CLEANER
PRODUCTION
CASE STUDY
HEYNE'S
WHOLESALE
NURSERY
SUMMARY
Heyne’s Wholesale Nursery has a water management strategy
involving a range of water efficiency measures which, when fully
implemented will substantially reduce consumption.The installation
of more efficient sprinklers and the future introduction of a new
evaporation monitoring system will potentially reduce water
consumption by approximately 30% resulting in an annual saving of
approximately $21,000. Further savings of $30,000 are expected
when water is sourced from the nearby Kaurna Park wetlands.
CASE STUDY CASE STUDY CASE STUDY CASE STUDY
HEYNE'S
WHOLESALE
NURSERY
Business Profile
Heyne’s Nursery Pty Ltd was one of the first nurseries to be established in SA and for 126 years has played a
prominent role in the development of the State’s nursery industry. Heyne’s wholesale plant production nursery has
32 employees and grows a broad range of plants in containers largely for the landscaping industry and garden centres.
Financial assistance provided
Irritech Consultants and the Institute of Hor ticultural Development, in Victoria, jointly carried out the consultancy
study with a grant of $11,800 provided by the EPA’s Cleaner Industr ies Demonstr ation Scheme .
Measures implemented
Irrigation management efficiency and a feasibility of water recycling.
Cleaner production motivators
Optimising water usage because of increasing water costs and expansion of the business, improvement in production
efficiency and minimisation of environmental impacts.
TRADITIONAL APPROACH
Water consumption for June 93 – May 94 was 89,503 kL with a total water cost of $78,762.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
#1
Gereration of waste stream
The waste stream is generated by irrigating container-grown nursery stock. Most
of the waste came from the areas watered by overhead sprinklers (approx 60%)
which have lower irrigation efficiency than areas watered by drip irrigation.
Waste stream, waste volume
Approx 40% of applied water ends up as excess irrigation water. For this particular
operation that translates to an annual volume of wastewater of 36,000kL at a
cost of $32,000 per annum.
Disposal methods
Wastewater from irrigation discharges to stormwater drainage through an
irrigation channel and eventually flows into the ocean. This method does not
incur any financial costs but the wastewater contains fertiliser salts, salts from the
source water, organic matter and residues of chemicals used in the production
process (eg herbicides).
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY CASE
CLEANER PRODUCTION INITIATIVES
Benefits recommended and implemented
WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
• The original watering system has been semi-automated with solenoid valves and a 32 station
Micro Master Controller, which allows for variables such as pot size, plant species, peak weather
conditions and the presence of customers.The controller boxes installed throughout the nursery
allow operators to monitor a particular section and determine whether a half or full watering
cycle is required.
• The introduction of a semi-automated irrigation controller system at a cost of $47,000 and
attention to hand watering achieved a reduction of 9,000 kL, during the 1994-95 season at a
saving of approximately $9,000.
IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS
The study identified two initiatives to improve water use efficiency and reduce wastewater.
Efficient Sprinklers
• The existing sprinkler was tested and an alternative was recommended.The acceptable industry
sprinkler distribution uniformity norm is at least 75%. A new lower application rate sprinkler,
the Antelco Roto Rain, has increased water distribution uniformity from 67% to 87%.This has
a projected reduction of 15,000 kL per annum at a saving of approximately $13,000.
• Water is not always dispersed directly to the pots (influence of wind), so placing less sensitive
plants around the sprinklers has enabled more plants to be grown with the same amount of
water.
• Selected segregation and grouping of different plant varieties according to water requirements
has led to more efficient water usage.
#2
CASE STUDY CASE STUDY CASE STUDY CASE STUDY
Irrigation management
• Irrigation management has the potential to further reduce water
use by using evaporation sensors that allow watering according
to the weather.The evaporation-based weather sensors will, when
installed, establish:
- the frequency of watering in dripper areas
- the run time per day in sprinkler areas.
Moisture level checks in the various sized pots determine optimum
watering times.The 80 mm evaporimeter (designed for home gardens)
is planned to be used for 300 mm diameter pots and larger which
are watered by drip irrigation. As small diameter pots (up to 250
mm) usually dry out daily in peak conditions, a 600 mm evaporimeter
is also being trialled. A mechanism is being developed to adjust the
run time directly according to the change in the water level reading
so that the run time can be varied automatically, on a daily basis.
Evaporimeter
BENEFITS FROM IMPROVED IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL
Water usage and
waste reduction
ECONOMIC
Productivity
Investment
Water
cost savings
Payback period
#3
• Efficient irrigation management significantly reduced water wastage by using more efficient sprinklers
and installing evaporation-based weather sensors.
• Water use efficiency is projected to increase from 63% to 83%.
• Time previously taken to hand-water plants not adequately watered by sprinklers is now markedly
reduced by more efficient and even watering.
• Even watering and reduction of under and over watering will result in minimal fertiliser loss and
therefore provide optimum growing condition for maximum production.
• Semi-automatic irrigation controller system.
• Installation of Antelco Roto Rain Sprinklers (completed 1996).
• Install evaporative sensors (projected 1999).
• Integration with wetland (projected 1999).
$47,000
$2,500
$3,120
$20,000
• Total investment
• Semi-automatic irrigation controller system.
• Installation of Antelco Roto Rain Sprinklers (completed 1996).
• Install evaporative sensors (projected 1999).
• Integration with wetland (projected 1999).
• Semi-automatic irrigation controller system.
• Installation of Antelco Roto Rain Sprinklers (completed 1996).
• Install evaporative sensors (projected 1999).
• Integration with wetland (projected 1999).
$72,620
$9,000
$13,000
$8,000
$30,000
5 years
3 months
5 months
8 months
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY CASE
HEYNE'S
WHOLESALE
NURSERY
Benefits Recommended and Still Being Considered
FEASIBILITY OF USING RECYCLED DRAINAGE WATER
This study initiative evolved into an investigation into the feasibility of all possible
alternate water sources of the nursery.The sources included:
• mains water
• bore water
• recycled runoff water
• desalinated mains or bore water
• ‘CAREFREE conditioned’ water from the mains or from a bore.
Salinity
Mains water can reach salinity levels close to bore water (1100 EC) at times in
summer but is usually manageable at around 600-700 EC. Runoff water has borderline
salinity levels (1000 EC) for recycling, so all three sources need dilution with low
salinity water before use. A desalination unit could provide low salinity water for
mixing to dilute the saline water. Alternatively, if it is confirmed that the CAREFREE
unit can condition water to mitigate the harmful effects of salinity, then this could
be an alternative to desalination.
Disinfection
Recycled drainage water will need to be disinfected before reuse. Chlorination and
ozonisation would not be effective for disinfection of plant pathogens because of
high pH and alkalinity, however chlorine dioxide is the preferred treatment. Disinfection
by UV light is likely to be only partially effective if recycled water is used because
the water has high turbidity and so the UV light penetration will be restricted.The
advantage of using recycled water is that the nursery would be able to reduce
fer tiliser application by approximately 10-15% because of its nutrient load.
#4
CASE STUDY CASE STUDY CASE STUDY CASE STUDY
HEYNE'S
WHOLESALE
NURSERY
Alternatives Pursued Since Study Completion
Recent research on the use of “Slow Flow” sand filtration has shown strong prospects for application because
it does not use chemicals and is applied online.
Chlorine dioxide treatment will probably be used as a back up treatment until the “Slow Flow” sand filtration
method is proven.
The integration of water supply and drainage with the Kaurna Park wetland as shown in the first flow diagram
is the preferred water source and is projected for implementation in 1999.
Should the supply from the wetlands not be sufficient, the desalination option will need to be pursued, as
shown in the second flow diagram. As Salisbury Council considers the wastewater quality after the desalination
treatment to be acceptable for the wetland, it will be directed to the head of the wetland and reused when
required.The estimated savings from use of the wetlands, are approximately $30,000 per annum following
the wetland treatment process.
Flow diagram of preferred irrigation system
Sprinkler
Small pots
Water
Treatment
Slow sand filter or
Chlorine dioxide
disinfection
#5
Groundwater
Extraction
Recharge
Drip
Advanced
Stock
Wetland
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY
CASE STUDY CASE
Plant sales area
Flow diagram of alternative irrigation system
TDS 100 EC
Reverse
Osmosis
TDS 2500EC
Mixing
Tank
TDS 600 EC
Nursery
Irrigation
TDS 100 EC
Recharge Bore
TDS>2500 EC
Groundwater Bore
TDS 1100 EC
Collection
Drain
Holding
Tank
(reuse)
TDS 900 EC
#6
Kaurna Park
Wetland
WHERE TO FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Garry Heyne
Manager
Heyne’s Wholesale Nurseries
Cnr Waterloo Rd and Bolivar Rd
BURTON SA 5110
Ph: (08) 8280 8088
www.heyne.com.au/WholesaleNursery/