours following injections after the two-bottle test (in accordance with the findings of Ma et al. 2011), subjects were rapidly decapitated, and brain tissue was immediately extracted and flash frozen in ice-cold methylbutane. Four samples from each age and dose group were randomly selected and cold-sectioned. The CeA and IC were located by cross-referencing maps from Paxinos and Watson (2005) and Palkovits and Brownstein (1988) and were isolated using a variant of the micropunch procedure described by the latter. Samples were placed in 70 μl of room temperature sucrose lysis buffer (containing 2.2 g sucrose, 2 ml 10 % SDS, and 100 μl 1 M HEPES in 18 ml distilled water) with protease inhibitors (Thermo Scientific #78442) and ultrasonically homogenized. After incubating on ice for an additional 45 min, they were cold-centrifuged for 15 min at 13,500 RPMs. Western blot analyses were performed as described previously (Kohut et al. 2012). Following electrophoresis and transfer, membranes were blocked in 5 % milk, probed with antiBDNF (Abcam, ab46176; 1:1,000), anti-TrkB (Abcam, ab51190; 1:1,000), anti-phospho-TrkB antibody (Abcam, ab75173; 1:2,000), and anti-β-actin as a loading control (Cell Signaling; 1:2,000; all diluted in 5 % BSA or milk) and then incubated with secondary antibody (anti-rabbit HRP; Cell Signaling; 1:2,000). Membranes were stripped, washed, and re-blocked with milk prior to proceeding to the next primary antibody. Bands were developed using Pierce West Dura chemiluminescence substrate (Thermo Scientific) and visualized on a UVP Biosystem Imaging system. Densitometry was performed using Image-J software (NIH, Bethesda). Statistical analyses Since adolescents drank less saccharin than their adult counterparts on the initial conditioning trial (mean of 5.3 vs. 9.1 ml, respectively), saccharin consumption for each subject on all subsequent trials was transformed to percent shift from its own baseline consumption (trial 1) and was analyzed with a 2 × 4 × 4 repeated measures ANOVA with between-subject factors of age (adolescent or adult) and dose (0, 10, 18, and 32) and a within-subject factor of trial (1–4). In the case of a threeway interaction, simple effects of trial at each age and dose (multivariate analysis) and the effects of age at each dose and trial (univariate analysis) were assessed with Bonferronicorrected multiple comparisons as warranted. Author's personal copy Psychopharmacology Results CTA acquisition and test a 100 ‡ % Shiftfrom Trial 1 50 ^ ^ 0 ‡ ‡ -50 ^ ‡ ‡ 1 2 3 4 Trial 0 b 10 18 100 32 ‡ 50 0 ‡ ^‡ ^‡ -50 ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ Percent shifts in saccharin consumption from baseline for adolescents and adults are represented in Fig. 1a, b, respectively. The 2 × 4 × 4 repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant effects of age [F (1, 59) = 4.063], dose [F (3, 59) = 18.708], and trial [F (3, 177) = 39.358], as well as an age × dose × trial interaction [F (9, 177) = 2.370]. The tests for simple effects of trial at each age and dose were significant [adolescents: group 0 F (3, 57) = 7.674, group 10 F (3, 57) = 12.137, group 18 F (3, 57) = 7.736, group 32 F (3, 57) = 9.266; adults: group 0 F (3, 57) = 5.337, group 10 F (3, 57) = 9.302, group 18 F (3, 57) = 8.079, group 32 F (3, 57) = 15.214]. Adjusted multiple comparisons revealed that the adolescent group 0 drank significantly more saccharin on trial 2 than trial 1 (see Fig. 1a), while there were no differences from trial 1 to trial 2 for any of the adolescent drug-treated groups. By trial 3, all of the adolescent drug-treated groups drank significantly less saccharin than their trial 1 baseline and groups 18 and 32 maintained significant suppression of saccharin consumption on trial 4. Conversely, all adult MPHtreated groups drank significantly less saccharin than on trial 1 on all subsequent trials (see Fig. 1b). Additionally, group 0 adults drank significantly more on trial 4 than on trial 1. The analyses of simple effects of age at each dose revealed that adolescent group 10 drank significantly more saccharin than adult group 10 on trial 2 [F (1, 59) = 6.695], and adolescent group 32 exhibited increased consumption compared to their ^ ‡ -100 % Shiftfrom Trial 1 On the two-bottle CTA test, saccharin and water consumption were recorded and percent saccharin of total fluid consumption (i.e., saccharin/saccharin + water) was then tested with a 2 × 4 factorial ANOVA with factors of age (adolescent or adult) and dose (0, 10, 18, and 32). A two-way interaction was followed by univariate analyses for simple effects at each level of age and dose and followed by Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons as needed. To assess differences in protein expression, densitometric data for each probe within each brain region were normalized to the respective individual’s β-actin result. Normalized values were divided by the mean for group 0 for that age group to arrive at the dependent variable, fold change, such that group 0’s mean fold change for each age group was always 1. Fold change data were analyzed with a 2 × 4 factorial ANOVA with factors of age (adolescent or adult) and dose (0, 10, 18, and 32). Given an interaction, simple effects of age and dose at all levels of each were assessed with univariate analyses followed by Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons where indicated. Significance for all tests was set to α = 0.05. ‡ ^ ^ -100 1 2 3 4 Trial Fig. 1 CTA acquisition data for a adolescents and b adults represented as percent shift from trial 1 ‡p<0.05 from respective trial 1, ^p<0.05 between ages adult counterparts on trials 2–4 [trial 2: F (1, 59) = 10.685, trial 3: F (1, 59) = 6.011, and trial 4: F (1, 59) = 7.540]. The 2 × 4 factorial ANOVA for percent saccharin consumed during the two-bottle test indicated significant effects of age [F (1, 59) = 37.665] and dose [F (3, 59) = 61.907], including an age × dose interaction [F (3, 59) = 5.571; see Fig. 2]. Tests for effects of dose at each age indicated significant differences [adolescents: F (3, 59) = 23.132; adults: F (3, 59) = 44.239], and multiple comparisons indicated that all groups receiving MPH for both ages drank a significantly lower percentage of saccharin than their respective group 0. Adolescent groups 10 and 32 drank a significantly higher percentage of saccharin than their adult counterparts [group 10: F (1, 59) = 35.255; group 32: F (1, 59) = 13.618]. BDNF/TrkB expression Analyses of the densitometric data from BDNF, TrkB, and pTrkB probes of samples dissected from the CeA in both age Author's personal copy Psychopharmacology 100 a 1.5 Adolescents Adults 80 * 60 ^ 40 * * 1.0 ^ (From Group 0) Fold Change % Saccharin ^ * * * * 0.5 20 * 18 32 Adol. 10 0 28 kDa Adult 0 0.0 * 28 kDa 14 kDa - act * 0 Adol. 10 18 10 18 32 14 kDa Group Fig. 2 CTA two-bottle test data normalized to percent saccharin of total fluid consumed (e.g., saccharin/saccharin+water); *p<0.05 from respective group 0, ^p<0.05 between ages Adult 0 32 MPH Dose Group Adolescents Adults 1.5 (From Group 0) Fold Change 1.0 0.5 0.0 Adol. 0 10 18 10 18 32 28 kDa Adult 28 kDa 14 kDa - act 14 kDa Adol. Adult 0 32 MPH Dose Group c 3 ^ (FromGroup0) Fold Change * ^ 2 * ^ 1 * * Adol. 0 0 10 18 10 18 32 220kDa Adult Fig. 3 Densitometry data for BDNF bands at a 14 kDa, b 28 kDa, and c 220 kDa; *p<0.05 from respective group 0, ^p<0.05 between ages b 220 kDa - act groups revealed no significant differences between age or drug groups (data not shown). The BDNF probe in samples dissected from the IC in both age groups resulted in two bands at the expected molecular weights of 14 and 28 kDa (see Figs. 3a, b). Pro-BDNF is a homodimer weighing 28 kDa, while mature BDNF is a 14-kDa monomer, each of which is capable of binding to, and activating, target receptor proteins (Fayard et al. 2005; Kolbeck et al. 1994). However, a third band also appeared at approximately 220 kDa in the IC samples of each age group but not in the CeA (see Fig. 3c). Similar bands at this weight have been reported from probes for p75, a second receptor protein to which BDNF may bind, yet they have remained unexplained (Djakiew et al. 1994; Pflug et al. 1992). After conducting additional probes for potential protein candidates that might complex with BDNF (e.g., p75 and Kidins220; see discussion below), tissue lysates were twice more processed and re-probed with the original antibodies, yielding the same results. The 2 × 4 factorial ANOVA for fold change in 14 kDa BDNF indicated no main effect of age or dose, but an age × dose interaction was present [F (3, 24) = 3.171; see Fig. 3a]. The test for simple effects of dose at each age indicated significant differences for both [adolescents: F (3, 24) = 20.759; adults: F (3, 24) = 7.177], and the adjusted multiple comparisons revealed that groups 18 and 32 in both age groups exhibited lower expression of 14 kDa BDNF than their respective group 0 controls. Analyses of age at each dose showed that adolescent group 32 expressed less 14 kDa BDNF than their adult counterparts [F (1, 24) = 9.773], while no other comparisons reached significance. The 2 × 4 factorial ANOVA for fold change in 28 kDa BDNF between age and Adol. Adult 0 MPH Dose Group 32 Author's personal copy Psychopharmacology 1.5 1.0 (From Group 0) Fold Change a 0.5 0 10 18 10 18 32 Adult 92 kDa 92 kDa -a c t Adol. 0.0 Adol. Adult 0 32 MPH Dose Group Adolescents Adults b 2 .0 ^ 1 .5 ^ ^ (From Group 0) Fold Change dose groups indicated no main effect of age or dose nor an age × dose interaction (see Fig. 3b). For the 220-kDa BDNF band, the 2 × 4 factorial ANOVA for fold change between age and dose groups indicated no main effect of age or dose, with an age × dose interaction [F (3, 24) = 32.954; see Fig. 3c]. The tests of dose at each age indicated differences for both ages [adolescents: F (3, 24) = 6.296; adults: F (3, 24) = 38.847], and multiple comparisons revealed that adolescent groups 18 and 32 expressed less 220 kDa BDNF than their respective group 0 (p < .05 for each), while the adult groups 18 and 32 expressed significantly more than the adult group 0. Further, the univariates for effects of age at each dose indicated that all adolescent groups treated with MPH expressed significantly less of the 220-kDa BDNF band than their adult counterparts [group 10: F (1, 24) = 9.644; group 18: F (1, 24) = 65.936; group 32: F (1, 24) = 170.874], while there were no age differences in group 0. The 2 × 4 factorial ANOVA for fold change in TrkB expression between age and dose groups indicated no effect of age, nor dose, nor an age × dose interaction (see Fig. 4a). The 2 × 4 factorial ANOVA for the activated form of TrkB (pTrkB) revealed no effect of age or dose, but an age × dose interaction [F (3, 24) = 5.727; see Fig. 4b]. Tests for simple effects of dose at each age showed that such effects occurred only in the adolescents [F (3, 24) = 5.743], and multiple comparisons indicated that adolescent group 32 expressed less activated TrkB than their respective group 0 (p < .05). Tests for dose at each age revealed that all adolescent MPH groups expressed less p-TrkB than their adult counterparts [group 10: F (1, 24) = 5.865; group 18: F (1, 24) = 19.569; group 32: F (1, 24) = 29.332]. 1 .0 0 .5 * 0 .0 Adol. Adult The present study evaluated age effects in CTA induced by MPH in adolescent and adult animals. In accordance with previous research, MPH induced robust taste avoidance of saccharin (Riley and Zellner 1978; Wetzell and Riley 2012), and in support of our hypothesis, the effect was attenuated in adolescent animals compared to adults. Adolescents were generally slower to acquire avoidance, as none of the MPH groups suppressed consumption until trial 3, while all three of the adult MPH groups had done so by trial 2. Further, the MPH-treated adults in groups 10 and 32 drank a lower percentage of saccharin on the two-bottle test than their adolescent counterparts. These results are in line with previous reports of attenuated adolescent CTA induced by abusable compounds and suggest that adolescents are similarly protected from the aversive effects of MPH relative to adults (see “Introduction”). Some explanations for the age-dependent variation of CTA include that adolescents are generally deficient in mechanisms 0 92 kDa 92 kDa - act Discussion 10 18 10 18 32 Adol. Adult 0 32 MPH Dose Group Fig. 4 Densitometry data for a TrkB and b p-TrkB bands *p<0.05 from respective group 0, ^p<0.05 between ages of memory and learning, have blunted taste reactivity, or enhanced motivation to drink compared to adults. If a general adolescent learning deficit were present, then this age group should exhibit attenuated conditioning in other associative preparations as well. Yet, CPP induced by many drugs of abuse are enhanced as a function of increases in adolescent reward sensitivity (Badanich et al. 2006; Belluzzi et al. 2004; Philpot et al. 2003; Vastola et al. 2002; Zakharova et al. 2009). Further, adolescents exhibit comparable CTA to adults when Author's personal copy Psychopharmacology induced by emetics that lack reinforcing effects (i.e., lithium chloride; see Cobuzzi et al. 2013 and Hurwitz et al. 2012 for discussions on this topic), indicating similar learning, as well as taste reactivity. Finally, it has been demonstrated that the differences in taste avoidance induced by morphine (adol < adults) are unaffected by variations in the deprivation level, suggesting that, at least for this compound, changes in motivation to drink unlikely impact the strength of avoidance learning (Hurwitz et al. 2012). Another possibility for the observed age effects concerns the possible impact of stress on the acquisition of CTAs. Specifically, adolescents were less removed from the stresses related to shipping than the adults. Both groups arrived at the facility on PND 21, and although the adolescents were allowed 7 days to acclimate, the adults had close to 50. Such differential stress may have mediated, in part, the behavioral differences reported. Although possible, it should be noted that there is no consistent evidence that stress impacts CTAs (see Hurwitz et al. 2012 for a discussion) and two direct assessments of such effects, as a function of age, have found none (Anderson et al. 2010, 2013). Further work is needed to conclusively demonstrate a roll for stress, or lack thereof, on CTA in adolescent versus adult animals. As well, we hypothesized that CTA age differences would correlate with changes in IC and CeA BDNF/TrkB activity, which are associated with memory processes during CTA (Ma et al. 2011) and are generally considered central to taste avoidance acquisition and retention (Castillo and Escobar 2011; Castillo et al. 2006; Martínez-Moreno et al. 2011; Moguel-González et al. 2008). We found no effects of age or drug on BDNF, TrkB, or p-TrkB in the CeA. However, there was a drug-dependent decrease in the expression of mature BDNF (14 kDa) in the IC of both age groups and the adolescent group 32 exhibited greater attenuation than their adult counterparts. The same adolescent group also exhibited a drug-induced decrease in p-TrkB, and expression of this activated receptor was blunted compared to the adults at all three doses of MPH. Although these results suggest attenuated IC BDNF activity in the adolescent animals compared to adults, in partial support of our hypothesis, the blunted expression of mature IC BDNF induced by MPH is inconsistent with the dose-dependent CTA in both ages and does not likely represent a mechanism for CTA age differences. However, the 220-kDa BDNF results indicate a dosedependent increase in the adults, similar to their expression of p-TrkB, which is in line with the adult MPH CTA and consistent with the position that IC BDNF correlates directly with strength of CTA learning. Further, the dose-dependent decrease of the adolescent 220-kDa band mirrors that group’s patterns of mature BDNF and p-TrkB, but still contrasts the dose-dependent increase in CTA in adolescents (albeit attenuated compared to adults). As stated, similar bands have been reported with probes for p75 in rat testicular tissue (Djakiew et al. 1994), as well as human prostate (Pflug et al. 1992), neither of which has been identified nor explained. Accordingly, our samples were probed with anti-p75 (Abcam, ab8874; 1:1,000), yielding no evidence that the protein was present (data not shown). Additionally, there have been recent reports of kinase-D-interacting substrate of 220 kDa (Kidins220; see Kong et al. 2001) which is known to complex with TrkB and p75 and modulate their signaling pathways following activation by BDNF (Chang et al. 2004; Neubrand et al. 2012). Although there is no evidence of BDNF binding directly to Kidins220, we also probed with anti-Kidins220 (Abcam, ab34790; 1:1,000) and again found no evidence that it was present (data not shown). Our methods incorporate sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) to linearize proteins and disassemble complexes, yet it is known that some complexes exhibit remarkable stability that can impart SDS resistance (among the more well-characterized of which are SNARE complexes; see Hayashi et al. 1994). In these cases, Western probes for any of the constituents of the complex can result in multiple bands over a wide weight range (Kubista et al. 2004). Thus, although impossible to interpret presently, it is conceivable that the 220-kDa band represents BDNF bound in a stable, as-yet-unidentified complex that is SDS resistant. However, future work will need to assess other candidates for a BDNF complex in the 220-kDa range and determine whether their presence has functional significance. That we did not see the expected drug effects on CeA BDNF/TrkB in either age group or in the IC of the adolescents, as reported by Ma et al. (2011), remains unexplained, but could relate to parametric differences. Ma et al. assessed secretion and synthesis of BDNF and TrkB after two conditioning trials, whereas we conducted five total trials. From trials 1 to 3, suppression of saccharin consumption was undergoing dramatic changes in both ages. Yet, from trials 3 to 4, suppression became asymptotic, suggesting that learning had occurred between trials 1 and 3. Thus, by the time of our assessment following trial 5, BDNF/TrkB activity related to CTA learning in the CeA and IC may have subsided. Future research will need to assess age differences in BDNF/TrkB while CTA learning is still occurring and whether the activity is dose-dependent. In conclusion, we assessed age differences in the expression of MPH CTA, as well as related BDNF/TrkB signaling in the IC and CeA. Our results demonstrate a blunted MPH CTA in adolescents compared to adults, which correlated with generally reduced IC BDNF/TrkB activity. However, while adult BDNF/TrkB activity appeared consistent with their behavioral results, MPH induced a dose-dependent attenuation of protein expression in the adolescent animals, contrary to their expression of CTA. Thus, the present results do not likely represent a general mechanism for CTA age differences. Perhaps the most parsimonious explanation for the present CTA results is that adolescents are simply less sensitive to the Author's personal copy Psychopharmacology aversive effects of MPH. The interaction of rewarding and aversive effects of abusable drugs likely results in a complex cluster of subjective stimuli that mediates the overall affective response and influences the propensity for continued use (see Verendeev and Riley 2012 for a recent review and interpretation for mechanisms of CTA with abusable drugs). For this reason, it is important to establish the physiological mediation of CTA age differences and establish targets for treatment and prevention of compulsive drug use in adolescents. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Nick Watson and Gervaise Henry from the Department of Biology, American University for their input and technical assistance with the Western blot analyses. Conflict of interest There are no conflicts of interest. References Anderson RI, Varlinskaya EI, Spear LP (2010) Ethanol induced conditioned taste aversion in male Sprague Dawley rats: impact of age and stress. Clinical and Experimental Research, Alcoholism 34:2106– 2115 Anderson RI, Agoglia AE, Morales M, Varlinskaya EI, Spear LP (2013) Stress, kappa manipulations, and aversive effects of ethanol in adolescent and adult male rats. Neuroscience 249:214–222 Badanich KA, Adler KJ, Kirstein CL (2006) Adolescents differ from adults in cocaine conditioned place preference and cocaine-induced dopamine in the nucleus accumbens septi. Eur J Pharmacol 550:95– 106 Barki-Harrington L, Belelovsky K, Doron G, Rosenblum K (2009) Molecular mechanisms of taste learning in the insular cortex and amygdala. In: Reilly S, Schachtman TR (eds) Conditioned taste aversion. Oxford University, New York, pp 341–363 Belluzzi JD, Lee AG, Oliff HS, Leslie FM (2004) Age-dependent effects of nicotine on locomotor activity and conditioned place preference in rats. Psychopharmacology 174:389–395 Brockwell N, Eikelboom R, Beninger R (1991) Caffeine-induced place and taste conditioning: production of dose-dependent preference and aversion. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38:513–517 Castillo DV, Escobar ML (2011) A role for MAPK and PI-3K signaling pathways in brain-derived neurotrophic factor modification of conditioned taste aversion retention. Behav Brain Res 217:248–252 Castillo DV, Figueroa-Guzmán Y, Escobar ML (2006) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor enhances conditioned taste aversion retention. Brain Res 1067:250–255 Chang MS, Arevalo JC, Chao MV (2004) Ternary complex with Trk, p75, and an ankyrin‐rich membrane spanning protein. J Neurosci Res 78:186–192 Cobuzzi J, Siletti K, Hurwitz Z, Wetzell B, Baumann M, Riley A (2013) Age differences in (±)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-induced conditioned taste aversions and monoaminergic activity. Dev Psychobiol. doi:10.1002/dev.21132 dela Peña I, Ahn HS, Choi JY, Shin CY, Ryu JH, Cheong JH (2011) Methylphenidate self-administration and conditioned place preference in an animal model of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Behav Pharmacol 22:31–39 Djakiew D, Pflug B, Dionne C, Onoda M (1994) Postnatal expression of nerve growth factor receptors in the rat testis. Biol Reprod 51:214– 221 Doremus-Fitzwater TL, Varlinskaya EI, Spear LP (2010) Motivational systems in adolescence: possible implications for age differences in substance abuse and other risk-taking behaviors. Brain Cogn 72: 114–123 Escobar ML, Bermúdez-Rattoni F (2000) Long-term potentiation in the insular cortex enhances conditioned taste aversion retention. Brain Res 852:208–212 Fayard B, Loeffler S, Weis J, Vögelin E, Krüttgen A (2005) The secreted brain‐derived neurotrophic factor precursor pro‐BDNF binds to TrkB and p75NTR but not to TrkA or TrkC. J Neurosci Res 80: 18–28 Freeman KB, Riley AL (2009) The origins of conditioned taste aversion learning: an historical analysis. In: Reilly S, Schachtman TR (eds) Conditioned taste aversion: behavioral and neural processes. Oxford University, New York, pp 9–33 Fryer RH, Kaplan DR, Feinstein SC, Radeke MJ, Grayson DR, Kromer LF (1996) Developmental and mature expression of full‐length and truncated TrkB, receptors in the rat forebrain. J Comp Neurol 374: 21–40 Hayashi T, McMahon H, Yamasaki S, Binz T, Hata Y, Südhof T, Niemann H (1994) Synaptic vesicle membrane fusion complex: action of clostridial neurotoxins on assembly. EMBO J 13:5051– 5061 Hunt T, Amit Z (1987) Conditioned taste aversion induced by selfadministered drugs: paradox revisited. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 11: 107–130 Hurwitz Z, Merluzzi A, Riley A (2012) Age-dependent differences in morphine-induced taste aversions. Dev Psychobiol 55:415–428 Hurwitz Z, Cobuzzi J, Merluzzi A, Wetzell B, Riley A (2013) Prepubertal Fischer 344 rats display stronger morphine-induced taste avoidance than prepubertal Lewis rats. Dev Psychobiol. doi:10.1002/dev. 21176 Infurna RN, Spear LP (1979) Developmental changes in amphetamineinduced taste aversions. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:31–35 King H, Riley A (2013) A history of morphine-induced taste aversion learning fails to affect morphine-induced place preference conditioning in rats. Learn Behav 41:433–442 Kohut SJ, Decicco-Skinner KL, Johari S, Hurwitz ZE, Baumann MH, Riley AL (2012) Differential modulation of cocaine’s discriminative cue by repeated and variable stress exposure: relation to monoamine transporter levels. Neuropharmacology 63:330–337 Kolbeck R, Jungbluth S, Barde YA (1994) Characterisation of neurotrophin dimers and monomers. Eur J Biochem 225:995–1003 Kong H, Boulter J, Weber JL, Lai C, Chao MV (2001) An evolutionarily conserved transmembrane protein that is a novel downstream target of neurotrophin and ephrin receptors. J Neurosci 21:176–185 Kubista H, Edelbauer H, Boehm S (2004) Evidence for structural and functional diversity among SDS-resistant SNARE complexes in neuroendocrine cells. J Cell Sci 117:955–966 Ma L, Wang DD, Zhang TY, Yu H, Wang Y, Huang SH, Lee FS, Chen ZY (2011) Region-specific involvement of BDNF secretion and synthesis in conditioned taste aversion memory formation. J Neurosci 31: 2079–2090 Martínez-Moreno A, Rodríguez-Durán LF, Escobar ML (2011) Late protein synthesis-dependent phases in CTA long-term memory: BDNF requirement. Front Behav Neurosci 5:1–6 Merluzzi A, Hurwitz Z, Briscione M, Cobuzzi J, Wetzell B, Rice K, Riley A (2013) Age-dependent MDPV-induced taste aversions and thermoregulation in adolescent and adult rats. Dev Psychobiol. doi:10. 1002/dev.21171 Moguel-González M, Gómez-Palacio-Schjetnan A, Escobar ML (2008) BDNF reverses the CTA memory deficits produced by inhibition of protein synthesis. Neurobiol Learn Mem 90:584–587 National Research Council (2003) Guidelines for the care and use of mammals in neuroscience and behavioral research. National Academy, Washington, D.C. Author's personal copy Psychopharmacology National Research Council (2011) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy, Washington, D.C. Neubrand VE, Cesca F, Benfenati F, Schiavo G (2012) Kidins220/ARMS as a functional mediator of multiple receptor signalling pathways. J Cell Sci 125:1845–1854 Ohira K, Hayashi M (2009) A new aspect of the TrkB signaling pathway in neural plasticity. Curr Neuropharmacol 7:276–285 Palkovits M, Brownstein MJ (1988) Maps and guide to microdissection of the rat brain. Elsevier, New York Paxinos G, Watson C (2005) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 5th edn. Academic, San Diego Peace TA, Singer AW, Niemuth NA, Shaw ME (2001) Effects of caging type and animal source on the development of foot lesions in Sprague Dawley rats (Rattus norvegicus). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 40:17–21 Pflug BR, Onoda M, Lynch JH, Djakiew D (1992) Reduced expression of the low affinity nerve growth factor receptor in benign and malignant human prostate tissue and loss of expression in four human metastatic prostate tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 52:5403–5406 Philpot RM, Badanich KA, Kirstein C (2003) Place conditioning: age related changes in the rewarding and aversive effects of alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 27:593–599 Riley AL (2011) The paradox of drug taking: the role of the aversive effects of drugs. Physiol Behav 103:69–78 Riley AL, Tuck D (1985) Conditioned taste aversions: a behavioral index of toxicity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 443:272–292 Riley AL, Zellner D (1978) Methylphenidate-induced conditioned taste aversion: an index of toxicity. Physiol Psychol 6:354–358 Sagvolden T (2000) Behavioral validation of the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) as an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD). Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24:31–39 Schramm-Sapyta N, Morris R, Kuhn C (2006) Adolescent rats are protected from the conditioned aversive properties of cocaine and lithium chloride. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 84:344–352 Schramm-Sapyta N, Cha YM, Chaudhry S, Wilson WA, Swartzwelder HS, Kuhn CM (2007) Differential anxiogenic, aversive, and locomotor effects of THC in adolesc ent and adult rats . Psychopharmacology 191:867–877 Schramm-Sapyta N, Walker Q, Caster J, Levin E, Kuhn C (2009) Are adolescents more vulnerable to drug addiction than adults? Evidence from animal models. Psychopharmacology 206:1–21 Shram MJ, Funk D, Li Z, Lê AD (2006) Periadolescent and adult rats respond differently in tests measuring the rewarding and aversive effects of nicotine. Psychopharmacology 186:201–208 Spear LP (2011) Rewards, aversions and affect in adolescence: emerging convergences across laboratory animal and human data. Dev Cogn Neurosci 1:390–403 Spear LP (2013) Adolescent neurodevelopment. J Adolesc Health 52:S7– S13 Vastola BJ, Douglas LA, Varlinskaya EI, Spear LP (2002) Nicotineinduced conditioned place preference in adolescent and adult rats. Physiol Behav 77:107–114 Verendeev A, Riley AL (2012) Conditioned taste aversion and drugs of abuse: history and interpretation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36:2193– 2205 Volkow N, Wang G, Fowler J, Logan J, Gerasimov M, Maynard L, Ding Y, Gatley S, Gifford A, Franceschi D (2001) Therapeutic doses of oral methylphenidate significantly increase extracellular dopamine in the human brain. J Neurosci 21:RC121 (1–5) Wetzell B, Riley A (2012) Adolescent exposure to methylphenidate has no effect on the aversive properties of cocaine in adulthood. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 101:394–402 Wise R, Yokel R, DeWitt H (1976) Both positive reinforcement and conditioned aversion from amphetamine and from apomorphine in rats. Science 191:1273–1275 Zakharova E, Leoni G, Kichko I, Izenwasser S (2009) Differential effects of methamphetamine and cocaine on conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in adult and adolescent male rats. Behav Brain Res 198:45–50