Version:
Page:
Issue Date:
01
1 of 3
21 May 1995
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Employee Name:
No.
Olga O’Grady
Position:
OBJECTIVE
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
Maintain sample turnaround time.
90% samples reported within stated
turnaround. Monitored through LIMS, InfoLab.
Minimise the number of repeat samples run due
to quality control not meeting acceptance
criteria.
Total sample repeats to be less than 2% - this
will be tracked through the LIMS, InfoLab.
Quality control to be evaluated on all sample
batches before reporting client results.
Control charts to be evaluated and any CRM,
in-house standard, replicate or blank not
meeting
acceptance
criteria
to
be
investigated.
Maintain Mineral Metal
accreditation with NATA.
Continued
conditions.
1
2
3
4
Metals Group Section
Leader
Group
Section
Ensure that consumables arrive “just in time”
with minimal stocks held on the premises.
accreditation
with
minimal
Monitor “stock outs”.
5
6
Both the employee and the manager need to sign off agreed objectives:
Employee's signature:
Line manager’s signature:
Olga O’Grady
Date: 3/3/2001
Iva Gonow
Date: 3/3/2001
05-006
Version:
Page:
Issue Date:
01
2 of 3
21 May 1995
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Employee Name:
Review period:
Objective
1
2
3
4
5
Olga O'Gardy
April 2001
Position:
to
Metal Section Supervisor
April 2002
Comment
Rating
85% samples were reported within the stated turnaround time.
1
3
2
2
2
Less than 2% samples were processed as repeats because of poor quality control
performance.
No quality control problems brought to supervisors attention.
No NATA re-assessment during the review period.
Minimal stock outs. Stocks held on hand meet laboratory requirements.
Rating system: 1 = below expectations, 2 = meets expectations, 3 = exceeds expectations.
Development plan
1
2
Sample turnaround times need to improve. Olga to investigate the use of a flow injection sample
introduction system for the ICP-MS instruments to improve throughput.
The maintenance of NATA accreditation could not be properly assessed as no third party audit
was conducted. Olga to be nominated as a NATA signatory at the next reassessment.
Employee's comments:
FI sample introduction will make us competitive with respect to sample turnaround times for ICP-MS
analysis.
Request to attend the next RACI Analytical Chemistry conferences as part of professional development
and training.
Line manager’s comments:
Olga’s performance was satisfactory for the review period. If the conference program is deemed relevant I
would support Olga’s request to attend the RACI conference.
Senior management’s
comments:
Olga will require training for the proposed NATA signatory role, this should be kept in mind and included in
the 2002/2003 budget.
Employee's signature:
Line manager’s signature:
Director or Laboratory Manager
Olga O’Grady
Date:
4/3/2002
Iva Gonow
Date:
4/3/2002
Len Mazzorello
Date:
6/3/2002
05-006
Version:
Page:
Issue Date:
01
3 of 3
21 May 1995
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW
05-006